FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Effects of Starch Overload and Cecal Buffering on Fecal Micr...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(23); 3435; doi: 10.3390/ani12233435

Effects of Starch Overload and Cecal Buffering on Fecal Microbiota of Horses.

Abstract: Starch overload in horses causes gastrointestinal and metabolic disorders that are associated with microbiota changes. Therefore, we identified the fecal microbiota and hypothesized that intracecal injection of alkaline solution (buffer; Mg(OH)2 + Al(OH)3) could stabilize these microbiota and clinical changes in horses submitted to corn starch overload. Ten crossbred horses (females and geldings) were allocated to group I (water−saline and starch−buffer treatments) and group II (water−buffer and starch−saline treatments). Clinical signs, gross analysis of the feces, and fecal microbiota were evaluated through 72 h (T0; T8; T12; T24; T48; T72). Corn starch or water were administrated by nasogastric tube at T0, and the buffer injected into the cecum at T8 in starch−buffer and water−buffer treatments. Starch overload reduced the richness (p < 0.001) and diversity (p = 0.001) of the fecal microbiota. However, the starch−buffer treatment showed greater increase in amylolytic bacteria (Bifidobacterium 0.0% to 5.6%; Lactobacillus 0.1% to 7.4%; p < 0.05) and decrease in fibrolytic bacteria (Lachnospiraceae 10.2% to 5.0%; Ruminococcaceae 11.7% to 4.2%; p 0.5; fribolytic r < 0.1; p < 0.05), showing that cecal infusion of buffer did not prevent, but intensified intestinal disturbances and the risk of laminitis.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-12-06 PubMed ID: 36496956PubMed Central: PMC9737938DOI: 10.3390/ani12233435Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the effect of starch overload on the gastrointestinal health of horses, and evaluates the impact of a buffering solution in mitigating these effects. The study found that while the buffer increased certain types of gut bacteria, it also intensified some negative effects associated with starch overload, such as intestinal disturbances and laminitis.

Research Design and Participants

  • Researchers used ten crossbred horses (both females and geldings) for this study.
  • The horses were divided into two groups, Group I (water-saline and starch-buffer treatments) and Group II (water-buffer and starch-saline treatments).
  • Observations and evaluations were carried out on the horses over a period of 72 hours, at several time intervals.

Experiment Procedure

  • At time T0, corn starch or water was administered to the horses through a nasogastric tube. This was done to simulate a condition of starch overload.
  • At the 8-hour mark (T8), a buffer was injected into the cecum, part of the large intestine, for horses under the starch-buffer and water-buffer treatments. This buffer comprised of an alkaline solution using magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide.

Findings

  • The administration of starch resulted in a significant decrease in the richness and diversity of the fecal microbiota of the horses.
  • In comparison with the starch-saline treatment, the starch-buffer treatment led to a more marked increase in amylolytic (starch-digesting) bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus.
  • Simultaneously, there was a decrease in fibrolytic (fiber-digesting) bacteria like Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae following the starch-buffer treatment.
  • The buffer, while instigating changes in the microbiota, did not guard against negative outcomes; horses under the starch-buffer treatment displayed more signs of abdominal discomfort and lameness linked to dysbiosis, an imbalance in the gut microbiota.
  • The changes induced by the buffer hence did not serve as a protective measure against the effects of starch overload, but instead appeared to exacerbate some of the adverse effects such as intestinal disturbances and increased risk of laminitis, a painful hoof condition.

Cite This Article

APA
Bustamante CC, de Paula VB, Rabelo IP, Fernandes CC, Kishi LT, Canola PA, Lemos EGM, Valadão CAA. (2022). Effects of Starch Overload and Cecal Buffering on Fecal Microbiota of Horses. Animals (Basel), 12(23), 3435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233435

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 23
PII: 3435

Researcher Affiliations

Bustamante, Caio C
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
de Paula, Vanessa B
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Rabelo, Isabela P
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Fernandes, Camila C
  • Department of Technology, Multiuse Sequencing Laboratory, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Kishi, Luciano T
  • Department of Technology, Multiuse Sequencing Laboratory, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Canola, Paulo A
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Lemos, Eliana Gertrudes de M
  • Department of Technology, Biochemistry of Microorganisms and Plants Laboratory, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Valadão, Carlos Augusto A
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.

