Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14463

Changes in pressure distribution of the solar surface after a single trimming event are associated with external hoof measurements in the equine fore foot.

Abstract: Trimming is critical for a functioning equine hoof. Pressure distribution provides information on loading; however, information on the effects of trimming on pressure distribution is lacking. Objective: To describe the pressure changes of equine fore feet following trimming. Methods: Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods: Fifty sound horses were recruited. Eighteen external hoof measures of the dorsal, lateral, medial and solar aspects were obtained before and after trimming from 94 fore feet. Horses were walked over a pressure mat before and after trimming and pressure maps of the solar surface created. Percentage change in hoof measures were assessed. Factors associated with an increase in pressure in the frog region after trimming were entered into a forward likelihood ratio logistic regression model. Odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and area under the curve receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at a cut-off value of p = 0.5. Results: Trimming resulted in a significant increase in pressure, topographically mapped to the frog region, in 12/94 (13% 95% CI 6; 20) feet. Percentage difference in bearing border length (OR 0.66 95% CI 0.51; 0.86), heel buttress to centre of pressure distance (OR 1.30 95% CI 1.10; 1.53), heel angle (lateral side) (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.04; 1.19) and heel length (medial side) (OR 0.92 95% CI 0.85; 0.99) were retained in the final model associated with increased pressure in the frog region following trimming. AUROC was excellent (0.94 95% CI 0.88; 0.99) with fair sensitivity (58% [95% CI 50; 66]) and excellent specificity (98% [95% CI 78; 118]). Conclusions: Subjective lameness exam; horse velocity unmeasured. Conclusions: Measuring pressure changes over the solar surface of the equine fore foot after trimming identified that an increased pressure in the frog region was linked to specific changes in hoof shape.
Publication Date: 2025-01-09 PubMed ID: 39785669DOI: 10.1111/evj.14463Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper studies the correlation between routine hoof trimming and pressure distribution changes on the surface of a horse’s forefoot. The researchers concluded that certain changes in hoof shape, following trimming, were linked to an increase in pressure in the frog region of the equine foot.

Methods and Participants

  • The study was conducted on fifty horses which were all in a sound condition.
  • Eighteen different external hoof measures across dorsal, lateral, medial, and solar aspects of the hoof were recorded both before and after trimming. A total of 94 forefoot hooves were examined.
  • The horses were made to walk across a pressure mat before and after the trimming to record pressure changes at different points on the solar surface of the hoof. This data was used to create pressure maps.
  • Percentage changes in hoof measures, based on the collected data, were analyzed. Also, factors related to an increase in pressure in the frog region after trimming were evaluated using a forward likelihood ratio logistic regression model.
  • The odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the area under the curve receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) were also measured.

Results

  • The results of trimming displayed a significant increase of pressure, particularly in the frog region, in around 13% of the feet.
  • The data found correlation between increased pressure in the frog region and variations in certain external hoof measures such as bearing border length, distance from heel buttress to center of pressure, lateral side heel angle, and medial side heel length.
  • The AUROC was excellent, indicating that the model robustly predicts outcomes. The model also had a fair sensitivity and excellent specificity level.

Conclusions

  • The study did not measure horse velocity during the lameness examination, which could be considered a limitation in the research approach.
  • However, the study concluded that measuring pressure changes on the solar surface of the equine fore foot after trimming could identify a correlation between an increased pressure in the frog region and specific changes in hoof shape. This finding could prove valuable information for those involved in equine foot care to minimize discomfort or injury to horses after trimming events.

Cite This Article

APA
Seery S, Gardiner J, Bates KT, Pinchbeck G, Clegg P, Ireland JL, Milner PI. (2025). Changes in pressure distribution of the solar surface after a single trimming event are associated with external hoof measurements in the equine fore foot. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14463

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Seery, Sarah
  • Department of Equine Clinical Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Gardiner, James
  • Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Bates, Karl T
  • Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, The William Henry Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Pinchbeck, Gina
  • Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Clegg, Pete
  • Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, The William Henry Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ireland, Joanne L
  • Department of Equine Clinical Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Milner, Peter I
  • Department of Equine Clinical Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

