FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Range of motion and between-measurement variation of spinal ...
PloS one2020; 15(2); e0222822; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222822

Range of motion and between-measurement variation of spinal kinematics in sound horses at trot on the straight line and on the lunge.

Abstract: Clinical assessment of spinal motion in horses is part of many routine clinical exams but remains highly subjective. A prerequisite for the quantification of spinal motion is the assessment of the expected normal range of motion and variability of back kinematics. The aim of this study was to objectively quantify spinal kinematics and between -measurement, -surface and -day variation in owner-sound horses. In an observational study, twelve owner-sound horses were trotted 12 times on four different paths (hard/soft straight line, soft lunge left and right). Measurements were divided over three days, with five repetitions on day one and two, and two repetitions on day three (recheck) which occurred 28-55 days later. Optical motion capture was used to collect kinematic data. Elements of the outcome were: 1) Ranges of Motion (ROM) with confidence intervals per path and surface, 2) a variability model to calculate between-measurement variation and test the effect of time, surface and path, 3) intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to determine repeatability. ROM was lowest on the hard straight line. Cervical lateral bending was doubled on the left compared to the right lunge. Mean variation for the flexion-extension and lateral bending of the whole back were 0.8 and 1 degrees. Pelvic motion showed a variation of 1.0 (pitch), 0.7 (yaw) and 1.3 (roll) degrees. For these five parameters, a tendency for more variation on the hard surface and reduced variation with increased repetitions was observed. More variation was seen on the recheck (p<0.001). ICC values for pelvic rotations were between 0.76 and 0.93, for the whole back flexion-extension and lateral bending between 0.51 and 0.91. Between-horse variation was substantially higher than within-horse variation. In conclusion, ROM and variation in spinal biomechanics are horse-specific and small, necessitating individual analysis and making subjective and objective clinical assessment of spinal kinematics challenging.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-02-25 PubMed ID: 32097432PubMed Central: PMC7041811DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222822Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates spinal movement in horses, revealing that it is highly individualized and presents challenges for both subjective and objective clinical assessments. The research aims to quantify spinal kinematics in sound horses, especially focusing on the variances in measurements, surfaces, and timings.

About the study

  • The study was observational, involving twelve horses that were made to trot 12 times on four different paths (a hard/soft straight line, and a soft lunge left and right).
  • The measurements were spread over three days, with five repetitions on the first two days, and two repetitions on day three which occurred 28-55 days later.
  • The researchers used an optical motion capture system to collect kinematic data.

Results and findings

  • The study found that the Range of Motion (ROM) was lowest on the hard straight line.
  • Cervical lateral bending doubled when lunging left compared to right.
  • Mean variation for the flexion-extension and lateral bending of the whole back were quite small, indicating consistency in these movements.
  • Pelvic motion showed a slight variation in pitch, yaw and roll degrees.
  • The study also showed a tendency for more variation on the hard surface and reduced variation with increased repetitions.
  • The amount of variation increased significantly on the recheck day.

Repeatability and variation

  • Repeatability, measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), found the values for pelvic rotations between 0.76 and 0.93, and for the whole back flexion-extension and lateral bending between 0.51 and 0.91.
  • Between-horse variability was significantly higher than within-horse variability, suggesting that spinal kinematics is highly individual to each horse.

Conclusion

  • The conclusion of the study holds that the ROM and the variation in spinal mechanics are very specific to individual horses and are quite small, making clinical assessment challenging.

Cite This Article

APA
Hardeman AM, Byström A, Roepstorff L, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Serra Bragança FM. (2020). Range of motion and between-measurement variation of spinal kinematics in sound horses at trot on the straight line and on the lunge. PLoS One, 15(2), e0222822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222822

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
Pages: e0222822
PII: e0222822

Researcher Affiliations

Hardeman, A M
  • Tierklinik Luesche GmbH, Luesche, Germany.
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Byström, A
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Roepstorff, L
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swagemakers, J H
  • Tierklinik Luesche GmbH, Luesche, Germany.
van Weeren, P R
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Serra Bragança, F M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Back / physiology
  • Biological Variation, Individual
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Gait
  • Horses
  • Locomotion
  • Range of Motion, Articular / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results

Conflict of Interest Statement

The involvement of ‘Tierklinik Lüsche GmbH’ does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Zimmerman M, Dyson S, Murray R. Close, impinging and overriding spinous processes in the thoracolumbar spine: the relationship between radiological and scintigraphic findings and clinical signs.. Equine Vet J 2012 Mar;44(2):178-84.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00373.xpubmed: 21880062google scholar: lookup
  2. Jeffcott LB. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse--a survey of 443 cases.. Equine Vet J 1980 Oct;12(4):197-210.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb03427.xpubmed: 7439145google scholar: lookup
  3. Wennerstrand J, Johnston C, Roethlisberger-Holm K, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Kinematic evaluation of the back in the sport horse with back pain.. Equine Vet J 2004 Dec;36(8):707-11.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848226pubmed: 15656501google scholar: lookup
  4. Wennerstrand J, Gómez Alvarez CB, Meulenbelt R, Johnston C, van Weeren PR, Roethlisberger-Holm K, Drevemo S. Spinal kinematics in horses with induced back pain.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009;22(6):448-54.
    doi: 10.3415/VCOT-08-09-0088pubmed: 19876520google scholar: lookup
  5. Gomez Alvarez CB, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, Johnston C, Back W, van Weeren PR. The effect of induced hindlimb lameness on thoracolumbar kinematics during treadmill locomotion.. Equine Vet J 2008 Mar;40(2):147-52.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X250184pubmed: 18089465google scholar: lookup
  6. Gómez Alvarez CB, Wennerstrand J, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, Johnston C, Back W, van Weeren PR. The effect of induced forelimb lameness on thoracolumbar kinematics during treadmill locomotion.. Equine Vet J 2007 May;39(3):197-201.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x173668pubmed: 17520968google scholar: lookup
  7. Greve L, Dyson SJ. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population.. Equine Vet J 2014 Nov;46(6):687-94.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12222pubmed: 24372949google scholar: lookup
  8. Greve L, Dyson SJ. An investigation of the relationship between hindlimb lameness and saddle slip.. Equine Vet J 2013 Sep;45(5):570-7.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12029pubmed: 23360352google scholar: lookup
  9. Greve L, Dyson S. Saddle fit and management: An investigation of the association with equine thoracolumbar asymmetries, horse and rider health.. Equine Vet J 2015 Jul;47(4):415-21.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12304pubmed: 24905610google scholar: lookup
  10. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness.. Equine Vet J 1996 Jan;28(1):71-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01592.xpubmed: 8565958google scholar: lookup
  11. Wolschrijn C, Audigié F, Wijnberg ID, Johnston C, Denoix JM, Back W. The neck and back. 2013. pp. 216–223.
  12. Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Thoracolumbar movement in sound horses trotting in straight lines in hand and on the lunge and the relationship with hind limb symmetry or asymmetry.. Vet J 2017 Feb;220:95-104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.003pubmed: 28190505google scholar: lookup
  13. Erichsen C, Eksell P, Holm KR, Lord P, Johnston C. Relationship between scintigraphic and radiographic evaluations of spinous processes in the thoracolumbar spine in riding horses without clinical signs of back problems.. Equine Vet J 2004 Sep;36(6):458-65.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044877341pubmed: 15460068google scholar: lookup
  14. Faber M, Johnston C, van Weeren PR, Barneveld A. Repeatability of back kinematics in horses during treadmill locomotion.. Equine Vet J 2002 May;34(3):235-41.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776186010pubmed: 12108740google scholar: lookup
  15. Gomez Alvarez CB, L'ami JJ, Moffat D, Back W, van Weeren PR. Effect of chiropractic manipulations on the kinematics of back and limbs in horses with clinically diagnosed back problems.. Equine Vet J 2008 Mar;40(2):153-9.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X250292pubmed: 18089466google scholar: lookup
  16. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, Janicek J, Kramer J, Lacarrubba A, Walsh DM, Cassells MW, Esther TM, Schiltz P, Frees KE, Wilhite CL, Clark JM, Pollitt CC, Shaw R, Norris T. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):92-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X479568pubmed: 20156242google scholar: lookup
  17. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, May SA. Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses.. Vet Rec 2006 Sep 9;159(11):346-9.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.159.11.346pubmed: 16963714google scholar: lookup
  18. Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Variation in gait parameters used for objective lameness assessment in sound horses at the trot on the straight line and the lunge.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):831-839.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13075pmc: PMC6850282pubmed: 30648286google scholar: lookup
  19. Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Forbes BS, Pfau T. Repeatability of gait analysis measurements in Thoroughbreds in training.. Equine Vet J 2018 Jul;50(4):513-518.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12802pubmed: 29284186google scholar: lookup
