Analyze Diet
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface2024; 21(215); 20230644; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0644

Shape change in the saddle region of the equine back during trot and walk.

Abstract: Equine back pain is prevalent among ridden horses and is often attributed to poor saddle fit. An alternative explanation is that saddle fits are technically good but fit to the wrong configuration. Saddles are fit for the standing horse, but much of the time ridden is instead spent locomoting when the back experiences the greatest peak forces. We used an array of cameras to reconstruct the surface of the back and its movement during trot, walk and standing for five horses. We verified the setup's accuracy by reconstructing a laser-scanned life-sized model horse. Our reconstructions demonstrate that saddles sit within a large, relatively low-mobile region of the back. However, saddles do sit adjacent to the highly mobile withers, which demands care in positioning and design around this important region. Critically, we identified that saddle curvature between standing and moving horses is substantially different, where trotting and walking horses have flatter backs than their standing configurations. Saddles designed around the locomoting configuration of horses may improve horse welfare by being better fit and decreasing the focal pressures applied by saddles.
Publication Date: 2024-06-19 PubMed ID: 38916112PubMed Central: PMC11286149DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0644Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses how horseback riding saddles, typically designed for horses when they’re standing, may not fit as well when the horse is in motion. The study investigates and compares the curvature of horses’ backs while standing, walking, and trotting, and offers insights into better saddle design to improve the well-being of horses.

Background

  • The problem of back pain in ridden horses is often attributed to poorly fitted saddles.
  • However, the researchers propose an alternative explanation – that the saddles are fitted well but designed for the wrong configuration.
  • Saddles are mainly designed for horses in a standing position but a large portion of the horse’s time is spent in locomotion, either trotting or walking.

Methodology

  • The researchers used a camera setup to track and study the dynamic movement and surface changes on horseback during different movements – standing, trotting, and walking.
  • The accuracy of this setup was verified using a life-sized model of a horse that was scanned with lasers.

Findings

  • The study found that the saddles typically sit on a less mobile region of the horse’s back.
  • However, the saddles are also situated adjacent to the horse’s withers, a highly mobile area that requires careful design consideration and saddle positioning.
  • Most importantly, the curvature of horses’ backs was found to be substantially different between the standing and trot/walk states, with the moving horses having a flatter back than when they’re standing.

Implications

  • These insights can be leveraged to design saddles that are better suited to the locomotive state of horses, which may lead to better welfare of the horses by providing a better fit and reducing the pressure points.

Cite This Article

APA
Smirnova KP, Frill MA, Warner SE, Cheney JA. (2024). Shape change in the saddle region of the equine back during trot and walk. J R Soc Interface, 21(215), 20230644. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2023.0644

Publication

ISSN: 1742-5662
NlmUniqueID: 101217269
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 215
Pages: 20230644

Researcher Affiliations

Smirnova, Kristina P
  • Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Frill, Michael A
  • Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Warner, Sharon E
  • Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Cheney, Jorn A
  • Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
  • School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton , Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Walking / physiology
  • Back / physiology
  • Biomechanical Phenomena

Grant Funding

  • University of Southampton
  • Worshipful Company of Saddlers

Conflict of Interest Statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Hungerbühler V, Weishaupt MA, Latif SN. ‘Feel the force’: prevalence of subjectively assessed saddle fit problems in Swiss riding horses and their association with saddle pressure measurements and back pain. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 99 , 103388.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103388pubmed: 33781419google scholar: lookup
  2. Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Partners with bad temper: reject or cure? A study of chronic pain and aggression in horses. PLoS One 5 , e12434.
  3. Landman MAAM, de Blaauw JA, van Weeren PR, Hofland LJ. Field study of the prevalence of lameness in horses with back problems. Vet. Rec. 155 , 165–168.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.155.6.165pubmed: 15357376google scholar: lookup
  4. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Biquand V, Hausberger M. Comparison of clinical examinations of back disorders and humans’ evaluation of back pain in riding school horses. BMC Vet. Res. 9 , 209.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-209pmc: PMC4015870pubmed: 24128080google scholar: lookup
  5. Egenvall A. Days-lost to training and competition in relation to workload in 263 elite show-jumping horses in four European countries. Prev. Vet. Med. 112 , 387–400.
  6. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. Vet. J. 184 , 27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  7. Sarrafian TL, Case JT, Kinde H, Daft BM, Read DH, Moore JD, Uzal FA, Stover SM. Fatal musculoskeletal injuries of Quarter Horse racehorses: 314 cases (1990-2007). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 241 , 935–942.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.241.7.935pubmed: 23013508google scholar: lookup
  8. Dittmann MT, Latif SN, Hefti R, Hartnack S, Hungerbühler V, Weishaupt MA. Husbandry, use, and orthopedic health of horses owned by competitive and leisure riders in Switzerland. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 91 , 103107.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103107pubmed: 32684252google scholar: lookup
  9. Dyson S, Carson S, Fisher M. Saddle fitting, recognising an ill‐fitting saddle and the consequences of an ill‐fitting saddle to horse and rider. Equine Vet. Educ. 27 , 533–543.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12436google scholar: lookup
  10. Geser-von Peinen K, Latif SN, Wiestner T, Bitschnau C, Renk B, Weishaupt MA. Applied load on the horse’s back under racing conditions. Vet. J. 198 , e88–92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.039pubmed: 24246649google scholar: lookup
  11. Bondi A, Norton S, Pearman L, Dyson S. Evaluating the suitability of an English saddle for a horse and rider combination. Equine Vet. Educ. 32 , 162–172.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13158google scholar: lookup
  12. Audigié F, Pourcelot P, Degueurce C, Denoix JM, Geiger D. Kinematics of the equine back: flexion‐extension movements in sound trotting horses. Equine Vet. J. 31 , 210–213.
  13. Licka T, Frey A, Peham C. Electromyographic activity of the longissimus dorsi muscles in horses when walking on a treadmill. Vet. J. 180 , 71–76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.001pubmed: 18314362google scholar: lookup
  14. Jeffcott LB, Dalin G. Natural rigidity of the horse’s backbone. Equine Vet. J. 12 , 101–108.
  15. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, Frewein J, Wilkens H, Wille KH. The locomotor system of the domestic mammals, 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey.
  16. Townsend HG, Leach DH. Relationship between intervertebral joint morphology and mobility in the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Vet. J. 16 , 461–465.
  17. Wakeling JM, Ritruechai P, Dalton S, Nankervis K. Segmental variation in the activity and function of the equine longissimus dorsi muscle during walk and trot. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 4 , 95–103.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061507812126google scholar: lookup
  18. Kienapfel K, Preuschoft H, Wulf A, Wagner H. The biomechanical construction of the horse’s body and activity patterns of three important muscles of the trunk in the walk, trot and canter. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl) 102 , e818–27.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12840pubmed: 29135048google scholar: lookup
  19. Schilling N, Carrier DR. Function of the epaxial muscles in walking, trotting and galloping dogs: implications for the evolution of epaxial muscle function in tetrapods. J. Exp. Biol. 213 , 1490–1502.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.039487pubmed: 20400634google scholar: lookup
  20. Marlin DJ, Weaver T, McKeever K, Clayton H, Roepstorff L. A novel 4-dimensional imaging technique to track back shape changes in exercising horses. In 11th Int. Conf. on Equine Exercise Physiology, Uppsala, Sweden, 26 June–1 July 2022.
    doi: 10.3920/cep2022.s1google scholar: lookup
  21. Lawson SEM, Marlin DJ. Preliminary report into the function of the shoulder using a novel imaging and motion capture approach. Equine Vet. J. 42 , 552–555.
  22. Murray R, Mackechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Could pressure distribution under race-exercise saddles affect limb kinematics and lumbosacral flexion in the galloping racehorse?. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 81 , 102795.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102795pubmed: 31668303google scholar: lookup
  23. Nyikos S. Elektronische satteldruckmessungen im zusammenhang mit rückenproblemen bei pferden. Pferdeheilkunde 21 , 187–198.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20050301google scholar: lookup
