Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.70130

The effect of full-limb flexion tests on static and dynamic muscle activity and locomotion asymmetry in owner-sound horses.

Abstract: Flexion tests are commonly used in equine locomotion examinations to identify underlying locomotor issues, yet their neuromuscular effects remain poorly understood. Response variability raises concerns about their clinical value in lameness assessments and pre-purchase evaluations. Objective: Primarily, to investigate the effect of full-limb flexion tests on static (flexed position) and dynamic (subsequent trot-up) muscle activity. Secondarily, to assess their effect on locomotion asymmetry during trotting. Methods: In vivo experiments. Methods: Sixteen warmblood horses were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 4) for surface electromyography of selected limbs. Forelimb region muscles included Splenius muscle, Triceps brachii caput longus muscle, Longissimus dorsi muscle, Extensor digitorum communis muscle, and Ulnaris lateralis muscle, while hindlimb region muscles included Gluteus medius muscle, Biceps femoris muscle, Semitendinosus muscle, Extensor digitorum longus muscle, and Flexor digitorum profundus muscle. Electromyographic data were side-normalised, and kinematic data from inertial measurement units assessed asymmetry in head, withers, and pelvis. Each limb underwent a 60-s full-limb flexion test, followed by straight-line trotting. Muscle activity in static and dynamic phases was compared to baseline using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with statistical parametric mapping, respectively. Kinematic variables were compared using a linear mixed-effect model. Results: No significant differences in normalised muscle activity were observed in fore- or hindlimb region muscles during flexion or subsequent trotting. However, pelvic displacement increased during the suspension phase of the ipsilateral limb, with significant vertical displacement (MaxDiff) after left (8.4 mm ± 2.4 SE [standard error], p = 0.002) and right (8.1 mm ± 2.4 SE, p = 0.004) hindlimb flexion test. Conclusions: Only full-limb flexion tests were investigated, limiting generalisability to distal or carpal/tarsal tests. Flexion force was not standardised. Conclusions: We found no evidence that flexion tests affect equine neuromuscular functioning in the muscles we investigated.
Publication Date: 2025-12-02 PubMed ID: 41331497DOI: 10.1111/evj.70130Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates how full-limb flexion tests impact muscle activity and movement symmetry in horses that show no lameness.
  • The research aims to understand whether these commonly used veterinary tests affect muscle function or gait asymmetry during trotting.

Introduction and Purpose

  • Context: Flexion tests are commonly used in equine veterinary examinations to detect potential locomotor problems by flexing a horse’s limb and then observing its gait.
  • Problem: The neuromuscular effects of these tests are not well understood, resulting in variability in responses and questions about their reliability for diagnosing lameness or evaluating horses pre-purchase.
  • Objective: To study how full-limb flexion affects:
    • Static muscle activity — muscle activation during the limb being held in a flexed position, and
    • Dynamic muscle activity — muscle activation during the subsequent trot.
  • Additionally, to assess if the flexion test impacts locomotion asymmetry during trotting.

Methods

  • Subjects: Sixteen warmblood horses, all owner-sound (no lameness), randomly assigned to four groups (4 horses per group).
  • Data collection: Surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes monitored muscles in the limb regions during tests:
    • Forelimbs: Splenius, Triceps brachii caput longus, Longissimus dorsi, Extensor digitorum communis, Ulnaris lateralis muscles.
    • Hindlimbs: Gluteus medius, Biceps femoris, Semitendinosus, Extensor digitorum longus, Flexor digitorum profundus muscles.
  • Procedures:
    • Each horse underwent a 60-second full-limb flexion test, holding the limb in a flexed position.
    • Immediately following, horses were trotted in a straight line to assess dynamic responses.
  • Measurements:
    • EMG data were collected and normalized side-to-side to allow comparison.
    • Inertial measurement units (IMUs) collected kinematic data assessing asymmetry in head, withers, and pelvis movement.
  • Statistical analysis:
    • One-way repeated measures ANOVA compared muscle activity during the static flexion phase versus baseline.
    • Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with statistical parametric mapping analyzed dynamic muscle activity during trot-up compared to baseline.
    • Linear mixed-effect models assessed differences in kinematic asymmetry measures.

Results

  • Muscle activity: No significant changes were found in the normalized muscle activation levels in either forelimb or hindlimb muscles during:
    • The static flexion phase.
    • The dynamic trotting phase following flexion.
  • Locomotion asymmetry:
    • Pelvic movement during the suspension phase (when the limb is lifted) increased in vertical displacement on the same side as the flexed limb.
    • Specifically, maximum vertical movement differences after left and right hindlimb flexion tests were approximately 8.4 mm and 8.1 mm respectively, which were statistically significant.
    • No significant asymmetry changes were noted in head or withers movement.

Conclusions and Limitations

  • Conclusions:
    • Full-limb flexion tests do not significantly alter muscle activation patterns in the muscles studied, neither statically during flexion nor dynamically during trotting after flexion.
    • The significant pelvic displacement observed suggests that flexion can influence gait mechanics slightly, though not via altered muscle activation in the measured muscles.
    • This suggests the neuromuscular function is largely unaffected by these flexion tests in clinically sound horses.
  • Limitations:
    • Only full-limb flexion tests were analyzed; other more localized tests (distal limb, or specific joint—carpal or tarsal) were not included.
    • The force applied during flexion was not standardized, which may influence reproducibility of results.
    • The study focused on a specific set of muscles and may not reflect the response of all muscles involved in limb movement.

Implications

  • The results call into question the reliability of flexion tests to induce neuromuscular changes observable by EMG in unaffected horses, which may impact interpretations in lameness or purchase evaluations.
  • While gait asymmetry was detected at the pelvis, the functional significance and clinical relevance require further investigation.
  • Veterinarians should consider these findings when using full-limb flexion tests to assess equine locomotion issues.

Cite This Article

APA
Jonkhart M, Serra Bragança FM, Smit IH, Brommer H, Suskens JJM. (2025). The effect of full-limb flexion tests on static and dynamic muscle activity and locomotion asymmetry in owner-sound horses. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70130

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Jonkhart, Marijke
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Serra Bragança, Filipe M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Sleip AI, Stockholm, Sweden.
Smit, Ineke H
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brommer, Harold
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Suskens, Jozef J M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Grant Funding

