FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Computed Tomography (CT)-Assisted 3D Cephalometry in Horses:...
Frontiers in veterinary science2020; 7; 434; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00434

Computed Tomography (CT)-Assisted 3D Cephalometry in Horses: Interincisal Angulation of Clinical Crowns.

Abstract: The angle encompassed between opposing incisors in horses is assumed to decline with age. Previous studies merely consider the overall profile view of clinical crowns presuming a generalized angle, neglecting potential tooth position-dependent differences. Cephalometric measurements from 3D computed tomographic thick-slab reconstructions of single incisors within a global reference frame were used to determine clinical crown interincisal angulation (IIA) of 48 horses. Based on predefined dentoalveolar landmarks, IIA was defined as the angle enclosed by the respective labial axis of the clinical crown (LACC). A measurement repeatability analysis was conducted including a comparison of third incisor teeth IIA with data obtained by cephalometric implementation of previously described landmarks for third incisor teeth (lingual/palatal border). The age-related angle course and differences between tooth positions were investigated considering LACCs of permanent incisors. Determining IIA by LACCs exhibited a high level of reproducibility applying for all tooth positions (mean coefficient of variation = 0.65 %; mean SD ± 0.89°). The comparison method for third incisor teeth revealed two times higher mean dispersion of repeated measurements, = 0.017. A non-linear model slightly increased predictability of angular changes over time as against linearity assumption. The angle decline was more distinctive in younger horses and appears to approach a final value in older ones. Third incisor teeth exhibited significantly higher angle decline compared to first and second incisor teeth, < 0.0001. According to the results, age determination of horses using clinical crown IIA is not recommended. Rather, 3D cephalometry may provide a promising tool to determine interdental and dentofacial angles of distinct tooth positions in health and disease.
Copyright © 2020 Kau, Failing and Staszyk.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-07-29 PubMed ID: 32851019PubMed Central: PMC7403475DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00434Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study examines the angle between opposing horse teeth, believed to decrease with age. Using 3D CT imaging to measure these angles, the researchers found that current age estimation methods based on this angle are inaccurate. Instead, the concept of 3D cephalometry could be a more effective tool to determine dental and facial angles in health and disease contexts.

Objective of the Study

  • The research aims to determine the interincisal angulation (IIA)—the angle between opposite incisors of horse teeth and the changes in this angle over time, especially when considering the differences in tooth positions.

Methodology

  • This study uses 3D Computerized Tomography (CT) based cephalometric measurements obtained from thick-slab reconstructions of single horse tooth within a collective reference frame.
  • The researchers examined the teeth of 48 horses to determine the clinical crown IIA.
  • To measure IIA, the labial axis of the clinical crown (LACC) was considered, and the study also tested the repeatability of these measurements.
  • A comparison was made using previously described landmarks for the third incisor teeth (lingual/palatal border).
  • The course of the age-based angle and differences between tooth positions were investigated, taking into account the LACCs of permanent incisors.
  • A non-linear model was used to improve the predictability of angular changes over time compared with linearity assumptions.

Findings

  • The study found a high level of reproducibility in determining IIA by LACCs for all tooth positions.
  • The measurement method for third incisor teeth showed a twice-higher mean dispersion of repeated measurements.
  • Age-related angle decline was more pronounced in younger horses and seemed to reach a constant value in older ones.
  • The angle reduction was significantly larger for the third incisor teeth compared to the first and second incisors.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that age determination of horses using clinical crown IIA is not recommended due to its unreliability.
  • Instead, 3D cephalometry could serve as a promising tool to determine interdental and dentofacial angles of unique tooth positions in both health and disease contexts.

Cite This Article

APA
Kau S, Failing K, Staszyk C. (2020). Computed Tomography (CT)-Assisted 3D Cephalometry in Horses: Interincisal Angulation of Clinical Crowns. Front Vet Sci, 7, 434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00434

