The Effect of Stirrup Iron Style on Normal Forces and Rider Position.
Abstract: The stirrup iron has the potential to modify the forces experienced by a horse and rider during ridden exercise. A range of stirrup designs are available, but no previous studies have investigated if these modifications influence riders' position and interaction with the horse. Novel flexible (F) or flexible and rotatable (FR) irons versus traditional (T) stirrups may positively impact the welfare and performance of the horse and rider. Four riders rode using the three stirrup types (T, F, and FR). Hip, knee, and ankle angles and toe position from film, and the normal force exerted bilaterally on force sensors on the stirrups tread were evaluated at the highest (HP) and lowest point (LP) of the posting trot (n = 4) and canter (n = 2). Statistics included Shapiro-Wilk's test, Friedman's test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test (significant at P < .05). No significant difference was seen between joint angles, toe position, or forces between the types of stirrups. At the HP, mean hip, knee, and ankle angles were 169.4° ± 10°, 150.7° ± 9.7°, and 94.5° ± 9.6°, and 139.1° ± 9.6°, 123.9° ± 10.9°, and 92.7° ± 9.5° at the LP. Riders had an 8.74° ± 6.66° difference of right versus left joints. Right toes rotated more laterally (P = .02) regardless of stirrup type. The mean trot and canter forces applied (N)/body weight (N) were 0.72 ± 0.15 (HP), 0.19 ± 0.15 (LP), and 0.18 ± 0.05 (canter). Riders shortened the stirrup leathers with F or FR. Stirrup style minimally impacted rider position or the forces experienced; however, forces differed by gait. Future studies regarding how a rider's experience and painful joints may contribute to asymmetries are warranted.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2020-08-04 PubMed ID: 33077067DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103203Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article examines whether different types of stirrup irons affect the forces endured by a horse and its rider, and whether they influence the rider’s position and interaction with the horse. The study did not find significant differences among traditional, flexible, or flexible and rotatable stirrups regarding joint angles, toe position, or forces induced. However, the forces did vary with different gaits.
Methodology
- Four riders participate in the study, using three different types of stirrups: Traditional (T), Flexible (F), and Flexible and rotatable (FR).
- Riders’ hip, knee, and ankle angles, as well as toe position were filmed and analyzed.
- Force exerted on the stirrups was evaluated using force sensors situated on the stirrups’ threads.
- Both the highest point (HP) and lowest point (LP) of the posting trot were evaluated, with four instances counted for each situation.
- The forces endured during the canter were registered twice.
- The study used Shapiro-Wilk’s test, Friedman’s test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test to conduct statistical analyses, with significance swaged at P less than .05.
Results
- The joint angles, toe positions, and forces did not show significant differences among the three different stirrup types.
- The mean hip, knee, and ankle angles measured at the HP were 169.4°, 150.7°, and 94.5°, respectively, while at the LP these measures registered 139.1°, 123.9°, and 92.7°, respectively.
- There was a notable difference of 8.74° in joint angles of the rider’s right side versus the left.
- Right toes tended to rotate more laterally, regardless of the type of stirrup used.
- Mean trot forces applied in relation to the body weight were 0.72 at HP, 0.19 at LP, and 0.18 during the canter.
- Riders were found to shorten the stirrup leathers when using flexible or flexible and rotatable stirrups.
Conclusion
- The findings indicated that stirrup style has minimal impact on the rider’s position and the forces experienced both by the horse and rider.
- The research also revealed that while the type of stirrup did not significantly affect the forces, the gait did.
- The study suggests that further inquiries should be made regarding how a rider’s experience and possible painful joints might contribute to asymmetries in riders.
Cite This Article
APA
Stapley ED, Stutzman BE, Manfredi JM.
(2020).
The Effect of Stirrup Iron Style on Normal Forces and Rider Position.
J Equine Vet Sci, 94, 103203.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103203 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Michigan State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, East Lansing, MI.
- Michigan State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, East Lansing, MI.
- Michigan State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, East Lansing, MI. Electronic address: manfred1@msu.edu.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Gait
- Horses
- Iron
- Physical Conditioning, Animal
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists