FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Stability of Gastric Fluid and Fecal Microbial Populations i...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(20); 2979; doi: 10.3390/ani14202979

Stability of Gastric Fluid and Fecal Microbial Populations in Healthy Horses under Pasture and Stable Conditions.

Abstract: Equine gastrointestinal microbial communities vary across the gastrointestinal tract and in response to diet or disease. Understanding the composition and stability of gastric fluid microbiota in healthy horses is a prerequisite to understanding changes associated with the development of disease. The objective of this study was to describe microbial communities in the gastric fluid and feces of healthy horses longitudinally. Horses were maintained on pasture (6 weeks), stabled (5 weeks), then returned to pasture. A consistent forage diet was provided throughout. Native gastric fluid and feces were collected weekly for full-length 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing and microbial profiling analysis. Fewer taxa were identified in the gastric fluid (770) than in the feces (5284). Species richness and diversity were significantly different between sample types ( < 0.001), but not between housing locations ( = 0.3). There was a significant effect of housing and horse on the Bray-Curtis compositional diversity of gastric ( = 0.005; = 0.009) and fecal ( = 0.001; = 0.001) microbiota. When horses moved from pasture to stable, the relative proportions of gastric fluid Lactobacillaceae increased and Streptococcaceae decreased, while fecal Firmicutes increased and Bacteriodota decreased. Within each housing condition, there was no significant week-to-week variation in gastric ( = 0.9) or fecal ( = 0.09) microbiota. Overall, these findings support the maintenance of stable gastric and fecal microbial populations under each management condition, providing a basis for further investigation of gastric fluid microbiota in diseases of the foregut.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-10-16 PubMed ID: 39457909PubMed Central: PMC11503871DOI: 10.3390/ani14202979Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of diet and living conditions on the stability and diversity of the bacteria present in the digestive system of healthy horses, particularly in the stomach and feces. The study suggests diet and housing conditions do affect various kinds of bacteria, but the overall populations remain stable week by week.

Objective and Method

  • The main aim of this study was to describe the compositions and stability of microbiota in the stomach fluid and feces of healthy horses over time.
  • The researchers carried out a longitudinal study where the horses were kept on pasture for 6 weeks, then stabled for 5 weeks, and then returned to pasture while maintaining a consistent forage diet throughout the study.
  • To study the microbial communities, gastric fluid and fecal samples were collected weekly and analyzed using full-length 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing and microbial profiling.

Findings

  • Researchers found fewer microbial taxa (770) in the stomach fluid than in the feces (5284).
  • Species richness (the number of different species) and microbial diversity differed significantly between samples from the stomach fluid and feces, but not between samples taken from horses in different housing conditions.
  • Housing and the individual horse had a significant effect on the Bray-Curtis compositional diversity, a measure of the difference in species composition, of the microbiota in the stomach and feces.
  • Notably, with the change in housing from pasture to stable, there was an increase in Lactobacillaceae (a kind of bacteria) and a decrease in Streptococcaceae (another kind of bacteria) in the stomach fluid. At the same time, there was an increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteriodota in the feces.
  • Despite these changes, there was no significant week-to-week variation in the microbiota in the stomach or feces within either housing condition.

Conclusion

The study concludes that the microbial populations in the stomach and feces of healthy horses remain stable over time despite changes in diet and housing conditions. The results provide a reference point for future research into how changes in the stomach microbiota might relate to diseases of the horse’s foregut.

Cite This Article

APA
Bishop RC, Kemper AM, Clark LV, Wilkins PA, McCoy AM. (2024). Stability of Gastric Fluid and Fecal Microbial Populations in Healthy Horses under Pasture and Stable Conditions. Animals (Basel), 14(20), 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14202979

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 20
PII: 2979

Researcher Affiliations

Bishop, Rebecca C
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Kemper, Ann M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Clark, Lindsay V
  • High-Performance Computing in Biology, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Wilkins, Pamela A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
McCoy, Annette M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.

