FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Frontiers in sports and active living2026; 8; 1741781; doi: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1741781

Money, morality, and nationalism: the contested sponsorship of the Falsterbo horse show.

Abstract: In early 2025, the Falsterbo Horse Show entered a title sponsorship agreement with Al Shira'aa Stables in the United Arab Emirates, prompting extensive Swedish media coverage and strong public reactions. This controversy offers an opportunity to examine how sport sponsorship becomes a site for moral and geopolitical boundary-making. Drawing on a Foucauldian understanding of discourse as a meaning-making practice, the study analyses 210 Swedish newspaper articles published between February and April 2025 to explore how power/knowledge operates through language and how sponsorship is discursively framed. The analysis identifies three interconnected discourses: the sold-out soul and sportwashing, dirty money and postcolonial morality, and pure money and Swedish nostalgia, that frame the sponsorship as morally and geopolitically contentious. Across these discourses, processes of fetishization and reduction imbue sponsorship funds with moral significance based on their origin. Media portrayals construct money from the UAE as symbolically contaminated, linked to gender inequality, LGBTQ+ rights, human rights violations, and animal welfare, while simultaneously idealizing Swedish sponsorship through nostalgic narratives of national integrity and moral coherence. These judgements draw on broader affective and historical formations, including white melancholia, which position Sweden as a nation losing an imagined ethical distinctiveness. Rather than evaluating the sponsorship itself, the article shows how sponsorship functions as an affective practice shaped by capitalism's identity-producing machinery, delineating which sponsors become imaginable or legitimate. By situating media reactions within wider cultural and geopolitical imaginaries, the study contributes to sport management and sponsorship research by showing how sponsorship is implicated in discourses of morality, identity, and belonging.
© 2026 Karlsson.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2026-04-13 PubMed ID: 42052555PubMed Central: PMC13111463DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1741781Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • The article examines the controversy surrounding the 2025 sponsorship deal between the Falsterbo Horse Show and the UAE-based Al Shira’aa Stables.
  • It analyzes Swedish media coverage to understand how sport sponsorship becomes a site for debates about morality, identity, and geopolitics.

Background and Context

  • The Falsterbo Horse Show, a prominent Swedish equestrian event, entered a title sponsorship agreement in early 2025 with Al Shira’aa Stables from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
  • This sparked extensive and critical media coverage in Sweden, provoking strong public reactions and controversy.
  • The controversy provides a case to study how sponsorship in sport is not just financial but carries moral and geopolitical implications.

Theoretical Framework

  • The study uses a Foucauldian approach to discourse, viewing language and media as practices that produce meaning, power, and knowledge.
  • Discourse is seen as shaping how people think about and interpret sponsorship deals, influencing which sponsors are seen as legitimate or illegitimate.

Data and Methodology

  • The analysis is based on 210 Swedish newspaper articles published between February and April 2025.
  • Articles were examined to identify common themes and discursive patterns concerning the sponsorship deal.

Key Findings: Three Interconnected Discourses

  • Sold-Out Soul and Sportwashing:
    • The UAE sponsorship is framed as “sportwashing” — using sport events to whitewash or distract attention from questionable human rights records.
    • It suggests a moral compromise or corruption of the sport’s integrity by accepting money from a problematic source.
  • Dirty Money and Postcolonial Morality:
    • Media portray the money from the UAE as “dirty,” symbolically contaminated by associations with gender inequality, LGBTQ+ rights violations, human rights abuses, and concerns about animal welfare.
    • This discourse reflects postcolonial critiques and moral judgments about the origins of sponsorship money and the countries involved.
  • Pure Money and Swedish Nostalgia:
    • By contrast, Swedish sponsors are idealized through nostalgic narratives that emphasize national integrity, moral coherence, and ethical distinctiveness.
    • These portrayals reflect a longing for a Sweden seen as ethically pure and distinct from morally contentious global players.

Processes Identified: Fetishization and Reduction

  • Sponsorship money is interpreted through processes that attribute moral significance based solely on its geographic and cultural origin.
  • Money from the UAE is reduced to its perceived moral taint, while Swedish money is fetishized as pure and wholesome.

Cultural and Affective Dimensions

  • The media discourse draws on broader affective experiences such as “white melancholia,” a sense of loss related to Sweden’s imagined ethical identity.
  • These feelings feed into the controversy, coloring perceptions of which sponsors are acceptable and which are not.
  • The analysis highlights how sponsorship becomes an “affective practice,” entwined with capitalism’s role in shaping identities and moral boundaries.

Contributions and Implications

  • The article advances sport management and sponsorship research by showing sponsorship is not simply economic but deeply entangled with moral and geopolitical discourses.
  • It reveals how media and public debates determine sponsorship legitimacy based on cultural imaginaries of morality, identity, and belonging.
  • This understanding suggests that sport organizations must consider how sponsorship deals intersect with broader social and cultural meanings, beyond just financial aspects.

Cite This Article

APA
Karlsson J. (2026). Money, morality, and nationalism: the contested sponsorship of the Falsterbo horse show. Front Sports Act Living, 8, 1741781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1741781

Publication

Frontiers in sports and active living
ISSN: 2624-9367
NlmUniqueID: 101765780
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 1741781
PII: 1741781

Researcher Affiliations

Karlsson, Jesper
  • Research in Education & Movement Culture, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 60 references
  1. Boronczyk F, Zarins N. Fans’ monetary evaluation of traditional and sponsored stadium names in the German Bundesliga. Eur Sport Manag Q (2022) 22(6):768–87.
    doi: 10.1080/16184742.2020.1828966google scholar: lookup
  2. Gillooly L, Medway D, Warnaby G, Grimes T. The importance of context in understanding football fans’ reactions to corporate stadia naming rights sponsorships. Eur J Mark (2020) 54(7):1501–22.
    doi: 10.1108/EJM-03-2018-0174google scholar: lookup
  3. Grohs R, Reisinger H, Woisetschläger DM. Attenuation of negative sponsorship effects in the context of rival sports teams’ fans. Eur J Mark (2015) 49(11/12):1880–901.
    doi: 10.1108/EJM-01-2013-0010google scholar: lookup
  4. Kim Y, Lee HW, Magnusen MJ, Kim M. Factors influencing sponsorship effectiveness: a meta-analytic review and research synthesis. J Sport Manag (2015) 29(4):408–25.
    doi: 10.1123/jsm.2014-0056google scholar: lookup
  5. Olson EL. Does sponsorship work in the same way in different sponsorship contexts?. Eur J Mark (2010) 44:180–99.
    doi: 10.1108/03090561011008664google scholar: lookup
  6. Woisetschläger DM, Backhaus C, Cornwell TB. Inferring corporate motives: how deal characteristics shape sponsorship perceptions. J Mark (2017) 81(5):121–41.
    doi: 10.1509/jm.16.0082google scholar: lookup
  7. Deleuze G, Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; (1983).
  8. Lazzarato M. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e) (2014).
  9. Mezzadra S, Neilson B. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham and London: Duke University Press; (2013).
  10. Said E. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books; (1978).
  11. Cornwell TB. Less “sponsorship as advertising” and more sponsorship-linked marketing as authentic engagement. J Advert (2019) 48(1):49–60.
    doi: 10.1080/00913367.2019.1588809google scholar: lookup
  12. Cornwell TB, Weeks CS, Roy DP. Sponsorship-linked marketing: opening the black box. J Advert (2005) 34(2):21–42.
    doi: 10.1080/00913367.2005.10639194google scholar: lookup
  13. Cunningham S, Cornwell TB, Coote LV. Expressing identity and shaping image: the relationship between corporate mission and corporate sponsorship. J Sport Manag (2009) 23(1):65–86.
    doi: 10.1123/jsm.23.1.65google scholar: lookup
  14. Tsordia C, Papadimitriou D, Parganas P. The influence of sport sponsorship on brand equity and purchase behavior. J Strateg Mark (2018) 26(1):85–105.
    doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2017.1374299google scholar: lookup
  15. Trail GT, Anderson DF, Fink JS. Consumer satisfaction and identity theory: a model of sport spectator conative loyalty. Sport Mark Q (2005) 14(2):98–111.
    doi: 10.1177/106169340501400204google scholar: lookup
  16. Hall J, O’Mahony B, Vieceli J. An empirical model of attendance factors at major sporting events.. Int J Hosp Manag (2010) 29(2):328–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.011google scholar: lookup
  17. Mazodier M, Merunka D. Achieving brand loyalty through sponsorship: the role of fit and self-congruity.. J Acad Mark Sci (2012) 40(6):807–20.
    doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0285-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  18. Witcher B, Craigen JG, Culligan D, Harvey A. The links between objectives and function in organizational sponsorship.. Int J Advert (1991) 10:13–33.
    doi: 10.1080/02650487.1991.11104431google scholar: lookup
  19. Henseler J, Wilson B, De Vreede D. Can sponsorships be harmful for events? Investigating the transfer of associations from sponsors to events.. Int J Sports Mark Spons (2009) 10(3):47–54.
    doi: 10.1108/IJSMS-10-03-2009-B006google scholar: lookup
  20. Jae Ko Y, Zhang J, Cattani K, Pastore D. Assessment of event quality in major spectator sports.. Manag Serv Qual (2011) 21:304–22.
    doi: 10.1108/09604521111127983google scholar: lookup
  21. Rundh B, Gottfridsson P. Delivering sports events: the arena concept in sports from a network perspective.. J Bus Ind Mark (2015) 30:785–94.
    doi: 10.1108/JBIM-06-2013-0131google scholar: lookup
  22. Thomas O, Kucza G, Schuppisser S. Can sports sponsorship affect consumers’ motivation for sports consumption?. J Promot Manag (2022) 28(7):893–922.
    doi: 10.1080/10496491.2021.2009611google scholar: lookup
  23. Weimar D, Holthoff LC, Biscaia R. When sponsorship causes anger: understanding negative fan reactions to postings on sports clubs’ online social media channels.. Eur Sport Manag Q (2020) 22:335–57.
    doi: 10.1080/16184742.2020.1786593google scholar: lookup
  24. Morgan A, Taylor T, Adair D. Sport event sponsorship management from the sponsee’s perspective.. Sport Manag Rev (2020) 23(5):838–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2020.04.006google scholar: lookup
  25. Tsiotsou RH, Alexandris K, Cornwell TB. Using evaluative conditioning to explain corporate co-branding in the context of sport sponsorship.. Int J Advert (2014) 33(2):295–327.
    doi: 10.2501/IJA-33-2-295-327google scholar: lookup
  26. Peluso AM, Rizzo C, Pino G. Controversial sports sponsorships: effects of sponsor moral appropriateness and self-team connection on sponsored teams and external benefit perceptions.. J Bus Res (2019) 98:339–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.068google scholar: lookup
  27. Pappu R, Cornwell TB. Corporate sponsorship as an image platform: understanding the roles of relationship fit and sponsor-sponsee similarity.. J Acad Mark Sci (2014) 42(5):490–510.
    doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0373-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. Brown K. Association between alcohol sports sponsorship and consumption: a systematic review.. Alcohol Alcohol (2016) 51(6):747–55.
    doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw006pmc: PMC5091292pubmed: 26911984google scholar: lookup
  29. Chadwick S, Widdop P, Burton N. Soft power sports sponsorship – a social network analysis of a new sponsorship form.. J Polit Mark (2022) 21(2):196–217.
    doi: 10.1080/15377857.2020.1723781google scholar: lookup
  30. Reiche D. Perceptions of Qatar airways sponsorships in major European football clubs: Bayern Munich, Barcelona, and Paris saint-germain.. J Arab Stud (2023) 13(1):51–72.
    doi: 10.1080/21534764.2024.2360240google scholar: lookup
  31. Chen C. Naming the ghost of capitalism in sport management.. Eur Sport Manag Q (2022) 22(5):663–84.
    doi: 10.1080/16184742.2022.2046123google scholar: lookup
  32. Karlsson J, Bäckström Å, Redelius K. Commercialization processes within Swedish child and youth sport – a deleuzioguttarian perspective.. Sport Soc (2022) 25(12):2397–414.
    doi: 10.1080/17430437.2021.1944114google scholar: lookup
  33. Karlsson J, Kilger M, Bäckström Å, Redelius K. Selling youth sport: the production and promotion of immaterial values in commercialised child and youth sport.. Sport Educ Soc (2023a) 28(5):565–78.
