Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(18); doi: 10.3390/ani14182697

Investigating Associations between Horse Hoof Conformation and Presence of Lameness.

Abstract: Hoof trimming and shoeing determine the horse's hoof shape and balance. Hoof conformation plays a crucial role in limb biomechanics and can consequently prevent or predispose to injury. This study investigated the relationship between the morphometric characteristics of the horse's hoof, specifically, the dorsal hoof wall angle (DHWA), the coronet band circumference (CBC), and lameness in 73 horses categorised as undertaking either show jumping, dressage, or riding school activities. Results from logistic regression indicated that horses with either a combination of acute DHWA with large CBC, or more upright feet with larger DHWA and smaller CBC have higher probabilities of lameness. Show jumping and dressage horses showed a higher prevalence of lameness. Hoof morphometry should be monitored, and podiatric interventions should be regularly scheduled for the maintenance of correct hoof conformation to prevent injury. This study suggests that an aligned hoof-pastern axis managed by a DHWA of around 50 degrees may prevent lameness, with special emphasis on horses in dressage and show jumping activities. On the other hand, we can also speculate that the disturbed axis alignment of DHWA may be a cause of lameness.
Publication Date: 2024-09-17 PubMed ID: 39335286PubMed Central: PMC11444133DOI: 10.3390/ani14182697Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research observes that the shape and balance of a horse’s hoof, influenced by hoof trimming and shoeing, plays a significant role in horse limb biomechanics. In particular, the study assesses how hoof configuration might prevent or cause injury, focussing on the dorsal hoof wall angle (DHWA) and the coronet band circumference (CBC). The study shows horses with certain hoof characteristics are more likely to suffer from lameness, noting a higher prevalence in show jumping and dressage horses.

Methodology

  • The study examined the relationship between the morphometric traits of horse’s hoof and lameness.
  • 73 horses were involved in the study and were categorised based on their activities, which included show jumping, dressage, or riding school activities.
  • The researchers looked specifically at the dorsal hoof wall angle (DHWA) and the coronet band circumference (CBC) as key parameters.

Findings

  • The study found that particular combinations of DHWA and CBC in a horse’s hoof were associated with higher probabilities of lameness.
  • Horses with an acute DHWA and a large CBC, or horses with more upright feet (large DHWA) and a smaller CBC, were more likely to be lame.
  • Show jumping and dressage horses demonstrated a higher incidence of lameness.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The research emphasizes the importance of regularly monitoring hoof morphometry and scheduling podiatric interventions to maintain correct hoof conformation and prevent injury.
  • An aligned hoof-pastern axis, managed by a DHWA of approximately 50 degrees, may help to prevent lameness. This is particularly relevant for horses engaged in dressage and show jumping activities.
  • The study also postulates that an unaligned axis of DHWA could be a cause of lameness, though more investigation is required to confirm this speculation.

Cite This Article

APA
Mata F, Franca I, Araújo J, Paixão G, Lesniak K, Cerqueira JL. (2024). Investigating Associations between Horse Hoof Conformation and Presence of Lameness. Animals (Basel), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182697

