Analyze Diet
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2021; 10(9); doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091137

Gut Microbiota Manipulation in Foals-Naturopathic Diarrhea Management, or Unsubstantiated Folly?

Abstract: Diarrhea in foals is a problem of significant clinical and economic consequence, and there are good reasons to believe microbiota manipulation can play an important role in its management. However, given the dynamic development of the foal microbiota and its importance in health and disease, any prophylactic or therapeutic efforts to alter its composition should be evidence based. The few clinical trials of probiotic preparations conducted in foals to date show underwhelming evidence of efficacy and a demonstrated potential to aggravate rather than mitigate diarrhea. Furthermore, recent studies have affirmed that variable but universally inadequate quality control of probiotics enables inadvertent administration of toxin-producing or otherwise pathogenic bacterial strains, as well as strains bearing transferrable antimicrobial resistance genes. Consequently, it seems advisable to approach probiotic therapy in particular with caution for the time being. While prebiotics show initial promise, an even greater scarcity of clinical trials makes it impossible to weigh the pros and cons of their use. Advancing technology will surely continue to enable more detailed and accurate mapping of the equine adult and juvenile microbiota and potentially elucidate the complexities of causation in dysbiosis and disease. In the meantime, fecal microbiota transplantation may be an attractive therapeutic shortcut, allowing practitioners to reconstruct a healthy microbiota even without fully understanding its constitution.
Publication Date: 2021-09-04 PubMed ID: 34578169PubMed Central: PMC8467620DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10091137Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of manipulating the gut microbiota in foals as a means to manage diarrhea, a significant health and economic issue. It emphasizes the need for evidence-based approaches and highlights that while interventions such as probiotics and prebiotics have shown some promise, they may also have unintended negative impacts such as worsening the diarrheal conditions or introducing harmful bacteria or antibiotic resistant genes.

Microbiota Manipulation for Diarrhea Management in Foals

  • Diarrhea in foals, young horses, has significant health and financial implications, leading to interest in microbiota manipulation as a possible solution. This involves changing the composition of the microbial communities living in the foal’s gut.
  • The foal’s microbiota is crucial for health and wellness, and any attempts to modify it, whether for preventive or therapeutic purposes, should be guided by solid scientific evidence.
  • Microbiota manipulation in foals could include use of probiotics, prebiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation.

Probiotics and Their Limitations

  • Probiotics are live bacteria and yeasts that are beneficial for gut health. Clinical trials of probiotic treatments in foals have been performed, but results are inconsistent and often underwhelming in terms of reducing diarrhea.
  • Probiotic treatments can sometimes worsen diarrheal conditions rather than improving them. In addition, quality control for probiotics is often inadequate, leading to risks such as the unintended administration of harmful bacteria strains or strains carrying antibiotic resistance genes.
  • These issues lead the authors to advise caution when considering probiotic therapy for foals.

Prebiotics and the Need for More Research

  • Prebiotics, which are substances that feed beneficial gut bacteria, have shown initial promise for managing diarrhea in foals. However, there is currently a severe lack of clinical trials in this area, making it hard to accurately assess the benefits and risks of prebiotic use.

Future Directions and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

  • As technology advances, it is expected that scientists will be able to generate more detailed and accurate maps of the microbiota in adult and young horses. This could shed light on how changes in the composition of the microbiota might cause diseases or disorders, including diarrhea.
  • In the interim, fecal microbiota transplantation, which involves transferring fecal matter from a healthy donor into a recipient, might present a useful therapy for restoring a healthy microbiota in foals. This technique allows practitioners to rebuild a healthy microbiota without fully understanding its composition.

