FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the ...
PloS one2021; 16(5); e0251144; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251144

Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting.

Abstract: High-level dressage horses regularly perform advanced movements, requiring coordination and force transmission between front and hind limbs across the thoracolumbosacral region. This study aimed at quantifying kinematic differences in dressage horses when ridden in sitting trot-i.e. with additional load applied in the thoracolumbar region-compared with trotting in-hand. Inertial sensors were glued on to the midline of the thoracic (T) and lumbar (L) spine at T5, T13, T18, L3 and middle of the left and right tubera sacrale of ten elite dressage horses (Mean±SD), age 11±1 years, height 1.70±0.10m and body mass 600±24kg; first trotted in-hand, then ridden in sitting trot on an arena surface by four Grand Prix dressage riders. Straight-line motion cycles were analysed using a general linear model (random factor: horse; fixed factor: exercise condition; covariate: stride time, Bonferroni post hoc correction: P<0.05). Differential roll, pitch and yaw angles between adjacent sensors were calculated. In sitting trot, compared to trotting in-hand, there was increased pitch (mean±S.D), (in-hand, 3.9 (0.5°, sitting trot 6.3 (0.3°, P = <0.0001), roll (in-hand, 7.7 (1.1°, sitting trot 11.6 (0.9°, P = 0.003) and heading values (in-hand, 4.2 (0.8), sitting trot 9.5 (0.6°, P = <0.0001) in the caudal thoracic and lumbar region (T18-L3) and a decrease in heading values (in-hand, 7.1 (0.5°, sitting trot 5.2 (0.3°, P = 0.01) in the cranial thoracic region (T5-T13). Kinematics of the caudal thoracic and lumbar spine are influenced by the rider when in sitting trot, whilst lateral bending is reduced in the cranial thoracic region. This biomechanical difference with the addition of a rider, emphasises the importance of observing horses during ridden exercise, when assessing them as part of a loss of performance assessment.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-05-06 PubMed ID: 33956858PubMed Central: PMC8101941DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251144Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a study examining the movement differences in the main body region of high-level dressage horses trotting under two different conditions—trotting freely and trotting with a rider. The observed differences highlight the influence of a rider and the need to consider this effect during performance evaluations.

Study Overview and Methodology

  • The paper explores the kinematic differences in dressage horses when they are trotting freely (referred to as “in-hand”) and when ridden in sitting trot, which adds load to the thoracolumbar region of the horse.
  • This investigation involved ten elite dressage horses and utilized inertial sensors attached to specific points on the horses’ thoracic (chest) and lumbar (lower back) spine to monitor their movements.
  • Each horse was first trotted in-hand and subsequently ridden in a sitting trot by one of four Grand Prix dressage riders in an arena. The motion cycles during straight-line movements were examined using a general linear model, with adjustments for multiple comparisons.

Research Findings

  • Upon analysis, the study found that there were statistically significant differences in the rotational movements of the horses under the two conditions.
  • When ridden in sitting trot, horses exhibited augmented pitch (rotation around a side-to-side axis), roll (rotation around a front-to-back axis), and heading values (direction the horse is facing) in the caudal thoracic and lumbar region, compared to trotting in-hand.
  • Conversely, heading values decreased in the cranial thoracic region (near the head) when horses were ridden in sitting trot.
  • The researchers concluded that the kinematics of the caudal thoracic and lumbar spine are influenced by the presence and weight of a rider, with lateral bending reduced in the cranial thoracic region when the horse is ridden.

Implications of the Study

  • These findings are of high relevance for dressage training and performance evaluations. The changes in movement when a rider is present underscore the need to monitor horses during ridden exercise when assessing them for potential performance issues.
  • By understanding how a rider’s weight and positioning impact a horse’s movement, trainers and veterinarians can adopt better strategies to optimize performance and maintain the health and welfare of the horse.

The study’s in-depth look at the effects of riding on a horse’s rotational movement provides a valuable contribution to the knowledge and practice of horse training and dressage competition preparation.

Cite This Article

APA
MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. (2021). Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting. PLoS One, 16(5), e0251144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251144

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Pages: e0251144

Researcher Affiliations

MacKechnie-Guire, Russell
  • Centaur Biomechanics, Moreton Morrell, Warwickshire, United Kingdom.
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Pfau, Thilo
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Lumbosacral Region / physiology
  • Male
  • Rotation
  • Running / physiology
  • Thorax / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