Grant Funding

  • 201524860-4 / Su00e3o Paulo Research Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 67 references
  1. Grimm P, Julliand V, Philippeau C, Sadet-Bourgeteau S. Effect of yeast supplementation on hindgut microbiota and digestibility of horses subjected to an abrupt change of hays.. Livest. Sci. 2016;186:34–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.022google scholar: lookup
  2. Milinovich GJ, Klieve AV, Pollitt CC, Trott DJ. Microbial events in the hindgut during carbohydrate-induced equine laminitis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Apr;26(1):79-94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.01.007pubmed: 20381737google scholar: lookup
  3. Kamada N, Seo SU, Chen GY, Núñez G. Role of the gut microbiota in immunity and inflammatory disease.. Nat Rev Immunol 2013 May;13(5):321-35.
    doi: 10.1038/nri3430pubmed: 23618829google scholar: lookup
  4. Manfredo Vieira S, Hiltensperger M, Kumar V, Zegarra-Ruiz D, Dehner C, Khan N, Costa FRC, Tiniakou E, Greiling T, Ruff W, Barbieri A, Kriegel C, Mehta SS, Knight JR, Jain D, Goodman AL, Kriegel MA. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans.. Science 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1156-1161.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aar7201pmc: PMC5959731pubmed: 29590047google scholar: lookup
  5. Costa MC, Weese JS. Understanding the Intestinal Microbiome in Health and Disease.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018 Apr;34(1):1-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.005pubmed: 29402480google scholar: lookup
  6. Garber A, Hastie P, Murray JA. Factors Influencing Equine Gut Microbiota: Current Knowledge.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 May;88:102943.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102943pubmed: 32303307google scholar: lookup
  7. Al Jassim RA, Andrews FM. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009 Aug;25(2):199-215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.04.005pubmed: 19580934google scholar: lookup
  8. Stewart HL, Pitta D, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Hennessy ML, Engiles JB, Southwood LL. Changes in the faecal bacterial microbiota during hospitalisation of horses with colic and the effect of different causes of colic.. Equine Vet J 2021 Nov;53(6):1119-1131.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13389pubmed: 33222287google scholar: lookup
  9. Moreau MM, Eades SC, Reinemeyer CR, Fugaro MN, Onishi JC. Illumina sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region 16S rRNA gene reveals extensive changes in bacterial communities in the cecum following carbohydrate oral infusion and development of early-stage acute laminitis in the horse.. Vet Microbiol 2014 Jan 31;168(2-4):436-41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.017pubmed: 24355533google scholar: lookup
  10. Garner HE, Moore JN, Johnson JH, Clark L, Amend JF, Tritschler LG, Coffmann JR, Sprouse RF, Hutcheson DP, Salem CA. Changes in the caecal flora associated with the onset of laminitis.. Equine Vet J 1978 Oct;10(4):249-52.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1978.tb02273.xpubmed: 738266google scholar: lookup
  11. Costa R.S., Botteon P.T., Ferraz V., Leme F.O.P., Faleiros R.R., Alves G.E.S.. Variações plasmáticas de aminas vasoativas em equinos sob efeito de sobrecarga de carboidratos e anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais.. Ciência Anim. Bras. 2012;13:93–98.
    doi: 10.5216/cab.v13i1.6970google scholar: lookup
  12. Warzecha CM, Coverdale JA, Janecka JE, Leatherwood JL, Pinchak WE, Wickersham TA, McCann JC. Influence of short-term dietary starch inclusion on the equine cecal microbiome.. J Anim Sci 2017 Nov;95(11):5077-5090.
    doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1754pmc: PMC6095290pubmed: 29293739google scholar: lookup
  13. Van den Berg M, Hoskin S.O., Rogers C.W., Grinberg A. Fecal pH and microbial populations in thoroughbred horses during transition from pasture to concentrate feeding.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:215–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.06.004google scholar: lookup
  14. Goodson J, Tyznik WJ, Cline JH, Dehority BA. Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the cecum of the pony.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988 Aug;54(8):1946-50.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.54.8.1946-1950.1988pmc: PMC202784pubmed: 3178206google scholar: lookup
  15. Harris P, Dunnett C. Nutritional tips for veterinarians.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2018;30:486–496.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12657google scholar: lookup
  16. Miller JK, Brzezinska-Slebodzinska E, Madsen FC. Oxidative stress, antioxidants, and animal function.. J Dairy Sci 1993 Sep;76(9):2812-23.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77620-1pubmed: 8227685google scholar: lookup
