Equine digital tendons show breed-specific differences in their mechanical properties that may relate to athletic ability and predisposition to injury.
Abstract: Throughout the ages, human subjects have selected horse breeds for their locomotor capacities. Concurrently, tissue properties may have diversified because of specific requirements of different disciplines. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of tendons with different functions between equine breeds traditionally selected for racing or sport. Methods: This study used ex vivo tendons and compared the mechanical properties of the common digital extensor tendon (CDET) and superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) between racehorses (Thoroughbred [TB]) and sports horses (Friesian Horse [FH], Warmblood [WB]). Methods: The SDFT and CDET of FH (n = 12), WBs (n = 12) and TBs (n = 8) aged 3-12 years were harvested. The cross sectional area (cm2 ), maximal load (N), ultimate strain (%), ultimate stress (MPa) and elastic modulus (MPa) were determined and tested for significant differences between the breeds (P<0.05). Results: The SDFT from WB horses had a significantly lower elastic modulus than TB horses and failed at a higher strain and load than both FHs and TBs. The mechanical properties of the CDET did not differ between breeds. In agreement with previous studies, the CDET failed at a higher stress and had a higher elastic modulus than the SDFT and, for the WB group of horses only, failed at a significantly lower strain. Interestingly, the mode of failure differed between breeds, particularly with respect to the FHs. Conclusions: The exercise history of horses used in this study was unknown and the age-range was relatively large; both these factors may have influenced the absolute properties reported in this study. Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that mechanical properties of the SDFT differ between breeds. These properties are likely to be related to selection for high-speed vs. an extravagant elastic gait and may be an important indicator of performance ability. The Summary is available in Spanish - see Supporting Information.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study investigates the mechanical properties of tendons in different horse breeds and finds that these properties, which are likely resulted from selective breeding for certain athletic abilities, differ between breeds.
Objective of the Research
The main goal of the study is to examine the differences in the biomechanical properties of tendons in different horse breeds, particularly in those breeds selected traditionally for racing or sport. This investigation focuses on the common digital extensor tendon (CDET) and superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT).
Methods Used in the Research
The study used ex vivo tendons taken from three horse breeds: Thoroughbred (TB), Friesian Horse (FH), and Warmblood (WB). A total of 8 TBs, 12 FHs, and 12 WBs, aged between 3 to 12 in years, were involved in the study.
The biomechanical properties studied include the cross-sectional area, maximum load, ultimate strain, ultimate stress, and elastic modulus. These properties were obtained for each tendon type in each breed, with statistical significance tested.
Findings of the Study
The research found that the SDFT from WB horses had a lower elastic modulus than TB horses and failed at a higher strain and load than both FHs and TBs. However, the mechanical properties of the CDET were not significantly different between breeds.
On comparison between the tendons, the CDET generally failed at a higher stress and had a higher elastic modulus than the SDFT. Especially for the WB horses, the CDET failed at a lower strain.
Interestingly, the mode of tendon failure differed among the horse breeds, with marked differences in the FH breed.
The study acknowledges some constraints in their results may be due to the unknown exercise history of the horses used and the relatively large age-range. Both these factors could potentially influence the observed tendon properties.
Conclusions Drawn from the Study
The study concludes that the biomechanical properties of the SDFT indeed differ between horse breeds. This variance is attributed to selective breeding for high speed in some breeds versus extravagant elastic gait in others, and these properties may serve as important indicators of performance capabilities.
Cite This Article
APA
Verkade ME, Back W, Birch HL.
(2019).
Equine digital tendons show breed-specific differences in their mechanical properties that may relate to athletic ability and predisposition to injury.
Equine Vet J, 52(2), 320-325.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13169
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Back, W
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Birch, H L
Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, London, UK.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Breeding
Horses
Sports
Tendon Injuries / veterinary
Tendons
References
This article includes 38 references
Kastelic J, Galeski A, Baer E. The multicomposite structure of tendon.. Connect. Tissue Res. 6, 11-23.
Tsuzaki M, Yamauchi M, Banes AJ. Tendon collagens: Extracellular matrix composition in shear stress and tensile components of flexor tendons.. Connect. Tissue Res. 29, 141-152.
Van Riet MI, Van den Belt AJM, Back W. Retrospective study of tendon and ligament distal limb injuries detected using ultrasound in Friesian horses admitted to an university hospital (2002-2012).. Proc. Voorjaarsdagen Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2.
Goodship AE, Birch HL. Cross sectional area measurement of tendon and ligament in vitro: a simple, rapid, non-destructive technique.. J. Biomech. 38, 605-608.
Dyson S. Lameness and poor performance in the sport horse: Dressage, show jumping and horse trials.. J Equine Vet Sci. 22, 145-150.
Crişan MI, Damian A, Ştefănuţ LC, Dezdrobitu CC, Neagu DM, Denoix J. Global Epidemiological Analysis of Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With the Deep Digital Flexor Tendinopathy in the Equine Distal Limb: 100 Cases.. J Equine Vet Sci. 67, 55-60.
Sallent I, Leon Lopez A, Aguirre-Álvarez G, Zeugolis DI. Assessing the Potential of Caprine Collagen Type I in the Development of Medical Devices. Biomacromolecules 2025 Oct 13;26(10):6418-6429.
Najeb M, Samy A, Rizk A, Mosbah E, Karrouf G. Clinical benefits of early-stage autologous conditioned serum and injectable platelet-rich fibrin on healing superficial digital flexor tendonitis in donkeys. Ir Vet J 2025 Jun 7;78(1):13.