Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2026; 345; 110790; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2026.110790

In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma equiperdum: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo antigens for an ethical and sustainable serological diagnosis of Dourine.

Abstract: The protozoan Trypanosoma equiperdum is the causative agent of Dourine, a contagious sexually transmitted disease of equines that can manifest itself in chronic or acute form. Dourine has serious veterinary and economic implications, as there are no vaccines available for prevention and the management of the disease requires the culling of infected animals, together with rigorous sanitary control measures. This study compares the traditional production of T. equiperdum antigen grown in vivo, with an in vitro cultivation methodology developed to eliminate the use of animals. The in vitro and in vivo antigens are evaluated within serological diagnostic methods for Dourine, using Complement Fixation Test and Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test. These methods are validated according to the principles and procedures outlined the WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, in order to assess their diagnostic performance and ethical sustainability. The results show the sensitivity and specificity of the in vivo antigen is comparable to the in vitro antigen. Precision parameters confirmed the robustness of the assays, with 100% concordance in repeatability and reproducibility. The IFAT showed excellent concordance with the CFT, suggesting its potential as a confirmatory test in eradication programs. The in vitro production system significantly reduces biosafety risks and logistical constraints associated with animal housing and infection. This approach is consistent with the 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction), offering a sustainable alternative to antigen production and supporting more ethical animal management in research, promoting animal welfare and sustainable veterinary diagnostic practices.
Publication Date: 2026-04-30 PubMed ID: 42102792DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2026.110790Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research evaluates an in vitro method for cultivating Trypanosoma equiperdum, the parasite causing Dourine in horses.
  • It compares the antigens produced in vitro with those traditionally grown in vivo in animals for use in serological diagnostic tests, aiming for an ethical and sustainable alternative.

Background and Importance

  • Trypanosoma equiperdum is a protozoan parasite responsible for Dourine, a sexually transmitted disease affecting equines.
  • The disease can present as chronic or acute, causing serious veterinary health issues and economic losses.
  • Currently, there are no vaccines available, so disease management relies on culling infected animals and strict sanitary measures.
  • Traditional antigen production requires infecting live animals (in vivo), raising ethical concerns, biosafety risks, and logistical challenges.

Objectives of the Study

  • Develop and evaluate an in vitro cultivation method for producing T. equiperdum antigens that eliminates the need for animal infection.
  • Compare the in vitro produced antigens with conventional in vivo antigens using serological diagnostics.
  • Validate the diagnostic methods according to standards set by WOAH (World Organisation for Animal Health).
  • Assess diagnostic performance and ethical sustainability to support animal welfare and reduce reliance on animal use.

Methodology

  • Produced T. equiperdum antigens using both traditional in vivo infection of animals and the developed in vitro cultivation technique.
  • Utilized two serological diagnostic tests:
    • Complement Fixation Test (CFT)
    • Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT)
  • Followed WOAH guidelines for validation involving:
    • Sensitivity and specificity assessment
    • Repeatability (same results on repeated tests)
    • Reproducibility (consistency across different conditions/labs)

Key Findings

  • The sensitivity and specificity of antigens produced in vitro were comparable to those produced in vivo.
  • Precision testing revealed 100% concordance in both repeatability and reproducibility for the diagnostic assays.
  • IFAT demonstrated excellent agreement with CFT results, supporting its role as a reliable confirmatory test in eradication programs.
  • The in vitro production methods significantly reduced biosafety risks and removed animal housing and infection challenges.

Significance and Impact

  • By eliminating the need for animal infection, the in vitro method aligns with the 3Rs principle:
    • Replacement: avoids using animals
    • Refinement: improves animal welfare by minimizing distress
    • Reduction: decreases the number of animals needed
  • This method offers a sustainable and ethical alternative for producing T. equiperdum antigens.
  • It facilitates safer, more efficient, and ethically sound diagnostic testing in veterinary practice.
  • Supports improved disease management, better animal welfare, and promotes sustainable veterinary diagnostics globally.

Cite This Article

APA
Armillotta G, Capista S, Rodomonti D, Traini S, Testa L, Serroni A, Laguardia C, Palucci C, Di Pancrazio C, Di Febo T, Puglielli O, Ronchi GF, Iorio M, Parolini F, Rossi E, Fanì S, Di Gennaro A, Perletta F, Natali AR, Salini R, Sacchini F, Tittarelli M, Maggetti M, Luciani M, Mercante MT. (2026). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma equiperdum: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo antigens for an ethical and sustainable serological diagnosis of Dourine. Vet Parasitol, 345, 110790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2026.110790

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 345
Pages: 110790
PII: S0304-4017(26)00109-3

Researcher Affiliations

Armillotta, Gisella
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Capista, Sara
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Rodomonti, Diamante
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Traini, Sara
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Testa, Lilia
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Serroni, Anna
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Laguardia, Caterina
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Palucci, Cristiano
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Di Pancrazio, Chiara
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Di Febo, Tiziana
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Puglielli, Onorina
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Ronchi, Gaetano Federico
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Iorio, Mariangela
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Parolini, Francesca
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Rossi, Emanuela
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Fanì, Sara
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Di Gennaro, Annapia
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Perletta, Fabrizia
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Natali, Anna Rita
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Salini, Romolo
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Sacchini, Flavio
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Tittarelli, Manuela
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.
Maggetti, Marta
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy. Electronic address: m.maggetti@izs.it.
Luciani, Mirella
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy; Department of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Mercante, Maria Teresa
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, Teramo, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Trypanosoma / immunology
  • Trypanosoma / growth & development
  • Dourine / diagnosis
  • Dourine / parasitology
  • Antigens, Protozoan / immunology
  • Horses
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Serologic Tests / veterinary
  • Serologic Tests / methods
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect / veterinary
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Complement Fixation Tests / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.