Indications, complications, and outcome of horses undergoing repeated celiotomy within 14 days after the first colic surgery: 95 cases (2005-2013).
Abstract: To examine factors associated with short- and long-term prognosis for horses undergoing repeated celiotomy within 14 days after the first colic surgery. Methods: Retrospective case series. Methods: 95 horses that had undergone 2 celiotomies within a 14-day period between 2005 and 2013 at 3 equine referral hospitals. Methods: Historical, clinical, and laboratory data were compared between horses that did not survive and horses that did survive to hospital discharge (short-term survival rate) and to > 3 and > 6 months after hospital discharge (long-term survival rates). Results: Strangulating small intestinal lesions were the most common finding during the first celiotomy (60/95 [63.2%]), and persistent gastric reflux was the most common reason for the second celiotomy (56/95 [58.9%]). Reasons for a second celiotomy were not associated with survival rate. For horses that had long-term follow-up, 22 of 92 (23.9%) survived > 6 months after hospital discharge. Two of 13 horses with intestinal resections during both surgeries survived to > 6 months after hospital discharge. Compared with horses not undergoing intestinal resection, significantly fewer horses requiring resection during 1 or both surgeries survived to hospital discharge and to > 3 and > 6 months after hospital discharge. Incisional infections occurred in 68.4% (26/38) of horses that survived to hospital discharge, and 31.6% (12/38) developed incisional hernias or dehiscence. Conclusions: Results indicated that the prognosis for horses undergoing repeated celiotomy is guarded, and intestinal resection negatively affects the long-term survival rate.
Publication Date: 2015-02-12 PubMed ID: 25671287DOI: 10.2460/javma.246.5.540Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research studied factors affecting the prognosis for horses undergoing two abdominal surgeries within 14 days, investigating the impact on both short-term (survival to hospital discharge) and long-term survival (beyond 3 and 6 months). The findings suggest a guarded prognosis, with a negative impact on long-term survival if intestinal resection is necessary.
Research Methodology
- The study was a retrospective case series analysis conducted on 95 horses, which had undergone two abdominal surgeries (celiotomy) within a 14-day period between 2005 and 2013 at three equine referral hospitals.
- Various historical, clinical and laboratory data were considered and compared between horses that survived and those which did not, for both the short-term (up to hospital discharge) and long-term (beyond 3 and 6 months) period.
Key Findings
- The most common finding during the first surgery was strangulating small intestinal lesions, present in 63.2% of the cases. The most common reason prompting the second surgery was persistent gastric reflux, in 58.9% of cases.
- The reasons for the second surgery did not have a direct link with the survival rate of the horses.
- Out of 92 horses tracked for long term follow-up, 23.9% survived beyond 6 months after hospital discharge. Only two of 13 horses that had intestinal resections during both surgeries survived to more than 6 months after hospital discharge.
- Compared to horses that did not require intestinal resection, significantly fewer that needed resection during one or both surgeries survived to hospital discharge and beyond 3 and 6 months post-discharge.
- In terms of complications, 68.4% of horses that survived to hospital discharge experienced incisional infections, and 31.6% developed incisional hernias or dehiscence (separation of parts where surgical incision was made).
Conclusions
- The study found that the outlook for horses undergoing repeated celiotomy is generally uncertain.
- Importantly, it was demonstrated that if intestinal resection was required during one or both surgeries, it negatively influenced the long-term survival rate of the horses.
- This raises the necessity for veterinary surgeons to consider these significant survival and recovery odds when deciding a surgical course of action for equine patients suffering from gastrointestinal ailments.
Cite This Article
APA
Dunkel B, Mair T, Marr CM, Carnwath J, Bolt DM.
(2015).
Indications, complications, and outcome of horses undergoing repeated celiotomy within 14 days after the first colic surgery: 95 cases (2005-2013).
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 246(5), 540-546.
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.246.5.540 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, England.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Colic / surgery
- Colic / veterinary
- Female
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horses
- Male
- Postoperative Complications
- Retrospective Studies
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists