FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PeerJ / Shoe configuration effects on equine forelimb gait kinetics ...
PeerJ2025; 13; e18940; doi: 10.7717/peerj.18940

Shoe configuration effects on equine forelimb gait kinetics at a walk.

Abstract: The shift in vertical forces on the equine hoof surface by heart-bar, egg-bar, and wooden clog shoes can significantly impact gait kinetics. Hypotheses tested in this study were that vertical, braking, and propulsion peak force (PF) and impulse (IMP) are different while shod with heart-bar, egg-bar, open-heel, and wooden clog shoes, or while unshod, and the resultant ground reaction force vector (GRF YZ ) has the longest duration of cranial angulation with open-heel shoes followed by unshod, then egg-bar and heart-bar shoes, and the shortest with wooden clog shoes. Forelimb GRFs were recorded as six non-lame, light-breed horses walked across a force platform (four trials/side) while unshod or with egg-bar, heart-bar, open-heel, or wooden clog shoes. Outcomes included vertical, braking, and propulsive peak forces (PFV, PFB, PFP) and impulses (IMPV, IMPB, IMPP), percent stance time to each PF, braking to vertical PF ratio (PFB/PFV), walking speed (m s-1), total stance time (ST) and percent of stance in braking and propulsion. The magnitude and direction of the resultant GRFYZ vectors were quantified at 5% stance increments. Kinetic measures were compared among shoeing conditions with a mixed effects model (p-value < 0.05). A random forest classifier algorithm was used to predict shoeing condition from kinetic outcome measures. All results are reported as mean ± SEM. Trial speed, 1.51 ± 0.02 m s-1, was not different among shoeing conditions. The PFV was lower with wooden clog (6.13 ± 0.1 N kg-1) versus egg-bar (6.35 ± 0.1 N kg-1) shoes or unshod (6.32 ± 0.1 N kg-1); the PFP was higher with wooden clog (0.81 ± 0.03 N kg-1) versus open-heel (0.71 ± 0.03 N kg-1) or egg-bar (0.75 ± 0.03 N kg-1) shoes or unshod (0.74 ± 0.03 N kg-1), and lower with open-heel compared to heart-bar shoes (0.77 ± 0.03 N kg-1). Both IMP B and IMPV were higher with open-heel shoes (-0.19 ± 0.008 N s kg-1, 3.28 ± 0.09 N s kg-1) versus unshod (-0.17 ± 0.008 N s kg-1, 3.16 ± 0.09 N s kg-1), and IMPV was higher with wooden clog shoes (3.26 ± 0.09 N s kg-1) versus unshod. With wooden clog shoes, PFB/PFV (0.12 ± 0.004) was higher than unshod (0.11 ± 0.004). Percent time to peak PFV, PFB, and PFP, and percent braking time were highest and percent propulsion time lowest with wooden clog shoes. The magnitude of the GRFYZ vector with the wooden clog shoe was the highest among shoeing conditions during the first stance half, lowest during the second stance half, highest during late propulsion, and had the most gradual braking to propulsion transition. Vectors were angled cranially with wooden clog shoes slightly longer than the others. Wooden clog shoes was the only shoeing condition accurately predicted from kinetic measures. Distinct, predictable changes in gait kinetics with wooden clog shoes may reduce stresses on hoof structures. Study results enhance knowledge about shoe effects on equine gait kinetics and cutting-edge measures to quantify them.
©2025 Aoun et al.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-02-26 PubMed ID: 40028219PubMed Central: PMC11871903DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18940Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studies the impact of different shoe configurations on the gait kinetics of a horse’s forelimb while walking. It was found that the type of shoe or lack thereof could significantly affect the vertical, braking, and propulsion peak force and impulse, as well as the vector of the resultant ground reaction force. Wooden clog shoes were found to alter gait kinetics in a distinct and predictable way that could potentially reduce stress on the structures of the hoof.

Study Design and Hypotheses

  • The researchers hypothesized that the peak force and impulse in vertical, braking, and propulsion are different for horses shod with heart-bar, egg-bar, open-heel, wooden clog shoes, or unshod.
  • Another hypothesis was that the duration of the cranial angulation of the resultant ground reaction force vector would be longest for open-heel shoes, followed by being unshod, and then egg-bar and heart-bar shoes, with the shortest being for wooden clog shoes.

Methodology

  • The researchers recorded the forelimb Ground Reaction Forces (GRFs) of six non-lame, light-breed horses as they walked across a force platform – four trials per side – while unshod or with egg-bar, heart-bar, open-heel, or wooden clog shoes.
  • The outcomes taken into consideration were vertical, braking, and propulsive peak forces and impulses, the percentage of stance time to each peak force, ratio of braking to vertical peak force, walking speed, total stance time (ST), and percentage of stance in braking and propulsion.

Results

  • It was found that the type of shoeing condition did not affect the trial speed – 1.51 ± 0.02 m s.
  • However, peak forces and impulses varied with the shoeing. With wooden clog shoes, the vertical peak force was lower than the egg-bar shoes or unshod, while the braking peak force was higher. On the other hand, the open-heel shoes resulted in both higher braking and propulsive impulses than being unshod, and the wooden clog shoes resulted in a higher propulsive impulse than being unshod.
  • In addition, wooden clog shoes resulted in a higher PF/PF ratio than being unshod and also resulted in the highest percentage time to peak PF, PF, and PF, while having the highest braking time and lowest propulsion time.
  • Furthermore, the magnitude of the ground reaction force vector with the wooden clog shoe was found to be the highest among shoeing conditions during the first half of the stance, lowest during the second half, and highest during late propulsion, indicating a more gradual transition from braking to propulsion. Notably, the wooden clog shoe was the only condition that could accurately be predicted based on kinetic measures.

Conclusion

  • Overall, this study illuminates the considerable impact different shoe configurations can have on gait kinetics. Specifically, wooden clog shoes have a distinct influence that could potentially reduce hoof stresses.
  • The results enhance our understanding of the effects of different shoes on equine gait kinetics and also provide valuable insight on measures to quantify these effects.

Cite This Article

APA
Aoun R, Ogunmola Z, Musso A, Taguchi T, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. (2025). Shoe configuration effects on equine forelimb gait kinetics at a walk. PeerJ, 13, e18940. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18940

Publication

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
NlmUniqueID: 101603425
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: e18940

Researcher Affiliations

Aoun, Rita
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
  • Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Ogunmola, Zaneta
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
  • Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Musso, Anaïs
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Taguchi, Takashi
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
  • Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Takawira, Catherine
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
  • Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Lopez, Mandi J
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
  • Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Shoes
  • Gait / physiology
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Forelimb / physiology
  • Walking / physiology
  • Kinetics

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

This article includes 57 references
  1. Aflatoony L. Flex, breathe, fit, and walk: exploring technologies accessible in academia for design and production of a custom fit shoes. International textile and apparel association annual conference proceedings 2019.
  2. Amitrano FN, Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, Schaeffer DJ. Effect of hoof boots and toe-extension shoes on the forelimb kinetics of horses during walking. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2016;77(5):527–533.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.5.527pubmed: 27111020google scholar: lookup
  3. Aoun R, Charles I, De Rouen A, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Shoe configuration effects on third phalanx and capsule motion of unaffected and laminitic equine hooves in-situ. PLOS ONE 2023;18(5):e0285475.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285475pmc: PMC10166494pubmed: 37155654google scholar: lookup
  4. Aoun R, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Horseshoe effects on equine gait—a systematic scoping review. Veterinary Surgery 2024;54(1):31–51.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.14162pmc: PMC11734879pubmed: 39278729google scholar: lookup
  5. Back W, Pille F. The role of the hoof and shoeing. In: Back W, Clayton H, editors. Equine locomotion. Elsevier; Cambridge: 2013. pp. 147–174.
  6. Barrey E. Investigation of the vertical hoof force distribution in the equine forelimb with an instrumented horseboot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1990;22(S9):35–38.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04731.xpubmed: 9259803google scholar: lookup
  7. Barrey E. Methods, applications and limitations of gait analysis in horses. The Veterinary Journal 1999;157(1):7–22.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0297pubmed: 10030124google scholar: lookup
  8. Biknevicius AR, Mullineaux DR, Clayton HM. Ground reaction forces and limb function in tölting Icelandic horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2004;36(8):743–747.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848190pubmed: 15656508google scholar: lookup
  9. Boyer K, Federolf P, Lin C, Nigg B, Andriacchi T. Kinematic adaptations to a variable stiffness shoe: mechanisms for reducing joint loading. Journal of Biomechanics 2012;45(9):1619–1624.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.010pubmed: 22541945google scholar: lookup
  10. Burwell J, Rabinowicz E. The nature of the coefficient of friction. Journal of Applied Physics 1953;24(2):136–139.
    doi: 10.1063/1.1721227google scholar: lookup
  11. Butler Jr K. The prevention of lameness by physiologically-sound horseshoeing. Proceedings of the annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 1985.
  12. Chateau H, Holden L, Robin D, Falala S, Pourcelot P, Estoup P, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. Biomechanical analysis of hoof landing and stride parameters in harness trotter horses running on different tracks of a sand beach (from wet to dry) and on an asphalt road. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42:488–495.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00277.xpubmed: 21059050google scholar: lookup
  13. Clarke EJ, Gillen A, Turlo A, Peffers MJ. An evaluation of current preventative measures used in equine practice to maintain distal forelimb functionality: a mini review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2021;8:758970.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.758970pmc: PMC8593328pubmed: 34796229google scholar: lookup
  14. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. Ground reaction forces: the sine qua non of legged locomotion. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;76:25–35.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.022pubmed: 31084749google scholar: lookup
  15. Crevier-Denoix N, Robin D, Pourcelot P, Falala S, Holden L, Estoup P, Desquilbet L, Denoix JM, Chateau H. Ground reaction force and kinematic analysis of limb loading on two different beach sand tracks in harness trotters. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42(S38):544–551.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00202.xpubmed: 21059058google scholar: lookup
  16. Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology 2004;207(20):3507–3514.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01171pubmed: 15339946google scholar: lookup
  17. Eliashar E, McGuigan M, Rogers K, Wilson A. A comparison of three horseshoeing styles on the kinetics of breakover in sound horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34(2):184–190.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776767303pubmed: 11902761google scholar: lookup
  18. Fajdiga G, Šubic B, Kovačič A. Bending stiffness of hybrid wood-metal composite beams: an experimentally validated numerical model. Forests 2021;12(7):918.
    doi: 10.3390/f12070918google scholar: lookup
  19. Goetz T, Comstock C. The use of adjustable heart bar shoes in the treatment of laminitis in horses. 31st annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 1985; pp. 605–616.
  20. Gustås P, Johnston C, Drevemo S. Ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns on two different surfaces at the trot. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2006;3(4):209–216.
    doi: 10.1017/S147806150667607Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Hagen J, Bos R, Brouwer J, Lux S, Jung FT. Influence of trimming, hoof angle and shoeing on breakover duration in sound horses examined with hoof-mounted inertial sensors. Veterinary Record 2021;189(4):e450.
    doi: 10.1002/vetr.450pubmed: 33993524google scholar: lookup
  22. Hagen J, Hüppler M, Geiger SM, Mäder D, Häfner FS. Modifying the height of horseshoes: effects of wedge shoes, studs, and rocker shoes on the phalangeal alignment, pressure distribution, and hoof-ground contact during motion. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;53:8–18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.01.014google scholar: lookup
  23. Hagen J, Hüppler M, Häfner F, Geiger S, Mäder D. Modifying horseshoes in the mediolateral plane: effects of side wedge, wide branch, and unilateral roller shoes on the phalangeal alignment, pressure forces, and the footing pattern. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;37:77–85.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.001google scholar: lookup
  24. Heel MCVV, Weeren PRV, Back W. Compensation for changes in hoof conformation between shoeing sessions through the adaptation of angular kinematics of the distal segments of the limbs of horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2006;67(7):1199–1203.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.7.1199pubmed: 16817743google scholar: lookup
  25. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Sagittal plane ground reaction forces, centre of pressure and centre of mass in trotting horses. The Veterinary Journal 2013;198:e14-e19.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.027pubmed: 24138935google scholar: lookup
  26. Hobbs SJ, Robinson MA, Clayton HM. A simple method of equine limb force vector analysis and its potential applications. PeerJ 2018;6:e4399.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.4399pmc: PMC5827015pubmed: 29492341google scholar: lookup
  27. Hüppler M, Häfner F, Geiger S, Mäder D, Hagen J. Modifying the surface of horseshoes: effects of eggbar, heartbar, open toe, and wide toe shoes on the phalangeal alignment, pressure distribution, and the footing pattern. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;37:86–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.009google scholar: lookup
  28. Ishihara A, Reed SM, Rajala-Schultz PJ, Robertson JT, Bertone AL. Use of kinetic gait analysis for detection, quantification, and differentiation of hind limb lameness and spinal ataxia in horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2009;234(5):644–651.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.234.5.644pubmed: 19250044google scholar: lookup
  29. Kambhampati SB. Constructing a pedotti diagram using excel charts. Journal of Biomechanics 2007;40(16):3748–3750.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.012pubmed: 17645882google scholar: lookup
  30. Karle A, Tank P, Vedpathak H, Mahida H, Shah R, Dhami M. Horseshoeing: an overview. Veterinary World 2010;3(3):148–151.
  31. Khumsap S, Clayton H, Lanovaz J, Bouchey M. Effect of walking velocity on forelimb kinematics and kinetics. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34(S34):325–329.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05441.xpubmed: 12405709google scholar: lookup
  32. Lawrence RM. The magic of the horse-shoe: with other folk-lore notes. Valparaiso, Indiana: Obscure Press; 1898.
  33. Lewis K, Northrop AJ, Crook GM, Mather J, Martin JH, Holt D, Clayton HM, Roepstorff L, Michael‘Mick’ LP, Hobbs SJ. Comparison of equipment used to measure shear properties in equine arena surfaces. Biosystems Engineering 2015;137:43–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.07.006google scholar: lookup
  34. Lin S-Y, Su P-F, Chung C-H, Hsia C-C, Chang C-H. Stiffness effects in rocker-soled shoes: biomechanical implications. PLOS ONE 2017;12(1):e0169151.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169151pmc: PMC5207519pubmed: 28046009google scholar: lookup
  35. McLaughlin RM, Gaughan EM, Roush JK, Skaggs CL. Effects of subject velocity on ground reaction force measurements and stance times in clinically normal horses at the walk and trot. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1996;57(1):7–11.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1996.57.01.7pubmed: 8720231google scholar: lookup
  36. Moyer W, Anderson J. Lamenesses caused by improper shoeing. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1975;166(1):47–52.
    pubmed: 1110198
  37. O’Grady SE. Therapeutic shoes: application of principles. In: Belknap J, Geor R, editors. Equine laminitis. Hoboken: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017. pp. 341–353.
    doi: 10.1002/9781119169239.ch38google scholar: lookup
  38. O’Grady S. The proper application of the wooden shoe: an overview. Equine Veterinary Education 2020;32(8):415–423.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13031google scholar: lookup
  39. O’Grady SE, Parks AH. Farriery options for acute and chronic laminitis. American Association of equine practitioners 2008.
  40. O’Grady S, Steward M. The wooden shoe as an option for treating chronic laminitis. Equine Veterinary Education 2009;21(2):107–112.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X397888google scholar: lookup
  41. O’Grady SE, Steward ML, Parks AH. How to construct and apply the wooden shoe for treating three manifestations of chronic laminitis. 2007; pp. 423–429.
  42. Pardoe C, McGuigan M, Rogers K, Rowe L, Wilson A. The effect of shoe material on the kinetics and kinematics of foot slip at impact on concrete. Equine Veterinary Journal 2001;33(S33):70–73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05363.xpubmed: 11721574google scholar: lookup
  43. Parkes RS, Witte TH. The foot-surface interaction and its impact on musculoskeletal adaptation and injury risk in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2015;47(5):519–525.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12420pubmed: 25640598google scholar: lookup
  44. Parks A. Form and function of the equine digit. Veterinary Clinics: Equine Practice 2003;19(2):285–307.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(03)00018-xpubmed: 14575161google scholar: lookup
  45. Parks AH. Therapeutic farriery: one veterinarian’s perspective. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2012;28(2):333–350.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.05.003pubmed: 22981193google scholar: lookup
  46. Pereira S, Anand S, Rajendran S, Wood C. A study of the structure and properties of novel fabrics for knee braces. Journal of Industrial Textiles 2007;36(4):279–300.
    doi: 10.1177/1528083707072357google scholar: lookup
  47. Robin D, Chateau H, Pacquet L, Falala S, Valette JP, Pourcelot P, Ravary B, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. Use of a 3D dynamometric horseshoe to assess the effects of an all-weather waxed track and a crushed sand track at high speed trot: preliminary study. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(3):253–256.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x397965pubmed: 19469231google scholar: lookup
  48. Roepstorff L, Johnston C, Drevemo S. The effect of shoeing on kinetics and kinematics during the stance phase. Equine Veterinary Journal 1999;31(30):279–285.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05235.xpubmed: 10659269google scholar: lookup
  49. Rogers CW, Back W. Wedge and eggbar shoes change the pressure distribution under the hoof of the forelimb in the square standing horse. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2003;23(7):306–309.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(03)01009-8google scholar: lookup
  50. Rogers CW, Back W. The effect of plain, eggbar and 6°-wedge shoes on the distribution of pressure under the hoof of horses at the walk. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2007;55(3):120–124.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2007.36753pubmed: 17534413google scholar: lookup
  51. Setterbo JJ, Garcia TC, Campbell IP, Reese JL, Morgan JM, Kim SY, Hubbard M, Stover SM. Hoof accelerations and ground reaction forces of Thoroughbred racehorses measured on dirt, synthetic, and turf track surfaces. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2009;70(10):1220–1229.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.10.1220pubmed: 19795936google scholar: lookup
  52. Steward ML. How to construct and apply atraumatic therapeutic shoes to treat acute or chronic laminitis in the horse. Proceedings of the 49th annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA 2003.
  53. Teoh JC, Low JH, Lim YB, Shim VP-W, Park J, Park S-B, Park SJ, Lee T. Investigation of the biomechanical effect of variable stiffness shoe on external knee adduction moment in various dynamic exercises. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013;6:1–9.
    doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-1pmc: PMC3848782pubmed: 24044429google scholar: lookup
  54. Van Heel M, Moleman M, Barneveld A, Van Weeren P, Back W. Changes in location of centre of pressure and hoof-unrollment pattern in relation to an 8-week shoeing interval in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2005;37(6):536–540.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314925pubmed: 16295931google scholar: lookup
  55. Van Heel M, VanWeeren P, Back W. Shoeing sound Warmblood horses with a rolled toe optimises hoof-unrollment and lowers peak loading during breakover. Equine Veterinary Journal 2006;38(3):258–262.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05549.xpubmed: 16706282google scholar: lookup
  56. Wang P, Takawira C, Taguchi T, Niu X, Nazzal MD, Lopez MJ. Assessment of the effect of horseshoes with and without traction adaptations on the gait kinetics of nonlame horses during a trot on a concrete runway. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2021;82(4):292–301.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.82.4.292pubmed: 33764831google scholar: lookup
  57. Weishaupt MA, Hogg H, Auer J, Wiestner T. Velocity-dependent changes of time, force and spatial parameters in Warmblood horses walking and trotting on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42:530–537.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00190.xpubmed: 21059056google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.