Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70187

Novel imaging protocol enables myelography of the cervical vertebral column using computed tomography with flexion and extension comparable to x-ray.

Abstract: Radiographic myelography is the traditional diagnostic method for detecting cervical spinal cord compression in horses but it is limited by superimposition and restriction to sagittal plane imaging. Computed tomography (CT) and CT myelography overcome many of these limitations yet previous CT protocols have not allowed dynamic imaging in flexion and extension comparable to radiographs. Objective: To describe and evaluate a novel CT myelography protocol that enables imaging of the equine cervical vertebral column (C to C/T) in flexion, neutral, and extension, and to compare intervertebral angle measurements with those obtained from radiographic myelography. Methods: Prospective clinical study. Methods: Eight horses with clinical signs related to the cervical vertebral column underwent CT myelography and radiographic myelography under general anaesthesia. A mobile gantry CT system combined with a custom support platform enabled controlled repositioning of the cervical vertebral column. Intervertebral angles (C to C/T) were measured in flexion, neutral, and extension by three blinded image reviewers. Agreement between modalities was assessed using ANOVA, Bland-Altman plot, and concordance correlation coefficients. Results: The entire dynamic CT myelography protocol was completed within 45 min. Across all positions and cervical segments, no statistically significant differences were found between CT and radiographic myelography angle measurements (p > 0.01). All horses recovered uneventfully from anaesthesia, and no contrast-related adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: Small sample size and the absence of repeated intra-observer measurements. Intervertebral angles served as a proxy for motion but did not directly assess the degree of spinal cord compression. Conclusions: Dynamic CT myelography is feasible, safe, and provides positional sensitivity comparable to radiographic myelography, while overcoming the limitations of superimposition and enabling multiplanar evaluation. This novel protocol offers a reliable diagnostic alternative for assessing cervical spinal pathology in horses and allows complete coverage of the cervical vertebral column from C to T.
Publication Date: 2026-05-13 PubMed ID: 42130048DOI: 10.1002/evj.70187Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study introduces and evaluates a new computed tomography (CT) myelography protocol for imaging the cervical spine in horses during flexion, neutral, and extension positions.
  • The new CT method offers dynamic, multiplanar images comparable to traditional radiographic myelography but without superimposition limitations.

Background

  • Cervical spinal cord compression in horses is commonly diagnosed with radiographic myelography.
  • Traditional radiographic myelography is limited to sagittal plane imaging and suffers from superimposition, which can obscure details.
  • Computed tomography (CT) myelography provides overcoming of some limitations by enabling cross-sectional imaging, but previously did not allow dynamic range-of-motion imaging similar to x-ray studies (flexion and extension).

Objective

  • To develop and test a novel dynamic CT myelography protocol capable of imaging the equine cervical spine from the cervical vertebrae C through cervicothoracic junction (C/T) in flexion, neutral, and extension positions.
  • To compare measurements of intervertebral angles obtained by this CT protocol with those from conventional radiographic myelography.

Methods

  • Eight horses showing clinical signs related to cervical spinal pathology were studied prospectively under general anesthesia.
  • A mobile gantry CT system was combined with a custom support platform to controllably reposition the horse’s neck in desired postures (flexion, neutral, extension).
  • CT myelography and traditional radiographic myelography were both performed for every horse.
  • Three independent, blinded reviewers measured intervertebral angles at each cervical segment and position.
  • Statistical methods used to compare angle measurements included ANOVA, Bland-Altman plots, and concordance correlation coefficients.

Results

  • The dynamic CT myelography protocol, covering the entire cervical vertebral column, took less than 45 minutes to complete in all horses.
  • Measurements of intervertebral angles did not significantly differ between CT and radiographic methods across all positions and segments (p > 0.01), indicating strong agreement.
  • All horses recovered normally from anesthesia with no adverse effects related to myelographic contrast medium.

Limitations

  • The sample size was relatively small with eight horses, limiting generalizability.
  • Intra-observer repeatability (same reviewer measuring angles multiple times) was not performed.
  • Intervertebral angles were used as an indirect measure of spinal range of motion, not a direct assessment of spinal cord compression.

Conclusions and Significance

  • Dynamic CT myelography in horses is feasible, safe, and yields measurements comparable to traditional radiographic myelography.
  • The CT protocol overcomes the limitations of superimposition inherent in radiographs, allowing multiplanar evaluation of spinal anatomy.
  • This novel protocol exams the entire cervical spine (C to T) dynamically, providing a comprehensive diagnostic tool for cervical spinal pathology in horses.
  • It expands diagnostic options for equine veterinarians by offering detailed, dynamic imaging that can improve the detection and assessment of cervical spinal disorders affecting horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Schulze N, Tull T, Drumond B, Reuter T, Werpy N. (2026). Novel imaging protocol enables myelography of the cervical vertebral column using computed tomography with flexion and extension comparable to x-ray. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70187