TP is director of EquiGait Ltd providing gait analysis products and services. RMG is director of Centaur Biomechanics These affiliations does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Henson F. Equine Neck and Back Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment. 2018; Second Edition.
  2. Audigie F, Degueurce C, Denoix J, Geiger D. Kinematics of the equine back: flexion-extension movements in sound trotting horses. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 1999;30:210–3.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05219.xpubmed: 10659253google scholar: lookup
  3. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt H, van Weeren R, Roepstorff l, Barneveld A. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses during trotting on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2001;62(5):757–64.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.757pubmed: 11341399google scholar: lookup
  4. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardv H, Van Weeren P, Roepstorfr L, Barneveld A. Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine spine during canter. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2001;33(33):145–9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05378.xpubmed: 11721556google scholar: lookup
  5. Faber M, Schamhardt H, van Weeren R, Johnston C, Roepstorff L, Barneveld A. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses walking on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61(4).
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.399pubmed: 10772104google scholar: lookup
  6. Gómez-Alvarez CB, Wennerstrand J, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, Johnston C, Back W. The effect of induced forelimb lameness on thoracolumbar kinematics during treadmill locomotion. Equine Veterinary Journal 2007;39(3):197–201.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x173668pubmed: 17520968google scholar: lookup
  7. Gomez Alvarez CB, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, Johnston C, Back W, van Weeren PR. The effect of induced hindlimb lameness on thoracolumbar kinematics during treadmill locomotion. Equine Veterinary Journal 2008;40(2):147–52.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X250184pubmed: 18089465google scholar: lookup
  8. Jeffcott L. Natural rigidity of the horse’s backbone. Equine Veterinary Journal 1980;12(101–108).
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb03393.xpubmed: 6447593google scholar: lookup
  9. Clayton H, Lanovaz J, Schamhardt H, Wessum R. The effects of a rider’s mass on ground reaction forces and fetlock kinematics at the trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1999;30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05165.xpubmed: 10659255google scholar: lookup
  10. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Rhodin M. Influence of seating styles on head and pelvic vertical movement symmetry in horses ridden at trot. PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0195341.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195341pmc: PMC5886531pubmed: 29621299google scholar: lookup
  11. Heim C, Pfau T, Gerber V, Schweizer C, Doherr M, Schupbach-Regula G. Determination of vertebral range of motion using inertial measurement units in 27 Franches-Montagnes stallions and comparison between conditions and with a mixed population. Equine Veterinary Journal 2016;48(4):509–16.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12455pubmed: 25919410google scholar: lookup
  12. Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Rhodin M, Byström A, Johnston C, Weeren PR. Kinetics and kinematics of the horse comparing left and right rising trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(3):292–6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x397127pubmed: 19469238google scholar: lookup
  13. de Cocq P, Prinsen H, Springer NCN, Weeren PR, Schreuder M, Muller M. The effect of rising and sitting trot on back movements and head-neck position of the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(5):423–7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x371387pubmed: 19642400google scholar: lookup
  14. Gomez alvarez C, RM, F Bobbert M, Meyeri H, Weishaupts M, Johnston C, Van Weeren P. The effect of head and neck position on the thoracolumbar kinematics in the unridden horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2006;36:445–51.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05585.xpubmed: 17402464google scholar: lookup
  15. Martin P, Cheze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Chateau H. Effects of the rider on the kinematics of the equine spine under the saddle during the trot using inertial measurement units: Methodological study and preliminary results. Vet Journal 2017;221:6–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.12.018pubmed: 28283082google scholar: lookup
  16. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor. Journal of Experimental Biology 2005;208(Pt 13):2503–14.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658pubmed: 15961737google scholar: lookup
  17. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Reducing peak pressures under the saddle panel at the level of the 10th to 13th thoracic vertebrae may be associated with improved gait features, even when saddles are fitted to published guidelines. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;54:60–9.
  18. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Girth pressure measurements reveal high peak pressures that can be avoided using an alternative girth design that also results in increased limb protraction and flexion in the swing phase. Vet Journal 2013;198(1):92–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.028pubmed: 23973365google scholar: lookup
  19. Warner S, Koch T, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2010(38):417–24.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00200.xpubmed: 21059039google scholar: lookup
  20. Starke S, Witte T, May S, Pfau T. Accuracy and precision of hind limb foot contact timings of horses determined using a pelvis-mounted inertial measurement unit. Journal of Biomechanics 2012;45(8):1522–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.014pubmed: 22483227google scholar: lookup
  21. Martin P, Chateau H, Pourcelot P, Duray L, Cheze L. Comparison Between Inertial Sensors and Motion Capture System to Quantify Flexion‐Extension Motion in the Back of a Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2014; (46).
  22. Rhodin M, Álvarez C, Byström A, Johnston C, Weeren P, Roepstorff L. The effect of different head and neck positions on the caudal back and hindlimb kinematics in the elite dressage horse at trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(3):274–9.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x394436pubmed: 19469235google scholar: lookup
  23. Goff L, Van Weeren P, Jeffcott L, Condie P, McGowan C. Quantification of equine sacral and iliac motion during gait: a comparison between motion capture with skin-mounted and bone-fixated sensors. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2010(38):468–74.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00204.xpubmed: 21059047google scholar: lookup
