FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Challenges to exotic disease preparedness in Great Britain: ...
Equine veterinary journal2021; 54(3); 563-573; doi: 10.1111/evj.13469

Challenges to exotic disease preparedness in Great Britain: The frontline veterinarian’s perspective.

Abstract: Exotic diseases pose a significant risk to horse health and welfare. Several stakeholder groups, including primary care veterinarians, share responsibility for maintaining freedom from pathogens that cause exotic diseases. However, little is known about the current state of exotic disease preparedness within the British horse industry. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore equine veterinarians' experiences of, and attitudes towards, exotic disease preparedness in Great Britain. Methods: This is a qualitative interview-based study. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care equine veterinarians in Great Britain. Participants were purposively selected to include perspectives across varying levels of experience, clientele and location. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three themes were developed: (a) the reactive generalist, relating to participants' self-concept of their role as primary care practitioners; (b) working within the bounds of influence, encompassing participants' perceived inability to influence their clients' knowledge and behaviours and (c) a fragmented horse industry, illustrating the wider culture in which participants worked, characterised by a lack of cohesion amongst its members. Conclusions: Only veterinarians' perspectives have been captured, so viewpoints from other stakeholders, such as horse owners and government officials, should be used to triangulate these findings. Conclusions: The findings suggest that improvements are required before an optimal level of exotic disease preparedness can be achieved. Additional support provided to frontline veterinarians, such as skills-based training (ie, clinical reasoning and collaborative relationship building), accessible and trusted emergency support networks and clear expectations and responsibilities during an outbreak are recommended to optimise exotic disease preparedness.
© 2021 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-06-24 PubMed ID: 34043828DOI: 10.1111/evj.13469Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the experiences and attitudes of frontline equine veterinarians in Great Britain with regard to preparedness for exotic diseases. It suggests that, despite their role, these veterinarians see themselves as primarily reactive, have limited influence over clients and face a fragmented industry, all of which hinder effective preparation for exotic diseases. The study recommends further training, support networks and clear expectations during outbreaks to better prepare for these diseases.

Research Methodology

  • The research was qualitative in nature and relied on semi-structured interviews. Primary care equine veterinarians in Great Britain were the main participants. The researchers selected the participants deliberately to ensure a diverse representation of experience, clientele, and locations.
  • All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for a comprehensive text analysis. The researchers conducted a thematic analysis on the transcriptions to identify recurrent patterns or themes.

Findings

  • The findings were grouped into three key themes:
    • The “reactive generalist” theme showed that participants often saw themselves as reactionary in their role as primary care providers, rather than as proactive practitioners playing a crucial role in preventing the spread of exotic diseases.
    • “Working within the bounds of influence”: This theme revealed participants’ perceived inability to effectively influence their clients’ knowledge and behaviors regarding exotic diseases.
    • “A fragmented horse industry”: The participants voiced frustrations about the industry in which they work, characterized by a lack of unity among its members, which may hinder cohesive, industry-wide response to exotic diseases.
  • It’s important to note that only the perspectives of veterinarians were captured in this study. To validate these findings, future research should also involve other stakeholders like horse owners and government officials.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The study suggests that preparations for dealing with exotic diseases in the British horse industry are currently suboptimal.
  • To improve preparedness, the study recommends the following measures:
    • Offer front-line veterinarians skills-based training on clinical reasoning and collaborative relationship building.
    • Create accessible and trusted emergency support networks to provide necessary help during an outbreak.
    • Establish clear expectations and responsibilities for veterinarians during an outbreak, to ensure a coordinated and efficient containment effort.

Cite This Article

APA
Spence KL, Rosanowski SM, Slater J, Cardwell JM. (2021). Challenges to exotic disease preparedness in Great Britain: The frontline veterinarian’s perspective. Equine Vet J, 54(3), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13469

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 3
Pages: 563-573

Researcher Affiliations

Spence, Kelsey L
  • Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Rosanowski, Sarah M
  • Equine Veterinary Consultants (EVC) Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Slater, Josh
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Cardwell, Jacqueline M
  • Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • United Kingdom
  • Veterinarians