Grant Funding

  • G3016 / Horse Trust

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Dollar JA. A handbook of horseshoeing. .
  2. Russell W. Scientific horseshoeing. .
  3. van Heel MC, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR, Back W. Dynamic pressure measurements for the detailed study of hoof balance: the effect of trimming. Equine Vet J 2004;36(8):778–782.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044847993google scholar: lookup
  4. Caldwell MN, Allan LA, Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Kissick KE, Milner PI. A test of the universal applicability of a commonly used principle of hoof balance. Vet J 2016;207:169–176.
  5. Wiggers N, Nauwelaerts SL, Hobbs SJ, Bool S, Wolschrijn CF, Back W. Functional locomotor consequences of uneven forefeet for trot symmetry in individual riding horses. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0114836.
  6. Kane AJ, Stover SM, Gardner IA, Bock KB, Case JT, Johnson BJ. Hoof size, shape, and balance as possible risk factors for catastrophic musculoskeletal injury of thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res 1998;59(12):1545–1552.
  7. Dyson SJ, Tranquille CA, Collins SN, Parkin TD, Murray RC. External characteristics of the lateral aspect of the hoof differ between non‐lame and lame horses. Vet J 2011;190(3):364–371.
  8. Holroyd K, Dixon JJ, Mair T, Bolas N, Bolt D, David F. Variation in foot conformation in lame horses with different foot lesions. Vet J 2013;195(3):361–365.
  9. Wilson AM, McGuigan MP, Fouracre L, MacMahon L. The force and contact stress on the navicular bone during trot locomotion in sound horses and horses with navicular disease. Equine Vet J 2001;33(2):159–165.
  10. Eliashar E, McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. Relationship of foot conformation and force applied to the navicular bone of sound horses at the trot. Equine Vet J 2004;36(5):431–435.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044868378google scholar: lookup
  11. Oomen AM, Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Sonneveld DC, Gasthuys F, Back W. Use of a pressure plate to analyse the toe‐heel load redistribution underneath a normal shoe and a shoe with a wide toe in sound warmblood horses at the walk and trot. Res Vet Sci 2012;93(2):1026–1031.
  12. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Huppes T, Gasthuys F, Back W. Comparison of pressure plate and force plate gait kinetics in sound warmbloods at walk and trot. Vet J 2010;186(3):347–351.
  13. Viitanen MJ, Wilson AM, McGuigan HR, Rogers KD, May SA. Effect of foot balance on the intra‐articular pressure in the distal interphalangeal joint in vitro. Equine Vet J 2003;35(2):184–189.
  14. Moleman M, van Heel MC, van Weeren PR, Back W. Hoof growth between two shoeing sessions leads to a substantial increase of the moment about the distal, but not the proximal, interphalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 2006;38(2):170–174.
  15. Faramarzi B, Nguyen A, Dong F. Changes in hoof kinetics and kinematics at walk in response to hoof trimming: pressure plate assessment. J Vet Sci 2018;19(4):557–562.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.2018.19.4.557google scholar: lookup
  16. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowaik RS. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;2(4):189–210.
    doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020402google scholar: lookup
  17. Pataky TC, Goulermas JY. Pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM): a pixel‐level approach to foot pressure image analysis. J Biomech 2008;41(10):2136–2143.
  18. Bates KT, Savage R, Pataky TC, Morse SA, Webster E, Falkingham PL. Does footprint depth correlate with foot motion and pressure?. J R Soc Interface 2013;10(83):20130009.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0009google scholar: lookup
  19. Pataky TC, Savage R, Bates KT, Sellers WI, Crompton RH. Short‐term step‐to‐step correlation in plantar pressure distributions during treadmill walking, and implications for footprint trail analysis. Gait Posture 2013;38(4):1054–1057.
  20. McClymont J, Pataky TC, Crompton RH, Savage R, Bates KT. The nature of functional variability in plantar pressure during a range of controlled walking speeds. R Soc Open Sci 2016;3(8):160369.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.160369google scholar: lookup
  21. Faramarzi B, Hung F, Nguyen A, Dong F. The effect of routine hoof trimming on midstance regional hoof kinetics at walk. Comp Exercise Physiol 2019;15(3):167–171.
  22. Reuden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, Arena ET. Image J2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform 2017;18:529.
    doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  23. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Sonneveld DC, Oomen AM, Gasthuys F, Back W. Contribution of dynamic calibration to the measurement accuracy of a pressure plate system throughout the stance phase in sound horses. Vet J 2012;193(2):471–474.
  24. Keijsers NL, Stolwijk NM, Nienhuis B, Duysens J. A new method to normalize plantar pressure measurements for foot size and foot progression angle. J Biomech 2009;42(1):87–90.
  25. Rogers CW, Back W. The effect of plain, eggbar and 6 degrees‐wedge shoes on the distribution of pressure under the hoof of horses at the walk. N Z Vet J 2007;55(3):120–124.
  26. Kummer M, Geyer H, Imboden I, Auer J, Lischer C. The effect of hoof trimming on radiographic measurements of the front feet of normal warmblood horses. Vet J 2006;172(1):58–66.
  27. Dockery A, Beasley B, Goldberg M, Aguirre G, Moorman VJ. Dose effect and duration of action of liposomal bupivacaine administered as a perineural analgesic in a reversible and adjustable frog‐pressure model of equine lameness. Am J Vet Res 2023;85(1):ajvr.23.06.0122.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.23.06.0122google scholar: lookup
  28. Hood DM, Taylor D, Wagner IP. Effects of ground surface deformability, trimming, and shoeing on quasistatic hoof loading patterns in horses. Am J Vet Res 2001;62(6):895–900.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.895google scholar: lookup
  29. Thomason JJ, McClinchey HL, Jofriet JC. Analysis of strain and stress in the equine hoof capsule using finite element methods: comparison with principal strains recorded in vivo. Equine Vet J 2002;34(7):719–725.
  30. Thomason JJ, Faramarzi B, Revill A, Sears W. Quantitative morphology of the equine laminar junction in relation to capsule shape in the forehoof of Standardbreds and thoroughbreds. Equine Vet J 2008;40(5):473–480.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x313652google scholar: lookup
  31. Colles CM. The relationship of frog pressure to heel expansion. Equine Vet J 1989;21(1):13–16.
  32. Roepstorff L, Johnston C, Drevemo S. In vivo and in vitro heel expansion in relation to shoeing and frog pressure. Equine Vet J 2001;33(33):54–57.
  33. Dyhre‐Poulsen P, Smedegaard HH, Roed J, Korsgaard E. Equine hoof function investigated by pressure transducers inside the hoof and accelerometers mounted on the first phalanx. Equine Vet J 1994;26(5):362–366.
  34. Arts ML, Bus SA. Twelve steps per foot are recommended for valid and reliable in‐shoe plantar pressure data in neuropathic diabetic patients wearing custom made footwear. Clin Biomech 2011;26(8):880–884.
  35. McClymont J, Savage R, Pataky TC, Crompton R, Charles J, Bates KT. Intra‐subject sample size effects in plantar pressure analyses. PeerJ 2021;9:e11660.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.11660google scholar: lookup
  36. Oosterlinck M, Hardeman LC, van der Meij BR, Veraa S, van der Kolk JH, Wijnberg ID. Pressure plate analysis of toe‐heel and medio‐lateral hoof balance at the walk and trot in sound sport horses. Vet J 2013;198(Suppl 1):e9–e13.
  37. Tyrer S, Heyman B. Sampling in epidemiological research: issues, hazards and pitfalls. BJPsych Bull 2016;40(2):57–60.
    doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.050203google scholar: lookup
  38. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Comparison of a body‐mounted inertial sensor system‐based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2013;74(1):17–24.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17google scholar: lookup
  39. Holzhauer M, Bremer R, Santman‐Berends I, Smink O, Janssens I, Back W. Cross‐sectional study of the prevalence of and risk factors for hoof disorders in horses in the Netherlands. Prev Vet Med 2017;140:53–59.
  40. Kummer M, Gygax D, Lischer C, Auer J. Comparison of the trimming procedure of six different farriers by quantitative evaluation of hoof radiographs. Vet J 2009;179(3):401–406.
  41. Ronchetti A, Day P, Weller R. Mediolateral hoof balance in relation to the handedness of apprentice farriers. Vet Rec 2011;168(2):48.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.c5993google scholar: lookup
  42. Romans CW, Conzemius MG, Horstman CL, Gordon WJ, Evans RB. Use of pressure platform gait analysis in cats with and without bilateral onychectomy. Am J Vet Res 2004;65(9):1276–1278.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1276google scholar: lookup
  43. Stadig S, Lascelles BD, Bergh A. Do cats with a cranial cruciate ligament injury and osteoarthritis demonstrate a different gait pattern and behaviour compared to sound cats?. Acta Vet Scand 2016;58(Suppl 1):70.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0248-xgoogle scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.