Debate continues on horse welfare issue.
Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2011-04-06 PubMed ID: 21465708
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Letter
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article discusses the ongoing debate concerning horse welfare, specifically focusing on the ethical dimensions and consequences of horse slaughter for human consumption. It challenges the argument that horse slaughter is necessary due to the existence of ‘unwanted horses’, presenting evidence suggesting that most slaughtered horses are in good health and could potentially have had different futures if not for this practice.
Disputing the Unwanted Horse Narrative
- The article begins by countering the statement made by Dr. Tom Lenz at the American Association of Equine Practitioners’ Annual Meeting that most horses sent to slaughter are either old, incurably lame, unmanageable, dangerous, or fail to meet their owners’ expectations—implying they are ‘unwanted’.
- The researchers reject this claim, presenting reports which show that 92% of horses arriving at slaughter plants were in good health and potentially suitable for further activities.
Profits from Healthy Horses
- The authors argue that the horse slaughter industry profits from the processing of healthy horses, deliberately targeting these animals.
- They estimate that approximately 65% of Thoroughbred racehorses end up in slaughterhouses, suggesting that many of these horses could potentially have pursued successful second careers if it weren’t for the slaughterhouse practice.
Questioning the Link Between Horse Slaughter and Equine Welfare
- The authors challenge the perceived need for horse slaughter in preventing neglect and abandonment.
- They argue that there is no demonstrated connection between horse slaughter and adverse conditions for horse welfare, instead suggesting that trends in equine abuse and neglect correspond with the economic climate.
The Role of the Slaughtering Industry and Horse Breeders
- The authors criticize the enduring legality of horse slaughter in the United States and the unchanged rates of slaughter, despite the relocation of slaughter plants.
- They propose the main determinant of slaughter rates is international demand for horse meat and not the availability of ‘unwanted’ horses in the U.S.
- The authors suggest that if the ratio of unwanted horses is a real concern, greater efforts should be exerted to reduce horse breeding rather than to advocate horse slaughter.
- They also call on the veterinary profession to be proactive in addressing the issue and push for changes in the industry.
Cite This Article
APA
Dodman NH.
(2011).
Debate continues on horse welfare issue.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 238(7), 839-840.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Abattoirs / legislation & jurisprudence
- Animal Welfare
- Animals
- Horses
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists