Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(13); doi: 10.3390/ani13132127

Saddle Thigh Block Design Can Influence Rider and Horse Biomechanics.

Abstract: The association between rider-saddle interaction and horse kinematics has been little studied. It was hypothesized that differences in a thigh block design would influence (a) rider-saddle interface pressures, (b) rider kinematics, and (c) equine limb/spinal kinematics. Eighteen elite sport horses/riders were trotted using correctly fitted dressage saddles with thigh blocks S (vertical face) and F (deformable face). Contact area, mean, and peak pressure between rider and saddle were determined using an on-saddle pressure mat. Spherical markers allowed for the measurement of horse/rider kinematics using two-dimensional video analysis. The kinematics of the equine thoracolumbosacral spine were obtained using skin-mounted inertial measuring units. Results were compared between thigh blocks (paired t-test p ≤ 0.05). With F, the contact area, mean, and peak pressure between rider and saddle were significantly higher (p = 0.0001), and the rider trunk anterior tilt was reduced, indicating altered rider-saddle interaction. The horse thoracic axial rotation and flexion/extension were reduced (p = 0.01-0.03), caudal thoracic and lumbar lateral bend was increased (p = 0.02-0.04), and carpal flexion increased (p = 0.01-0.05) with F compared to S. During straight-line locomotion when in sitting trot, thigh block F was associated with altered rider-saddle interaction and rider and equine kinematics, leading to a more consistent rider-saddle interface, a more upright rider trunk during stance, an increased horse thoracic stability and lumbar lateral bend, and forelimb flexion, supporting the importance of optimising rider-saddle-horse interaction.
Publication Date: 2023-06-27 PubMed ID: 37443924PubMed Central: PMC10340000DOI: 10.3390/ani13132127Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study’s focus is on the impact of different saddle designs, specifically the thigh block, on the biomechanics of both the rider and the horse. The research suggests that a deformable thigh block design can alter the interaction between the rider and saddle, leading to changes in both equine and rider kinematics, potentially improving horse stability and rider position.

Study Design and Hypothesis

  • The research scrutinizes how variations in a saddle’s thigh block design may influence a) pressures at the rider-saddle interface, b) rider kinematics – the physics of motion, and c) horse limb and spinal kinematics. The researchers hypothesized that a deformable-faced thigh block, compared to a vertical-faced one, would lead to different rider and horse biomechanics.

Subjects and Experimentation

  • Eighteen elite sport horses and riders participated in the study. All subjects trotted using correctly fitted dressage saddles with two types of thigh blocks: S (vertical face) and F (deformable face).
  • An on-saddle pressure mat was used to measure the contact area, mean, and peak pressure between the rider and the saddle.
  • Rider and horse kinematics were measured using two-dimensional video analysis with the help of spherical markers.
  • To capture the horse spine movements, researchers used skin-mounted inertial measuring units that provided data on thoracolumbosacral motion.

Results and Comparison

  • The study discovered significant differences between the two thigh block designs. The deformable-faced (F) design resulted in higher contact area, mean, and peak pressure between the rider and the saddle, a significant increase compared to the vertical face (S) design.
  • Differences in rider kinematics were also present. The rider’s trunk anterior tilt was reduced with the deformable-faced block, suggesting a change in rider-saddle interaction and potentially improved balance or posture.
  • Additionally, the deformable-faced design had a significant impact on the horse’s movement. Thoracic axial rotation and flexion/extension in the horse were reduced, while caudal thoracic and lumbar lateral bend increased. Forelimb flexion was also greater with the deformable face thigh block.
  • These differences may correlate to increased stability and changes in gait or stride of the horse.

Conclusion

  • This study supports the significance of optimizing rider-saddle-horse interaction. Differences in saddle design, especially the thigh block, can influence rider and horse biomechanics, which could potentially impact performance or prevent injury. Specifically, a deformable thigh block design was noted to increase stability and cause a more upright rider trunk position during stance and modify horse biomechanics.

Cite This Article

APA
Murray R, Fisher M, Fairfax V, MacKechnie-Guire R. (2023). Saddle Thigh Block Design Can Influence Rider and Horse Biomechanics. Animals (Basel), 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132127