  20. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Dent EV, Kellerman TE, Wilson DA, Reed SK. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses.. Am J Vet Res 2011 Sep;72(9):1156-63.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  21. Johnston C, Holm KR, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Kinematic evaluation of the back in fully functioning riding horses.. Equine Vet J 2004 Sep;36(6):495-8.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044877431pubmed: 15460073google scholar: lookup
  22. AAEP. Guide to veterinary services for horse shows. 1999.
  23. Serra Bragança FM, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Pfau T, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Quantitative lameness assessment in the horse based on upper body movement symmetry: The effect of different filtering techniques on the quantification of motion symmetry. Biomed Signal Process Control 2020;57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101674google scholar: lookup
  24. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LE, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Dec;73(12):1890-9.
    pubmed: 23176414doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890google scholar: lookup
  25. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. The role of biomechanical analysis of horse and rider in equitation science. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2017;190: 123–132.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.011google scholar: lookup
  26. Holmström M, Fredericson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged as good and poor at the trot. Equine Vet J 1994;26: 51–56.
    pubmed: 0
  27. Dyson S, Greve L. Subjective Gait Assessment of 57 Sports Horses in Normal Work: A Comparison of the Response to Flexion Tests, Movement in Hand, on the Lunge, and Ridden. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;38: 1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.012google scholar: lookup
  28. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Haubro Andersen P, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner.. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176253.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176253pmc: PMC5404851pubmed: 28441406google scholar: lookup
  29. Williams J. Laterality: implications for equine management and performance. Vet Nurse 2014;2: 434–441.
    doi: 10.12968/vetn.2011.2.8.434google scholar: lookup
  30. Chateau H, Holden L, Robin D, Falala S, Pourcelot P, Estoup P, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. Biomechanical analysis of hoof landing and stride parameters in harness trotter horses running on different tracks of a sand beach (from wet to dry) and on an asphalt road.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):488-95.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00277.xpubmed: 21059050google scholar: lookup
  31. Oosterlinck M, Royaux E, Back W, Pille F. A preliminary study on pressure-plate evaluation of forelimb toe-heel and mediolateral hoof balance on a hard vs. a soft surface in sound ponies at the walk and trot.. Equine Vet J 2014 Nov;46(6):751-5.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12210pubmed: 24417416google scholar: lookup
  32. Crevier-Denoix N, Robin D, Pourcelot P, Falala S, Holden L, Estoup P, Desquilbet L, Denoix JM, Chateau H. Ground reaction force and kinematic analysis of limb loading on two different beach sand tracks in harness trotters.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):544-51.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00202.xpubmed: 21059058google scholar: lookup
  33. Hébert-Losier K, Mourot L, Holmberg HC. Elite and amateur orienteers' running biomechanics on three surfaces at three speeds.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015 Feb;47(2):381-9.
    doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000413pubmed: 24983340google scholar: lookup
  34. Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, Wiestner T, Hernlund E, Pfau T, van Weeren PR, Weishaupt MA. Quantification of the effect of instrumentation error in objective gait assessment in the horse on hindlimb symmetry parameters.. Equine Vet J 2018 May;50(3):370-376.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12766pmc: PMC5900976pubmed: 29032614google scholar: lookup
  35. Starke SD, May SA, Pfau T. Understanding hind limb lameness signs in horses using simple rigid body mechanics.. J Biomech 2015 Sep 18;48(12):3323-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.019pubmed: 26163753google scholar: lookup
  36. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Lopes MA. Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system-based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2013 Jan;74(1):17-24.
    pubmed: 23270341doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17google scholar: lookup
  37. Parkes RS, Weller R, Groth AM, May S, Pfau T. Evidence of the development of 'domain-restricted' expertise in the recognition of asymmetric motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2009 Feb;41(2):112-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x343000pubmed: 19418737google scholar: lookup
  38. Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci 1971;10: 25–61.
    doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4google scholar: lookup
  39. Hausknecht M, Li WK, Mauk M, Stone P. Machine Learning Capabilities of a Simulated Cerebellum.. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2017 Mar;28(3):510-522.
    doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2512838pubmed: 26829807google scholar: lookup
  40. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ. Visual Object Recognition: Do We (Finally) Know More Now Than We Did?. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2016 Oct 14;2:377-396.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114621pubmed: 28532357google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 16 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.