Grant Funding

  • The Alborada Trust

References

This article includes 52 references
  1. Animal and Plant Health Agency. United Kingdom Contingency Plan for Exotic Notifiable Diseases of Animals. 2015.
  2. Winter AC, Ward WR. Experiences of University of Liverpool veterinary students during the 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease. Vet Rec 2002;151(15):437-42.
  3. Rossides SC. A farming perspective on the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom. OIE Rev Sci Tech 2002;21(3):831-8.
  4. Hoare R, Paxton D. Industry liaison officers in the infected states of Australia during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak. Aust Vet J 2011;89(Suppl. 1):101-103.
  5. Nusbaum KE, Rollin BE, Wohl JS. The veterinary profession’s duty of care in response to disasters and food animal emergencies. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;231(2):200-2.
  6. Animal and Plant Health Agency. Equine infectious anaemia in Cornwall and Devon: epidemiology report. 2014.
  7. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Equine viral arteritis confirmed in Devon. 2019.
  8. Dominguez M, Münstermann S, de Guindos I, Timoney P. Equine disease events resulting from international horse movements: systematic review and lessons learned. Equine Vet J 2016;48(5):641-53.
  9. Kerwick CM, Meers J, Phillips CJC. Training veterinary personnel for effective identification and diagnosis of exotic animal diseases. J Vet Med Educ 2008;35(2):255-61.
  10. Chomel BB, Marano NN. Essential veterinary education in emerging infections, modes of introduction of exotic animals, zoonotic diseases, bioterrorism, implications for human and animal health and disease manifestation. OIE Rev Sci Tech 2009;28(2):559-65.
  11. Sellens E, Norris JM, Dhand NK, Heller J, Hayes L, Gidding HF. Q fever knowledge, attitudes and vaccination status of Australia’s veterinary workforce in 2014. PLoS One 2016;11(1):e0146819.
  12. Hayes L, Britton S, Weerasinghe G, Woodgate RG, Hernandez-Jover M. Insights into the knowledge, practices and training needs of veterinarians working with smallholder livestock producers in Australia. Prev Vet Med 2018;154:54-62.
  13. McDonald I, McKinnon M. Communicating biosecurity information to Australian-registered veterinarians. Aust Vet J 2019;97(10):394-7.
  14. Wiethoelter AK, Schembri N, Dhand NK, Sawford K, Taylor MR, Moloney B. Australian horse owners and their biosecurity practices in the context of Hendra virus. Prev Vet Med 2017;148:28-36.
  15. Wolff C, Abigaba S, Sternberg Lewerin S. Ugandan cattle farmers’ perceived needs of disease prevention and strategies to improve biosecurity. BMC Vet Res 2019;15(1):208.
  16. Renault V, Humblet MF, Moons V, Bosquet G, Gauthier B, Cebrián LM. Rural veterinarian’s perception and practices in terms of biosecurity across three European countries. Transbound Emerg Dis 2018;65(1):e183-93.
  17. Brennan ML, Richens I, Hobson-West P, Wapenaar W. Biosecurity and vaccination: what do your clients see as challenges and opportunities?. Cattle Pract 2015;23:352-4.
  18. Maxwell JA. A realist approach to qualitative research. 2012.
  19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101.
  20. May S. Towards a scholarship of primary health care. Vet Rec 2015;176(26):677-82.
  21. Dixon WHR, Kinnison T, May SA. Understanding the primary care paradigm: an experiential learning focus of the early veterinary graduate. Vet Rec 2017;181(18):480.
  22. McKenzie BA. Veterinary clinical decision-making: cognitive biases, external constraints, and strategies for improvement. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244(3):271-6.
  23. May SA. Clinical reasoning and case-based decision making: the fundamental challenge to veterinary educators. J Vet Med Educ 2013;40(3):200-9.
  24. Vandeweerd J-M, Vandeweerd S, Gustin C, Keesemaecker G, Cambier C, Clegg P. Understanding veterinary practitioners’ decision-making process: implications for veterinary medical education. J Vet Med Educ 2012;39(2):142-51.
  25. Kinnison T, Guile D, May SA. Veterinary team interactions, part 2: the personal effect. Vet Rec 2015;177(21):541.
  26. Palmer S, Fozdar F, Sully M. The effect of trust on West Australian farmers’ responses to infectious livestock diseases. Sociol Ruralis 2009;49(4):360-74.
  27. O’Brien K, Wildman S, Rowlands D. Notifiable diseases: Communication in relation to equine infectious anaemia in Devon. Vet Rec 2010;167(15):588.
  28. Spence KL, Cardwell JM, Slater J, Rosanowski SM. Preliminary insight into horse owners’ perceptions of, and attitudes towards, exotic diseases in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet Res 2019;15(1):1-9.