    doi: 10.1080/13573322.2022.2057462google scholar: lookup
  34. Karlsson J, Bäckström Å, Kilger M, Redelius K. Looks, liveliness, and laughter: visual representations in commercial sports for children.. Int J Sport Commun (2023b) 16(2):178–86.
    doi: 10.1123/ijsc.2022-0202google scholar: lookup
  35. Amin-Khan T. New orientalism, securitisation and the western media’s incendiary racism.. Third World Q (2012) 33(9):1595–610.
    doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.720831google scholar: lookup
  36. Puar JK. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; (2008).
  37. Wahid MA. From orientalism to neo-orientalism: medial representations of Islam and the Muslim world.. Textual Pract (2025) 39(2):162–81.
    doi: 10.1080/0950236X.2023.2288112google scholar: lookup
  38. Loomba A. Colonialism/Postcolonialism.. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; (2005).
  39. Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others.. Am Anthropol (2002) 104(3):783–90.
    doi: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783google scholar: lookup
  40. Dalacoura K. Homosexuality as cultural battleground in the Middle East: culture and postcolonial international theory.. Third World Q (2014) 35(7):1290–306.
    doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.926119google scholar: lookup
  41. Darnell SC. Orientalism through sport: towards a said-ian analysis of imperialism and “sport for development and peace”.. Sport Soc (2014) 17(8):1000–14.
    doi: 10.1080/17430437.2013.838349google scholar: lookup
  42. Lundström C, Hübinette T. Vit Melankoli: En Analys av en Nation I Kris.. Göteborg: Makadam; (2020).
  43. Garner S. Whiteness: An introduction.. 1st ed. London: Routledge; (2007).
  44. Saunders-Hastings E. “Send back the bloodstained money”: Frederick Douglass on tainted gifts.. Am Polit Sci Rev (2021) 115(3):729–41.
    doi: 10.1017/S0003055421000319google scholar: lookup
  45. Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge.. New York: Pantheon; (1972).
  46. St. Pierre EA. The appearance of data. Cult Stud Crit Methodol (2013) 13(4):223–7.
    doi: 10.1177/1532708613487862google scholar: lookup
  47. Deleuze G. Difference and Repetition. New York: University of Minnesota Press; (1994).
  48. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud (1988) 14(3):575–99.
    doi: 10.2307/3178066google scholar: lookup
  49. Karlsson J, Wenell L. The Middle East through a Western lens: the (re)production of imaginaries in the Qatar World Cup media coverage. Sport Soc (2026):1–13.
    doi: 10.1080/17430437.2026.2629404google scholar: lookup
  50. Foucault M. Diskursen ska inte uppfattas som…. In: Götselius T, Olsson U, editors. Diskursernas Kamp. Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion; (2008). p. 171–3.
  51. Bryman A. Samhällsvetenskapliga Metoder. Malmö: Liber; (2011).
  52. Jackson YA, Mazzei AL. Thinking With Theory in Qualitative Research. London: Routledge; (2012).
  53. MacLure M. Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. Int J Qual Stud Educ (2013) 26(6):658–67.
    doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755google scholar: lookup
  54. Flood L. Volvoarbetare vittnar om dåliga arbetsvillkor. Arbetet (2018).
  55. Gatu H. Facklig kritik mot Ikea, Åhléns och Ica. Dagens Arbete (2013).
  56. Alexandrova-Zorina L. Imperiets Barn: Ett Reportage. Stockholm: Volante; (2023).
  57. . Många utländska bärplockare utnyttjas i människohandel – barnen far mest illa. SVT Nyheter (2022).
  58. Bao V. Social democratic hauntings: on Swedish dissociation and melancholia. S Atl Q (2025) 124(1):196–205.
    doi: 10.1215/00382876-11557833google scholar: lookup
  59. Callies M, Clarke B, Gerhardt C. The discourse of stadium renamings: a comparative analysis of fan banners in Germany and England. In: Lavric E, Pisek G, editors. Language and Football (Tübinger Beiträge für Linguistik 589). Tübingen: Narr; (2024). p. 317–37.
  60. Hall S. The west and the rest: discourse and power. In: Hall S, Gieben B, editors. Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press (1992). p. 275–331.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 103,832 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.