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 18

Researcher Affiliations

Mata, Fernando
  • Center for Research in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Franca, Inês
  • Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Araújo, José
  • Center for Research in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Mountain Research Centre, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Paixão, Gustavo
  • Center for Research in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Veterinary and Animal Research Centre, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Lesniak, Kirsty
  • Equine Science Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Cerqueira, Joaquim Lima
  • Center for Research in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Veterinary and Animal Research Centre, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Hobbs SJ, Curtis S, Martin J, Sinclair J, Clayton HM. Hoof Matters: Developing an Athletic Thoroughbred Hoof. Animals 2022;12:3119.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12223119pmc: PMC9686713pubmed: 36428348google scholar: lookup
  2. Shahkhosravi NA, Gohari S, Komeili A, Burvill C, Davies H. Linear Elastic and Hyperelastic Studies of Equine Hoof Mechanical Response at Different Hydration Levels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021;121:104622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104622pubmed: 34116431google scholar: lookup
  3. Faramarzi B, Kepler A, Dong F, Dobson H. Morphovolumetric Analysis of the Hoof in Standardbred Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;71:40–45.
  4. Malone SR, Davies HMS. Changes in Hoof Shape during a Seven-Week Period When Horses Were Shod versus Barefoot. Animals 2019;9:1017.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121017pmc: PMC6940763pubmed: 31766684google scholar: lookup
  5. Lazarus BS, Luu RK, Ruiz-Pérez S, Barbosa JDV, Jasiuk I, Meyers MA. Equine Hoof Wall Deformation: Novel Aspects Revealed. Small Struct. 2023;4:2200402.
    doi: 10.1002/sstr.202200402google scholar: lookup
  6. Kelleher ME, Burns TD, Werre SR, White NA. The Immediate Effect of Routine Hoof Trimming and Shoeing on Horses’ Gait. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;102:103633.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103633pubmed: 34119199google scholar: lookup
  7. Aoun R, Charles I, DeRouen A, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Shoe Configuration Effects on Third Phalanx and Capsule Motion of Unaffected and Laminitic Equine Hooves In-Situ. PLoS ONE 2023;18:e0285475.
  8. Baxter GM, Stashak TS, Keegan KG. Examination for Lameness: History, Visual Exam, and Conformation. In: Baxter GM, editor. Adams and Stashak’s Lameness in Horses. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2020. pp. 67–188.
  9. Leśniak K, Whittington L, Mapletoft S, Mitchell J, Hancox K, Draper S, Williams J. The Influence of Body Mass and Height on Equine Hoof Conformation and Symmetry. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;77:43–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.013pubmed: 31133315google scholar: lookup
  10. Hagen J, Kojah K, Geiger M. Correlations between the Equine Metacarpophalangeal Joint Angulation and Toe Conformation in Statics. Open Vet. J. 2018;8:96–103.
    doi: 10.4314/ovj.v8i1.15pmc: PMC5918130pubmed: 29721438google scholar: lookup
  11. Shahkhosravi NA, Son J, Davies HMS, Komeili A. An Investigation into Different Measurement Techniques to Assess Equine Proximal Hoof Circumference. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;115:104028.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104028pubmed: 35661772google scholar: lookup
  12. Back W., Pille F. Equine Locomotion. Elsevier Health Sciences; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2013. The Role of the Hoof and Shoeing; pp. 147–174.
  13. Rooney JR. The Angulation of the Forefoot and Pastern of the Horse. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1984;4:138–143.
  14. Healey P. Measurement of the hoof-pastern axis for foot management. Am. Farriers J. 2016;12:33–36.
  15. Weeren PR, Crevier-Denoix N. Equine Conformation: Clues to Performance and Soundness?. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:591–596.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X159007pubmed: 17228571google scholar: lookup
  16. O’Grady SE, Ovnicek G. Foot Care and Farriery: BASIC FOOT CARE. In: Baxter GM, editor. Adams and Stashak’s Lameness in Horses. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2020. pp. 1091–1142.
  17. Davies HM. No Hoof, No Horse! The Clinical Implications of Modelling the Hoof Capsule. Equine Vet. J. 2002;34:646–647.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776250432pubmed: 12455833google scholar: lookup
  18. Pezzanite L, Bass L, Kawcak C, Goodrich L, Moorman V. The Relationship between Sagittal Hoof Conformation and Hindlimb Lameness in the Horse. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:464–469.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13050pubmed: 30472759google scholar: lookup
  19. Kolstrung R, Stachurska A, Piȩta M, Silmanowicz P, Ussing AP. Hoof Wall Angulation in the Horse (Equus caballus). Med. Weter. 2013;69:181–186.
  20. Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. A Meta-Analysis of Genetic Parameter Estimates for Conformation Traits in Horses. Livest. Sci. 2021;250:104601.
  21. Folla F, Sartori C, Mancin E, Pigozzi G, Mantovani R. Genetic Parameters of Linear Type Traits Scored at 30 Months in Italian Heavy Draught Horse. Animals 2020;10:1099.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061099pmc: PMC7341255pubmed: 32630510google scholar: lookup
  22. AAEP . Veterinarian’s Guide to Equestrian Competition Official Duties. American Association of Equine Practitioners; Lexington, KY, USA: 2020. pp. 1–11.
  23. Stachurska A, Kolstrung R, Pieta M, Silmanowicz P, Klimorowska A. Differentiation between Fore and Hind Hoof Dimensions in the Horse (Equus caballus). Arch. Anim. Breed. 2008;51:531–540.
    doi: 10.5194/aab-51-531-2008google scholar: lookup
  24. Van Heel MCV, Moleman M, Barneveld A, Van Weeren PR, Back W. Changes in Location of Centre of Pressure and Hoof-unrollment Pattern in Relation to an 8-week Shoeing Interval in the Horse. Equine Vet. J. 2005;37:536–540.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314925pubmed: 16295931google scholar: lookup
  25. Müller-Quirin J, Dittmann MT, Roepstorff C, Arpagaus S, Latif SN, Weishaupt MA. Riding Soundness—Comparison of Subjective with Objective Lameness Assessments of Owner-Sound Horses at Trot on a Treadmill. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;95:103314.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314pubmed: 33276930google scholar: lookup
  26. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory Load Redistribution of Horses with Induced Weightbearing Hindlimb Lameness Trotting on a Treadmill. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:727–733.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848244pubmed: 15656505google scholar: lookup
  27. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory Load Redistribution of Horses with Induced Weight-Bearing Forelimb Lameness Trotting on a Treadmill. Vet. J. 2006;171:135–146.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.09.004pubmed: 15974567google scholar: lookup
  28. Dittmann MT, Latif SN, Hefti R, Hartnack S, Hungerbühler V, Weishaupt MA. Husbandry, Use, and Orthopedic Health of Horses Owned by Competitive and Leisure Riders in Switzerland. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;91:103107.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103107pubmed: 32684252google scholar: lookup
  29. Hibbs KC, Jarvis GE, Dyson SJ. Crooked Tail Carriage in Horses: Increased Prevalence in Lame Horses and Those with Thoracolumbar Epaxial Muscle Tension or Sacroiliac Joint Region Pain. Equine Vet. Educ. 2021;33:368–375.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13316google scholar: lookup
  30. Antonioli ML, Canola PA, de Carvalho JRG, Fonseca MG, Ferraz GdC. Immediate Effect of Hoof Trimming on Hoof and Thoracic Joint Angles in Mangalarga Mares. Animals 2023;13:2490.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13152490pmc: PMC10416872pubmed: 37570298google scholar: lookup
  31. Jacquinet G, Rowan C, Ryan J, Vinardell T, Thompson RI, Johnson J. Radiological Measurements of the Feet of Normal Straight Egyptian Arabian Horses in Qatar. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;137:105072.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105072pubmed: 38714101google scholar: lookup
  32. O’Grady SE. Basic Farriery for the Performance Horse. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:203–218.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.12.002pubmed: 18314044google scholar: lookup
  33. Greve L, Dyson S. What Can We Learn from Visual and Objective Assessment of Non-lame and Lame Horses in Straight Lines, on the Lunge and Ridden?. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:479–491.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13016google scholar: lookup
  34. Bushe T, Turner TA, Poulos PW, Harwell NM. The Effect of Hoof Angle on Coffin, Pastern and Fetlock Joint Angles. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners (USA); San Diego, CA, USA. 4–7 December 1988.
  35. Clayton HM. Cinematographic Analysis of the Gait of Lame Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1986;6:70–78.
  36. Clayton HM. The Effect of an Acute Hoof Wall Angulation on the Stride Kinematics of Trotting Horses. Equine Vet. J. 1990;22:86–90.
  37. Turner TA. Examination of the Equine Foot. Vet. Clin. Equine Pract. 2003;19:309–332.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(03)00023-3pubmed: 14575162google scholar: lookup
  38. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH. Identification of Risk Factors for Lameness in Dressage Horses. Vet. J. 2010;184:27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  39. Luthersson N, Mannfalk M, Parkin TDH, Harris P. Laminitis: Risk Factors and Outcome in a Group of Danish Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;53:68–73.
  40. Coleman MC, Belknap JK, Eades SC, Galantino-Homer HL, Hunt RJ, Geor RJ, McCue ME, McIlwraith CW, Moore RM, Peroni JF. Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Pasture-and Endocrinopathy-Associated Laminitis in North American Horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2018;253:470–478.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.253.4.470pubmed: 30058970google scholar: lookup
  41. Pollard D, Wylie CE, Verheyen KLP, Newton JR. Identification of Modifiable Factors Associated with Owner-Reported Equine Laminitis in Britain Using a Web-Based Cohort Study Approach. BMC Veterinay Res. 2019;15:59.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1798-8pmc: PMC6373032pubmed: 30755193google scholar: lookup
  42. Decurnex V, Anderson GA, Davies HMS. Influence of Different Exercise Regimes on the Proximal Hoof Circumference in Young Thoroughbred Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:233–236.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X393220pubmed: 19469227google scholar: lookup
  43. Hagen J, Bos R, Brouwer J, Lux S, Jung FT. Influence of Trimming, Hoof Angle and Shoeing on Breakover Duration in Sound Horses Examined with Hoof-Mounted Inertial Sensors. Vet. Rec. 2021;189:e450.
    doi: 10.1002/vetr.450pubmed: 33993524google scholar: lookup
  44. de Sousa NR, Luna SPL, Pizzigatti D, Martins MTA, Possebon FS, Aguiar ACS. Relation between Type and Local of Orthopedic Injuries with Physical Activity in Horses. Ciência Rural 2016;47:20151218.
  45. Dyson S. Lameness and Poor Performance in the Sport Horse: Dressage, Show Jumping and Horse Trials. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2002;22:145–150.
  46. O’Grady SE. Farriery for the Foal: A Review Part 1: Basic Trimming. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:553–560.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13072google scholar: lookup
  47. Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Back W. Heritability of Foot Conformation and Its Relationship to Sports Performance in a Dutch Warmblood Horse Population. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:139–143.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X366130pubmed: 19418741google scholar: lookup
  48. Ross MW, Dyson SJ. The Foot and Shoeing. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. W. B. Saunders; Saint Louis, MO, USA: 2003. pp. 250–275.
  49. Dyson S. Recognition of Lameness: Man versus Machine. Vet. J. 2014;201:245–248.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.018pubmed: 24923757google scholar: lookup
  50. Dyson S. Equine Lameness: Clinical Judgment Meets Advanced Diagnostic Imaging. American Association of Equine Practitioners Annual Convention; Nashville, TN, USA: 2013.
  51. Alvarez CBG, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, Johnston C, Back W, van Weeren PR. The Effect of Induced Hindlimb Lameness on Thoracolumbar Kinematics during Treadmill Locomotion. Equine Vet. J. 2008;40:147–152.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X250184pubmed: 18089465google scholar: lookup