  17. Julliand V, Grimm P. The Impact of Diet on the Hindgut Microbiome.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;52:23–28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.03.002google scholar: lookup
  18. Biddle AS, Black SJ, Blanchard JL. An in vitro model of the horse gut microbiome enables identification of lactate-utilizing bacteria that differentially respond to starch induction.. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e77599.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077599pmc: PMC3788102pubmed: 24098591google scholar: lookup
  19. Kuhl J, Winterhoff N, Wulf M, Schweigert FJ, Schwendenwein I, Bruckmaier RM, Aurich JE, Kutzer P, Aurich C. Changes in faecal bacteria and metabolic parameters in foals during the first six weeks of life.. Vet Microbiol 2011 Aug 5;151(3-4):321-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.017pubmed: 21511405google scholar: lookup
  20. Daly K, Proudman CJ, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Dyer J, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease.. Br J Nutr 2012 Apr;107(7):989-95.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003825pubmed: 21816118google scholar: lookup
  21. Park T, Cheong H, Yoon J, Kim A, Yun Y, Unno T. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota of Horses with Intestinal Disease and Their Healthy Counterparts.. Vet Sci 2021 Jun 17;8(6).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci8060113pmc: PMC8234941pubmed: 34204317google scholar: lookup
  22. Maton PN, Burton ME. Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use.. Drugs 1999 Jun;57(6):855-70.
    doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00003pubmed: 10400401google scholar: lookup
  23. Ahmed AE, Constable PD, Misk NA. Effect of an orally administered antacid agent containing aluminum hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide on abomasal luminal pH in clinically normal milk-fed calves.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002 Jan 1;220(1):74-9.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.74pubmed: 12680452google scholar: lookup
  24. Clark CK, Merritt AM, Burrow JA, Steible CK. Effect of aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide antacid and bismuth subsalicylate on gastric pH in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996 May 15;208(10):1687-91.
    pubmed: 8641951
  25. Tillotson K, Traub-Dargatz JL. Gastrointestinal protectants and cathartics.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2003 Dec;19(3):599-615.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2003.08.008pubmed: 14740759google scholar: lookup
  26. McGorum B.C., Pirie R.S.. Antimicrobial associated diarrhoea in the horse. Part 1: Overview; pathogenesis; and risk factors.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2009;21:610–616.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X476871google scholar: lookup
  27. Maia M.A., Botteon P.T.L., Spindola B.F., Botteon R.C.C.M.. Alteration of the fecal pH of the equines by oral administration of alkalizing agents.. Braz. J. Vet. Med. 2017;39:1–6.
    doi: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm017google scholar: lookup
  28. Uribe Diaz A.P., Santana A.E., Valadão C.A.A., Souza A.H.. Canulação cecal em equinos.. Ciência Anim. Bras. 2010;11:357–362.
    doi: 10.5216/cab.v11i2.1206google scholar: lookup
  29. Santos T.M., Almeida F.Q., Godoi F.N., Silva V.P., França A.B., Santiago J.M., Santos C.S.. Capacidade tamponante; pH e consistência das fezes em equinos submetidos à sobrecarga dietética com amido.. Ciência Rural. 2009;39:1782–1788.
    doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782009005000123google scholar: lookup
  30. Berg EL, Fu CJ, Porter JH, Kerley MS. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation in the yearling horse: effects on fecal pH, microbial content, and volatile fatty acid concentrations.. J Anim Sci 2005 Jul;83(7):1549-53.
    doi: 10.2527/2005.8371549xpubmed: 15956463google scholar: lookup
  31. Obel N. Studies on the Histopathology of Acute Laminitis.. 1948.
  32. Stewart AS, Pratt-Phillips S, Gonzalez LM. Alterations in Intestinal Permeability: The Role of the "Leaky Gut" in Health and Disease.. J Equine Vet Sci 2017 May;52:10-22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.02.009pmc: PMC6467570pubmed: 31000910google scholar: lookup
  33. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4516-22.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107pmc: PMC3063599pubmed: 20534432google scholar: lookup
  34. Fernandes CC, Kishi LT, Lopes EM, Omori WP, Souza JAM, Alves LMC, Lemos EGM. Bacterial communities in mining soils and surrounding areas under regeneration process in a former ore mine.. Braz J Microbiol 2018 Jul-Sep;49(3):489-502.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.006pmc: PMC6066727pubmed: 29452849google scholar: lookup
