Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2013; 198 Suppl 1; e157-e160; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.052

Comparison of microgyro-based measurements of equine metatarsal/metacarpal bone to a high speed video locomotion analysis system during treadmill locomotion.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare an inertial motion system (IMS) to an optical based locomotion analysis system measuring limb sagittal segment angles in horses at the walk and trot. The metatarsal/metacarpal bones of two horses (20 trials) were fitted with optical system markers and an IMS. Between the systems, measuring range of motion (ROM) of the sagittal metatarsal/metacarpal bone angles, the IMS measured higher ROM than the optical system (bias 1.6°; precision at 1.96 standard deviation 1.9°). The same angle data were used to assess inter-limb symmetry by calculating phase shift between the limbs within a stride. This showed essentially no bias and the precision was 0.025%. The IMS has potential for quantification of ROM and phase shift of equine distal limb movement.
Publication Date: 2013-09-26 PubMed ID: 24360759DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.052Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on a comparison between an inertial motion system (IMS) and an optical based locomotion analysis system in measuring limb movements of horses. Results show the IMS potentially providing a more quantifiable measure of range of motion and phase shift in the movement of equine distal limbs.

Objective of the Study

  • The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of an Inertial motion system (IMS) and an optical based locomotion analysis system in measuring sagittal segment angles (movements in forward and backward direction) of equine’s metacarpal/metatarsal bones during walk and trot.

Methodology of the Study

  • Two horses were selected for this study and were subjected to 20 trials each.
  • The metacarpal/metatarsal bones of these horses were fitted with markers of the optical system and an IMS.

Findings of the Study

  • The Inertial Motion System (IMS) measured a higher range of motion (ROM) than the optical system. The bias of measurements was 1.6° with a precision at 1.96 standard deviation at 1.9°. This indicates that the IMS was more likely to register a larger degree of movement as compared to the optical system.
  • The same data was used to calculate the phase shift, which is the difference in timing of peak limb displacement between left and right limbs within a stride. The results displayed almost no bias and the precision was stated to be 0.025%, suggesting hardly any discrepancy or error in measurements.

Conclusion of the Study

  • The research proved the potential of the IMS for quantifying range of motion and phase shifts of equine distal limb movements. This could provide valuable insights for evaluating and improving locomotion in horses, further leading to better performance and less injury.

Cite This Article

APA
Roepstorff L, Wiestner T, Weishaupt MA, Egenvall E. (2013). Comparison of microgyro-based measurements of equine metatarsal/metacarpal bone to a high speed video locomotion analysis system during treadmill locomotion. Vet J, 198 Suppl 1, e157-e160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.052

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 198 Suppl 1
Pages: e157-e160
PII: S1090-0233(13)00480-2

Researcher Affiliations

Roepstorff, L
  • Unit of Equine Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7046, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: lars.roepstorff@slu.se.
Wiestner, T
  • Equine Department, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Weishaupt, M A
  • Equine Department, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Egenvall, E
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 705, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Exercise Test / veterinary
  • Horses / physiology
  • Locomotion / physiology
  • Metacarpal Bones / physiology
  • Metatarsal Bones / physiology
  • Video Recording

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
    doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
  2. Crecan CM, Morar IA, Lupsan AF, Repciuc CC, Rus MA, Pestean CP. Development of a Novel Approach for Detection of Equine Lameness Based on Inertial Sensors: A Preliminary Study. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Sep 19;22(18).
    doi: 10.3390/s22187082pubmed: 36146429google scholar: lookup
  3. Pagliara E, Marenchino M, Antenucci L, Costantini M, Zoppi G, Giacobini MDL, Bullone M, Riccio B, Bertuglia A. Fetlock Joint Angle Pattern and Range of Motion Quantification Using Two Synchronized Wearable Inertial Sensors per Limb in Sound Horses and Horses with Single Limb Naturally Occurring Lameness. Vet Sci 2022 Aug 25;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090456pubmed: 36136672google scholar: lookup
  4. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Chateau H, Marin F. The Protraction and Retraction Angles of Horse Limbs: An Estimation during Trotting Using Inertial Sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2021 May 30;21(11).
    doi: 10.3390/s21113792pubmed: 34070859google scholar: lookup
  5. Schwarz J, Vidondo B, Maninchedda UE, Sprick M, Schöpfer MC, Cruz AM. Inter-evaluator and Intra-evaluator Reliability of a Software Program Used to Extract Kinematic Variables Obtained by an Extremity-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System in Sound Horses at the Trot Under Soft and Hard Ground Conditions and Treadmill Exercise. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:595455.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.595455pubmed: 33748204google scholar: lookup
  6. Qu F, Stoeckl BD, Gebhard PM, Hullfish TJ, Baxter JR, Mauck RL. A Wearable Magnet-Based System to Assess Activity and Joint Flexion in Humans and Large Animals. Ann Biomed Eng 2018 Dec;46(12):2069-2078.
    doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-2105-8pubmed: 30083860google scholar: lookup
  7. Stutz JC, Vidondo B, Ramseyer A, Maninchedda UE, Cruz AM. Effect of three types of horseshoes and unshod feet on selected non-podal forelimb kinematic variables measured by an extremity mounted inertial measurement unit sensor system in sound horses at the trot under conditions of treadmill and soft geotextile surface exercise. Vet Rec Open 2018;5(1):e000237.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000237pubmed: 29955366google scholar: lookup
  8. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup