Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2010; 237(12); 1395-1401; doi: 10.2460/javma.237.12.1395

Evaluation of a postexposure rabies prophylaxis protocol for domestic animals in Texas: 2000-2009.

Abstract: To determine whether postexposure rabies prophylaxis (PEP) in domestic animals, as mandated in Texas, has continued to be effective and to evaluate preexposure or postexposure vaccination failures from 2000 through 2009. Methods: Retrospective case series. Methods: 1,014 unvaccinated domestic animals (769 dogs, 126 cats, 72 horses, 39 cattle, 3 sheep, 4 goats, and 1 llama) that received PEP and 12 vaccinated domestic animals (7 dogs and 5 cats) with possible failure of protection. Methods: Zoonotic incident reports from 2000 through 2009 were reviewed for information regarding unvaccinated domestic animals that received PEP in accordance with the state protocol after exposure to a laboratory-confirmed rabid animal; reports also were reviewed for any preexposure or postexposure vaccination failures. The state-required PEP protocol was as follows: immediately vaccinate the animal against rabies, isolate the animal for 90 days, and administer booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period. Results: From 2000 through 2009, 1,014 animals received PEP; no failures were recorded. One preexposure vaccination failure was recorded. Conclusions: The Texas PEP protocol was used during the 10-year period. Results indicated that an effective PEP protocol for unvaccinated domestic animals exposed to rabies was immediate vaccination against rabies, a strict isolation period of 90 days, and administration of booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period.
Publication Date: 2010-12-16 PubMed ID: 21155679DOI: 10.2460/javma.237.12.1395Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article evaluates the effectiveness of postexposure rabies prophylaxis (PEP) protocol for domestic animals in Texas from 2000 to 2009.

Introduction

  • The study aims to ascertain the effectiveness of the mandated rabies PEP protocol for domestic animals in Texas and to evaluate any failures of preexposure or postexposure vaccinations during the period from 2000 to 2009.
  • Collecting data retrospectively, the researchers looked into the cases of 1,014 unvaccinated and 12 vaccinated domestic animals, including dogs, cats, horses, cattle, sheep, goats, and a llama, that had received PEP and may have experienced failure of protection.

Methods

  • The researchers reviewed zoonotic incident reports spanning a decade for information regarding domestic animals that became a subject of the state PEP protocol after exposure to a laboratory-confirmed rabid animal.
  • The state-mandated PEP protocol required an immediate vaccination against rabies, 90 days of animal isolation, and booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period.

Results

  • Results from the decade-long study revealed that all 1,014 animals that had received PEP, experienced no failures. However, one preexposure vaccination failure was recorded.

Conclusion

  • The conclusion drawn from the study showed that the Texas PEP protocol in use for a decade was effective.
  • The model PEP protocol for unprotected domestic animals subjected to rabies included immediate vaccination against rabies, strict isolation for a period of 90 days, and dispensation of booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilson PJ, Oertli EH, Hunt PR, Sidwa TJ. (2010). Evaluation of a postexposure rabies prophylaxis protocol for domestic animals in Texas: 2000-2009. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 237(12), 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.237.12.1395

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 237
Issue: 12
Pages: 1395-1401

Researcher Affiliations

Wilson, Pamela J
  • Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control Branch, MC 1956, PO Box 149347, Austin, TX 78714, USA. Pam.Wilson@dshs.state.tx.us
Oertli, Ernest H
    Hunt, Patrick R
      Sidwa, Thomas J

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Animals, Domestic
        • Cat Diseases / epidemiology
        • Cat Diseases / prevention & control
        • Cats
        • Cattle
        • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
        • Cattle Diseases / prevention & control
        • Dog Diseases / epidemiology
        • Dog Diseases / prevention & control
        • Dogs
        • Rabies / epidemiology
        • Rabies / prevention & control
        • Rabies / veterinary
        • Rabies Vaccines / administration & dosage
        • Rabies Vaccines / immunology
        • Retrospective Studies
        • Texas / epidemiology
        • Vaccination / veterinary

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Chao TY, Zhang SF, Chen L, Tsao E, Rupprecht CE. In Vivo Efficacy of SYN023, an Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail, in Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Animal Models. Trop Med Infect Dis 2020 Feb 21;5(1).
          doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5010031pubmed: 32098049google scholar: lookup
        2. Klevar S, Høgåsen HR, Davidson RK, Hamnes IS, Treiberg Berndtsson L, Lund A. Cross-border transport of rescue dogs may spread rabies in Europe. Vet Rec 2015 Jun 27;176(26):672.
          doi: 10.1136/vr.102909pubmed: 26113337google scholar: lookup
        3. Davis AD, Jarvis JA, Pouliott CE, Morgan SM, Rudd RJ. Susceptibility and pathogenesis of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) to heterologous and homologous rabies viruses. J Virol 2013 Aug;87(16):9008-15.
          doi: 10.1128/JVI.03554-12pubmed: 23741002google scholar: lookup
        4. Thichumpa W, Wiratsudakul A, Suwanpakdee S, Sararat C, Modchang C, Pan-Ngum S, Prompoon N, Sagarasaeranee O, Premashthira S, Thanapongtharm W, Chumkaeo A, Pan-Ngum W. Study of dog population dynamics and rabies awareness in Thailand using a school-based participatory research approach. Sci Rep 2024 Sep 3;14(1):20477.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71207-7pubmed: 39227680google scholar: lookup