Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2006; 174(3); 492-500; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008

The advent of equitation science.

Abstract: The lengthy association of humans with horses has established traditional equestrian techniques that have served military and transport needs well. Although effective, these techniques have by-passed the research findings of modern psychologists, who developed the fundamentals of learning theory. That said, the pools of equestrian debate are far from stagnant. The latest wave of horse whisperers has offered some refinements and some novel interpretations of the motivation of horses undergoing training. Additionally, the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) has introduced the concept of the 'happy equine athlete' and, in the light of the hyperflexion (Rollkür) debate, recently examined the possible effects of some novel dressage modalities on equine 'happiness'. However, many still question the welfare of the ridden horse since it is largely trained using negative reinforcement, has to respond to pressure-based signals and is seldom asked to work for positive rewards. Science holds tremendous promise for removing emotiveness from the horse-riding welfare debate by establishing how much rein tension is too much; how much contact is neutral; how contact can be measured; how discomfort can be measured; how pain can be measured; and how learned helplessness manifests in horses. These are some of the topics addressed by equitation science, an emerging discipline that combines learning theory, physics and ethology to examine the salience and efficacy of horse-training techniques.
Publication Date: 2006-12-08 PubMed ID: 17157542DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the inefficiencies and possible welfare implications of traditional equestrian techniques. The study explores the use of modern equitation science, combining learning theory, physics and ethology, to assess and improve horse training methods and ultimately the wellbeing of the horses themselves.

Background of the Study

  • The study sets the stage by highlighting the long historical relationship between humans and horses, focusing on traditional training and riding techniques, predominantly used for military purposes and transportation.
  • The study further contends that these traditional practices largely ignore established findings from psychology’s learning theory, which could improve training techniques and enhance horse welfare.
  • Despite the dominance of these conventional methods, the authors note currents within the equestrian world hinting at change, such as the wave of ‘horse whisperers’ introducing refined approaches and new interpretations of horse motivation during training.

Modern Equestrian Trends And Debates

  • Modern trends within equestrian circles, such as the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI)’s concept of the ‘happy equine athlete’, are also mentioned. The authors explain how the FEI explores the potential effects of new dressage forms on horses’ welfare, particularly in the context of the controversial hyperflexion (Rollkür) technique.
  • The paper raises concerns about the welfare of ridden horses as current training methods predominantly use negative reinforcement and pressure-based signals rather than rewarding positive behaviour.

Introduction to Equitation Science

  • To address these challenges, the authors propose equitation science as a solution. This emerging discipline merges learning theory, physics, and ethology to evaluate the relevance and effectiveness of horse training techniques.
  • Using science, the study suggests, can remove emotional responses from discussions about horse welfare, by determining objective indicators of comfort and discomfort – such as rein tension and learned helplessness – in horses. This offers a clear framework for evaluating and improving horse handling techniques from a welfare perspective.

Expectations for Equitation Science

  • The authors conclude by emphasizing the potential of equitation science to revolutionize traditional equestrian practices, leading to improvements in horse welfare and training outcomes.
  • By measuring and studying these aspects, equitation science can provide valuable insights and data to make informed decisions on the appropriate training techniques, shifting away from outdated, possibly harmful practices, and creating a better future for both horses and their handlers.

Cite This Article

APA
McGreevy PD. (2006). The advent of equitation science. Vet J, 174(3), 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 174
Issue: 3
Pages: 492-500

Researcher Affiliations

McGreevy, Paul D
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, Gunn Building (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. paulm@vetsci.usyd.edu.au

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Conflict, Psychological
  • Horses
  • Learning

References

This article includes 33 references

Citations

This article has been cited 32 times.
  1. Kieson E. Interspecies Relational Theory: A Framework for Compassionate Interspecies Interactions. Vet Sci 2025 Jun 14;12(6).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12060586pubmed: 40559823google scholar: lookup
  2. Hall-Bromley A, Dixon L. Education and Licensing of Horse Owners: Addressing Poor Horse Welfare in the UK. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 3;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071037pubmed: 40218430google scholar: lookup
  3. Sigurðardóttir H, Eriksson S, Niazi A, Rhodin M, Albertsdóttir E, Kristjansson T, Lindgren G. Genetic influence of a STAU2 frameshift mutation and RELN regulatory elements on performance in Icelandic horses. Sci Rep 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11641.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95593-8pubmed: 40185812google scholar: lookup
  4. O'Connell E, Dyson S, McLean A, McGreevy P. No More Evasion: Redefining Conflict Behaviour in Human-Horse Interactions. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 31;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030399pubmed: 39943169google scholar: lookup
  5. Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Lundgren C, Ritter C. A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare. Anim Welf 2025;34:e11.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.2pubmed: 39935780google scholar: lookup
  6. Pereira-Figueiredo I, Rosa I, Sancho Sanchez C. Forced Handling Decreases Emotionality but Does Not Improve Young Horses' Responses toward Humans and their Adaptability to Stress. Animals (Basel) 2024 Mar 2;14(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14050784pubmed: 38473169google scholar: lookup
  7. Williams JM, Berg LC, Clayton HM, Kirsch K, Marlin D, Randle H, Roepstroff L, Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MSV, Weishaupt MA, Munsters C. A Delphi Study to Determine International and National Equestrian Expert Opinions on Domains and Sub-Domains Essential to Managing Sporthorse Health and Welfare in the Olympic Disciplines. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 2;13(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13213404pubmed: 37958159google scholar: lookup
  8. Nyberg L, Linnavalli T, Hartmann E, Kalland M. Finnish and Swedish riding school pupils' motivation towards participation in non-riding education. Front Sports Act Living 2023;5:1232428.
    doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1232428pubmed: 37927452google scholar: lookup
  9. Keener MM, Tumlin KI. The Triple-E Model: Advancing Equestrian Research with Perspectives from One Health. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 16;13(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13162642pubmed: 37627432google scholar: lookup
  10. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of Substance P as a New Stress Parameter in Horses in a Stress Model Involving Four Different Stress Levels. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071142pubmed: 37048398google scholar: lookup
  11. Stallones L, McManus P, McGreevy P. Sustainability and the Thoroughbred Breeding and Racing Industries: An Enhanced One Welfare Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 31;13(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030490pubmed: 36766378google scholar: lookup
  12. Egenvall A, Byström A, Pökelmann M, Connysson M, Kienapfel-Henseleit K, Karlsteen M, McGreevy P, Hartmann E. Rein tension in harness trotters during on-track exercise. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:987852.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.987852pubmed: 36304413google scholar: lookup
  13. McKenzie J, Fenner K, Hyde M, Anzulewicz A, Burattini B, Romness N, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Equine Responses to Acceleration and Deceleration Cues May Reflect Their Exposure to Multiple Riders. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 31;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010066pubmed: 33396451google scholar: lookup
  14. Demarie S, Galvani C, Billat VL. Horse-Riding Competitions Pre and Post COVID-19: Effect of Anxiety, sRPE and HR on Performance in Eventing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Nov 21;17(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228648pubmed: 33233325google scholar: lookup
  15. Fenner K, Dashper K, Serpell J, McLean A, Wilkins C, Klinck M, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Development of a Novel Questionnaire Approach to the Investigation of Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 24;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111960pubmed: 33114408google scholar: lookup
  16. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  17. Fenner K, Hyde M, Crean A, McGreevy P. Identifying Sources of Potential Bias When Using Online Survey Data to Explore Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review. Vet Sci 2020 Sep 22;7(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030140pubmed: 32971754google scholar: lookup
  18. Fenner K, Dashper K, Wilkins C, Serpell J, McLean A, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Building Bridges between Theory and Practice: How Citizen Science Can Bring Equine Researchers and Practitioners Together. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 13;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091644pubmed: 32933118google scholar: lookup
  19. Weller D, Franklin S, Shea G, White P, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. The Reported Use of Nosebands in Racing and Equestrian Pursuits. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 30;10(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050776pubmed: 32365844google scholar: lookup
  20. Early J, Arnott E, Wilson B, Wade C, McGreevy P. The Perceived Value of Behavioural Traits in Australian Livestock Herding Dogs Varies with the Operational Context. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 16;9(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070448pubmed: 31315219google scholar: lookup
  21. Piccolo L, Kienapfel K. Voluntary Rein Tension in Horses When Moving Unridden in a Dressage Frame Compared with Ridden Tests of the Same Horses-A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 6;9(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9060321pubmed: 31174265google scholar: lookup
  22. Yngvesson J, Rey Torres JC, Lindholm J, Pättiniemi A, Andersson P, Sassner H. Health and Body Conditions of Riding School Horses Housed in Groups or Kept in Conventional Tie-Stall/Box Housing. Animals (Basel) 2019 Feb 26;9(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9030073pubmed: 30813613google scholar: lookup
  23. DuBois C, Nakonechny L, Derisoud E, Merkies K. Examining Canadian Equine Industry Participants' Perceptions of Horses and Their Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2018 Nov 7;8(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110201pubmed: 30405030google scholar: lookup
  24. Veen I, Killian D, Vlaminck L, Vernooij JCM, Back W. The use of a rein tension device to compare different training methods for neck flexion in base-level trained Warmblood horses at the walk. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):825-830.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12831pubmed: 29517811google scholar: lookup
  25. McGreevy PD, Griffiths MD, Ascione FR, Wilson B. Flogging tired horses: Who wants whipping and who would walk away if whipping horses were withheld?. PLoS One 2018;13(2):e0192843.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192843pubmed: 29466458google scholar: lookup
  26. Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Bolwell C, Gordon S. The Challenges of Using Horses for Practical Teaching Purposes in Veterinary Programmes. Animals (Basel) 2016 Nov 11;6(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6110069pubmed: 27845702google scholar: lookup
  27. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, Knight P, Celi P, Jeffcott L, Muscatello G. A Survey on Transport Management Practices Associated with Injuries and Health Problems in Horses. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162371.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162371pubmed: 27588689google scholar: lookup
  28. Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework. Animals (Basel) 2016 May 6;6(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6050033pubmed: 27164148google scholar: lookup
  29. Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The Contribution of Equitation Science to Minimising Horse-Related Risks to Humans. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 23;6(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6030015pubmed: 26907354google scholar: lookup
  30. Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Eisersiö M, Rhodin M, van Weeren R. Stride-related rein tension patterns in walk and trot in the ridden horse. Acta Vet Scand 2015 Dec 30;57:89.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0182-3pubmed: 26715156google scholar: lookup
  31. Haigh L, Thompson K. Helmet Use Amongst Equestrians: Harnessing Social and Attitudinal Factors Revealed in Online Forums. Animals (Basel) 2015 Jul 17;5(3):576-91.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5030373pubmed: 26479375google scholar: lookup
  32. Collins J, Hanlon A, More S, Duggan V. The structure and regulation of the Irish equine industries: Links to considerations of equine welfare. Ir Vet J 2008 Nov 1;61(11):746-56.
    doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-11-746pubmed: 21851704google scholar: lookup