Cite This Article

APA
Goodman-Davis R, Figurska M, Cywinska A. (2021). Gut Microbiota Manipulation in Foals-Naturopathic Diarrhea Management, or Unsubstantiated Folly? Pathogens, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091137

Publication

ISSN: 2076-0817
NlmUniqueID: 101596317
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 9

Researcher Affiliations

Goodman-Davis, Rachel
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
  • The Scientific Society of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Figurska, Marianna
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Cywinska, Anna
  • Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 82 references
  1. Oliver-Espinosa O. Foal diarrhea: Established and postulated causes, prevention, diagnostics, and treatments.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2018;34:55–68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.003pmc: PMC7134762pubmed: 29395727google scholar: lookup
  2. Schoster A, Staempfli H.R, Guardabassi L.G, Jalali M, Weese J.S. Comparison of the fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and diarrheic foals at two and four weeks of life.. BMC Vet. Res. 2017;13:144.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1064-xpmc: PMC5450145pubmed: 28558788google scholar: lookup
  3. Dwyer R.M. Control and Prevention of Foal Diarrhea Outbreaks, Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP 2001.. American Association of Equine Practitioners 2020.
  4. Magdesian K.G. Neonatal foal diarrhea.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2005;21:295–312.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2005.04.009pmc: PMC7135406pubmed: 16051051google scholar: lookup
  5. Costa M.C, Weese J.S. Understanding the intestinal microbiome in health and disease.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2018;34:1–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.005pubmed: 29402480google scholar: lookup
  6. Garber A, Hastie P, Murray J.A. Factors influencing equine gut microbiota: Current knowledge.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;88:102943.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102943pubmed: 32303307google scholar: lookup
  7. Kauter A, Epping L, Semmler T, Antao E.M, Kannapin D, Stoeckle S.D, Gehlen H, Lübke-Becker A, Günther S, Wieler L.H. The gut microbiome of horses: Current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.. Anim. Microbiome. 2019;1:14.
    doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3pmc: PMC7807895pubmed: 33499951google scholar: lookup
  8. Mach N, Ruet A, Clark A, Bars-Cortina D, Ramayo-Caldas Y, Crisci E, Pennarun S, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan M.P. Priming for welfare: Gut microbiota is associated with equitation conditions and behavior in horse athletes.. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:8311.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65444-9pmc: PMC7239938pubmed: 32433513google scholar: lookup
  9. Schoster A, Staempfli H.R, Abrahams M, Jalali M, Weese J.S, Guardabassi L. Effect of a probiotic on prevention of diarrhea and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens shedding in foals.. J. Vet. Int. Med. 2015;29:925–931.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12584pmc: PMC4895414pubmed: 25903509google scholar: lookup
  10. Schoster A, Weese J.S, Guardabassi L. Probiotic use in horses—What is the evidence for their clinical efficacy?. J. Vet. Int. Med. 2014;28:1640–1652.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12451pmc: PMC4895607pubmed: 25231539google scholar: lookup
  11. John J, Roediger K, Schroedl W, Aldaher N, Vervuert I. Development of intestinal microflora and occurrence of diarrhoea in sucking foals: Effects of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi supplementation.. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:34.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0355-3pmc: PMC4333172pubmed: 25889817google scholar: lookup
  12. Weese J.S, Anderson M.E.C, Lowe A, Monteith G.J. Preliminary investigation of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG in horses: Fecal recovery following oral administration and safety.. Can. Vet. J. 2003;44:299–302.
    pmc: PMC372248pubmed: 12715981
  13. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Kot W, Fielden J, Frøkiær H, van Galen G, Nielsen D.S, Hansen A.K. Development of the equine gut microbiota.. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:14427.
    pmc: PMC6783416pubmed: 31594971
  14. Costa M.C, Stämpfli H.R, Allen-Vercoe E, Weese J.S. Development of the faecal microbiota in foals.. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:681–688.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12532pubmed: 26518456google scholar: lookup
  15. Schoster A. Probiotic use in equine gastrointestinal disease.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2018;34:13–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.004pubmed: 29402478google scholar: lookup
  16. Franz C.M, Huch M, Abriouel H, Holzapfel W, Gálvez A. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety.. Int. J. Food Microb. 2011;151:125–140.
  17. Campedelli I, Mathur H, Salvetti E, Clarke S, Rea M.C, Torriani S, Ross R.P, Hill C, O’Toole P.W. Genus-wide assessment of antibiotic resistance in Lactobacillus spp.. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;85:e01738-18.
    pmc: PMC6293106pubmed: 30366997
  18. Cui Y, Wang S, Ding S, Shen J, Zhu K. Toxins and mobile antimicrobial resistance genes in bacillus probiotics constitute a potential risk for One Health.. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;382:121266.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121266pubmed: 31563808google scholar: lookup
  19. Das D.J, Shankar A, Johnson J.B, Thomas S. Critical insights into antibiotic resistance transferability in probiotic Lactobacillus.. Nutrition. 2020;69:110567.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110567pubmed: 31733594google scholar: lookup
  20. Gueimonde M, Sánchez B.G, de Los Reyes-Gavilán C, Margolles A. Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria.. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:202.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00202pmc: PMC3714544pubmed: 23882264google scholar: lookup
  21. Zheng M, Zhang R, Tian X, Zhou X, Pan X, Wong A. Assessing the risk of probiotic dietary supplements in the context of antibiotic resistance.. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:908.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00908pmc: PMC5437161pubmed: 28579981google scholar: lookup
  22. Urubschurov V, Stroebel C, Günther E, Romanowski K, Büsing K, Zeyner A. Effect of oral supplementation of probiotic strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Enterococcus faecium on the composition of the faecal microbiota of foals.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2019;103:915–924.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.13079pubmed: 30854744google scholar: lookup
  23. Weese J.S, Rousseau J. Evaluation of Lactobacillus pentosus WE7 for prevention of diarrhea in neonatal foals.. JAVMA. 2005;226:2031–2034.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.2031pubmed: 15989186google scholar: lookup
  24. Mackie R.I, Wilkins C.A. Enumeration of anaerobic bacterial microflora of the equine gastrointestinal tract.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988;54:2155–2160.
  25. Leng J, Walton G, Swann J, Darby A, La Ragione R, Proudman C. “Bowel-on-the-bench”: Proof-of-concept of a three stage, in vitro, fermentation model of the equine large intestine.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;86:e02093-19.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.02093-19pmc: PMC6912081pubmed: 31676474google scholar: lookup
  26. Costa M.C, Silva G, Ramos R.V, Staempfli H.R, Arroyo L.G, Kim P, Weese J.S. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses.. Vet. J. 2015;205:74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.018pubmed: 25975855google scholar: lookup
  27. Dougal K, Harris P.A, Edwards A, Pachebat J.A, Blackmore T.M, Worgan H.J, Newbold C.J. A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of different regions of the equine hindgut.. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;82:642–652.
  28. De La Torre U, Henderson J.D, Furtado K.L, Pedroja M, Elenamarie O, Mora A, Pechanec M.Y, Maga E.A, Mienaltowski M.J. Utilizing the fecal microbiota to understand foal gut transitions from birth to weaning.. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0216211.
  29. Mullen K.R, Yasuda K, Divers T.J, Weese J.S. Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.. Equine Vet. Edu. 2018;30:151–160.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12559pmc: PMC7159401pubmed: 32313396google scholar: lookup
  30. Costa M.C, Arroyo L.G, Allen-Vercoe E, Stämpfli H.R, Kim P.T, Sturgeon A, Weese J.S. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16s rRNA gene.. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41484.
  31. Weese J.S, Holcombe S.J, Embertson R.M, Kurtz K.A, Roessner H.A, Jalali M, Wismer S.E. Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:641–649.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12361pubmed: 25257320google scholar: lookup