Grant Funding

  • n/a / University of Illinois Microbiome Research Fund
  • D22EQ-452 / Morris Animal Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 117 references
  1. Tinker M.K., White N.A., Lessard P., Thatcher C.D., Pelzer K.D., Davis B., Carmel D.K.. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality.. Equine Vet. J. 1997;29:448–453.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03157.xpubmed: 9413717google scholar: lookup
  2. Daly K., Proudman C.J., Duncan S.H., Flint H.J., Dyer J., Shirazi-Beechey S.P.. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease.. Br. J. Nutr. 2012;107:989–995.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003825pubmed: 21816118google scholar: lookup
  3. Willing B., Voros A., Roos S., Jones C., Jansson A., Lindberg J.E.. Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:908–914.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X447806pubmed: 20383990google scholar: lookup
  4. Grimm P., Philippeau C., Julliand V.. Faecal parameters as biomarkers of the equine hindgut microbial ecosystem under dietary change.. Animal. 2017;11:1136–1145.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002779pubmed: 28065211google scholar: lookup
  5. Hansen N.C., Avershina E., Mydland L.T., Naesset J.A., Austbo D., Moen B., Mage I., Rudi K.. High nutrient availability reduces the diversity and stability of the equine caecal microbiota.. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:27216.
    doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27216pmc: PMC4526772pubmed: 26246403google scholar: lookup
  6. Julliand S., Martin A., Julliand V.. Effect of dehydrated alfalfa on equine gastric and faecal microbial ecosystems.. Livest. Sci. 2018;215:16–20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.05.005google scholar: lookup
  7. Kristoffersen C., Jensen R.B., Avershina E., Austbø D., Tauson A.-H., Rudi K.. Diet-Dependent Modular Dynamic Interactions of the Equine Cecal Microbiota.. Microbes Environ. 2016;31:378–386.
    doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME16061pmc: PMC5158109pubmed: 27773914google scholar: lookup
  8. Proudman C.J., Hunter J.O., Darby A.C., Escalona E.E., Batty C., Turner C.. Characterisation of the faecal metabolome and microbiome of Thoroughbred racehorses.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:580–586.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12324pubmed: 25041526google scholar: lookup
  9. Durham A.E.. The role of nutrition in colic.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2009;25:67–78.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2008.11.003pubmed: 19303551google scholar: lookup
  10. Antwis R.E., Lea J.M.D., Unwin B., Shultz S.. Gut microbiome composition is associated with spatial structuring and social interactions in semi-feral Welsh Mountain ponies.. Microbiome. 2018;6:207.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0593-2pmc: PMC6251106pubmed: 30466491google scholar: lookup
  11. Dougal K., de la Fuente G., Harris P.A., Girdwood S.E., Pinloche E., Newbold C.J.. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse.. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77660.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077660pmc: PMC3812009pubmed: 24204908google scholar: lookup
  12. O'Donnell M., Harris H.M., Jeffery I.B., Claesson M.J., Younge B., O’Toole P., Ross R.P.. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses.. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;57:492–501.
    doi: 10.1111/lam.12137pubmed: 23889584google scholar: lookup
  13. Julliand V., Grimm P.. Horse Species Symposium: The microbiome of the horse hindgut: History and current knowledge.. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:2262–2274.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0198pubmed: 27285903google scholar: lookup
  14. Stewart H.L., Pitta D., Indugu N., Vecchiarelli B., Engiles J.B., Southwood L.L.. Characterization of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2018;79:811–819.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.8.811pubmed: 30058849google scholar: lookup
  15. Blackmore T.M., Dugdale A., Argo C.M., Curtis G., Pinloche E., Harris P.A., Worgan H.J., Girdwood S.E., Dougal K., Newbold C.J.. Strong Stability and Host Specific Bacterial Community in Faeces of Ponies.. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75079.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075079pmc: PMC3770578pubmed: 24040388google scholar: lookup
  16. Morrison P.K., Newbold C.J., Jones E., Worgan H.J., Grove-White D.H., Dugdale A.H., Barfoot C., Harris P.A., Argo C.M.. The Equine Gastrointestinal Microbiome: Impacts of Age and Obesity.. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:3017.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03017pmc: PMC6293011pubmed: 30581426google scholar: lookup
  17. Dong H.J., Ho H., Hwang H., Kim Y., Han J., Lee I., Cho S.. Diversity of the Gastric Microbiota in Thoroughbred Racehorses Having Gastric Ulcer.. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;26:763–774.
