Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(2); doi: 10.3390/ani15020126

From Prediction to Precision: Explainable AI-Driven Insights for Targeted Treatment in Equine Colic.

Abstract: Colic is a leading cause of mortality in horses, demanding precise and timely interventions. This study integrates machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to predict survival outcomes in horses with colic, using clinical, procedural, and diagnostic data. Random forest and XGBoost emerged as top-performing models, achieving F1 scores of 85.9% and 86.1%, respectively. SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) was employed to provide interpretable insights, offering both global and local explanations for model predictions. The analysis revealed that key features, such as pulse rate, lesion type, and total protein levels, significantly influenced survival likelihood. Local interpretations highlighted the unique contribution of clinical factors to individual cases, enabling personalized insights that guide targeted treatment strategies. These tailored predictions empower veterinarians to prioritize interventions based on the specific conditions of each horse, moving beyond generalized care protocols. By combining predictive accuracy with interpretability, this study advances precision veterinary medicine, enhancing outcomes for equine colic cases and setting a benchmark for future applications of AI in animal health.
Publication Date: 2025-01-08 PubMed ID: 39858126PubMed Central: PMC11758311DOI: 10.3390/ani15020126Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explored the integration of machine learning and explainable AI to predict survival outcomes in horses with colic, a common yet life-threatening condition. Using this method, veterinarians can pinpoint interventions based on individual needs, improving treatment precision and ultimately, survival rates.

Explainable AI and Machine Learning Models

  • The research integrated machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to predict survival outcomes in horses diagnosed with colic.
  • Colic, a digestive disorder that causes severe abdominal discomfort, is a leading cause of death in horses. Timely and effective treatment is critical to increasing survival rates.
  • Top performing ML models for predicting survival outcomes were Random forest and XGBoost, achieving F1 scores of 85.9% and 86.1% respectively.
  • The high F1 scores signify that these two models were effective in balancing precision and recall in their predictions.

Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)

  • Researchers used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the output of the machine learning models. SHAP is a game theoretic approach to explain the output of any ML model.
  • SHAP values help interpret the model’s output, providing both global and local explanations for the predictions. Global interpretation gives an overall understanding of the model while local interpretation allows understanding individual predictions.
  • This interpretability is important in medical contexts where understanding the factors influencing a model’s decision is crucial for trust and transparency.

Key Influencing Features and Individualized Treatment

  • Analysis revealed that features such as pulse rate, lesion type, and total protein levels in the horse significantly influenced survival likelihood.
  • The local interpretations of SHAP values provided insights into clinical factors’ unique contribution to individual cases. This can guide veterinarians in formulating personalized treatment strategies.
  • With this, veterinarians could prioritize interventions based on the particular conditions of each horse, moving away from generalized care protocols and advancing precision in veterinary medicine.

Future Implications

  • This research advances the use of AI in veterinary medicine, particularly in treating equine colic. By integrating predictive accuracy with interpretability, more nuanced and individualized treatment approaches can be developed.
  • The study sets a precedent for future applications of AI in animal health. It demonstrates how AI and machine learning can be used for medical diagnoses and determining treatment strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Cetintav B, Yalcin A. (2025). From Prediction to Precision: Explainable AI-Driven Insights for Targeted Treatment in Equine Colic. Animals (Basel), 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020126

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 2

Researcher Affiliations

Cetintav, Bekir
  • Department of Biostatistics, Veterinary Faculty, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15030 Burdur Merkez, Turkey.
Yalcin, Ahmet
  • Institute of Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15030 Burdur Merkez, Turkey.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Christophersen MT, Dupont N, Berg-Sørensen KS, Konnerup C, Pihl TH, Andersen PH. Short-term survival and mortality rates in a retrospective study of colic in 1588 Danish horses.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014;56:20.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-20pmc: PMC3998380pubmed: 24712831google scholar: lookup
  2. Spadari A, Gialletti R, Gandini M, Valle E, Cerullo A, Cavallini D, Giusto G. Short-term survival and postoperative complications rates in horses undergoing colic surgery: A multicentre study.. Animals 2023;13:1107.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13061107pmc: PMC10044551pubmed: 36978647google scholar: lookup
  3. Iglesias-García M, Rodríguez Hurtado I, Ortiz-Díez G, De la Calle del Barrio J, Fernández Pérez C, Gómez Lucas R. Predictive models for equine emergency exploratory laparotomy in Spain: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative mortality-associated factors.. Animals 2022;12:1375.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12111375pmc: PMC9179522pubmed: 35681838google scholar: lookup
  4. Morton AJ, Blikslager AT. Surgical and postoperative factors influencing short-term survival of horses following small intestinal resection: 92 cases (1994–2001). Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:450–454.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776117700pubmed: 12358046google scholar: lookup
  5. Dybkjær E, Steffensen KF, Honoré ML, Dinesen MA, Christophersen MT, Pihl TH. Short-term survival rates of 1397 horses referred for colic from 2010 to 2018.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2022;64:11.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-022-00631-4pmc: PMC9077955pubmed: 35526044google scholar: lookup
  6. Freeman DE, Hammock P, Baker GJ, Goetz T, Foreman JH, Schaeffer DJ, Richter H-A, Inoue O, Magid JH. Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in the horse.. Equine Vet. J. 2000;32:42–46.
  7. Thomson P, Garrido D, Santibáñez R, Lara F. Preliminary Functional Analysis of the Gut Microbiome in Colic Horses.. Animals 2024;14:3222.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14223222pmc: PMC11590964pubmed: 39595275google scholar: lookup
  8. Fraiwan MA, Abutarbush SM. Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Survivability Likelihood and Need for Surgery in Horses Presented With Acute Abdomen (Colic). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;90:102973.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102973pubmed: 32534764google scholar: lookup
  9. Mahmoud M. Towards Sustainable Equine Welfare: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques in Predicting Horse Survival.. Sustain. Mach. Intell. J. 2023;5:1–10.
    doi: 10.61185/SMIJ.2023.55105google scholar: lookup
  10. Megahed A, Kandeel S, Alshaya DS, Attia KA, AlKahtani MD, Albohairy FM, Selim A. A comparison of logistic regression and classification tree to assess brucellosis associated risk factors in dairy cattle.. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022;203:105664.
  11. Shahinfar S, Khansefid M, Haile-Mariam M, Pryce JE. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of lameness in dairy cows.. Animal 2021;15:100391.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100391pubmed: 34800868google scholar: lookup
  12. Guleria P, Naga Srinivasu P, Ahmed S, Almusallam N, Alarfaj FK. XAI Framework for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Classification Techniques.. Electronics 2022;11:4086.
  13. Hernandez M, Ramon-Julvez U, Ferraz F, with the ADNI Consortium. Explainable AI toward understanding the performance of the top three TADPOLE Challenge methods in the forecast of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.. PLoS ONE 2022;17:e0264695.
  14. Çetintav B, Yalçın A. Targeting Vaccine Hesitancy A Data-Driven Approach Using AI and Public Health Data.. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ. J. Health Sci. Inst. 2024;12:24–33.
  15. McLeish M, Cecile M. Horse Colic [Dataset]. University of California; Irvine, CA, USA: 1989. UCI Machine Learning Repository.
