FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Aust Vet J / Citizens’ juries give verdict on whether private pract...
Australian veterinary journal2020; 98(7); 273-279; doi: 10.1111/avj.12957

Citizens’ juries give verdict on whether private practice veterinarians should attend unvaccinated Hendra virus suspect horses.

Abstract: Hendra virus (HeV) is endemic in Australian flying foxes, posing a threat to equine and human health. Equine vaccination remains the most effective risk mitigation strategy. Many horses remain unvaccinated - even in higher-risk regions. Debate surrounding the vaccine's use is characterised by conflicting perspectives, misunderstanding and mistrust. Private veterinary practitioners are critical to early identification of public health risk through recognition, sampling and management of suspect-equine-HeV-cases. However, managing such cases can be burdensome, with some veterinarians opting not to attend unvaccinated horses or to abandon equine practice because of risk posed by HeV disease and liability. Objective: Ascertain the perspectives of informed citizens on what obligations (if any) private veterinarians have to attend unvaccinated horses with HeV or HeV-like disease. Methods: Three citizens' juries were tasked with considering approaches to managing HeV risk in Australia, including (reported here) roles and obligations of private veterinarians in responding to HeV-suspect-cases. Results: Jurors acknowledged that HeV management posed an important challenge for private veterinarians. A clear majority (27 of 31 jurors) voted that veterinarians should not be obliged to attend unvaccinated horses. All recognised that greater support for veterinarians should be a priority. Conclusions: When informed of HeV risks and strategies for control and management, citizens appreciated the need to support veterinarians performing this critical 'One Health' role for public benefit. The current governance framework within which zoonotic disease recognition and response operates limits the contingency and scope for increasing support and efficacy of these important veterinary public health practices.
© 2020 Australian Veterinary Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-06-11 PubMed ID: 32529687DOI: 10.1111/avj.12957Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the duty of veterinarians to attend to unvaccinated horses at risk of HeV disease. Using citizen juries, the researchers found that a majority did not consider it mandatory for veterinarians to attend unvaccinated horses with the Hev or Hev-like disease, insisting rather on more backing for veterinarians.

Objective

The research’s main goal was to establish informed citizens’ views on the responsibilities of private veterinarians in attending to unvaccinated horses that could potentially be affected by the Hendra virus (HeV).

Methodology

  • The researchers used three citizens’ juries to gather various approaches to managing the HeV risks in Australia.
  • These juries were given the task of analyzing and delivering verdicts on the roles and obligations of private veterinary practitioners in responding to possible cases of Hendra virus.

Results

  • 27 out of 31 jurors voted that veterinarians shouldn’t be obliged to attend unvaccinated horses, acknowledging that managing HeV was a significant challenge.
  • All jurors agreed that more support should be given to veterinarians in managing these cases.

Conclusions

  • After understanding the risks associated with HeV and its control measures, the jurors agreed that vets needed more support as they play a pivotal role in public health.
  • It was also noted that the existing policies limited the scope for improving the support and effectiveness of critical veterinary public health practices.

In essence, this study argues for the need to strengthen policies and supports for veterinarians to effectively play their role in managing and controlling diseases that can cross-over from animals to humans, such as the Hendra virus.

Cite This Article

APA
Annand EJ, Reid PA, Johnson J, Gilbert GL, Taylor M, Walsh M, Ward MP, Wilson A, Degeling C. (2020). Citizens’ juries give verdict on whether private practice veterinarians should attend unvaccinated Hendra virus suspect horses. Aust Vet J, 98(7), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12957

Publication

Australian veterinary journal
ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 98
Issue: 7
Pages: 273-279

Researcher Affiliations

Annand, E J
  • The University of Sydney, School of Veterinary Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • The University of Sydney, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • CSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Equine Veterinary and Epidemiology Services, EquiEpiVet, Berrima, New South Wales, Australia.
Reid, P A
  • Private Equine Veterinary Practice, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Johnson, J
  • The University of Sydney, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gilbert, G L
  • The University of Sydney, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Taylor, M
  • Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Walsh, M
  • The University of Sydney, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ward, M P
  • The University of Sydney, School of Veterinary Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • The University of Sydney, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Wilson, A
  • The University of Sydney, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Degeling, C
  • University of Wollongong, Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Australia
  • Hendra Virus
  • Henipavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Private Practice
  • Veterinarians
  • Zoonoses

Grant Funding

  • APP1083079 / National Health and Medical Research Council

References

This article includes 46 references
  1. Kung N, McLaughlin A, Taylor M. Hendra virus and horse owners - Risk perception and management.. PLOS One 2013;8:e80897.
  2. Manyweathers J, Field H, Jordan D. Risk mitigation of emerging Zoonoses: Hendra virus and non-vaccinating horse owners.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2017;64:1898-1911.
  3. Schemann K, Annand EJ, Reid PA. Investigation of the effect of Equivac® HeV Hendra virus vaccination on thoroughbred racing performance.. Aust Vet J 2018;96:132-141.
  4. Goyen KA, Wright JD, Cunneen A. Playing with fire - What is influencing horse owners' decisions to not vaccinate their horses against deadly Hendra virus infection?. PLOS One 2017;12:e0180062.
  5. Manyweathers J, Field H, Longnecker N. “Why won't they just vaccinate?” Horse owner risk perception and uptake of the Hendra virus vaccine.. BMC Vet Res 2017;13:103.
  6. Reid PA. Submission No. 200 to the Agriculture and Environment Committee, Queensland Parliament - Hendra virus (HeV) EquiVac® Vaccine and its use by Veterinary Surgeons in Queensland.. Queensland Government, 2016.
  7. Australian Government. Work health and safety act 2011.. No. 137, 2011 July 1, 2018.
  8. Australian Government. Biosecurity Act 2015.. No. 61. 2015 July 3, 2019.
  9. NSW government department of primary industries. Local Land Services.. .
  10. One Welfare. Veterinary Oaths.. .
  11. McNeill PM, Dowton SB. Declarations made by graduating medical students in Australia and New Zealand.. Med J Aust 2002;176:123-125.
  12. Broder C, Weir D, Reid P. Hendra virus and Nipah virus animal vaccines.. Vaccine 2016;34:3525-3534.
  13. Bull E. Reasons for moving from equine practice in south East Queensland to Alice Springs northern territory.. Pers Commun 2017.
  14. Mendez DH, Judd J, Speare R. Unexpected result of Hendra virus outbreaks for veterinarians, Queensland, Australia.. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:83-85.
  15. Australian Veterinary Association Ltd. Submission No. 186 to the Agriculture and Environment Committee, Queensland Parliament - Hendra virus EquiVac® vaccine and its use by veterinary surgeons in Queensland.. Queensland Government, 2016.
  16. Queensland Parliament Agriculture and Environment Committee Inquiry. Hendra virus EquiVac® vaccine and its use by veterinary surgeons in Queensland.. Queensland Government, 2016.
  17. Halliday J, Daborn C, Auty H. Bringing together emerging and endemic zoonoses surveillance: Shared challenges and a common solution.. Philos Trans R Soc B 2012;367:2872-2880.
  18. Thornton M, Mor S, Eastwood K. How does a vet find a new disease that no one has seen before?. Control Therapy Ser 2019:294:5-6.
  19. National Research Council (US) Committee on Achieving Sustainable Global Capacity for Surveillance and Response to Emerging Diseases of Zoonotic Origin. Sustaining global surveillance and response to emerging zoonotic diseases.. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC), 2009.
  20. . One Health Surveillance in Denmark.. .
  21. The Senate of the United States. 1903: Advancing Emergency Preparedness Through One Health Act of 2019 (Introduced version).. 2019.
  22. Queensland Government Hendra Virus Interagency Technical Working Group. Hendra virus infection prevention advice 2014.. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Government.
  23. FAO, WHO, OIE. Taking a multisectoral, One Health Approach: A Tripartite Guide to Addressing Zoonotic Diseases in Countries.. 2019.
  24. Street J, Duszynski K, Krawczyk S. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review.. Soc Sci Med 2014;109:1-9.
  25. Degeling C, Rychetnik L, Street J. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of citizens'/community juries.. Soc Sci Med 2017;179:166-171.
  26. Blacksher E, Diebel A, Forest P-G. What is public deliberation?. Hastings Center Rep 2012;42:14-17.
  27. Degeling C, Johnson J, Iredell J. Assessing the public acceptability of proposed policy interventions to reduce the misuse of antibiotics in Australia: A report on two community juries.. 2017.
