FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown ...
PloS one2014; 9(8); e103140; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103140

Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown at dressage competitions and their relation to conflict behaviour and performance marks.

Abstract: Much controversy exists among riders, and in particular among those practicing dressage, regarding what can be considered an "appropriate" Head-Neck-Position (HNP). The objective was to assess the prevalence of different HNPs in the field, the behavioural reactions of horses during warm-up and competition rides in relation to HNP and the relation between HNP and marks achieved in the competition. Horses (n = 171) were selected during dressage competitions according to their HNP (3 categories based on the degree of flexion), and their behaviour was recorded during 3 minutes each of riding in the warm-up area and in the competition. Scans were carried out on an additional 355 horses every 15 minutes to determine the proportion of each HNP in the warm-up area. Sixty-nine percent of the 355 horses were ridden with their nasal planes behind the vertical in the warm-up area, 19% were ridden at or behind the vertical and only 12% were ridden with their nasal plane in front of the vertical. Horses carrying their nasal plane behind the vertical exhibited significantly (P<0.0001) more conflict behaviours than horses with their nose held in front of the vertical. Horses were commonly presented with a less flexed HNP during competition compared to warm-up (P<0.05). A HNP behind the vertical was penalised with lower marks in the lower (P = 0.0434) but not in the higher (P = 0.9629) competition levels. Horses in higher classes showed more (P = 0.0015) conflict behaviour than those in lower classes. In conclusion, dressage horses are commonly ridden during warm-up for competitions with their nasal plane behind the vertical, and this posture seems to cause significantly more conflict behaviour than HNPs in front of the vertical.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-08-04 PubMed ID: 25090242PubMed Central: PMC4121138DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103140Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on the common head-neck position (HNP) in horses during dressage competitions, its connection to the horses’ behavioral reactions, and the impact on their grading. The study observed that horses with their noses behind the vertical had more behavioral issues, and, this HNP is often deemed less favorable in competition grading.

Study Methodology

  • The researchers selected 171 horses during dressage competitions based on their HNP. HNPs were categorised into three groups – the nose behind the vertical, at or behind the vertical, and in front of the vertical. The behavior of the selected horses was recorded for 3 minutes during both warm-up and competition.
  • An additional number of 355 horses were observed every 15 minutes to determine the proportion of each HNP in the warm-up area.

Findings of the Study

  • Out of the 355 additional horses studied, 69% were ridden with their nasal plane behind the vertical in the warm-up area. 19% were ridden at or behind the vertical and only 12% had their nasal plane in front of the vertical.
  • The horses carrying their nasal plane behind the vertical showed significantly more conflict behaviours than horses with their noses in front of the vertical.
  • During competitions, the horses were often presented with less flexed HNP as compared to warm-ups.

Link between HNP and Competition Marks

  • A HNP behind the vertical led to lower marks in the lower levels of competition but didn’t affect scoring in higher levels.
  • Horses in higher competitive classes showed more conflict behaviours than those in lower classes.

Conclusion of the Study

  • The finding of this research suggests that during dressage competition warm-ups, horses are commonly ridden with their nasal plane or HNP behind the vertical. This position is linked to significantly more conflict behaviours than HNPs in front of the vertical.

Cite This Article

APA
Kienapfel K, Link Y, König V Borstel U. (2014). Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown at dressage competitions and their relation to conflict behaviour and performance marks. PLoS One, 9(8), e103140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103140

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 8
Pages: e103140

Researcher Affiliations

Kienapfel, Kathrin
  • Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Link, Yvonne
  • Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
König V Borstel, Uta
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Competitive Behavior
  • Conflict, Psychological
  • Head / physiology
  • Horses
  • Least-Squares Analysis
  • Neck / physiology
  • Pilot Projects
  • Posture / physiology
  • Prevalence

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Correction: Human Direct Actions May Alter Animal Welfare, a Study on Horses (Equus caballus). PLoS ONE 2010 5(4): e10257.
    pmc: PMC2860978pubmed: 20442766doi: 10.1371google scholar: lookup
  2. Cavendish W (1667) A new Method, and extraordinary invention, to dress horses, and work them according to nature. London: Tho. Milbourn.
  3. HDV (1937) Heeresdienstvorschrift. Herford: Mittler.
  4. Pfeil-Rotermund S, Zeeb K. Zum Ausdruckverhalten von Springpferden. KTBL-Schriften Vertrieb 1994 p. 231–239.
  5. Caanitz H. Ausdrucksverhalten von Pferden und Interaktion zwischen Pferd und Reiter zu Beginn der Ausbildung. Dissertation Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover.
  6. von Borstel UU, Duncan IJH, Shoveller AK, Merkies K, Keeling LJ. Impact of riding in a coercively obtained Rollkur posture onwelfare and fear of performance horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2009 116: 228–236.
  7. König von Borstel U, Gliβmann C. Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tenions and behavioural parameters. PLoS ONE 2014 9: e87285.
    pmc: PMC3906164pubmed: 24489890
  8. Kienapfel K. Und was meinen die Pferde dazu? Über das Ausdrucksverhalten von Pferden bei verschiedenen Halsstellungen. Pferdeheilkunde 2011 27: 372–380.
  9. van Dierendonck M, van Dalum M, Beekmans M, Christensen JW. Acute stress response of dressage horses ridden in three different head and neck positions. 2012 p 62.
  10. McGreevy P. Equine Behaviour: A guide for veterinarians and equine scientists. 2004 Edinburg, London, New York, Oxford, Philadelphia, St Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Saunders.
  11. Ludewig AK, Gauly M, König v Borstel U. Effect of shortened reins on rein tension, stress and discomfort behaviour in dressage horses. 2011 In: Van Dierendonck M, de Cocp P, Visser K, editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Equitation Science Conference, Hooge Mierde, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
  12. Zeitler-Feicht MH. Handbuch Pferdeverhalten. 2008 Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer.
  13. McLean A, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2010 5: 187–195.
  14. McGreevy P, Warren-Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2012 7: 142–148.
  15. Kienapfel K, Preuschoft H. Viel zu eng! Über die Verschnallung der Nasenriemen. Pferdeheilkunde 2010 26: 178–185.
  16. Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Conwa R, O'Muiris E. Two methods of measuring in- vivo pressures applied by a cavesson noseband. 2013 In: Heleski C, Wickens C, editors. 9th International Equitation Science Conference Proceedings. Newark: University of Delaware. p. 38.
  17. Gómez Álvarez CB, Rhodin M, Bobbert M F, Meyer H, Weishaupt MA. The effect of head and neck position on the thoracolumbar kinematics in the unridden horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2006 38: 445–451.
    pubmed: 17402464
  18. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, von Peinen K, Waldern N M, Roepstorff L. Effect of head and neck position on vertical ground reaction forces and interlimb coordination in the dressage horse ridden at walk and trot on a treadmill. Equine veterinary Journal 2006 36: 387–392.
    pubmed: 17402453
  19. Waldner NM, Wiestner T, von Peinen K, Gómez Álvarez CG, Roepstorff L. Influence of different head-neck positions on vertical ground reaction forces, linear and time parameters in the unridden horse walking and trotting on a treadmill. Equine veterinary Journal 2009 41: 268–273.
    pubmed: 19469234
  20. Wijnberg ID, Slentjens J, van der Kolk JH, Back W. Effect of head and neck position on outcome of quantative neuromuscular diagnostic techniques in warmblood riding horses directly following moderate exercise. Equine veterinary Journal 2010 42: 261–267.
    pubmed: 21059016
  21. Becker-Birck M, Schmidt A, Wulf M, Aurich J, von der Wense A. Cortisol release, heart rate and heart rate variability, and superficial body temperature, in horses lunged either with hyperflexion of the neck or with an extended head and neck position. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2013 97: 322–330.
    pubmed: 22320155
  22. Kienapfel K. The effect of three different head–neck positions on the average EMG activity of three important neck muscles in the horse. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2014 (in print).
    pubmed: 24954642
  23. Plewa D. Der Einfluss der Beizäumung auf die Bewertung durch den Dressurrichter. Pferdeheilkunde 2006 22: 700–702.
  24. Hawson LA, McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Variability of scores in the Olympic dressage competition and implications for horse training and welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour 2010 5: 170–176.
  25. Murray RC, Mann S, Parkin TDH. Warm-up in dressage competions: association with level, completion type and final score. Equine Comparative Exercise Physiology 2006 3: 185–189.
  26. König von Borstel U, Kassebaum L, Gauly M. Effect of discipline (Western vs Dressage) and skill level on learning and discomfort behaviour of riding horses. 2011 In: Van Dierendonck M, de Cocp P, Visser K, editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Equitation Science Conference, Hooge Mierde, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, p 75.
  27. McGreevy PD, Harman A, McLean A, Hawson L. Over-flexing the horse's neck: A modern Equestrian obsession?. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour: Clinical Applications and Research 2010 5: 180–186.
  28. Hutchings K, Randle H. Is horse head position used as an indicator of training in advertisements?. 2013 In: Heleski C, Wickens C, editors. 9th International Equitation Science Conference Proceedings. Newark, USA: University of Delaware, p 79.
  29. McGrogan C, Hutchison MD, King JE. Dimensions of horse personality based on owner and trainer supplied personality traits. Applied Animal Behavior Science 2008 113: 206–14.
  30. McDonnell SM, Diehl NK. Computer-assisted recording of live and videotaped horse behavior: reliability studies. Applied Animal Behavior Science 1990 27: 1–7.
  31. König v Borstel U, Pirsich W, Gauly M, Bruns E. Repeatability and reliability of scores from ridden temperament tests conducted during performance tests. Applied Animal Behavior Science 2012 139: 251–63.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.