Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(11); 1960; doi: 10.3390/ani10111960

The Development of a Novel Questionnaire Approach to the Investigation of Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour.

Abstract: The Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) is a questionnaire instrument developed to obtain quantitative data on the domestic equine triad of training, management, and behaviour of horses. The E-BARQ was developed to identify how changes in training and management impact behaviour over time, to define normal behaviour in horses, and to discover how to improve rider safety and horse welfare, leading to ethical equitation. During the development of the E-BARQ, we also investigated how best to motivate stakeholders to engage with this citizen science project. The pilot version of the E-BARQ collected qualitative data on respondents' experience of the questionnaire. The pilot questionnaire was developed with the assistance of an international panel (with professional expertise in horse training, equitation science, veterinary science, equestrian coaching, welfare, animal behaviour, and elite-level riding), and was used to collect data on 1320 horses from approximately 1194 owner/caregiver respondents, with an option for respondents to provide free-text feedback. A Rotated Principal Component Analysis of the 218 behavioural, management, and training questionnaire items extracted a total of 65 rotated components. Thirty-six of the 65 rotated components demonstrated high internal reliability. Of the 218 questionnaire items, 43 items failed to reach the Rotated Principal Component Analysis criteria and were not included in the final version of the E-BARQ. Survey items that failed the Rotated Principal Component Analysis inclusion criteria were discarded if found to have a less than 85% response rate, or a variance of less than 1.3. Of those that survived the Rotated Principal Component Analysis, items were further assigned to horse temperament (17 rotated components), equitation (11 rotated components), and management and equipment (8 rotated components) groups. The feedback from respondents indicated the need for further items to be added to the questionnaire, resulting in a total of 214 items for the final E-BARQ survey. Many of these items were further grouped into question matrices, and the demographic items for horse and handler included, giving a final total of 97 questions on the E-BARQ questionnaire. These results provided content validity, showing that the questionnaire items were an acceptable representation of the entire horse training, management, and behavioural domain for the development of the final E-BARQ questionnaire.
Publication Date: 2020-10-24 PubMed ID: 33114408PubMed Central: PMC7693391DOI: 10.3390/ani10111960Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study proposes and validates the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ), a novel tool aimed at understanding and improving horse training, management and behavior. The questionnaire was refined through several stages, with the end goal of ameliorating horse welfare and ensuring ethical equitation.

Objective and Approach

  • The E-BARQ was designed to help researchers understand how different training methods and management changes affect horse behavior over time.
  • With the insights gathered, the ultimate goal was to improve rider safety and promote horse welfare, thereby paving the way for ethical equitation.
  • During the development of the E-BARQ, the research team also assessed strategies to incentivize stakeholders to participate in this citizen science project.

Data Collection and Analysis

  • Qualitative data were initially gathered via the pilot version of the E-BARQ, which was used to garner feedback on the questionnaire itself from around 1194 horse owners/caregivers.
  • This questionnaire, developed with the input of an international expert panel, gathered data on 1320 horses. Respondents could also provide additional feedback in a free-form text format.
  • Following this, a Rotated Principal Component Analysis was performed on the 218 original questions, yielding 65 key components.
  • Of these 65 rotated components, 36 showed high internal reliability. However, 43 items failed to meet the criteria for inclusion in the Rotated Principal Component Analysis and were thus excluded from the final version of the questionnaire.

Development of Final Questionnaire

  • Surviving questionnaire items were further divided into categories reflecting horse temperament, management and equipment, and equitation – with 17, 8, and 11 rotated components respectively.
  • Feedback from the pilot questionnaire indicated the need for additional items, resulting in the final E-BARQ containing a total of 214 items.
  • These items were grouped into question matrices. With the inclusion of demographic data for both the horse and its handler, the finalized questionnaire contained a total of 97 questions.
  • The final format of the questionnaire provided content validity, by adequately covering the full range of aspects related to horse training, management, and behavior – ultimately enabling the implementation of the finalized E-BARQ.

Cite This Article

APA
Fenner K, Dashper K, Serpell J, McLean A, Wilkins C, Klinck M, Wilson B, McGreevy P. (2020). The Development of a Novel Questionnaire Approach to the Investigation of Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour. Animals (Basel), 10(11), 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111960