  29. Bronner A, Hénaux V, Fortané N, Hendrikx P, Calavas D. Why do farmers and veterinarians not report all bovine abortions, as requested by the clinical brucellosis surveillance system in France?. BMC Vet Res 2014;10(1):93.
  30. Elbers AR, Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn MJ, Zarafshani K, Koch G. To report or not to report: a psychosocial investigation aimed at improving early detection of avian influenza outbreaks. Rev Sci Tech 2010;29(3):435-49.
  31. Golding SE, Ogden J, Higgins HM. Shared goals, different barriers: a qualitative study of UK veterinarians’ and farmers’ beliefs about antimicrobial resistance and stewardship. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:132.
  32. Woods A. Is prevention better than cure? the rise and fall of veterinary preventive medicine, c.1950-1980. Soc. Hist Med 2013;26(1):113-31.
  33. Ruston A, Shortall O, Green M, Brennan M, Wapenaar W, Kaler J. Challenges facing the farm animal veterinary profession in England: a qualitative study of veterinarians’ perceptions and responses. Prev Vet Med 2016;127:84-93.
  34. Kaler J, Green LE. Sheep farmer opinions on the current and future role of veterinarians in flock health management on sheep farms: a qualitative study. Prev Vet Med 2013;112:370-7.
  35. Bellet C, Woodnutt J, Green LE, Kaler J. Preventative services offered by veterinarians on sheep farms in England and Wales: opinions and drivers for proactive flock health planning. Prev Vet Med 2015;122(4):381-8.
  36. Buckley P, Buckley D, Coleman GT, Morton JM. Preventive health care of Pony Club horses in rural New South Wales, Australia. Aust Vet J 2016;94(8):265-70.
  37. Robinson NJ, Brennan ML, Cobb M, Dean RS. Investigating preventive-medicine consultations in first-opinion small-animal practice in the United Kingdom using direct observation. Prev Vet Med 2016;124:69-77.
  38. Hamilton L. Bridging the divide between theory and practice: taking a co-productive approach to vet-farmer relationships. Food Ethics 2018;1(3):221-33.
  39. Frankel RM. Pets, vets, and frets: What relationship-centered care research has to offer veterinary medicine. J Vet Med Educ 2006;33(1):20-7.
  40. Bard AM, Main DCJ, Haase AM, Whay HR, Roe EJ, Reyher KK. The future of veterinary communication: Partnership or persuasion? A qualitative investigation of veterinary communication in the pursuit of client behaviour change. PLoS One 2017;12(3):1-17.
  41. Armitage-Chan E. “I wish I was someone else”: Complexities in identity formation and professional wellbeing in veterinary surgeons. Vet Rec 2020;187(3):1-10.
  42. Jansen J, Steuten CDM, Renes RJ, Aarts N, Lam TJGM. Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: effective communication on udder health. J Dairy Sci 2010;93(3):1296-306.
  43. Belshaw Z, Robinson NJ, Dean RS, Brennan ML. Motivators and barriers for dog and cat owners and veterinary surgeons in the United Kingdom to using preventative medicines. Prev Vet Med 2018;154:95-101.
  44. Heffernan C, Nielsen L, Thomson K, Gunn G. An exploration of the drivers to bio-security collective action among a sample of UK cattle and sheep farmers. Prev Vet Med 2008;87(3-4):358-72.
  45. Fielding KS, Terry DJ, Masser BM, Hogg MA. Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. Br J Soc Psychol 2008;47(1):23-48.
  46. Naylor R, Hamilton-Webb A, Little R, Maye D. The ‘Good Farmer’: farmer identities and the control of exotic livestock disease in England. Sociol Ruralis 2016;58(1):3-19.
  47. Pentecostes JU. Individualism vs. collectivism: implications for health promotion. Phillipine J Psychol 1999;32(2):127-35.
  48. Crossman GK. The organisational landscape of the English horse industry: a contrast with Sweden and the. Netherlands. 2010.
  49. Gregory A. Communication dimensions of the UK foot and mouth disease crisis, 2001. J Public Aff 2005;5(3-4):312-28.
  50. Smith B. Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal 2018;10:137-49.
  51. Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol 2014;11(1):25-41.
  52. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483-88.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Rosanowski SM, Magouras I, Ho WC, Yiu WCJ, Pfeiffer DU, Zeeh F. The challenges of pig farming in Hong Kong: a study of farmers' perceptions and attitudes towards a pig health and production management service.. BMC Vet Res 2023 Feb 1;19(1):30.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03591-7pubmed: 36726131google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.