Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2026; 1-6; doi: 10.2460/javma.26.02.0122

Depth and distribution of colonic sand accumulation in a desert population of horses and its association with diagnosis of sand colic.

Abstract: To describe patient and management characteristics associated with radiographic sand accumulation in a desert population of horses, as well as identify factors independently associated with a diagnosis of sand colic and need for surgical intervention. Unassigned: Horses were prospectively allocated into 3 groups: control horses, horses with sand colic, and horses with non-sand-associated colic. Signalment, radiographs, and management outcomes were compared between groups. Unassigned: Median depth of sand was significantly greater in horses diagnosed with sand colic compared to other groups (112.16 vs 10.5 vs 12.0 mm). Increasing sand depth was associated with increased odds of having sand colic. Younger horses were more likely to be diagnosed with sand colic (2 vs 4.9 years); however, surgical intervention was more likely in older horses (2.6 vs 1.3 years). Unassigned: Horses diagnosed with sand colic exhibited greater sand depth compared to those with non-sand colic or controls. For every millimeter of sand present, horses had a 2% increase in the odds of being diagnosed with sand colic. Factors independently associated with a diagnosis of sand colic were a lower body weight, presence of cranial sand on radiographs, and increasing sand depth. Unassigned: The OR of a diagnosis of sand colic increases by 2% with every millimeter of measured sand depth. Additionally, greater depths of sand were not associated with increased risk of surgical management. This data helps clinicians determine the relevance of sand identified radiographically in horses presenting for colic.
Publication Date: 2026-08-21 PubMed ID: 42633781DOI: 10.2460/javma.26.02.0122Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research investigated how the amount and location of sand in the colon of desert horses relate to the diagnosis of sand colic and the likelihood of needing surgery.
  • The study compared horses with sand colic, horses with other types of colic, and healthy control horses to identify factors linked to sand colic.

Study Purpose and Design

  • The main goal was to describe characteristics (such as age, weight, and management factors) associated with the amount of sand found in the colon via radiographs.
  • The study also aimed to identify which factors independently predict a diagnosis of sand colic and if surgery is required.
  • Subjects were prospectively divided into three groups:
    • Control horses with no colic
    • Horses diagnosed with sand colic
    • Horses diagnosed with non-sand-related colic

Key Findings: Sand Depth and Colic Diagnosis

  • The median depth of accumulated sand in the colon was much greater in horses diagnosed with sand colic (112.16 mm) compared to those with other colic (12.0 mm) and control horses (10.5 mm).
  • There was a direct correlation between increasing sand depth and the chance of being diagnosed with sand colic.
  • For every additional millimeter of sand measured on radiographs, the odds of having sand colic increased by 2%.

Age and Surgical Intervention Correlations

  • Horses diagnosed with sand colic tended to be younger, with a median age of 2 years, compared to 4.9 years in other colic types.
  • However, older horses with sand colic were more likely to require surgical intervention compared to younger horses (median age 2.6 years vs 1.3 years, respectively).

Other Factors Associated with Sand Colic

  • Lower body weight was independently linked to a higher chance of sand colic diagnosis.
  • Presence of sand located cranially in the colon on radiographs was another significant factor.
  • Increasing depth of sand accumulation itself was a strong independent predictor of sand colic.

Clinical Implications

  • Radiographic detection of sand, especially greater depths and cranial localization, is crucial for diagnosing sand colic in horses living in desert environments.
  • While deeper sand accumulation increases the likelihood of sand colic, it does not necessarily correlate with an increased need for surgery.
  • These findings assist veterinarians in evaluating the clinical significance of sand seen on radiographs and making informed management decisions for horses presenting with colic symptoms.

Cite This Article

APA
Sikorska Z, Stapley E, Oliveira J, Lazala JE, Fernandes T, David F, Vinardell T, Jamieson C. (2026). Depth and distribution of colonic sand accumulation in a desert population of horses and its association with diagnosis of sand colic. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.26.02.0122

Publication

ISSN: 1943-569X
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 1-6

Researcher Affiliations

Sikorska, Zuzanna
  • 1Anglesey Lodge Equine Hospital, The Curragh, County Kildare, Ireland.
Stapley, Emma
  • 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Oliveira, Joao
  • 3Equine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab, Doha, Qatar.
Lazala, Jude Eric
  • 4Equine Care Group, Lummen, Belgium.
Fernandes, Tiago
  • 4Equine Care Group, Lummen, Belgium.
David, Florent
  • 3Equine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab, Doha, Qatar.
  • 4Equine Care Group, Lummen, Belgium.
Vinardell, Tatiana
  • 3Equine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab, Doha, Qatar.
  • 4Equine Care Group, Lummen, Belgium.
Jamieson, Camilla
  • 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
  • 3Equine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab, Doha, Qatar.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.