  28. Braunack-Mayer AJ, Street JM, Rogers WA. Including the public in pandemic planning: A deliberative approach.. BMC Public Health 2010;10:501.
  29. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. Monitoring Flying-Fox Populations.. .
  30. NSW DPI. Hendra case confirmed in upper Hunter Valley.. 2019. Orange, New South Wales: Department of Primary Industries.
  31. Field H, Jordan D, Edson D. Spatiotemporal aspects of Hendra virus infection in Pteropid bats (flying-foxes) in eastern Australia.. PLoS One 2015;10.
    pmc: PMC4666458
  32. Martin G, Yanez-Arenas C, Chen C. Climate change could increase the geographic extent of Hendra virus spillover risk.. EcoHealth 2018;15:509-525.
  33. Roberts BJ, Catterall CP, Eby P. Latitudinal range shifts in Australian flying-foxes: A re-evaluation.. Aust Ecol 2012;37:12-22.
  34. . Community Perspectives on Ecological Approaches to Bat-borne Infectious Risks.. One Health ethics 2018.
  35. Thomas R, Sims R, Degeling C. CJCheck stage 1: Development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.. 2016. Sydney, Australia: Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney.
  36. Degeling C, Gilbert GL, Annand E. Managing the risk of Hendra virus spillover in Australia using ecological approaches: A report on three community juries.. PLOS One 2018;13:e0209798.
  37. Smith C. An investigation into the impact of current Hendra virus policies on the welfare of horses and equine practice in Queensland.. In Proceedings of the Bain Fallon Memorial Lectures, Gold Coast 2017. Equine Veterinarians Australia, Gold Coast, 2017: 18.
  38. Degeling C, Johnson J, Ward M. A Delphi survey and analysis of expert perspectives on one health in Australia.. EcoHealth 2017;14:783-792.
  39. Adamson S, Marich A, Roth I. One health in NSW: Coordination of human and animal health sector management of zoonoses of public health significance.. NSW Public Health Bull 2011;22:105.
  40. Chan J, Doyle B, Branley J. An outbreak of psittacosis at a veterinary school demonstrating a novel source of infection.. One Health 2017;3:29-33.
  41. Malo JA, Colbran C, Young M. An outbreak of Q fever associated with parturient cat exposure at an animal refuge and veterinary clinic in Southeast Queensland.. Aust New Z J Public Health 2018;42:451-455.
  42. Annand EA, Reid PA. Clinical review of two fatal equine cases of infection with the insectivorous bat strain of Australian bat lyssavirus.. Aust Vet J 2014;92:324-332.
  43. Animal Health Australia. National Significant Disease Investigation Program - Animal Health Australia.. .
  44. Australian Government The Department of Agriculture and Water Resources. National Animal Health Surveillance and Diagnostics Business Plan 2016-2019. Version 2.. 2018: 26.
  45. Texas Department of State Health Services. Infectious Disease Control Unit (IDCU) Overview.. .
  46. Ward MP, Scheurmann JA. The relationship between equine and human West Nile virus disease occurrence.. Sci Direct 2008;129:378-383.

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Annand EJ, Horsburgh BA, Xu K, Reid PA, Poole B, de Kantzow MC, Brown N, Tweedie A, Michie M, Grewar JD, Jackson AE, Singanallur NB, Plain KM, Kim K, Tachedjian M, van der Heide B, Crameri S, Williams DT, Secombe C, Laing ED, Sterling S, Yan L, Jackson L, Jones C, Plowright RK, Peel AJ, Breed AC, Diallo I, Dhand NK, Britton PN, Broder CC, Smith I, Eden JS. Novel Hendra Virus Variant Detected by Sentinel Surveillance of Horses in Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 2022 Mar;28(3):693-704.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2803.211245pubmed: 35202527google scholar: lookup
  2. White J, Thompson K, van den Berg D, O'Neill G, Mendez DH, Talwar J, Degeling C, Forsythe R, Durrheim DN. 'Pretty devastating': exploring horse owner and veterinarian lived experiences of the equine Hendra virus. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1661615.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1661615pubmed: 41357753google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.