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Schulze, N
  • Equine Clinic Seeburg GmbH, Dallgow-Döberitz, Germany.
Tull, T
  • Ocala Equine Hospital, Ocala, Florida, USA.
Drumond, B
  • Equine Diagnostic Imaging Inc., Archer, Florida, USA.
Reuter, T
  • ICM-Institut Chemnitzer Maschinen- und Anlagenbau e.V, Chemnitz, Germany.
Werpy, N
  • Equine Diagnostic Imaging Inc., Archer, Florida, USA.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Tucker R, Hall YS, Hughes TK, Parker RA. Osteochondral fragmentation of the cervical articular process joints; prevalence in horses undergoing CT for investigation of cervical dysfunction.. Equine Vet J 2020;54:106–113.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13410google scholar: lookup
  2. Puchalski SM. Advances in equine computed tomography and use of contrast media.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2012;28:563–581.
  3. Wright L, Puchalski SM, Kristoffersen M, Lindegaard C. Arthroscopic approach and intra‐articular anatomy of the equine atlanto‐occipital joint.. Vet Surg 2018;47:756–767.
  4. Lindgren CM, Wright L, Kristoffersen M, Puchalski SM. Computed tomography and myelography of the equine cervical spine: 180 cases (2013–2018).. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33(9):475–483.
  5. Mól M, Garrett K, Ruby R, Janes J, Reed S. Equine intervertebral disc disease with dorsal protrusion and spinal cord compression: a computed tomography, myelography, MRI, and histopathologic case study.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2024;65(5):534–538.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.13388google scholar: lookup
  6. Gough SL, Anderson JDC, Nixon JJ. Computed tomographic cervical myelography in horses: technique and findings in 51 clinical cases.. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34:2142–2151.
  7. Janes JG, Garrett KS, McQuerry KJ, Pease AP, Williams NM, Reed SM. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy.. Equine Vet J 2014;46:681–686.
  8. Johnson PJ, Constantinescu GM. Collection of cerebrospinal fluid in horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2000;12:7–12.
  9. Hahn CN, Handel I, Green SL, Bronsvoort MB, Mayhew IG. Assessment of the utility of using intra‐and intervertebral minimum sagittal diameter ratios in the diagnosis of cervical vertebral malformation in horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49:1–6.
  10. Down SS, Henson FMD. Radiographic retrospective study of the caudal cervical articular process joints in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2009;41:518–524.
  11. Levine JM, Scrivani PV, Divers TJ, Furr M, Mayhew IJ, Reed S. Multicenter case‐control study of signalment, diagnostic features, and outcome associated with cervical vertebral malformation‐malarticulation in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;237:812–822.
  12. Hudson NPH, Mayhew IG. Radiographic and myelographic assessment of the equine cervical vertebral column and spinal cord.. Equine Vet Educ 2005;17:34–38.
  13. Szklarz M, Skalec A, Kirstein K, Janeczek M, Kasparek M, Kasparek A. Management of equine ataxia caused by cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy: a European perspective 2010–2015.. Equine Vet Educ 2018;30:370–376.
  14. Papageorges M, Gavin PR, Sande RD, Barbee DD, Grant BD. Radiographic and myelographic examination of the cervical vertebral column in 306 ataxic horses.. Vet Radiol 1987;28:53–59.
  15. Moore B, Holbrook TC, Stefanacci JD, Reed SM, Tate LP, Menard MC. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography and myelography in six horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy.. Equine Vet J 1992;24(3):197–202.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306google scholar: lookup
  16. Kristoffersen M, Puchalski S, Skog S, Lindegaard C. Cervical computed tomography (CT) and CT myelography in live horses: 16 cases. Equine Vet J 2014;46(S47):11.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12323_23google scholar: lookup
  17. Ogden NKE, Winderickx K, Stack JD. Computed tomography of the equine caudal spine and pelvis. Pathological findings in 56 clinical cases (2018–2023). Equine Vet J 2025;57(5):1279–1289.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14426google scholar: lookup
  18. Dennison S, Drees R, Rylander H, Yandell BS, Milovancev M, Pettigrew R. Evaluation of different computed tomography techniques and myelography for the diagnosis of acute canine myelopathy: diagnosing acute canine myelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51(3):254–258.
  19. Hellige M, Schröder C, Seehusen F, Cavalleri J‐M, Rohn K, Stadler P. Computed tomographic myelography of the cranial cervical spine in Warmblood horses with no spinal pathology—inter‐ and intravertebral ratios and distribution of contrast columns in neutral and flexed cervical spine. Equine Vet J 2025;57(5):1375–1386.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14552google scholar: lookup
  20. Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Stubbs NC. Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: effects on intervertebral angulations. Equine Vet J 2010;42(S38):688–694.
  21. Nelson BB, Goodrich LR, Barrett MF, Grinstaff MW, Kawcak CE. Use of contrast media in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in horses: techniques, adverse events and opportunities. Equine Vet J 2017;49:410–424.
  22. Mullen KR, Furness MC, Johnson AL, Norman TE, Hart KA, Burton AJ. Adverse reactions in horses that underwent general anesthesia and cervical myelography. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:954–960.
  23. Sleutjens J, Voorhout G, van der Kolk JH, Wijnberg ID, Back W. The effect of ex vivo flexion and extension on intervertebral foramina dimensions in the equine cervical spine. Equine Vet J 2010;42:425–430.
  24. Van Biervliet J, Scrivani PV, Divers TJ, Erb HN, De Lahunta A, Nixon A. Evaluation of decision criteria for detection of spinal cord compression based on cervical myelography in horses: 38 cases (1981–2001). Equine Vet J 2004;36:14–20.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044864642google scholar: lookup
  25. Schulze N, Werpy N, Gernhardt J, Fritsch G, Hildebrandt T, Vanderperren K. Dynamic three‐dimensional computed tomographic imaging facilitates evaluation of the equine cervical articular process joint in motion. Equine Vet J 2023;55(1):83–91.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13560google scholar: lookup
  26. Koch R, Spoerl E. Statistische Verfahren zum Vergleich zweier Messmethoden und zur Kalibrierung: Konkordanz‐, Korrelations‐ und Regressionsanalyse am Beispiel der Augeninnendruckmessung. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2007;224(1):52–57.
    doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927278google scholar: lookup
  27. Gerke O. Reporting standards for a Bland–Altman agreement analysis: a review of methodological reviews. Diagnostics 2020;10(5):334.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.