  35. Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis.. Nucleic Acids Res 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D633-42.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244pmc: PMC3965039pubmed: 24288368google scholar: lookup
  36. Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data.. Nucleic Acids Res 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W180-W188.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx295pmc: PMC5570177pubmed: 28449106google scholar: lookup
  37. Lerner A, Aminov R, Matthias T. Dysbiosis May Trigger Autoimmune Diseases via Inappropriate Post-Translational Modification of Host Proteins.. Front Microbiol 2016;7:84.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00084pmc: PMC4742538pubmed: 26903965google scholar: lookup
  38. Elzinga S.E., Weese J.S., Adams A.A.. Comparison of the fecal microbiota in horses with Equine Metabolic Syndrome and metabolically normal controls fed a similar all-forage diet.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;44:9–16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.05.010google scholar: lookup
  39. Garner HE, Coffman JR, Hahn AW, Hutcheson DP, Tumbleson ME. Equine laminitis of alimentary origin: an experimental model.. Am J Vet Res 1975 Apr;36(4 Pt.1):441-4.
    pubmed: 1124880
  40. Morrison PK, Newbold CJ, Jones E, Worgan HJ, Grove-White DH, Dugdale AH, Barfoot C, Harris PA, Argo CM. The Equine Gastrointestinal Microbiome: Impacts of Age and Obesity.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:3017.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03017pmc: PMC6293011pubmed: 30581426google scholar: lookup
  41. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Geor RJ, Nielsen BD, Schott HC 2nd, Elzinga S, Newbold CJ. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87424.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087424pmc: PMC3913607pubmed: 24504261google scholar: lookup
  42. Bulmer LS, Murray JA, Burns NM, Garber A, Wemelsfelder F, McEwan NR, Hastie PM. High-starch diets alter equine faecal microbiota and increase behavioural reactivity.. Sci Rep 2019 Dec 9;9(1):18621.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54039-8pmc: PMC6901590pubmed: 31819069google scholar: lookup
  43. Coenen M, Vervuert I. A minimum of roughage and a maximum of starch necessary benchmarks for equine diets.. Pferdeheilkunde. 2010;26:147–151.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20100204google scholar: lookup
  44. Picard C, Fioramonti J, Francois A, Robinson T, Neant F, Matuchansky C. Review article: bifidobacteria as probiotic agents -- physiological effects and clinical benefits.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 Sep 15;22(6):495-512.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.xpubmed: 16167966google scholar: lookup
  45. Wang W, Chen L, Zhou R, Wang X, Song L, Huang S, Wang G, Xia B. Increased proportions of Bifidobacterium and the Lactobacillus group and loss of butyrate-producing bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease.. J Clin Microbiol 2014 Feb;52(2):398-406.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.01500-13pmc: PMC3911339pubmed: 24478468google scholar: lookup
  46. Million M, Tidjani Alou M, Khelaifia S, Bachar D, Lagier JC, Dione N, Brah S, Hugon P, Lombard V, Armougom F, Fromonot J, Robert C, Michelle C, Diallo A, Fabre A, Guieu R, Sokhna C, Henrissat B, Parola P, Raoult D. Increased Gut Redox and Depletion of Anaerobic and Methanogenic Prokaryotes in Severe Acute Malnutrition.. Sci Rep 2016 May 17;6:26051.
    doi: 10.1038/srep26051pmc: PMC4869025pubmed: 27183876google scholar: lookup
  47. Van Soest P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant.. 2nd ed. Cornell University Press; London, UK: 1994. pp. 230–289.
  48. Milani C, Lugli GA, Duranti S, Turroni F, Mancabelli L, Ferrario C, Mangifesta M, Hevia A, Viappiani A, Scholz M, Arioli S, Sanchez B, Lane J, Ward DV, Hickey R, Mora D, Segata N, Margolles A, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacteria exhibit social behavior through carbohydrate resource sharing in the gut.. Sci Rep 2015 Oct 28;5:15782.
    doi: 10.1038/srep15782pmc: PMC4623478pubmed: 26506949google scholar: lookup
  49. O'Callaghan A, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria and Their Role as Members of the Human Gut Microbiota.. Front Microbiol 2016;7:925.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925pmc: PMC4908950pubmed: 27379055google scholar: lookup
  50. Geor RJ. Current concepts on the pathophysiology of pasture-associated laminitis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Aug;26(2):265-76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.06.001pubmed: 20699174google scholar: lookup