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 11
PII: 1960

Researcher Affiliations

Fenner, Kate
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia.
Dashper, Katherine
  • School of Events, Tourism and Hospitality Management, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK.
Serpell, James
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
McLean, Andrew
  • Equitation Science International, 3 Wonderland Ave, Tuerong, Victoria 3915, Australia.
Wilkins, Cristina
  • Saddletops Pty Ltd., Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.
Klinck, Mary
  • Dre Mary Klinck, m.v., consultante en comportement, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X0A6, Canada.
Wilson, Bethany
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia.
McGreevy, Paul
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. McGreevy PD. The advent of equitation science.. Vet J 2007 Nov;174(3):492-500.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008pubmed: 17157542google scholar: lookup
  2. Jones B., McGreevy P.. Ethical equitation: Applying a cost-benefit approach.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2010;5:196–202.
  3. Boot M., McGreevy P.D.. The X files: Xenophon re-examined through the lens of equitation science.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2013;8:367–375.
  4. McGreevy PD. The fine line between pressure and pain: ask the horse.. Vet J 2011 Jun;188(3):250-1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.10.011pubmed: 21094060google scholar: lookup
  5. Fédération Equestre Internationale. Dressage Rules.. .
  6. König von Borstel U, McGreevy PD. Behind the vertical and behind the times.. Vet J 2014 Dec;202(3):403-4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.005pubmed: 25453242google scholar: lookup
  7. McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2010;5:187–195.
  8. Fenner K, Yoon S, White P, Starling M, McGreevy P. The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses' Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses.. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0154179.
  9. Telatin A., Franklin J., Bargali P., Greene E.. A pilot study: Can whip use changes to improve equine welfare have unintended consequences?. Proceedings of the 13th International Equitation Science Conference Wagga Wagga, Australia. 22–26 October 2017.
  10. Hood J, McDonald C, Wilson B, McManus P, McGreevy P. Whip Rule Breaches in a Major Australian Racing Jurisdiction: Welfare and Regulatory Implications.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jan 16;7(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7010004pmc: PMC5295154pubmed: 28275207google scholar: lookup
  11. Dashper K.. Tools of the Trade or Part of the Family? Horses in Competitive Equestrian Sport.. Soc. Anim. 2014;22:352–371.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341343google scholar: lookup
  12. Weller D, Franklin S, Shea G, White P, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. The Reported Use of Nosebands in Racing and Equestrian Pursuits.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 30;10(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050776pmc: PMC7278451pubmed: 32365844google scholar: lookup
  13. Christensen J., Ladewig J., Sondergaard E., Malmkvist J.. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
  14. Freire R, Buckley P, Cooper JJ. Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses.. Equine Vet J 2009 May;41(5):487-92.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X383883pubmed: 19642410google scholar: lookup
  15. McGreevy PD, French NP, Nicol CJ. The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling.. Vet Rec 1995 Jul 8;137(2):36-7.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.137.2.36pubmed: 8525580google scholar: lookup
  16. Fenner K, Hyde M, Crean A, McGreevy P. Identifying Sources of Potential Bias When Using Online Survey Data to Explore Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review.. Vet Sci 2020 Sep 22;7(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030140pmc: PMC7558402pubmed: 32971754google scholar: lookup
  17. Fenner K., McLean A., McGreevy P.. Cutting to the chase: How round-pen, lunging and high-speed liberty work may compromise horse welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2019;29:88–94.
  18. Thomson PC, Hayek AR, Jones B, Evans DL, McGreevy PD. Number, causes and destinations of horses leaving the Australian Thoroughbred and Standardbred racing industries.. Aust Vet J 2014 Aug;92(8):303-11.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12204pubmed: 24954530google scholar: lookup
  19. Hawson L.A., Oddie C., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Is safety valued in the Australian pony market?. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2011;6:254–260.
  20. Oddie C.F., Hawson L.A., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Do vendors value safety in the Australian recreational (non-Thoroughbred) riding horse market?. J. Vet. Behav. 2014;9:375–381.
  21. McGreevy P.D., Oddie C.F., Hawson L.A., McLean A.N., Evans D.L.. Do vendors value safety in Thoroughbred horses in the Australian recreational riding horse market?. J. Vet. Behav. 2015;9:153–157.
  22. McLean AN. Overshadowing: a silver lining to a dark cloud in horse training.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008;11(3):236-48.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101064pubmed: 18569221google scholar: lookup
  23. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The use of equipment and training practices and the prevalence of owner-reported ridden behaviour problems in UK leisure horses.. Equine Vet J 2013 Jan;45(1):15-9.
  24. O'Connor S, Hitchens PL, Fortington LV. Hospital-treated injuries from horse riding in Victoria, Australia: time to refocus on injury prevention?. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2018;4(1):e000321.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000321pmc: PMC5812386pubmed: 29464106google scholar: lookup