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 13

Researcher Affiliations

Murray, Rachel
  • Rossdales Veterinary Surgeons, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7NN, UK.
Fisher, Mark
  • Woolcroft Saddlery, Mays Lane, Wisbech PE13 5BU, UK.
Fairfax, Vanessa
  • Fairfax Saddles, The Saddlery, Fryers Road, Bloxwich, Walsall, West Midlands WS3 2XJ, UK.
MacKechnie-Guire, Russell
  • Centaur Biomechanics, Dunstaffanage House, Moreton Morrell, Warwickshire CV35 9BD, UK.
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Brookman's Park, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Vanessa Fairfax is employed by Fairfax Saddles. VF was not involved in data management, processing, or statistical analysis. None of the remaining authors of this paper have a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Heim C, Pfau T, Gerber V, Schweizer C, Doherr M, Schüpbach-Regula G, Witte S. Determination of vertebral range of motion using inertial measurement units in 27 Franches-Montagnes stallions and comparison between conditions and with a mixed population.. Equine Vet J 2016 Jul;48(4):509-16.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12455pubmed: 25919410google scholar: lookup
  2. Mackechnie-Guire R, Mackechnie-Guire E, Fisher M, Mathie H, Bush R, Pfau T, Weller R. Relationship between saddle and rider kinematics, horse locomotion and thoracolumbar pressures in sound horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;69:52.
  3. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of Tree Width on Thoracolumbar and Limb Kinematics, Saddle Pressure Distribution, and Thoracolumbar Dimensions in Sports Horses in Trot and Canter.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 21;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pmc: PMC6827167pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
  4. Martin P, Cheze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Chateau H. Effects of Large Saddle Panels on the Biomechanics of the Equine Back During Rising Trot: Preliminary Results.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;48:15–22.
  5. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Reducing Peak Pressures Under the Saddle Panel at the Level of the 10th to 13th Thoracic Vertebrae May Be Associated With Improved Gait Features, Even When Saddles Are Fitted to Published Guidelines.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;54:60–69.
  6. Murray R, Mackechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Reducing peak pressures under the saddle at thoracic vertebrae 10-13 is associated with alteration in jump kinematics.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2018;14:239–247.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP180021google scholar: lookup
  7. Murray R, Mackechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Could Pressure Distribution Under Race-Exercise Saddles Affect Limb Kinematics and Lumbosacral Flexion in the Galloping Racehorse?. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Oct;81:102795.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102795pubmed: 31668303google scholar: lookup
  8. Clayton HM, Hampson A, Fraser P, White A, Egenvall A. Comparison of rider stability in a flapless saddle versus a conventional saddle.. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0196960.
  9. Walker V.A., Pettit I, Tranquille C.A., Spear J, Dyson S.J., Murray R.C.. Relationship between pelvic tilt control, horse-rider synchronisation, and rider position in sitting trot.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2020;16:423–432.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190071google scholar: lookup
  10. Uldahl M, Christensen JW, Clayton HM. Relationships between the Rider's Pelvic Mobility and Balance on a Gymnastic Ball with Equestrian Skills and Effects on Horse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 9;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020453pmc: PMC7915365pubmed: 33572205google scholar: lookup
  11. Peham C, Licka T, Schobesberger H, Meschan E. Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait.. Hum Mov Sci 2004 Nov;23(5):663-71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006pubmed: 15589627google scholar: lookup
  12. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Sagittal plane ground reaction forces, centre of pressure and centre of mass in trotting horses.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e14-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.027pubmed: 24138935google scholar: lookup
  13. Hobbs SJ, St George L, Reed J, Stockley R, Thetford C, Sinclair J, Williams J, Nankervis K, Clayton HM. A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.. PeerJ 2020;8:e9022.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9022pmc: PMC7185025pubmed: 32355578google scholar: lookup
  14. Byström A, Rhodin M, von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Basic kinematics of the saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses trotting on a treadmill.. Equine Vet J 2009 Mar;41(3):280-4.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X394454pubmed: 19469236google scholar: lookup
  15. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher M, Hargreaves S, Pfau T. The Effect That Induced Rider Asymmetry Has on Equine Locomotion and the Range of Motion of the Thoracolumbar Spine When Ridden in Rising Trot.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 May;88:102946.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102946pubmed: 32303298google scholar: lookup
  16. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor.. J Exp Biol 2005 Jul;208(Pt 13):2503-14.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658pubmed: 15961737google scholar: lookup
  17. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Girth pressure measurements reveal high peak pressures that can be avoided using an alternative girth design that also results in increased limb protraction and flexion in the swing phase.. Vet J 2013 Oct;198(1):92-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.028pubmed: 23973365google scholar: lookup
  18. Warner SM, Koch TO, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):417-24.
  19. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pmc: PMC8003829pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
  20. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting.. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251144.
  21. Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL, Schamhardt HC, van Wessum R. The effects of a rider's mass on ground reaction forces and fetlock kinematics at the trot.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Jul;(30):218-21.
  22. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt H, van Weeren R, Roepstorff L, Barneveld A. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses trotting on a treadmill.. Am J Vet Res 2001 May;62(5):757-64.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.757pubmed: 11341399google scholar: lookup
  23. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt HC, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L, Barneveld A. Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine spine during canter.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2001 Apr;(33):145-9.
  24. Martin P, Chateau H, Pourcelot P, Duray L, Cheze L. Comparison Between Inertial Sensors and Motion Capture System to Quantify Flexion-Extension Motion in the Back of a Horse.. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2014;46:43.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12267_131google scholar: lookup
  25. Deckers I, MacKechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Fisher D, Nankervis K. The effect of a saddle on the kinematics of the thoracolumbosacral spine at walk and trot in-hand in 11th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology, Uppsala, Sweden 2022.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2022;18((Suppl. S1)):S1–S121.
  26. MacKechnie-Guire R, Fairfax V, Pfau T. Movement symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level jumping horses, when trotted in-hand and ridden in a straight line with three different riding positions.. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:12–13.
  27. MacKechnie-Guire R, Fairfax V, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level jumping horses, when trotted in-hand and ridden in a straight line with three different riding positions.. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:9–10.
  28. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Rhodin M. Influence of seating styles on head and pelvic vertical movement symmetry in horses ridden at trot.. PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0195341.
  29. Symes D, Ellis R. A preliminary study into rider asymmetry within equitation.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):34-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.016pubmed: 19375366google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.