Analyze Diet
Transboundary and emerging diseases2016; 64(6); 1825-1836; doi: 10.1111/tbed.12577

Comparative Risk Analysis of Two Culicoides-Borne Diseases in Horses: Equine Encephalosis More Likely to Enter France than African Horse Sickness.

Abstract: African horse sickness (AHS) and equine encephalosis (EE) are Culicoides-borne viral diseases that could have the potential to spread across Europe if introduced, thus being potential threats for the European equine industry. Both share similar epidemiology, transmission patterns and geographical distribution. Using stochastic spatiotemporal models of virus entry, we assessed and compared the probabilities of both viruses entering France via two pathways: importation of live-infected animals or importation of infected vectors. Analyses were performed for three consecutive years (2010-2012). Seasonal and regional differences in virus entry probabilities were the same for both diseases. However, the probability of EE entry was much higher than the probability of AHS entry. Interestingly, the most likely entry route differed between AHS and EE: AHS has a higher probability to enter through an infected vector and EE has a higher probability to enter through an infectious host. Consequently, different effective protective measures were identified by 'what-if' scenarios for the two diseases. The implementation of vector protection on all animals (equine and bovine) coming from low-risk regions before their importation was the most effective in reducing the probability of AHS entry. On the other hand, the most significant reduction in the probability of EE entry was obtained by the implementation of quarantine before import for horses coming from both EU and non-EU countries. The developed models can be useful to implement risk-based surveillance.
Publication Date: 2016-09-23 PubMed ID: 27658808DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12577Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers have studied the probabilities of African Horse Sickness and Equine Encephalosis, two vector-borne diseases, entering France. They found Equine Encephalosis to be more likely to enter through an infectious host while African Horse Sickness through an infected vector. They also propose distinct protective measures for both diseases.

Objective of the study

  • The primary aim of this research was to investigate and compare the likelihood of two vector-borne viral diseases – African Horse Sickness (AHS) and Equine Encephalosis (EE) – entering France. They used stochastic spatiotemporal models to predict the potential entry routes of these viruses.

Methodology

  • The researchers utilized stochastic spatiotemporal models that estimate the chance of virus entry into France. They examined this over three consecutive years, from 2010 to 2012, with particular emphasis on how the probabilities varied with seasons and different regions.
  • Two main pathways for virus entry were considered: the importation of live-infected animals and the importation of infected vectors (midges of the Culicoides genus).

Findings

  • The study found that both AHS and EE showed the same patterns of seasonal and regional differences in their entry probabilities into France. However, EE had a significantly higher probability of entry than AHS.
  • Moreover, the most likely route of virus entry was different for each disease. AHS was more likely to enter through infected vectors, while EE was more likely to enter through live-infected animals (hosts).

Proposed Protective Measures

  • The research presented different protective measures for the two diseases. For AHS, the most efficient prevention method was implementing vector protection on all imported animals from low-risk regions. This means taking steps to prevent any vectors like midges from infecting the animals before they are brought into the country.
  • For EE, the greatest reduction in virus entry probability was achieved by implementing quarantine measures for horses imported from both EU and non-EU countries. This would involve keeping the imported animals isolated for a period to ensure they are not infected before entering the population.

Implications

  • The models developed in this study suggest specific actions for reducing the risk of these diseases entering France. Not only could these steps protect the national equine industry, but they could also provide guidance for addressing similar risks in other countries.
  • Moreover, these findings may also be useful in implementing risk-based surveillance, aiding in the effective monitoring and prevention of these potentially devastating diseases.

Cite This Article

APA
Faverjon C, Leblond A, Lecollinet S, Bødker R, de Koeijer AA, Fischer EAJ. (2016). Comparative Risk Analysis of Two Culicoides-Borne Diseases in Horses: Equine Encephalosis More Likely to Enter France than African Horse Sickness. Transbound Emerg Dis, 64(6), 1825-1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12577

Publication

ISSN: 1865-1682
NlmUniqueID: 101319538
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 64
Issue: 6
Pages: 1825-1836

Researcher Affiliations

Faverjon, C
  • INRA UR0346 Animal Epidemiology, VetagroSup, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Leblond, A
  • INRA UR0346 Animal Epidemiology and Equine Department, VetAgroSup, Marcy L'Etoile, France.
Lecollinet, S
  • Animal Health Laboratory, UMR1161 Virologie, INRA ANSES ENVA, UPE, ANSES, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Bødker, R
  • National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksgerg, Denmark.
de Koeijer, A A
  • Central Veterinary Institute, part of Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Fischer, E A J
  • Central Veterinary Institute, part of Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

MeSH Terms

  • African Horse Sickness / epidemiology
  • African Horse Sickness / transmission
  • African Horse Sickness / virology
  • Animals
  • Ceratopogonidae / virology
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / epidemiology
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / transmission
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / veterinary
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / virology
  • Communicable Diseases, Imported / epidemiology
  • Communicable Diseases, Imported / transmission
  • Communicable Diseases, Imported / veterinary
  • Communicable Diseases, Imported / virology
  • France / epidemiology
  • Horses
  • Insect Vectors / virology
  • Probability
  • Quarantine
  • Reoviridae Infections / epidemiology
  • Reoviridae Infections / transmission
  • Reoviridae Infections / veterinary
  • Reoviridae Infections / virology
  • Risk

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Piketh G, Viljoen A, Eberhardt C. Clinical signs, clinical pathology and outcomes in horses infected naturally with equine encephalosis virus. Equine Vet J 2026 Mar;58(2):434-443.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.70117pubmed: 41235818google scholar: lookup
  2. Marques ARP, Gonzalez Villeta L, Simons R, Horigan V, de Vos C, Conrady B. Quantitative risk assessment for infectious disease introduction in animal populations: a comprehensive review. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1648695.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1648695pubmed: 41142563google scholar: lookup
  3. Tirosh-Levy S, Steinman A. Equine Encephalosis Virus. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jan 29;12(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12030337pubmed: 35158658google scholar: lookup