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 7
Pages: 434
PII: 434

Researcher Affiliations

Kau, Silvio
  • Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Topographic Anatomy, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary-Anatomy, -Histology and -Embryology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Failing, Klaus
  • Unit for Biomathemathics and Data Processing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Staszyk, Carsten
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary-Anatomy, -Histology and -Embryology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Habermehl KH. [How accurate is age determination in horses].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1981 May 1;94(9):167-71.
    pubmed: 7271740
  2. Richardson JD, Cripps PJ, Lane JG. An evaluation of the accuracy of ageing horses by their dentition: changes of dental morphology with age.. Vet Rec 1995 Jul 29;137(5):117-21.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.137.5.117pubmed: 8533255google scholar: lookup
  3. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H. Ageing horses by an examination of their incisor teeth: an (im)possible task?. Vet Rec 1996 Mar 30;138(13):295-301.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.138.13.295pubmed: 8730689google scholar: lookup
  4. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H, Van Loon G. Ageing draft and trotter horses by their dentition.. Vet Rec 1997 Jul 5;141(1):17-20.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.141.1.17pubmed: 9248018google scholar: lookup
  5. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H, Van Loon G. Ageing Arab horses by their dentition.. Vet Rec 1998 Jun 13;142(24):659-62.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.142.24.659pubmed: 9670444google scholar: lookup
  6. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H. Age-related morphometry of equine incisors.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1999 Dec;46(10):633-43.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.1999.00261.xpubmed: 10638301google scholar: lookup
  7. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H, Van Loon G. Age determination in mini-Shetland ponies and donkeys.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1999 Sep;46(7):421-9.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.1999.00229.xpubmed: 10528536google scholar: lookup
  8. Klugh D. Eruption and shedding of teeth. 1st ed London: CRC Press; (2010) p. 79–88.
    doi: 10.1201/b15198-9google scholar: lookup
  9. Muylle S. Ageig. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders. (2011) p. 85–96.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-2980-6.00007-6google scholar: lookup
  10. Nicholls VM, Townsend N. Dental Disease in Aged Horses and Its Management.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2016 Aug;32(2):215-27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.04.002pubmed: 27449389google scholar: lookup
  11. Richardson J. Ageing horses - an illustrated guide. In Practice (1997) 19:486–9.
    doi: 10.1136/inpract.19.9.486google scholar: lookup
  12. Martin MT, Martin MT, Scrutchfield WL, Joyce JR. A systematic approach to estimating the age of a horse. Am Assoc Equine Pract (1999) 45:273–5.
  13. Dixon PM, du Toit N. Dental anatomy. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders; (2011) p. 51–76.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-2980-6.00005-2google scholar: lookup
  14. Loch WE, Bradley M. Determining Age of Horses by Their Teeth. MU Extension, University of Missouri-Columbia G2842 (1998) Available online at: https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/4028. (accessed April 16, 2019).
  15. Domanska-Kruppa N, Venner M, Bienert-Zeit A. Cephalometric Study of the Overjet Development in Warmblood Foals.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:431.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00431pmc: PMC6895015pubmed: 31850386google scholar: lookup
  16. Arnbjerg J. Generalized hypercementosis in geriatric horses. J Vet Dent (2014) 31:153–9.
    doi: 10.1177/089875641403100302google scholar: lookup
  17. Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects.. Angle Orthod 2001 Apr;71(2):90-102.
    doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0090:AOACAO>2.0.CO;2pubmed: 11302594google scholar: lookup
  18. Ludwig M. A cephalometric analysis of the relationship between facial pattern, interincisal angulation and anterior overbite changes.. Angle Orthod 1967 Jul;37(3):194-204.
    pubmed: 19919215doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1967)037<0194:acaotr>2.0.co;2google scholar: lookup
  19. Livas C, Delli K, Spijkervet FKL, Vissink A, Dijkstra PU. Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software.. Angle Orthod 2019 Nov;89(6):889-896.
    doi: 10.2319/021919-124.1pubmed: 31282737google scholar: lookup
  20. Schrock P, Lüpke M, Seifert H, Staszyk C. Finite element analysis of equine incisor teeth. Part 2: investigation of stresses and strain energy densities in the periodontal ligament and surrounding bone during tooth movement.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198(3):590-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.010pubmed: 24252223google scholar: lookup
  21. Staszyk C, Suske A, Pöschke A. Equine dental and periodontal anatomy: a tutorial review. Equine Vet Educ (2015) 27:474–81.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12317google scholar: lookup
  22. Schrock P, Lüpke M, Seifert H, Staszyk C. Three-dimensional anatomy of equine incisors: tooth length, enamel cover and age related changes.. BMC Vet Res 2013 Dec 9;9:249.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-249pmc: PMC3878928pubmed: 24321365google scholar: lookup
  23. Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement.. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Apr;129(4):458-68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.013pubmed: 16627170google scholar: lookup
  24. Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography.. Angle Orthod 2013 Mar;83(2):212-21.
    doi: 10.2319/041812-325.1pubmed: 23066654google scholar: lookup
  25. Henry TJ, Puchalski SM, Arzi B, Kass PH, Verstraete FJM. Radiographic evaluation in clinical practice of the types and stage of incisor tooth resorption and hypercementosis in horses.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jul;49(4):486-492.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12650pubmed: 27862232google scholar: lookup
  26. Lisboa Cde O, Masterson D, da Motta AF, Motta AT. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.. J Appl Oral Sci 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):112-9.
    doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140336pmc: PMC4428454pubmed: 26018303google scholar: lookup
  27. Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010 Feb;39(2):100-6.
    doi: 10.1259/dmfr/82724776pmc: PMC3520203pubmed: 20100922google scholar: lookup
  28. Listmann L, Schrock P, Failing K, Staszyk C. Occlusal Angles of Equine Incisors.. J Vet Dent 2017 Dec;34(4):259-267.
    doi: 10.1177/0898756417739465pubmed: 29130414google scholar: lookup
  29. Strauch S, Schwarzer J, Kau S. Computertomografie in der Pferdezahnheilkunde – ein Überblick. Pferde Spiegel (2019) 22:23–36.
    doi: 10.1055/a-0671-8580google scholar: lookup
  30. Barakzai SZ, Barnett TP. Computed tomography and scintigraphy for evaluation of dental disease in the horse. Equine Vet Educ (2015) 27:323–31.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12288google scholar: lookup
  31. Bregger MDK, Koch C, Zimmermann R, Sangiorgio D, Schweizer-Gorgas D. Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids.. BMC Vet Res 2019 Aug 13;15(1):289.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2045-zpmc: PMC6693248pubmed: 31409395google scholar: lookup
  32. Floyd MR. The modified Triadan system: nomenclature for veterinary dentistry.. J Vet Dent 1991 Dec;8(4):18-9.
    doi: 10.1177/089875649100800402pubmed: 1815632google scholar: lookup
  33. Triadan H. [Veterinary dentistry: tooth preservation (cavity therapy with "composite materials" and endodontics) in monkeys].. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1972 Jun;114(6):292-316.
    pubmed: 4625330
  34. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 663. Boston; Mass: Houghton Mifflin College Devision; (2003).
  35. Jodeh DS, Kuykendall LV, Ford JM, Ruso S, Decker SJ, Rottgers SA. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.. J Craniofac Surg 2019 Jul;30(5):1568-1571.
    doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005555pubmed: 31299770google scholar: lookup
  36. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011 Mar;69(3):606-22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.010pmc: PMC3059215pubmed: 21257250google scholar: lookup
  37. Quintero JC, Trosien A, Hatcher D, Kapila S. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical perspective, current status, and future developments.. Angle Orthod 1999 Dec;69(6):491-506.
    pubmed: 10593439doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0491:ciiohp>2.3.co;2google scholar: lookup
  38. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review.. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011 Jul;40(5):265-73.
    doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039pmc: PMC3520262pubmed: 21697151google scholar: lookup
  39. Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.. Eur J Radiol 2011 Mar;77(3):397-402.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.023pubmed: 19819091google scholar: lookup
  40. Bergersen EO. Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements.. Angle Orthod 1980 Jul;50(3):230-44.
    pubmed: 6931505doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1980)050<0230:eadicr>2.0.co;2google scholar: lookup
  41. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015pubmed: 17709072google scholar: lookup
  42. Carmalt JL, Townsend HG, Allen AL. Effect of dental floating on the rostrocaudal mobility of the mandible of horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003 Sep 1;223(5):666-9.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.666pubmed: 12959386google scholar: lookup
  43. Staszyk C, Wulff W, Jacob HG, Gasse H. Collagen fiber architecture of the periodontal ligament in equine cheek teeth.. J Vet Dent 2006 Sep;23(3):143-7.
    doi: 10.1177/089875640602300303pubmed: 17022193google scholar: lookup
  44. McMullan WC. Dental criteria for estimating age in the horse. Equine Pract (1983) 5:36–43.
  45. Staszyk C, Bienert A, Kreutzer R, Wohlsein P, Simhofer H. Equine odontoclastic tooth resorption and hypercementosis.. Vet J 2008 Dec;178(3):372-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.017pubmed: 19010701google scholar: lookup
  46. Lorello O, Foster DL, Levine DG, Boyle A, Engiles J, Orsini JA. Clinical treatment and prognosis of equine odontoclastic tooth resorption and hypercementosis.. Equine Vet J 2016 Mar;48(2):188-94.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12406pubmed: 25557855google scholar: lookup
  47. Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S. Root resorption--diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors.. Dent Traumatol 2003 Aug;19(4):175-82.
    doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00192.xpubmed: 12848710google scholar: lookup
  48. Kunz JR, Granella MCS, Mendes RP, Müller TR, Kau S, Fonteque JH. High prevalence of orodental disorders in South Brazilian cart horses: walking a tightrope between animal welfare and socio-economic inevitability. J Vet Dent (2019).

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Kau S, Motter KS, Moser VJ, Kunz JR, Pellachin M, Hartl B. Intra- and Interexaminer Measurement Variability Analysis of an Orthodontic Gauge Device to Determine Incisor Occlusal Surface Angles in the Horse.. Vet Sci 2022 Sep 7;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090481pubmed: 36136698google scholar: lookup
  2. Kau S, Mansfeld MD, Šoba A, Zwick T, Staszyk C. The facultative human oral pathogen Prevotella histicola in equine cheek tooth apical/ periapical infection: a case report.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Oct 30;17(1):343.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03048-9pubmed: 34717609google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.