Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2019; 246; 7-11; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.012

Can the hoof be shod without limiting the heel movement? A comparative study between barefoot, shoeing with conventional shoes and a split-toe shoe.

Abstract: Conventional shoeing restricts heel movement, which may have a negative effect on the orthopaedic health of the horse. A randomised crossover experimental study using noninvasive techniques was performed to compare the mediolateral heel movement in barefoot horses, horses shod with a conventional toe clipped shoe and with a new type of shoe with a split toe. In eight horses, 16 forelimbs were tested barefoot, shod with a conventional shoe and with the split-toe (ST) shoe, in random order. A displacement sensor was secured on the heels and measurements were collected continuously at a frequency of 679Hz while horses were exercised on a treadmill at the walk (1.8m/s), trot (3.5m/s) and canter (8m/s). Differences in heel movement between the conditions were analysed using a generalised estimating equations approach. The conventional shoe was associated with significantly less heel expansion compared with the ST shoe and barefoot situation in all gaits (P≤0.001). Heel expansion with the ST shoe was not significantly different from the barefoot condition. For all gaits, shoeing was associated with a significant reduction in heel contraction compared with the barefoot situation (P≤0.038), except for the heel contraction at the canter using a conventional shoe. In conclusion, the heel expansion with the ST shoe did not differ significantly from when the horse was barefoot, in contrast with the significant restriction of the heel movement when a conventional shoe was used.
Publication Date: 2019-02-01 PubMed ID: 30902192DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates and compared the impact of barefoot, conventional shoeing and a new split-toe shoe design on the freedom of heel movement in horses. It found that the new split-toe shoe interacts with the horse foot akin to the barefoot condition, without limiting the heel’s movement as conventional shoes do.

Research Methodology

  • A randomized crossover experimental study design was used. This design allows individual subjects to serve as their control, reducing the effect of confounders.
  • The study was conducted on eight horses, testing 16 forelimbs in total.
  • Each horse’s foot was tested in three different states in a random order: barefoot, shod with a conventional shoe, and shod with a split-toe (ST) shoe.
  • A high-frequency displacement sensor was secured on the heels of the horses. This sensor took continuous measurements as the horses were exercised on a treadmill at different speeds representing walking, trotting, and cantering.

Analysis and Results

  • The data collected was analysed using a statistical method called generalised estimating equations (GEE). GEE is a methodology for estimating population-averaged effects that is appropriate when dealing with clustered (or correlated) data.
  • The study found that conventional shoeing was associated with significantly reduced heel expansion in comparison to the ST shoe and barefoot condition.
  • The amount of heel expansion when using the ST shoe was not significantly different from the barefoot condition. On the contrary, the barefoot condition will allow more heel contraction and expansion than either shoeing option.
  • Shoeing was linked with a significant reduction in heel contraction for horses, compared to the barefoot condition, highlighting the restriction caused by shoeing. The only outlier to this pattern was during the cantering gait when using a conventional shoe.

Conclusion

  • The study concludes that the use of split-toe shoes enable a similar level of heel expansion as seen in barefoot horses, while conventional shoes significantly limit the heel’s movement. This implies that the split-toe shoe could promote better orthopedic health for the horse.
  • This research serves as a foundation for further clinical studies to prove the benefits of the split-toe shoe in maintaining or enhancing orthopedic health in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Brunsting J, Dumoulin M, Oosterlinck M, Haspeslagh M, Lefère L, Pille F. (2019). Can the hoof be shod without limiting the heel movement? A comparative study between barefoot, shoeing with conventional shoes and a split-toe shoe. Vet J, 246, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.012

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 246
Pages: 7-11
PII: S1090-0233(19)30008-5

Researcher Affiliations

Brunsting, J
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Dumoulin, M
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Michele.Dumoulin@ugent.be.
Oosterlinck, M
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Haspeslagh, M
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Lefère, L
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Biology of Large Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Pille, F
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Foot
  • Forelimb
  • Hoof and Claw / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Random Allocation
  • Shoes
  • Walking

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Aoun R, Charles I, DeRouen A, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Shoe configuration effects on third phalanx and capsule motion of unaffected and laminitic equine hooves in-situ. PLoS One 2023;18(5):e0285475.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285475pubmed: 37155654google scholar: lookup
  2. Sellke L, Ludewig E, Handschuh S, Witter K. Measuring Equine Hooves in Radiographs and Computed Tomography Images Reveals Unexpected Size Differences. Anat Histol Embryol 2026 Jan;55(1):e70073.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.70073pubmed: 41392775google scholar: lookup
  3. Dahl VE, Singer ER, Garcia TC, Hawkins DA, Stover SM. Hoof Expansion, Deformation, and Surface Strains Vary with Horseshoe Nail Positions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 4;13(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13111872pubmed: 37889766google scholar: lookup