Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2026; 16(7); 1082; doi: 10.3390/ani16071082

Priorities and Recommendations for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Improve Equid Health and Welfare.

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used for equid health and welfare. This study aimed to establish consensus on where and how AI should be developed to achieve maximum benefit in this field. A workshop involving 41 stakeholders generated statements about current welfare concerns, areas for AI development, and barriers and solutions to AI use. Statements were circulated through Delphi surveys (acceptance set at 75% agreement). One-hundred-and-six statements reached agreement. Ethological needs not being met and poor equid management practices were key welfare concerns. Participants identified that insufficient owner/carer knowledge and understanding were important factors contributing to welfare concerns. Priority areas for AI development included assessment of equid wellbeing, as well as individual and population-level monitoring. Barriers included limited understanding of both equine behaviour and AI, biased, unethical, or insufficient data collection, difficulties developing accurate models, challenges to validation, and uncertainty around interpretation. Proposed solutions included development of evidence-based, unbiased AI systems, following best practice guidelines, requiring approval/regulation of AI tools, collaboration, and education of AI users. This is the first study to identify stakeholders' opinions about where AI is likely to have the greatest benefit for equids, potential barriers, and solutions. The findings should be used to prioritise funding and development.
Publication Date: 2026-04-01 PubMed ID: 41976060DOI: 10.3390/ani16071082Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance the health and welfare of equids, and this study gathered expert consensus on the most important areas for AI development and implementation to maximize benefits. It also identified major welfare concerns, barriers to AI adoption, and practical recommendations to overcome these challenges.

Study Objectives and Approach

  • Aim: To establish consensus among stakeholders on how AI can be effectively developed and used to improve equid (horses, donkeys, mules) health and welfare.
  • Method: A workshop involving 41 participants with expertise or interest in equid welfare was convened to generate statements regarding:
    • Current welfare concerns in equids
    • Priority areas where AI could have the greatest impact
    • Barriers to the successful implementation of AI
    • Solutions and recommendations for overcoming these barriers
  • These statements were further refined and validated through Delphi surveys, requiring at least 75% agreement among respondents for a statement to be accepted.

Key Found Welfare Concerns

  • Ethological needs of equids are often not met – meaning their natural behaviors, social interactions, and environmental requirements are inadequately addressed.
  • Poor management practices contribute significantly to welfare issues.
  • Insufficient knowledge and understanding among equid owners and carers about proper care and behavior of animals were identified as major factors affecting welfare negatively.

Priority Areas for AI Development

  • Assessment of equid wellbeing through automated or AI-driven tools, including behavioral monitoring and health evaluation.
  • Individual-level monitoring, such as tracking the health and behavior of single animals for early detection of welfare problems.
  • Population-level monitoring, where AI can analyze data across groups of equids to identify trends, outbreaks of disease, or welfare issues.

Identified Barriers to AI Implementation

  • Limited understanding of both equine behavior and AI technology among potential users and developers, leading to challenges in designing effective tools.
  • Biased, unethical, or insufficient data collection hinders the development of reliable AI models.
  • Difficulty in developing accurate AI models that generalize well to diverse real-world conditions.
  • Challenges in validating AI systems to ensure they work as intended and provide trustworthy outputs.
  • Uncertainty in interpreting AI-generated data, limiting user confidence and uptake.

Proposed Solutions to Overcome Barriers

  • Development of AI systems that are evidence-based and unbiased, ensuring high scientific standards and ethical data practices.
  • Adherence to best practice guidelines in AI development and application for equid welfare.
  • Implementation of approval or regulatory frameworks to validate and monitor AI tools before widespread use.
  • Encouragement of collaboration among AI developers, equine experts, and end-users to align technology with practical needs.
  • Focus on education and training for AI users to improve understanding of both equine behavior and AI capabilities.

Significance and Future Use

  • This is the first study to systematically gather stakeholder opinions regarding where AI can best benefit equid welfare, potential obstacles, and how to address them.
  • The consensus findings provide clear guidance to prioritize research funding and development efforts focused on high-impact areas.
  • The recommendations aim to accelerate the ethical and effective implementation of AI technologies to support equid health, welfare assessment, and management.

Cite This Article

APA
Young PL, Hyde R, Douglas J, Freeman SL. (2026). Priorities and Recommendations for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Improve Equid Health and Welfare. Animals (Basel), 16(7), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071082

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 7
PII: 1082

Researcher Affiliations

Young, Philippa L
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
Hyde, Robert
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
Douglas, Janet
  • World Horse Welfare, Anne Colvin House, Norwich NR16 2LR, UK.
Freeman, Sarah L
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.

Grant Funding

  • None / Animal Welfare Research Network

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.