Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2013; (45); 54-61; doi: 10.1111/evj.12160

Comparative kinematic analysis of the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses cantering on a turf and a synthetic surface.

Abstract: The relationship between track surface properties and limb kinematics is poorly understood. Hoof orientation within the track surface has never been quantified under training conditions. Previously described kinematic and dynamic differences between leading and trailing forelimbs at the canter poorly correlate with epidemiological data regarding injuries. Objective: To compare joint kinematics and hoof orientation in the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses cantering on turf and on a synthetic surface. Methods: Noninvasive experimental study. Methods: The right forelimb of 5 horses was equipped with markers facing the main joints while markers and a dynamometric horseshoe were placed on the hoof. The horses were filmed with 2 high-speed cameras (1000 Hz) while cantering (30 km/h). Recordings were repeated at each lead and alternated on turf and on a synthetic surface. Joint angles and angles of the hoof and limb to the track were measured from the 2-dimensional coordinates of the markers. Results: Elbow, carpus and fetlock were more maximally flexed during swing and had a larger range of motion throughout the stride in the leading forelimb. Maximal carpal extension during stance was also larger on this limb, which had a more toe-up orientation. Comparing surfaces, the limb was more oblique at landing, the range of motion of the hoof into the surface was larger, most kinematic events were delayed and fetlock and carpus extension velocities were smaller on the synthetic surface. Conclusions: The differences between limbs were more prominent than those between surfaces and the more toe-up orientation on the hoof of the leading forelimb suggests a different loading of that limb's joints and tendons. Differences between limbs may be important in the interpretation of lead changes in lame horses. While the synthetic surface appears to be less strenuous for the joints in the forelimbs, it was associated with changes in timing of the kinematic events of the stride.
Publication Date: 2013-12-01 PubMed ID: 24304405DOI: 10.1111/evj.12160Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the kinematics (motion) of the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses when they canter on turf compared to a synthetic surface. The study found noticeable differences in how the limbs behave, hinting at the possible impacts on joint and tendon loading. Additionally, the synthetic surface appeared less strenuous for the horse’s joints but caused changes to the timing of the stride’s kinematic events.

Objective and Methods

  • The study aimed to understand the effects of different surfaces (turf and synthetic) on the kinematics of a horse’s forelimbs during a canter, an essentially three-beat gait that is faster than a trot but slower than a gallop.
  • Five horses were equipped with markers on their right forelimbs and hooves. These markers were used to track movements and angles during high-speed filming (1000 Hz) while the horses cantered at a speed of 30 km/h.
  • Recordings were taken on both turf and synthetic surfaces, at each lead (a lead refers to whether the left or the right foot strides out further during a canter), and the 2D coordinates were used to measure various angles between the limbs and the surface.

Results

  • The research found significant differences in the flexion (bending) and range of motion between the leading forelimb (the limb that strides out the furthest) and the trailing forelimb (the limb that is left behind).
  • The leading forelimb showed more maximum flexion, demonstrating a larger range of motion throughout the stride, as well as a ‘toe-up’ orientation, which suggests different loading conditions on its joints and tendons.
  • When comparing the surfaces, the research found that the synthetic surface causes the limb to land more obliquely (at an angle), altering the range of motion of the hoof into the surface, delaying kinematic events, and reducing the velocity of the fetlock (ankle) and carpus (wrist) extensions.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that the differences between the limbs were more significant than the differences between the surfaces.
  • The study suggests potential implications for understanding lead changes (switching of the leading limb during a canter) in lame horses, which may further inform injury prediction or prevention strategies.
  • Though the synthetic surface might be less strenuous for the joints, it revealed changes in the timing of stride events, which is useful for preparing horses for different track conditions and managing equine health.

Cite This Article

APA
Crevier-Denoix N, Falala S, Holden-Douilly L, Camus M, Martino J, Ravary-Plumioen B, Vergari C, Desquilbet L, Denoix JM, Chateau H, Pourcelot P. (2013). Comparative kinematic analysis of the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses cantering on a turf and a synthetic surface. Equine Vet J Suppl(45), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12160

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 45
Pages: 54-61

Researcher Affiliations

Crevier-Denoix, N
  • Université Paris Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700, Maisons-Alfort, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Falala, S
    Holden-Douilly, L
      Camus, M
        Martino, J
          Ravary-Plumioen, B
            Vergari, C
              Desquilbet, L
                Denoix, J-M
                  Chateau, H
                    Pourcelot, P

                      MeSH Terms

                      • Animals
                      • Biomechanical Phenomena
                      • Forelimb
                      • Gait
                      • Hoof and Claw
                      • Horses
                      • Range of Motion, Articular
                      • Tendons

                      Citations

                      This article has been cited 4 times.
                      1. Horan K, Price H, Day P, Mackechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Timing Differences in Stride Cycle Phases in Retired Racehorses Ridden in Rising and Two-Point Seat Positions at Trot on Turf, Artificial and Tarmac Surfaces.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 9;13(16).
                        doi: 10.3390/ani13162563pubmed: 37627354google scholar: lookup
                      2. Sorby-Adams AJ, Marian OC, Bilecki IM, Elms LE, Camargo J, Hall K, Crowther RG, Leonard AV, Wadsworth GI, Spear JH, Turner RJ, Jones CF. Neurological scoring and gait kinematics to assess functional outcome in an ovine model of ischaemic stroke.. Front Neurol 2023;14:1071794.
                        doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1071794pubmed: 36891474google scholar: lookup
                      3. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Chateau H, Marin F. The Protraction and Retraction Angles of Horse Limbs: An Estimation during Trotting Using Inertial Sensors.. Sensors (Basel) 2021 May 30;21(11).
                        doi: 10.3390/s21113792pubmed: 34070859google scholar: lookup
                      4. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Château H, Marin F. Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse's Limb.. Sensors (Basel) 2020 May 25;20(10).
                        doi: 10.3390/s20102983pubmed: 32466104google scholar: lookup