  • Friends of VetMed

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Ramey DW. Prospective evaluation of forelimb flexion tests in practice: clinical response, radiographic correlations, and predictive value for future lameness. Am Assoc Equine Practnrs 1997;43:116–120.
  2. Shelton AV, Tupper J, Bolt DM. Prejudicial findings regarding suitability for intended purpose during pre‐purchase examinations in a mixed horse population—a retrospective observational study in the United Kingdom. Equine Vet J 2025;57(1):153–159.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14061google scholar: lookup
  3. Davidson EJ. Lameness evaluation of the athletic horse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018;34(2):181–191.
  4. Ross MW. Chapter 8—manipulation. 2011;p. 80–88.
  5. Armentrout AR, Beard WL, White BJ, Lillich JD. A comparative study of proximal hindlimb flexion in horses: 5 versus 60 seconds. Equine Vet J 2012;44(4):420–424.
  6. Putnam JRC, Holmes LM, Green MJ, Freeman SL. Incidence, causes and outcomes of lameness cases in a working military horse population: a field study. Equine Vet J 2014;46(2):194–197.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12084google scholar: lookup
  7. Zetterberg E, Persson‐Sjodin E, Lundblad J, Hernlund E, Rhodin M. Prevalence of movement asymmetries in high‐performing riding horses perceived as free from lameness and riders' perception of horse sidedness. PLoS One 2024;19(7):e0308061.
  8. Kearney CM, van Weeren PR, Cornelissen BP, den Boon P, Brama PA. Which anatomical region determines a positive flexion test of the distal aspect of a forelimb in a nonlame horse?. Equine Vet J 2010;42(6):547–551.
  9. Marshall JF, Lund DG, Voute LC. Use of a wireless, inertial sensor‐based system to objectively evaluate flexion tests in the horse. Equine Vet J 2012;44(S43):8–11.
  10. Starke SD, Willems E, Head M, May SA, Pfau T. Proximal hindlimb flexion in the horse: effect on movement symmetry and implications for defining soundness. Equine Vet J 2012;44(6):657–663.
  11. Spoormakers TJP, St. George L, Smit IH, Hobbs SJ, Brommer H, Clayton HM. Adaptations in equine axial movement and muscle activity occur during induced fore‐ and hindlimb lameness: a kinematic and electromyographic evaluation during in‐hand trot. Equine Vet J 2023;55(6):1112–1127.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13906google scholar: lookup
  12. St. George LB, Spoormakers TJP, Smit IH, Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM, Roy SH. Adaptations in equine appendicular muscle activity and movement occur during induced fore‐ and hindlimb lameness: an electromyographic and kinematic evaluation. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:989522.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.989522google scholar: lookup
  13. St. George LB, Spoormakers TJP, Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM, Roy SH, Richards J. Classification performance of sEMG and kinematic parameters for distinguishing between non‐lame and induced lameness conditions in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1358986.
  14. Lawin FJ, Byström A, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Almlöf M, Silva M. Is markerless more or less? Comparing a smartphone computer vision method for equine lameness assessment to multi‐camera motion capture. Animals 2023;13(3):390.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030390google scholar: lookup
  15. Smit IH, Parmentier JIM, Rovel T, van Dieen J, Serra Bragança FM. Towards standardisation of surface electromyography measurements in the horse: bipolar electrode location. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2024;76:102884.
  16. St. George L, Hobbs SJ, Richards J, Sinclair J, Holt D, Roy SH. The effect of cut‐off frequency when high‐pass filtering equine sEMG signals during locomotion.. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018;43:28–40.
  17. Serra Bragança FM, Broomé S, Rhodin M, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsson V, Voskamp JP. Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning.. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):17785.
  18. Pataky TC. One‐dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python.. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2012;15(3):295–301.
  19. Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median.. J Exp Soc Psychol 2013;49(4):764–766.
  20. St. George L, Roy SH, Richards J, Sinclair J, Hobbs SJ. Surface EMG signal normalisation and filtering improves sensitivity of equine gait analysis.. Comp Exerc Physiol 2019;15(3):173–186.
    doi: 10.3920/cep190028google scholar: lookup
  21. Rhodin M, Persson‐Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot.. Equine Vet J 2018;50(6):818–824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844google scholar: lookup
  22. Persson‐Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Andersen PH, Forsström KH, Byström A. Withers vertical movement symmetry is useful for locating the primary lame limb in naturally occurring lameness.. Equine Vet J 2024;56(1):76–88.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13947google scholar: lookup
  23. van Bijlert PA, Geijtenbeek T, Smit IH, Schulp AS, Bates KT. Muscle‐driven predictive physics simulations of quadrupedal locomotion in the horse.. Integr Comp Biol 2024;64(3):694–714.
    doi: 10.1093/icb/icae095google scholar: lookup
  24. Keg PR, van Weeren PR, Back W, Bameveld A. Influence of the force applied and its period of application on the outcome of the flexion test of the distal forelimb of the horse.. Vet Rec 1997;141(18):463–466.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.141.18.463google scholar: lookup
  25. Keg PR, van Weeren PR, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Variations in the force applied to flexion tests of the distal limb of horses.. Vet Rec 1997;141(17):435–438.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.141.17.435google scholar: lookup
  26. Busschers E, van Weeren PR. Use of the flexion test of the distal forelimb in the sound horse: repeatability and effect of age, gender, weight, height and fetlock joint range of motion.. J Vet Med Ser A 2001;48(7):413–427.
  27. Dyson S, Greve L. Subjective gait assessment of 57 sports horses in Normal work: a comparison of the response to flexion tests, movement in hand, on the lunge, and ridden.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;38:1–7.
  28. Pfau T, Jennings C, Mitchell H, Olsen E, Walker A, Egenvall A. Lungeing on hard and soft surfaces: movement symmetry of trotting horses considered sound by their owners.. Equine Vet J 2016;48(1):83–89.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12374google scholar: lookup
  29. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Haubro Andersen P, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner.. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176253.
  30. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;91(3):297–310.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.