  24. Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion. J. Anat. 206 , 193–204.
  25. Greve L, Dyson SJ. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population. Equine Vet. J. 46 , 687–694.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12222pubmed: 24372949google scholar: lookup
  26. Barstow A, Dyson S. Clinical features and diagnosis of sacroiliac joint region pain in 296 horses: 2004–2014. Equine Vet. Educ. 27 , 637–647.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12377google scholar: lookup
  27. Von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Von Rechenberg B, Weishaupt MA. Relationship between saddle pressure measurements and clinical signs of saddle soreness at the withers. Equine Vet. J. 42 , 650–653.
  28. Jeffcott LB. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse—a survey of 443 cases. Equine Vet. J. 12 , 197–210.
  29. Mackechnie-Guire R, Mackechnie-Guire E, Fisher M, Mathie H, Bush R, Pfau T, Weller R. Relationship between saddle and rider kinematics, horse locomotion, and thoracolumbar pressures in sound horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 69 , 43–52.
  30. Meschan EM, Peham C, Schobesberger H, Licka TF. The influence of the width of the saddle tree on the forces and the pressure distribution under the saddle. Vet. J. 173 , 578–584.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.02.005pubmed: 16632390google scholar: lookup
  31. Edmunds JL, Worgan HJ, Dougal K, Girdwood SE, Douglas JL, McEwan NR. In vitro analysis of the effect of supplementation with activated charcoal on the equine hindgut. J. Equine Sci. 27 , 49–55.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.27.49pmc: PMC4914397pubmed: 27330398google scholar: lookup
  32. Willing B, Vörös A, Roos S, Jones C, Jansson A, Lindberg JE. Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training. Equine Vet. J. 41 , 908–914.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x447806pubmed: 20383990google scholar: lookup
  33. Cheney JA, Rehm JC, Swartz SM, Breuer KS. Bats actively modulate membrane compliance to control camber and reduce drag. J. Exp. Biol. 225 , jeb243974.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.243974pmc: PMC9377553pubmed: 35762250google scholar: lookup
  34. Cheney JA, Stevenson JPJ, Durston NE, Maeda M, Song J, Megson-Smith DA, Windsor SP, Usherwood JR, Bomphrey RJ. Raptor wing morphing with flight speed. J. R. Soc. Interface. 18 , 20210349.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0349pmc: PMC8277465pubmed: 34255986google scholar: lookup
  35. Hartley R, Zisserman A. Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511811685google scholar: lookup
  36. Guire R, Weller R, Fisher M, Beavis J. Investigation looking at the repeatability of 20 society of master saddlers qualified saddle fitters’ observations during static saddle fit. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 56 , 1–5.
  37. Nankervis KJ, Bradley F, Kosek K, Dyson SJ. Investigation of the reliability of saddle fitters to determine the position of the last thoracic vertebra of horses using palpation techniques: a pilot study. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 77 , 1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.003pubmed: 31133301google scholar: lookup
  38. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. Reducing peak pressures under the saddle panel at the level of the 10th to 13th thoracic vertebrae may be associated with improved gait features, even when saddles are fitted to published guidelines. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 54 , 60–69.
  39. Dyson S, Greve L. Saddles and girths: what is new?. Vet. J 207 , 73–79.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.06.012pubmed: 26598786google scholar: lookup
  40. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The effect of tree width on thoracolumbar dimensions in sports horses in trot and canter. Animals (Basel) 9 , 842.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pmc: PMC6827167pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
  41. Clayton HM, MacKechnie-Guire R. Tack fit and use. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 38 , 585–601.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2022.07.003pubmed: 36244939google scholar: lookup
  42. Harman J. Tack and saddle fit. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 15 , 247–261.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30175-xpubmed: 10218253google scholar: lookup
  43. Peham C, Licka T, Schobesberger H, Meschan E. Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait. Hum. Mov. Sci. 23 , 663–671.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006pubmed: 15589627google scholar: lookup
  44. Soroko M, Cwynar P, Howell K, Yarnell K, Dudek K, Zaborski D. Assessment of saddle fit in racehorses using infrared thermography. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 63 , 30–34.
  45. Greve L, Dyson S. A longitudinal study of back dimension changes over 1 year in sports horses. Vet. J. 203 , 65–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.031pubmed: 25510314google scholar: lookup
  46. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Kersjes AW. Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch warmblood horses at normal walk. Equine Vet. J. 18 , 207–214.
  47. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC, Van Osch GJ, Van den Bogert AJ. Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch warmblood horses at normal trot. Equine Vet. J. 25 , 134–137.
  48. Deban SM, Schilling N, Carrier DR. Activity of extrinsic limb muscles in dogs at walk, trot and gallop. J. Exp. Biol. 215 , 287–300.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.063230pubmed: 22189773google scholar: lookup
  49. Smirnova KP, Frill MA, Warner SE, Cheney JA. Data from: Shape change in the saddle region of the equine back during trot and walk. Figshare .