  32. Coverdale J.A. Horse species symposium: Can the microbiome of the horse be altered to improve digestion?. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:2275–2281.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0056pubmed: 27285904google scholar: lookup
  33. Quercia S, Freccero F, Castagnetti C, Soverini M, Turroni S, Biagi E, Rampelli S, Lanci A, Mariella J, Chinellato E. Early colonisation and temporal dynamics of the gut microbial ecosystem in Standardbred foals.. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:231–237.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12983pubmed: 29931762google scholar: lookup
  34. Yuyama T, Yusa S, Takai S, Tsubaki S, Kado Y, Morotomi M. Evaluation of a host-specific Lactobacillus Probiotic in neonatal foals.. Intern. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med. 2004;2:26–33.
  35. Barr B. Nutritional management of the foal with diarrhoea.. Equine Vet. Edu. 2018;30:100–105.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12564pmc: PMC7163645pubmed: 32313395google scholar: lookup
  36. Browning G.F, Chalmers R.M, Snodgrass D.R, Batt R.M, Hart C.A, Ormarod S.E, Leadon D, Stoneham S.J, Rossdale P.D. The prevalence of enteric pathogens in diarrhoeic thoroughbred foals in Britain and Ireland.. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:405–409.
  37. Frederick J, Giguère S, Sanchez L.C. Infectious agents detected in the feces of diarrheic foals: A retrospective study of 233 cases (2003–2008). J. Vet. Int. Med. 2009;23:1254–1260.
  38. Slovis N.M, Elam J, Estrada M, Leutenegger C.M. Infectious agents associated with diarrhoea in neonatal foals in central Kentucky: A comprehensive molecular study.. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:311–316.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12119pmc: PMC7163618pubmed: 23773143google scholar: lookup
  39. Johnston R.H, Kamstra L.D, Kohler P.H. Mares’ milk composition as related to “foal heat” scours.. J. Anim. Sci. 1970;31:549–553.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1970.313549xpubmed: 5535335google scholar: lookup
  40. Mallicote M, House A.M, Sanchez L.C. A review of foal diarrhoea from birth to weaning.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2012;24:206–214.
  41. Kuhl J, Winterhoff N, Wulf M, Schweigert F.J, Schwendenwein I, Bruckmaier R.M, Aurich J.E, Kutzer P, Aurich C. Changes in faecal bacteria and metabolic parameters in foals during the first six weeks of life.. Vet. Microbiol. 2011;151:321–328.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.017pubmed: 21511405google scholar: lookup
  42. Fielding C.L. Diarrhea in Foals.. Robinson’s Curr. Ther. Equine Med. 2015;173:722–725.
  43. Masri M.D, Merritt A.M, Gronwall R, Burrows C.F. Faecal composition in foal heat diarrhoea.. Equine Vet. J. 1986;18:301–306.
  44. Dunkel B, Wilkins P.A. Infectious foal diarrhoea: Pathophysiology, prevalence anddiagnosis.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2004;16:94–101.
  45. Dhama K, Pawaiya R.V.S, Chakraborty S, Tiwari R, Saminathan M, Verma A.K. Coronavirus Infection in Equines: A Review.. AJAVA. 2014;9:164–176.
  46. Giguere S. Clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of infections caused by Rhodococcus equi in foals.. AAEP Proc. 2010;56:121–124.
  47. Saeed M.A, Beveridge I, Ghazanfar A, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes K.J, El-Hage C, O’Handley R. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia.. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:188.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pmc: PMC6489199pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
  48. Freccero F, Lanci A, Mariella J, Viciani E, Quercia S, Castagnetti A, Castagnetti C. Changes in the fecal microbiota associated with broad-spectrum antimicrobial administration in hospitalized neonatal foals with probiotics supplementation.. Animals. 2021;11:2283.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082283pmc: PMC8388449pubmed: 34438741google scholar: lookup
  49. Wohlfender F.D, Barrelet F.E, Doherr M.G, Straub R, Meier H.P. Diseases in neonatal foals. Part 1: The 30 day incidence of disease and the effect of prophylactic antimicrobial drug treatment during the first three days post partum.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;4:179–185.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X345116pubmed: 19418748google scholar: lookup
  50. Collignon P.J, McEwen S.A. One health-its importance in helping to better control antimicrobial resistance.. Trop. Med. Inf. Dis. 2019;4:22.
    doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed4010022pmc: PMC6473376pubmed: 30700019google scholar: lookup
  51. [(accessed on 11 April 2021)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32019R0006&from=EN.
  52. [(accessed on 11 April 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf.
  53. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson G.R, Merenstein D.J, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani R.B, Flint H.J, Salminen S. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic.. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514.
    doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66pubmed: 24912386google scholar: lookup
  54. Guo B, Harstall C, Louie T, van Zanten S.V, Dieleman L.A. Systematic review: Faecal transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.. Alim. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012;35:865–875.
  55. McKinney C.A, Bedenice D, Pacheco A.P, Oliveira B.C.M, Paradis M.-R, Mazan M, Widmer G. Assessment of clinical and microbiota responses to fecal microbial transplantation in adult horses with diarrhea.. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0244381.
  56. Schoster A, Guardabassi L, Staempfli H.R, Abrahams M, Jalali M, Weese J.S. The longitudinal effect of a multi-strain probiotic on the intestinal bacterial microbiota of neonatal foals.. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:689–696.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12524pubmed: 26509834google scholar: lookup
  57. Plaza-Diaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda F.J, Gil-Campos M, Gil A. Mechanisms of action of probiotics.. Adv. Nutr. 2019;10((Suppl. S1)):S49–S66.
    pmc: PMC6363529pubmed: 30721959
  58. Cooke C.G, Gibb Z, Harnett J.E. The safety, tolerability and efficacy of probiotic bacteria for equine use.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;99:103407.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103407pubmed: 33781424google scholar: lookup
  59. Elghandour M.M.Y, Tan Z.L, Abu Hafsa S.H, Adegbeye M.J, Greiner R, Ugbogu E.A, Cedillo Monroy J, Salem A.Z.M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic feed additive to non and pseudo-ruminant feeding: A review.. J. Applied. Microb. 2020;128:658–674.
    doi: 10.1111/jam.14416pubmed: 31429174google scholar: lookup
  60. Bailey K, Gilkerson J.R, Browning G.F. Equine rotaviruses—Current understanding and continuing challenges.. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;167:135–144.
  61. Pusterla N, Gebhart C. Lawsonia intracellularis infection and proliferative enteropathy in foals.. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;167:34–41.
  62. Diab S.S, Kinde H, Moore J, Shahriar M.F, Odani J, Anthenill L, Songer G, Uzal F.A. Pathology of Clostridium perfringens type C enterotoxemia in horses.. Vet. Pathol. 2012;49:255–263.
    doi: 10.1177/0300985811404710pubmed: 21502373google scholar: lookup
  63. Mackenthun E, Coenen M, Vervuert I. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and fermentation profile in healthy horses.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013;97((Suppl. S1)):115–120.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12043pubmed: 23639024google scholar: lookup
  64. Desrochers A.M, Dolente B.A, Roy M.-F, Boston R, Carlisle S. Efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii for treatment of horses with acute enterocolitis.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005;227:954–959.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.954pubmed: 16190596google scholar: lookup
  65. Boyle A.G, Magdesian K.G, Durando M.M, Gallop R, Sigdel S. Saccharomyces boulardii viability and efficacy in horses with antimicrobial-induced diarrhea.. Vet. Rec. 2013;172:128.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.100833pubmed: 23161811google scholar: lookup
  66. Lauková A, Styková E, Kubašová I, Strompfová V, Gancarčíková S, Plachá I, Miltko R, Belzecki G, Valocký I, Simonová M.P. Enterocin M-Producing Enterococcus faecium CCM 8558 demonstrating probiotic properties in horses.. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2020;12:1555–1561.
    doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09655-6pubmed: 32378078google scholar: lookup
  67. Xia Y, Qin S, Shen Y. Probiotic potential of Weissella strains isolated from horse feces, a probable equine probiotic.. Microb. Pathog. 2019;132:117–123.
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.032pubmed: 31009656google scholar: lookup