  24. de Cocq P, van Weeren R, Back W. Effects of girth, saddle and weight on movements of the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2004;36.
    pubmed: 15656511
  25. Peham C, Licka T, Schobesberger H, Meschan E. Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait. Human Movement Science 2004;23(5):663–71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006pubmed: 15589627google scholar: lookup
  26. Pfau T, Simons V, Rombach N, Stubbs N, Weller R. Effect of a 4-week elastic resistance band training regimen on back kinematics in horses trotting in-hand and on the lunge. Equine Veterinary Journal 2017;49(6):829–35.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12690pubmed: 28432739google scholar: lookup
  27. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher M, Hargreaves S, Pfau T. The Effect That Induced Rider Asymmetry Has on Equine Locomotion and the Range of Motion of the Thoracolumbar Spine When Ridden in Rising Trot. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2020;88:102946.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102946pubmed: 32303298google scholar: lookup
  28. Bertram JEA, Gutmann A. Motions of the running horse and cheetah revisited: fundamental mechanics of the transverse and rotary gallop. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 2008;6(35):549–59.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0328pmc: PMC2696142pubmed: 18854295google scholar: lookup
  29. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of tree width on thoracolumbar and limb kinematics, saddle pressure distribution, and thoracolumbar dimensions in sports horses in trot and canter. Animals (Basel) 2019;9(10).
    pmc: PMC6827167pubmed: 31640213
  30. Martin P, Cheze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Chateau H. Effect of the rider position during rising trot on the horses biomechanics (back and trunk kinematics and pressure under the saddle). Journal of Biomechanics 2016;49(7):1027–33.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.016pubmed: 26947029google scholar: lookup
  31. Martin P, Cheze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Chateau H. Effects of Large Saddle Panels on the Biomechanics of the Equine Back During Rising Trot: Preliminary Results. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;48:15–22.
  32. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral spine in high-level dressage horses ridden in a straight line, in sitting trot and seated canter compared to in-hand trot. Animals 2021;11(3).
    pmc: PMC8003829pubmed: 33804702
  33. Álvarez CBG, Rhodin M, Byström A, Back W, Weeren PR. Back kinematics of healthy trotting horses during treadmill versus over ground locomotion. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(3):297–300.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x397370pubmed: 19469239google scholar: lookup
  34. Buchner H, Savelberg H, Schamhardt H, Merkens H, Barneveld A. Kinematics of treadmill versus overground locomotion in horses. Veterinary Quarterly 1994;16(sup2):87–90.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.1994.9694509pubmed: 7801509google scholar: lookup
  35. Johnston C, Holm K, Faber M, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Effect of conformational aspects on the movement of the equine back. Vet Clin North American Equine Pract 2002;34(314–8).
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05439.xpubmed: 12405707google scholar: lookup
  36. Clayton H. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, working, medium and extended trot in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994;26:230–4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04375.xpubmed: 8542844google scholar: lookup
  37. Clayton H. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, working, medium and extended trot in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994;26(3):230–4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04375.xpubmed: 8542844google scholar: lookup
  38. Gandy EA, Bondi A, Hogg R, Pigott TMC. A preliminary investigation of the use of inertial sensing technology for the measurement of hip rotation asymmetry in horse riders. Sports Technology 2014;7(1–2):79–88.
  39. Gunst S, Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Roepstorff C, Latif S, Klaassen B. Influence of Functional Rider and Horse Asymmetries on Saddle Force Distribution During Stance and in Sitting Trot. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;78:20–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.215pubmed: 31203980google scholar: lookup
  40. Walker A, Applegate C, Pfau T, Sparkes E, Wilson A, Witte T. The kinematics and kinetics of riding a racehorse: A quantitative comparison of a training simulator and real horses. Journal of Biomechanics 2016;49(14):3368–74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.031pubmed: 27622974google scholar: lookup
  41. Munz A, Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding. Human Movement Science 2014;33:227–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003pubmed: 24290612google scholar: lookup
  42. Johnston C, Roethlisberger Holm K, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Kinematic Evaluation of the Back in Fully Functioning Riding Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2004;36(6):495–8.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044877431pubmed: 15460073google scholar: lookup
  43. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 2007;12(5):464–74.
    pubmed: 17712716
  44. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses, Equus caballus. Animal Behaviour 2012;83(1):239–47.
  45. Bystrom A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Braganca FS. Asymmetries of horses walking and trotting on treadmill with and without rider. Equine Veterinary Journal 2020.
    pubmed: 32125717
  46. Bystrom A, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Braganca FS, Hernlund E. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk. PLoS One 2018;13(9):e0204548.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204548pmc: PMC6160136pubmed: 30261019google scholar: lookup
  47. Clayton HMS B, Egenvall A. Rein tension asymmetries when riding a horse simulator. Compartive Exercise Physiology 2017;13:237–42.
  48. Engell M, Hernlund, Egenvall A, Clayton H, Roepstorff L. Does foot pronation in unmounted horseback riders affect pelvicmovement during walking?. Compartive Exercise Physiology 2016;11:231–7.
  49. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne R. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans. Animal Cognition 2010;13(2):229–38.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  50. Geutjens C, Clayton H, Kaiser L. Forces and pressures beneath the saddle during mounting from the ground and from a raised mounting platform. Veterinary Journal 2008;175(3):332–7.
    pubmed: 17572121
  51. Lucidi P, Bacco G, Sticco M, Mazzoleni G, Benvenuti M, Bernabò N. Assessment of motor laterality in foals and young horses (Equus caballus) through an analysis of derailment at trot. Physiology & Behavior 2013;109:8–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.006pubmed: 23201413google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.