  25. Silver JR. Spinal injuries resulting from horse riding accidents.. Spinal Cord 2002 Jun;40(6):264-71.
    doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101280pubmed: 12037707google scholar: lookup
  26. Buckley P, Morton JM, Buckley DJ, Coleman GT. Misbehaviour in Pony Club horses: incidence and risk factors.. Equine Vet J 2013 Jan;45(1):9-14.
  27. Hsu Y, Serpell JA. Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003 Nov 1;223(9):1293-300.
  28. McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape.. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e80529.
  29. McGreevy PD, Wilson B, Starling MJ, Serpell JA. Behavioural risks in male dogs with minimal lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones may complicate population-control benefits of desexing.. PLoS One 2018;13(5):e0196284.
  30. Starling M, Fawcett A, Wilson B, Serpell J, McGreevy P. Behavioural risks in female dogs with minimal lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones.. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0223709.
  31. MacLean EL, Snyder-Mackler N, vonHoldt BM, Serpell JA. Highly heritable and functionally relevant breed differences in dog behaviour.. Proc Biol Sci 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20190716.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0716pmc: PMC6790757pubmed: 31575369google scholar: lookup
  32. Zapata I, Serpell JA, Alvarez CE. Genetic mapping of canine fear and aggression.. BMC Genomics 2016 Aug 8;17:572.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2936-3pmc: PMC4977763pubmed: 27503363google scholar: lookup
  33. Stone HR, McGreevy PD, Starling MJ, Forkman B. Associations between Domestic-Dog Morphology and Behaviour Scores in the Dog Mentality Assessment.. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0149403.
  34. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.. J Biomed Inform 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010pmc: PMC2700030pubmed: 18929686google scholar: lookup
  35. Camargo F., Gombeski W., Barger P., Jehlik C., Wiemers H., Mead J., Lawyer A.. Horse-related injuries: Causes, preventability, and where educational efforts should be focused.. Cogent Food Agric. 2018;4.
  36. Qualtrics XM. [(accessed on 23 October 2020)]; Available online: https://www.qualtrics.com/au/
  37. Dashper K.. Human-Animal Relationships in Equestrian Sport and Leisure.. .
  38. Fenner K, Matlock S, Williams J, Wilson B, McLean A, Serpell J, McGreevy P. Validation of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ): A New Survey Instrument for Exploring and Monitoring the Domestic Equine Triad.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
    pmc: PMC7692587pubmed: 33126670doi: 10.3390/ani10111982google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Yokomori T, Ohnuma A, Tozaki T, Segawa T, Itou T. Identification of Personality-Related Candidate Genes in Thoroughbred Racehorses Using a Bioinformatics-Based Approach Involving Functionally Annotated Human Genes. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 20;13(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13040769pubmed: 36830556google scholar: lookup
  2. Anzulewicz A, Fenner K, Hyde M, Heald S, Burattini B, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Impact of the Sex of Handlers and Riders on the Reported Social Confidence, Compliance and Touch Sensitivity of Horses in Their Care. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 8;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010130pubmed: 33430130google scholar: lookup
  3. McKenzie J, Fenner K, Hyde M, Anzulewicz A, Burattini B, Romness N, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Equine Responses to Acceleration and Deceleration Cues May Reflect Their Exposure to Multiple Riders. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 31;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010066pubmed: 33396451google scholar: lookup
  4. Romness N, Fenner K, McKenzie J, Anzulewicz A, Burattini B, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Associations between Owners' Reports of Unwanted Ridden Behaviour and In-Hand Behaviour in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 18;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122431pubmed: 33353091google scholar: lookup
  5. Burattini B, Fenner K, Anzulewicz A, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Age-Related Changes in the Behaviour of Domestic Horses as Reported by Owners. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122321pubmed: 33297447google scholar: lookup
  6. Fenner K, Matlock S, Williams J, Wilson B, McLean A, Serpell J, McGreevy P. Validation of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ): A New Survey Instrument for Exploring and Monitoring the Domestic Equine Triad. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111982pubmed: 33126670google scholar: lookup
  7. Chapman M, Fenner K, Thomas MJW, Thompson K. Stakeholder Views on the Potential Benefits and Feasibility of an Equestrian Industry-Specific Health, Safety and Welfare Management System. Animals (Basel) 2024 Nov 28;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233450pubmed: 39682412google scholar: lookup
  8. Guyo M, Tareke M, Tonamo A, Bediye D, Defar G. Evaluations of Morphometric Traits and Body Conformation Indices of Horse Ecotypes Reared in the Highlands of Bale Eco-Region, Ethiopia. Vet Med Sci 2024 Nov;10(6):e70114.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.70114pubmed: 39501603google scholar: lookup
  9. Fenner K, Wilson BJ, Ermers C, McGreevy PD. Reported Agonistic Behaviours in Domestic Horses Cluster According to Context. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 16;14(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14040629pubmed: 38396597google scholar: lookup