  68. Weese J.S, Anderson M.E.C, Lowe A, Penno R, DaCosta T.M, Button L, Goth K.C. Screening of the equine intestinal microflora for potential probiotic organisms.. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:351–355.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044890616pubmed: 15163044google scholar: lookup
  69. Tanabe S, Suzuki T, Wasano Y, Nakajima F, Kawasaki H, Tsuda T, Nagamine N, Tsurumachi T, Sugaya K, Akita H. Anti-inflammatory and intestinal barrier-protective activities of commensal Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in thoroughbreds: Role of probiotics in diarrhea prevention in neonatal thoroughbreds.. J. Equine Sci. 2014;25:37–43.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.25.37pmc: PMC4090357pubmed: 25013357google scholar: lookup
  70. Rivulgo V.M, Ceci M, Haeublin G, Sparo M, Sanchez Bruni S. Efficacy of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in diarrhoea prevention in newborn foals.. Rev. Vet. 2016;27:3–6.
  71. Ströbel C, Günther E, Romanowski K, Büsing K, Urubschurov V, Zeyner A. Effects of oral supplementation of probiotic strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Enterococcus faecium on diarrhoea events of foals in their first weeks of life.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018;102:1357–1365.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12923pubmed: 29790614google scholar: lookup
  72. Weese J.S. Microbiologic evaluation of commercial probiotics.. JAVMA. 2002;220:794–797.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.794pubmed: 11918274google scholar: lookup
  73. Gouriet F, Million M, Henri M, Fournier P.E, Raoult D. Lactobacillus rhamnosus bacteremia: An emerging clinical entity.. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Inf. Dis. 2012;31:2469–2480.
    doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1599-5pubmed: 22544343google scholar: lookup
  74. Vendrig J.C, Coffeng L.E, Fink-Gremmels J. Effects of orally administered galacto-oligosaccharides on immunological parameters in foals: A pilot study.. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:278.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0278-4pmc: PMC4241218pubmed: 25407340google scholar: lookup
  75. Niele N, van Zwol A, Westerbeek E.A, Lafeber H.N, van Elburg R.M. Effect of non-human neutral and acidic oligosaccharides on allergic and infectious diseases in preterm infants.. Eur. J. Pediatrics. 2013;172:317–323.
    doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1886-2pubmed: 23132642google scholar: lookup
  76. Van den Berg J.P, van Zwieteren N, Westerbeek E.A, Garssen J, van Elburg R.M. Neonatal modulation of serum cytokine profiles by a specific mixture of anti-inflammatory neutral and acidic oligosaccharides in preterm infants.. Cytokine. 2013;64:188–195.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.07.002pubmed: 23911205google scholar: lookup
  77. van den Berg J.P, Westerbeek E.A, van der Klis F.R, Berbers G.A, Lafeber H.N, van Elburg R.M. Neutral and acidic oligosaccharides supplementation does not increase the vaccine antibody response in preterm infants in a randomized clinical trial.. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70904.
  78. Vendrig J.C, Fink-Gremmels J. Intestinal barrier function in neonatal foals: Options for improvement.. Vet. J. 2012;193:32–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.01.032pubmed: 22377327google scholar: lookup
  79. Cehak A, Krägeloh T, Zuraw A, Kershaw O, Brehm R, Breves G. Does prebiotic feeding affect equine gastric health? A study on the effects of prebiotic-induced gastric butyric acid production on mucosal integrity of the equine stomach.. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019;124:303–309.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.04.008pubmed: 31030117google scholar: lookup
  80. de Lagarde M, Larrieu C, Praud K, Lallier N, Trotereau A, Sallé G, Fairbrother J.M, Schouler C, Doublet B. Spread of multidrug-resistant IncHI1 plasmids carrying ESBL gene blaCTX-M-1 and metabolism operon of prebiotic oligosaccharides in commensal Escherichia coli from healthy horses, France.. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55:105936.
  81. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges A.R. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2011;53:994–1002.
    doi: 10.1093/cid/cir632pubmed: 22002980google scholar: lookup
  82. McKinney C.A, Oliveira B.C.M, Bedenice D, Paradis M.-R, Mazan M, Sage S, Sanchez A, Widmer G. The fecal microbiota of healthy donor horses and geriatric recipients undergoing fecal microbial transplantation for the treatment of diarrhea.. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230148.