  51. Kim KA, Jeong JJ, Yoo SY, Kim DH. Gut microbiota lipopolysaccharide accelerates inflamm-aging in mice.. BMC Microbiol 2016 Jan 16;16:9.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0625-7pmc: PMC4715324pubmed: 26772806google scholar: lookup
  52. McCall IC, Betanzos A, Weber DA, Nava P, Miller GW, Parkos CA. Effects of phenol on barrier function of a human intestinal epithelial cell line correlate with altered tight junction protein localization.. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009 Nov 15;241(1):61-70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.002pmc: PMC2877281pubmed: 19679145google scholar: lookup
  53. Jakobsson HE, Rodríguez-Piñeiro AM, Schütte A, Ermund A, Boysen P, Bemark M, Sommer F, Bäckhed F, Hansson GC, Johansson ME. The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier.. EMBO Rep 2015 Feb;16(2):164-77.
    doi: 10.15252/embr.201439263pmc: PMC4328744pubmed: 25525071google scholar: lookup
  54. Hankel J, Mößeler A, Hartung CB, Rath S, Schulten L, Visscher C, Kamphues J, Vital M. Responses of Ileal and Fecal Microbiota to Withdrawal of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in a Porcine Model of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency.. Int J Mol Sci 2022 Oct 2;23(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms231911700pmc: PMC9570030pubmed: 36233002google scholar: lookup
  55. Pryde SE, Duncan SH, Hold GL, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 Dec 17;217(2):133-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.xpubmed: 12480096google scholar: lookup
  56. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0154037.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154037pmc: PMC4851386pubmed: 27128793google scholar: lookup
  57. Ze X, Le Mougen F, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. Some are more equal than others: the role of "keystone" species in the degradation of recalcitrant substrates.. Gut Microbes 2013 May-Jun;4(3):236-40.
    doi: 10.4161/gmic.23998pmc: PMC3669169pubmed: 23549436google scholar: lookup
  58. Belknap JK, Black SJ. Sepsis-related laminitis.. Equine Vet J 2012 Nov;44(6):738-40.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00668.xpubmed: 23106625google scholar: lookup
  59. Lopes MA, White NA 2nd, Donaldson L, Crisman MV, Ward DL. Effects of enteral and intravenous fluid therapy, magnesium sulfate, and sodium sulfate on colonic contents and feces in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2004 May;65(5):695-704.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.695pubmed: 15141893google scholar: lookup
  60. Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation.. Cell 2014 Mar 27;157(1):121-41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011pmc: PMC4056765pubmed: 24679531google scholar: lookup
  61. Hintz HF, Schryver HF. Magnesium metabolism in the horse.. J Anim Sci 1972 Oct;35(4):755-9.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1972.354755xpubmed: 5075819google scholar: lookup
  62. Schryver HF, Parker MT, Daniluk PD, Pagan KI, Williams J, Soderholm LV, Hintz HF. Salt consumption and the effect of salt on mineral metabolism in horses.. Cornell Vet 1987 Apr;77(2):122-31.
    pubmed: 3568683
  63. Hintz HF, Cymbaluk NF. Nutrition of the horse.. Annu Rev Nutr 1994;14:243-67.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.14.070194.001331pubmed: 7946520google scholar: lookup
  64. Franzan BC, Coelho IDS, de Souza MT, Santos MMM, de Almeida FQ, Silva VP. Fecal Microbiome Responses to Sudden Diet Change in Mangalarga Marchador horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022 Jan;108:103803.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103803pubmed: 34864510google scholar: lookup
  65. Blackmore TM, Dugdale A, Argo CM, Curtis G, Pinloche E, Harris PA, Worgan HJ, Girdwood SE, Dougal K, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR. Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies.. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e75079.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075079pmc: PMC3770578pubmed: 24040388google scholar: lookup
  66. Shepherd ML, Swecker WS Jr, Jensen RV, Ponder MA. Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2012 Jan;326(1):62-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02434.xpubmed: 22092776google scholar: lookup
  67. Almeida ML, Feringer WH Júnior, Carvalho JR, Rodrigues IM, Jordão LR, Fonseca MG, Carneiro de Rezende AS, de Queiroz Neto A, Weese JS, Costa MC, Lemos EG, Ferraz GC. Intense Exercise and Aerobic Conditioning Associated with Chromium or L-Carnitine Supplementation Modified the Fecal Microbiota of Fillies.. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0167108.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167108pmc: PMC5147854pubmed: 27935992google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.