Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2007; 231(9); 1378-1385; doi: 10.2460/javma.231.9.1378

Outcome of medical and surgical treatment of cecal impaction in horses: 114 cases (1994-2004).

Abstract: To determine short- and long-term outcomes, including recurrence rates, for horses with cecal impaction treated medically or surgically. Methods: Retrospective case series. Methods: 114 horses. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for information on signalment, history, clinical findings, treatment (medical vs surgical), and short-term outcome. Information on longterm outcome was obtained through a mail survey and telephone interview with owners. Results: 54 horses were treated medically, 49 horses were treated surgically, and 11 horses were euthanized after initial examination without further treatment. Horses treated surgically were significantly more likely to have signs of moderate or severe pain than were horses treated medically. Forty-four of the 54 (81%) horses treated medically were discharged from the hospital. Twelve of the 49 horses treated surgically were euthanized at surgery because of cecal rupture. Thirty-five of the 37 (95%) horses that were allowed to recover from surgery were discharged from the hospital. In 34 horses treated surgically, typhlotomy without a bypass procedure was performed. Long-term (>or= 1 year) follow-up information was available for 19 horses treated medically and 28 horses treated surgically. Eighteen (95%) and 25 (89%) of the horses, respectively, were alive at least 1 year after treatment. Conclusions: Results suggested that medical and surgical treatment were both associated with favorable outcomes in horses with cecal impactions. In this population, typhlotomy alone without cecal bypass was associated with a low recurrence rate. The long-term prognosis for horses that were discharged from the hospital was good.
Publication Date: 2007-11-03 PubMed ID: 17975999DOI: 10.2460/javma.231.9.1378Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about the investigation of short and long-term results, including recurrence rates, of horses with cecal impaction who underwent either medical or surgical treatment.

Objective and Methodology

  • The paper aims to determine the outcomes, both short and long-term, and the recurrence rates for horses with cecal impaction treated either medically or surgically.
  • The research was conducted retrospectively by reviewing medical records of 114 horses for details about their health status, history, clinical findings, treatment method (either medicinal or surgical), and the initial outcome after treatment.
  • Apart from reviewing medical records, the study also collected long-term outcome data through a mail survey and phone interviews conducted with the horse owners.

Results

  • Out of 114 horses, 54 were treated medically, 49 surgically, and 11 were euthanized after initial examination without further treatment.
  • Horses who underwent surgical treatment were more likely to exhibit signs of moderate or severe pain compared to those treated medically.
  • Most horses (81%) treated medically were discharged from the hospital, while some others (12 out of 49) treated surgically were euthanized due to cecal rupture during surgery. However, a vast majority of horses that survived the surgery (95%) were discharged from the hospital.
  • In terms of surgical procedures, typhlotomy without a bypass procedure was performed on 34 out of 49 horses.
  • Long-term follow-up information was available for 19 horses treated medically and 28 horses treated surgically. Interestingly, the survival rates of both groups were high, with 95% of medically treated horses and 89% of surgically treated horses alive at least 1 year post-treatment.

Conclusion

  • Based on these findings, the study concludes that both medical and surgical treatments are associated with favorable outcomes in horses with cecal impactions.
  • Performing typhlotomy alone without a cecal bypass procedure was linked to a lower incidence rate of recurrence.
  • The long-term prognosis for horses that were discharged from the hospital was generally positive, indicating a promising outcome from the interventions in dealing with cecal impactions in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Plummer AE, Rakestraw PC, Hardy J, Lee RM. (2007). Outcome of medical and surgical treatment of cecal impaction in horses: 114 cases (1994-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 231(9), 1378-1385. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.231.9.1378

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 231
Issue: 9
Pages: 1378-1385

Researcher Affiliations

Plummer, Amy E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4475, USA.
Rakestraw, Peter C
    Hardy, Joanne
      Lee, Ryan M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Cecum / surgery
        • Clonixin / analogs & derivatives
        • Clonixin / therapeutic use
        • Fecal Impaction / drug therapy
        • Fecal Impaction / surgery
        • Fecal Impaction / veterinary
        • Female
        • Follow-Up Studies
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horses
        • Isotonic Solutions / therapeutic use
        • Male
        • Mineral Oil / therapeutic use
        • Prognosis
        • Recurrence
        • Retrospective Studies
        • Ringer's Solution
        • Treatment Outcome
        • Xylazine / therapeutic use

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Gough RL, McGovern KF, Bladon BM, Carmichael LA. Caecal dysfunction following standing surgical procedures. Vet Med Sci 2022 Sep;8(5):1930-1935.
          doi: 10.1002/vms3.882pubmed: 35894758google scholar: lookup
        2. Jennings K, Curtis L, Burford J, Freeman S. Prospective survey of veterinary practitioners' primary assessment of equine colic: clinical features, diagnoses, and treatment of 120 cases of large colon impaction. BMC Vet Res 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2.
          doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S2pubmed: 25238179google scholar: lookup
        3. Wormstrand BH, Ihler CF, Diesen R, Krontveit RI. Surgical treatment of equine colic - a retrospective study of 297 surgeries in Norway 2005-2011. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Jun 16;56(1):38.
          doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-38pubmed: 24934123google scholar: lookup
        4. Westgarth S, Singh A, Vince AR. Subclinical cecal impaction in a dog. Can Vet J 2013 Feb;54(2):171-3.
          pubmed: 23904642