    doi: 10.4014/jmb.1507.07054pubmed: 26809803google scholar: lookup
  18. Mackie R.I., Wilkins C.A.. Enumeration of anaerobic bacterial microflora of the equine gastrointestinal tract.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988;54:2155–2160.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.54.9.2155-2160.1988pmc: PMC202828pubmed: 3190223google scholar: lookup
  19. Van Weyenberg S., Sales J., Janssens G.P.J.. Passage rate of digesta through the equine gastrointestinal tract: A review.. Livest. Sci. 2006;99:3–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.04.008google scholar: lookup
  20. Ericsson A.C., Johnson P.J., Lopes M.A., Perry S.C., Lanter H.R.. A Microbiological Map of the Healthy Equine Gastrointestinal Tract.. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166523.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166523pmc: PMC5112786pubmed: 27846295google scholar: lookup
  21. Costa M.C., Silva G., Ramos R.V., Staempfli H.R., Arroyo L.G., Kim P., Weese J.S.. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses.. Vet. J. 2015;205:74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.018pubmed: 25975855google scholar: lookup
  22. Costa M.C., Weese J.S.. The equine intestinal microbiome.. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2012;13:121–128.
    doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000035pubmed: 22626511google scholar: lookup
  23. Żak-Bochenek A., Żebrowska-Różańska P., Bajzert J., Siwińska N., Madej J.P., Kaleta-Kuratewicz K., Bochen P., Łaczmański Ł., Chełmońska-Soyta A.. Comparison and characterization of the bacterial microbiota and SIgA production in different gastrointestinal segments in horses.. Vet. Res. Commun. 2024.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10489-8pubmed: 39180603google scholar: lookup
  24. Henneke D.R., Potter G.D., Kreider J.L., Yeates B.F.. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet. J. 1983;15:371–372.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xpubmed: 6641685google scholar: lookup
  25. Andrews S.. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High throughput Sequence Data.. Babraham Institute; Cambridge, UK: 2016.
  26. Ras V., Botha G., Aron S., Lennard K., Allali I., Claassen-Weitz S., Mwaikono K.S., Kennedy D., Holmes J.R., Rendon G.. Using a multiple-delivery-mode training approach to develop local capacity and infrastructure for advanced bioinformatics in Africa.. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021;17:e1008640.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008640pmc: PMC7906323pubmed: 33630830google scholar: lookup
  27. Callahan B.J., McMurdie P.J., Rosen M.J., Han A.W., Johnson A.J., Holmes S.P.. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869pmc: PMC4927377pubmed: 27214047google scholar: lookup
  28. Lan Y., Wang Q., Cole J.R., Rosen G.L.. Using the RDP classifier to predict taxonomic novelty and reduce the search space for finding novel organisms.. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32491.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032491pmc: PMC3293824pubmed: 22403664google scholar: lookup
  29. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., Peplies J., Glockner F.O.. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools.. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219pmc: PMC3531112pubmed: 23193283google scholar: lookup
  30. McLaren M.R.. Silva SSU taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2 (Silva version 138) (Version 2) [Data set]. 2020.
    doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3986799google scholar: lookup
  31. Wright E.S.. DECIPHER: Harnessing local sequence context to improve protein multiple sequence alignment.. BMC Bioinform. 2015;16:322.
    doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0749-zpmc: PMC4595117pubmed: 26445311google scholar: lookup
  32. Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P.. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments.. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490pmc: PMC2835736pubmed: 20224823google scholar: lookup
  33. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2023.
  34. McMurdie P.J., Holmes S.. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217pmc: PMC3632530pubmed: 23630581google scholar: lookup
  35. Kassambara A.. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests.. 2023.
  36. Salonen A., Salojärvi J., Lahti L., De Vos W.M.. The adult intestinal core microbiota is determined by analysis depth and health status.. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18:16–20.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03855.xpubmed: 22647042google scholar: lookup
  37. Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., Minchin P.R., O’Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P.. vegan: Community Ecology Package.. 2017.
  38. Bray J.R., Curtis J.T.. An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin.. Ecol. Monogr. 1957;27:325–349.
    doi: 10.2307/1942268google scholar: lookup
  39. Hamady M., Lozupone C., Knight R.. Fast UniFrac: Facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data.. ISME J. 2009;4:17–27.
    doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.97pmc: PMC2797552pubmed: 19710709google scholar: lookup
  40. Anderson M.J.. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017.
  41. Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S.. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8pmc: PMC4302049pubmed: 25516281google scholar: lookup
  42. Tyma J.F., Epstein K.L., Whitfield-Cargile C.M., Cohen N.D., Giguère S.. Investigation of effects of omeprazole on the fecal and gastric microbiota of healthy adult horses.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2019;80:79–86.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.1.79pubmed: 30605038google scholar: lookup
  43. Perkins G.A., Den Bakker H.C., Burton A.J., Erb H.N., McDonough S.P., McDonough P.L., Parker J., Rosenthal R.L., Wiedmann M., Dowd S.E.. Equine Stomachs Harbor an Abundant and Diverse Mucosal Microbiota.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:2522–2532.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.06252-11pmc: PMC3318809pubmed: 22307294google scholar: lookup
  44. Paul L.J., Ericsson A.C., Andrews F.M., Keowen M.L., Morales Yniguez F., Garza F., Banse H.E.. Gastric microbiome in horses with and without equine glandular gastric disease.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021;35:2458–2464.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16241pmc: PMC8478018pubmed: 34351018google scholar: lookup
  45. Paul L.J., Ericsson A.C., Andrews F.M., McAdams Z., Keowen M.L., St Blanc M.P., Banse H.E.. Dietary and management factors influence the equine gastric microbiome.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2022;260:1–7.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.22.07.0277pubmed: 36108099google scholar: lookup
  46. Paul L.J., Ericsson A.C., Andrews F.M., McAdams Z., Keowen M.L., St Blanc M.P., Banse H.E.. Field study examining the mucosal microbiome in equine glandular gastric disease.. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0295697.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295697pmc: PMC10703338pubmed: 38060520google scholar: lookup
  47. Varloud M., Roussel A., Boisot P., Julliand V.. A technique for the collection and the study of biochemical and microbial characteristics of postprandial gastric contents from conscious horses.. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2007;133:259–274.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.04.004google scholar: lookup
  48. Willette J.A., Pitta D., Indugu N., Vecchiarelli B., Hennessy M.L., Dobbie T., Southwood L.L.. Experimental crossover study on the effects of withholding feed for 24 h on the equine faecal bacterial microbiota in healthy mares.. BMC Vet. Res. 2021;17:3.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02706-8pmc: PMC7786913pubmed: 33402190google scholar: lookup
  49. Arroyo L.G., Rossi L., Santos B.P., Gomez D.E., Surette M.G., Costa M.C.. Luminal and Mucosal Microbiota of the Cecum and Large Colon of Healthy and Diarrheic Horses.. Animals. 2020;10:1403.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081403pmc: PMC7460328pubmed: 32806591google scholar: lookup
  50. Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Hamady M., Fraser-Liggett C.M., Knight R., Gordon J.I.. The Human Microbiome Project.. Nature. 2007;449:804–810.
    doi: 10.1038/nature06244pmc: PMC3709439pubmed: 17943116google scholar: lookup
  51. Berg G., Rybakova D., Fischer D., Cernava T., Vergès M.-C.C., Charles T., Chen X., Cocolin L., Eversole K., Corral G.H.. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges.. Microbiome. 2020;8:103.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0pmc: PMC7329523pubmed: 32605663google scholar: lookup
  52. Neu A.T., Allen E.E., Roy K.. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2104429118.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104429118pmc: PMC8713806pubmed: 34862327google scholar: lookup
  53. Custer G.F., Gans M., Diepen L.T.A.v., Dini-Andreote F., Buerkle C.A.. Comparative Analysis of Core Microbiome Assignments: Implications for Ecological Synthesis.. mSystems. 2023;8:e01066-22.
    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01066-22pmc: PMC9948721pubmed: 36744955google scholar: lookup
  54. Sharon I., Quijada N.M., Pasolli E., Fabbrini M., Vitali F., Agamennone V., Dötsch A., Selberherr E., Grau J.H., Meixner M.. The Core Human Microbiome: Does It Exist and How Can We Find It? A Critical Review of the Concept.. Nutrients. 2022;14:2872.
    doi: 10.3390/nᐔ2872pmc: PMC9323970pubmed: 35889831google scholar: lookup
  55. Park T., Cheong H., Yoon J., Kim A., Yun Y., Unno T.. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota of Horses with Intestinal Disease and Their Healthy Counterparts.. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:113.
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci8060113pmc: PMC8234941pubmed: 34204317google scholar: lookup
  56. Ayoub C., Arroyo L.G., Macnicol J.L., Renaud D., Weese J.S., Gomez D.E.. Fecal microbiota of horses with colitis and its association with laminitis and survival during hospitalization.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2022;36:2213–2223.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16562pmc: PMC9708523pubmed: 36271677google scholar: lookup
  57. Tavenner M.K., McDonnell S.M., Biddle A.S.. Development of the equine hindgut microbiome in semi-feral and domestic conventionally-managed foals.. Anim. Microbiome. 2020;2:43.
    doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00060-6pmc: PMC7807438pubmed: 33499959google scholar: lookup
  58. Garber A., Hastie P., Murray J.-A.. Factors Influencing Equine Gut Microbiota: Current Knowledge.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;88:102943.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102943pubmed: 32303307google scholar: lookup
  59. Bulmer L.S., Murray J.-A., Burns N.M., Garber A., Wemelsfelder F., McEwan N.R., Hastie P.M.. High-starch diets alter equine faecal microbiota and increase behavioural reactivity.. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18621.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54039-8pmc: PMC6901590pubmed: 31819069google scholar: lookup
  60. Staniar W.B., Neuendorf L.E., Brooks S.A.. Preliminary Investigation of the Changes in Fecal Streptococcal Population due to Diet and Time of Day in Horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;46:18–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.07.013google scholar: lookup
  61. Bailey S.R., Baillon M.L., Rycroft A.N., Harris P.A., Elliott J.. Identification of Equine Cecal Bacteria Producing Amines in an In Vitro Model of Carbohydrate Overload.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:2087–2093.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2087-2093.2003pmc: PMC154823pubmed: 12676687google scholar: lookup
  62. Milinovich G.J., Burrell P.C., Pollitt C.C., Klieve A.V., Blackall L.L., Ouwerkerk D., Woodland E., Trott D.J.. Microbial ecology of the equine hindgut during oligofructose-induced laminitis.. ISME J. 2008;2:1089–1100.
    doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.67pubmed: 18580970google scholar: lookup
  63. Reveles K.R., Ryan C.N., Chan L., Cosimi R.A., Haynes W.L.. Proton pump inhibitor use associated with changes in gut microbiota composition.. Gut. 2018;67:1369–1370.
    doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315306pmc: PMC6031263pubmed: 28993417google scholar: lookup
  64. Botha M., Botes M., Loos B., Smith C., Dicks L.M.T.. Lactobacillus equigenerosi Strain Le1 Invades Equine Epithelial Cells.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:4248–4255.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.00552-12pmc: PMC3370564pubmed: 22504808google scholar: lookup
  65. Olsen I., Dewhirst F.E., Paster B.J., Busse H.J.. Pasteurellaceae.. Bergey's Man. Syst. Archaea Bact. 2015:1–9.
  66. Chaucheyras-Durand F., Sacy A., Karges K., Apper E.. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.. Microorganisms. 2022;10:2517.
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122517pmc: PMC9783266pubmed: 36557769google scholar: lookup
  67. Su S., Zhao Y., Liu Z., Liu G., Du M., Wu J., Bai D., Li B., Bou G., Zhang X.. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments of Mongolian horses.. MicrobiologyOpen. 2020;9:1085–1101.
    doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1020pmc: PMC7294312pubmed: 32153142google scholar: lookup
  68. Alexander F., Davies M.E.. Production and fermentation of lactate by bacteria in the alimentary canal of the horse and pig.. J. Comp. Pathol. 1963;73:1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(63)80001-6pubmed: 14011947google scholar: lookup
  69. Biddle A.S., Black S.J., Blanchard J.L.. An In Vitro Model of the Horse Gut Microbiome Enables Identification of Lactate-Utilizing Bacteria That Differentially Respond to Starch Induction.. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77599.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077599pmc: PMC3788102pubmed: 24098591google scholar: lookup
  70. White G., Prior S.D.. Comparative effects of oral administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine or oxytetracycline on the faecal flora of horses.. Vet. Rec. 1982;111:316–318.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.111.14.316pubmed: 6293150google scholar: lookup
  71. Leng J., Proudman C., Blow F., Darby A.C., Swann J.. Understanding intestinal microbiota in equine grass sicnkess: Next generation sequencing of faecal bacterial DNA.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:9.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12486_19pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  72. Decewicz P., Kitowicz M., Radlinska M.. Characteristics and Comparative Genomic Analysis of a Novel Virus, VarioGold, the First Bacteriophage of Variovorax.. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:13539.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms232113539pmc: PMC9658991pubmed: 36362326google scholar: lookup
  73. Thomas J.C., Helgason T., Sinclair C.J., Moir J.W.B.. Isolation and characterization of metaldehyde-degrading bacteria from domestic soils.. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017;10:1824–1829.
    doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12719pmc: PMC5658602pubmed: 28707368google scholar: lookup
  74. Xia W., Liu L., Shi N., Zhang C., Tang A., He G.. Epstein Barr virus infection in tree shrews alters the composition of gut microbiota and metabolome profile.. Virol. J. 2023;20:177.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02147-3pmc: PMC10410904pubmed: 37553712google scholar: lookup
  75. Xu M., Jiang Z., Huang W., Yin J., Ou S., Jiang Y., Meng L., Cao S., Yu A., Cao J.. Altered Gut Microbiota Composition in Subjects Infected With Clonorchis sinensis.. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2292.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02292pmc: PMC6172334pubmed: 30323795google scholar: lookup
  76. Funke G., Aravena-Roman M., Frodl R.. First Description of Curtobacterium spp. Isolated from Human Clinical Specimens.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:1032–1036.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1032-1036.2005pmc: PMC1081300pubmed: 15750056google scholar: lookup
  77. Chase A.B., Arevalo P., Polz M.F., Berlemont R., Martiny J.B.H.. Evidence for Ecological Flexibility in the Cosmopolitan Genus Curtobacterium.. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1874.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01874pmc: PMC5118839pubmed: 27920771google scholar: lookup
  78. Palberg D., Kisiała A., Jorge G.L., Emery R.J.N.. A survey of Methylobacterium species and strains reveals widespread production and varying profiles of cytokinin phytohormones.. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22:49.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02454-9pmc: PMC8822675pubmed: 35135483google scholar: lookup
  79. Senthilkumar M., Pushpakanth P., Arul Jose P., Krishnamoorthy R., Anandham R.. Diversity and functional characterization of endophytic Methylobacterium isolated from banana cultivars of South India and its impact on early growth of tissue culture banana plantlets.. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021;131:2448–2465.
    doi: 10.1111/jam.15112pubmed: 33891792google scholar: lookup
  80. Gallego V., García M.T., Ventosa A.. Methylobacterium adhaesivum sp. nov., a methylotrophic bacterium isolated from drinking water.. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006;56:339–342.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63966-0pubmed: 16449436google scholar: lookup
  81. Cruz A.T., Cazacu A.C., Allen C.H.. Pantoea agglomerans, a Plant Pathogen Causing Human Disease.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:1989–1992.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.00632-07pmc: PMC1933083pubmed: 17442803google scholar: lookup
  82. Julien M.E., Shih J.B., Correa Lopes B., Vallone L.V., Suchodolski J.S., Pilla R., Scott E.M.. Alterations of the bacterial ocular surface microbiome are found in both eyes of horses with unilateral ulcerative keratitis.. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0291028.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291028pmc: PMC10490969pubmed: 37682941google scholar: lookup
  83. Henker L.C., Lorenzett M.P., Keller A., Siqueira F.M., Driemeier D., Pavarini S.P.. Fibrinonecrotic Placentitis and Abortion Associated with Pantoea agglomerans Infection in a Mare.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;92:103156.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103156pubmed: 32797784google scholar: lookup
  84. Salter S.J., Cox M.J., Turek E.M., Calus S.T., Cookson W.O., Moffatt M.F., Turner P., Parkhill J., Loman N.J., Walker A.W.. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses.. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87.
    doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0087-zpmc: PMC4228153pubmed: 25387460google scholar: lookup
  85. Gao W., Chan Y., You M., Lacap-Bugler D.C., Leung W.K., Watt R.M.. In-depth snapshot of the equine subgingival microbiome.. Microb. Pathog. 2016;94:76–89.
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.11.002pubmed: 26550763google scholar: lookup
  86. Townsend K.S., Johnson P.J., Lacarrubba A.M., Martin L.M., Ericsson A.C.. Exodontia associated bacteremia in horses characterized by next generation sequencing.. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:6314.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85484-zpmc: PMC7973801pubmed: 33737590google scholar: lookup
  87. Conrado F.O., Stacy N.I., Wellehan J.F.X.. Out with the old, in with the new: What’s up with Simonsiella spp.?. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2023;52:208–209.
    doi: 10.1111/vcp.13246pubmed: 37029600google scholar: lookup
  88. Radosavljevic V., Zutic J., Radanovic O., Ivetic V., Pavlovic I., Zutic M.. A Case Report: Isolation of Alysiella filiformis from Pig’s Lungs.. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2013;19:721–723.
    doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.8648google scholar: lookup
  89. Zhang Z., Huang B., Wang Y., Zhu M., Wang C.. Could Weaning Remodel the Oral Microbiota Composition in Donkeys? An Exploratory Study.. Animals. 2022;12:2024.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12162024pmc: PMC9404433pubmed: 36009615google scholar: lookup
  90. White D.C., Sutton S.D., Ringelberg D.B.. The genus Sphingomonas: Physiology and ecology.. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1996;7:301–306.
    doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80034-6pubmed: 8785434google scholar: lookup
  91. Li X.B., Huang X.X., Li Q., Li X.Y., Li J.H., Li C., He L.J., Jing H.X., Yang K.L.. Effects of different grains on bacterial diversity and enzyme activity associated with digestion of starch in the foal stomach.. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18:407.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03510-2pmc: PMC9670411pubmed: 36397114google scholar: lookup
  92. Santibáñez R., Lara F., Barros T.M., Mardones E., Cuadra F., Thomson P.. Ocular Microbiome in a Group of Clinically Healthy Horses.. Animals. 2022;12:943.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12080943pmc: PMC9028004pubmed: 35454190google scholar: lookup
  93. Bond S.L., Timsit E., Workentine M., Alexander T., Leguillette R.. Upper and lower respiratory tract microbiota in horses: Bacterial communities associated with health and mild asthma (inflammatory airway disease) and effects of dexamethasone.. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:184.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1092-5pmc: PMC5569571pubmed: 28835202google scholar: lookup
  94. Raspa F., Chessa S., Bergero D., Sacchi P., Ferrocino I., Cocolin L., Corvaglia M.R., Moretti R., Cavallini D., Valle E.. Microbiota characterization throughout the digestive tract of horses fed a high-fiber vs. a high-starch diet.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1386135.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1386135pmc: PMC11130486pubmed: 38807937google scholar: lookup
  95. Lima S.F., Teixeira A.G.V., Higgins C.H., Lima F.S., Bicalho R.C.. The upper respiratory tract microbiome and its potential role in bovine respiratory disease and otitis media.. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29050.
    doi: 10.1038/srep29050pmc: PMC4929571pubmed: 27363739google scholar: lookup
  96. Gupta R.S., Gao B.. Phylogenomic analyses of clostridia and identification of novel protein signatures that are specific to the genus Clostridiumsensu stricto (cluster I). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009;59:285–294.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.001792-0pubmed: 19196767google scholar: lookup
  97. Zakia L.S., Gomez D.E., Caddey B.B., Boerlin P., Surette M.G., Arroyo L.G.. Direct and culture-enriched 16S rRNA sequencing of cecal content of healthy horses and horses with typhlocolitis.. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0284193.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284193pmc: PMC10101396pubmed: 37053174google scholar: lookup
  98. Huang C., Ge F., Yao X., Guo X., Bao P., Ma X., Wu X., Chu M., Yan P., Liang C.. Microbiome and Metabolomics Reveal the Effects of Different Feeding Systems on the Growth and Ruminal Development of Yaks.. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:682989.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.682989pmc: PMC8265505pubmed: 34248900google scholar: lookup
  99. Tang J., Zhao M., Yang W., Chen H., Dong Y., He Q., Miao X., Zhang J.. Effect of Composite Probiotics on Antioxidant Capacity, Gut Barrier Functions, and Fecal Microbiome of Weaned Piglets and Sows.. Animals. 2024;14:1359.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14091359pmc: PMC11082949pubmed: 38731362google scholar: lookup
  100. Qiu X., Qin X., Chen L., Chen Z., Hao R., Zhang S., Yang S., Wang L., Cui Y., Li Y.. Serum Biochemical Parameters, Rumen Fermentation, and Rumen Bacterial Communities Are Partly Driven by the Breed and Sex of Cattle When Fed High-Grain Diet.. Microorganisms. 2022;10:323.
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020323pmc: PMC8878564pubmed: 35208778google scholar: lookup
  101. Corrêa-Oliveira R., Fachi J.L., Vieira A., Sato F.T., Vinolo M.A.R.. Regulation of immune cell function by short-chain fatty acids.. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2016;5:e73.
    doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.17pmc: PMC4855267pubmed: 27195116google scholar: lookup
  102. Costa M.C., Arroyo L.G., Allen-Vercoe E., Stampfli H.R., Kim P.T., Sturgeon A., Weese J.S.. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41484.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041484pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989google scholar: lookup
  103. Costa M.C., Stampfli H.R., Arroyo L.G., Allen-Vercoe E., Gomes R.G., Weese J.S.. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:19.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524google scholar: lookup
  104. Stewart H.L., Southwood L.L., Indugu N., Vecchiarelli B., Engiles J.B., Pitta D.. Differences in the equine faecal microbiota between horses presenting to a tertiary referral hospital for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure.. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:336–342.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13010pubmed: 30153353google scholar: lookup
  105. Weinert-Nelson J.R., Biddle A.S., Sampath H., Williams C.A.. Fecal Microbiota, Forage Nutrients, and Metabolic Responses of Horses Grazing Warm- and Cool-Season Grass Pastures.. Animals. 2023;13:790.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13050790pmc: PMC10000167pubmed: 36899650google scholar: lookup
  106. Weinert-Nelson J.R., Biddle A.S., Williams C.A.. Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems.. Anim. Microbiome. 2022;4:41.
    doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00192-xpmc: PMC9210719pubmed: 35729677google scholar: lookup
  107. Zened A., Combes S., Cauquil L., Mariette J., Klopp C., Bouchez O., Troegeler-Meynadier A., Enjalbert F.. Microbial ecology of the rumen evaluated by 454 GS FLX pyrosequencing is affected by starch and oil supplementation of diets.. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013;83:504–514.
    doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12011pubmed: 22974422google scholar: lookup
  108. Fan Q., Wanapat M., Hou F.. Chemical Composition of Milk and Rumen Microbiome Diversity of Yak, Impacting by Herbage Grown at Different Phenological Periods on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.. Animals. 2020;10:1030.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061030pmc: PMC7341253pubmed: 32545764google scholar: lookup
  109. Teixeira C.G., Fusieger A., Milião G.L., Martins E., Drider D., Nero L.A., De Carvalho A.F.. Weissella: An Emerging Bacterium with Promising Health Benefits.. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2021;13:915–925.
    doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09751-1pubmed: 33565028google scholar: lookup
  110. Sharma N., Gupta D., Park Y.-S.. Genome analysis revealed a repertoire of oligosaccharide utilizing CAZymes in Weissella confusa CCK931 and Weissella cibaria YRK005.. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023;32:553–564.
    doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01232-7pmc: PMC9992689pubmed: 36911327google scholar: lookup
  111. Kang C.E., Park Y.J., Kim J.H., Lee N.-K., Paik H.-D.. Probiotic Weissella cibaria displays antibacterial and anti-biofilm effect against cavity-causing Streptococcus mutans.. Microb. Pathog. 2023;180:106151.
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106151pubmed: 37172659google scholar: lookup
  112. Kavitake D., Devi P.B., Shetty P.H.. Overview of exopolysaccharides produced by Weissella genus—A review.. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;164:2964–2973.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.185pubmed: 32853618google scholar: lookup
  113. Park S., Saravanakumar K., Sathiyaseelan A., Han K.-S., Lee J., Wang M.-H.. Polysaccharides of Weissella cibaria Act as a Prebiotic to Enhance the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023;195:3928–3940.
    doi: 10.1007/s12010-022-04104-2pubmed: 35947292google scholar: lookup
  114. Ford T., McAdams Z.L., Townsend K.S., Martin L.M., Johnson P.J., Ericsson A.C.. Effect of Sugar Beet Pulp on the Composition and Predicted Function of Equine Fecal Microbiota.. Biology. 2023;12:1254.
    doi: 10.3390/biology12091254pmc: PMC10525916pubmed: 37759653google scholar: lookup
  115. Gomez A., Sharma A.K., Grev A., Sheaffer C., Martinson K.. The Horse Gut Microbiome Responds in a Highly Individualized Manner to Forage Lignification.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;96:103306.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103306pubmed: 33349409google scholar: lookup
  116. Mshelia E.S., Adamu L., Wakil Y., Turaki U.A., Gulani I.A., Musa J.. The association between gut microbiome, sex, age and body condition scores of horses in Maiduguri and its environs.. Microb. Pathog. 2018;118:81–86.
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.018pubmed: 29530806google scholar: lookup
  117. Salem S.E., Maddox T.W., Berg A., Antczak P., Ketley J.M., Williams N.J., Archer D.C.. Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period.. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8510.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26930-3pmc: PMC5981443pubmed: 29855517google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.