    doi: 10.24432/C58W23google scholar: lookup
  16. de Klerk J, Tildesley M, Labuschagne K, Gorsich E. Modelling bluetongue and African horse sickness vector (Culicoides spp.) distribution in the Western Cape in South Africa using random forest machine learning.. Parasites Vectors 2024;17:354.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06446-8pmc: PMC11340078pubmed: 39169433google scholar: lookup
  17. Machado G, Mendoza MR, Corbellini LG. What variables are important in predicting bovine viral diarrhea virus? A random forest approach.. Vet. Res. 2015;46:85.
    doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0219-7pmc: PMC4513962pubmed: 26208851google scholar: lookup
  18. Edelman D. Adapting support vector machine methods for horserace odds prediction.. Ann. Oper. Res. 2007;151:325–336.
    doi: 10.1007/s10479-006-0131-7google scholar: lookup
  19. Taha A, Darwish A, Hassanien AE, ElKholy A. Arabian horse identification based on whale optimised multi-class support vector machine.. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 2020;63:83–92.
    doi: 10.1504/IJCAT.2020.107910google scholar: lookup
  20. Burócziová M, Říha J. Horse breed discrimination using machine learning methods.. J. Appl. Genet. 2009;50:375–377.
    doi: 10.1007/BF03195696pubmed: 19875888google scholar: lookup
  21. Sawitri S, Simanjuntak M, Pardede AMH. Application of Naive Bayes Method to Diagnose FMD Disease in Goats.. Matech 2024 3:140–148.
  22. Bidder OR, Campbell HA, Gómez-Laich A, Urgé P, Walker J, Cai Y, Wilson RP. Love thy neighbour: Automatic animal behavioural classification of acceleration data using the k-nearest neighbour algorithm.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e88609.
  23. Jayalakshmi N, Sangeeta V, Muttipati AS. Taylor Horse Herd Optimized Deep Fuzzy clustering and Laplace based K-nearest neighbor for web page recommendation.. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2023;175:103351.
  24. Chunga J, Shina D, Hwanga S, Park G. Horse race rank prediction using learning-to-rank approaches.. Korean J. Appl. Stat. 2024;37:239–253.
  25. Lu YH, Li ZZ, Liu ZL, Su C, Wang HJ, Zhang B, Hou Y. Association analysis between common pesticide and veterinary drug exposure in humans and diabetes mellitus based on XGBoost.. Chin. J. Food Hyg. 2023;35:3.
  26. Chen L. Prediction model of pet rescue outcome based on LightGBM and Bayesian optimisation.. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023;2646:012030.
  27. Tran VQ, Byeon H. Predicting dementia in Parkinson’s disease on a small tabular dataset using hybrid LightGBM–TabPFN and SHAP.. Digit. Health. 2024;10:20552076241272585.
    doi: 10.1177/20552076241272585google scholar: lookup
  28. Chandraprabha M, Dhanaraj RK. Adaboost CNN with Horse Herd Optimization Algorithm to Forecast the Rice Crop Yield.. Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 2023;11:192–203.
  29. Dissanayake O, McPherson S, Allyndree J, Kennedy E, Cunningham P, Riaboff L. Personalized Weighted AdaBoost for Animal Behavior Recognition from Sensor Data; Proceedings of the 31st Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS); Letterkenny, Ireland.. 7–8 December 2023; Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE; 2023. pp. 1–8.
  30. Nhat-Duc H, Van-Duc T. Comparison of histogram-based gradient boosting classification machine, random forest, and deep convolutional neural network for pavement raveling severity classification.. Autom. Constr. 2023;148:104767.
  31. Piles M, Bergsma R, Gianola D, Gilbert H, Tusell L. Feature selection stability and accuracy of prediction models for genomic prediction of residual feed intake in pigs using machine learning.. Front. Genet. 2021;12:611506.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.611506pmc: PMC7938892pubmed: 33692825google scholar: lookup
  32. Lundberg S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions.. arXiv 20171705.07874.
  33. Molnar C. Interpretable Machine Learning.. 2020.
  34. Punyapornwithaya V, Klaharn K, Arjkumpa O, Sansamur C. Exploring the predictive capability of machine learning models in identifying foot and mouth disease outbreak occurrences in cattle farms in an endemic setting of Thailand.. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022;207:105706.
  35. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Stämpfli HR, Kim PT, Sturgeon A, Weese JS. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e41484.