Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2006; 144(3-4); 380-384; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.041

The influence of distance on movement of tabanids (Diptera: Tabanidae) between horses.

Abstract: Two studies evaluated the potential use of spatial barriers to reduce the mechanical transmission of disease agents by tabanids in the Pantanal region of Brazil. Tabanids at stations separated by four different distances (5, 10, 25, and 50m) were marked. In the first study, tabanids were marked and allowed to feed until engorgement or natural interruption occurred and captured if they transferred to the other horse. A total of 2847 tabanids belonging to nine different species were marked. The percentage of tabanids that moved between horses was 10.5 at 5m, 6.8 at 10m, and 4.6 at 25m. In the second study, flies were marked, feeding was then interrupted, and the flies were released approximately 50cm from the host. A total of 1274 tabanids belonging to five different species were marked. The percentage of flies that moved between horses was 9.7 at 5m, 9.7 at 10m, and 4.6 at 25m. No tabanids transferred between animals separated by 50m in either experiment. The results of this study strongly support the recommendation that segregation of animals effectively prevents the mechanical transmission of pathogens by tabanids.
Publication Date: 2006-11-16 PubMed ID: 17112669DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.041Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study discusses two experiments conducted to establish the influence of distance on the movement of tabanids (types of horseflies) between two horses and how it aids in the reduction of mechanical disease transmission.

Study Overview

  • The series of investigations were aimed at evaluating whether spatial barriers could be useful in reducing the mechanical transmission of disease agents by tabanids.
  • The studies took place in the Pantanal region of Brazil, an area associated with a high population of these insects.

First Study

  • In the initial study, tabanids at stations separated by four different distances (5, 10, 25 and 50 meters) were marked for identification.
  • These marked tabanids were allowed to feed on a horse until they were full or naturally interrupted. If these flies then transferred to another horse, they were captured and noted.
  • A total of 2847 tabanids from nine different species were marked and observed.
  • The percentage of tabanids that moved between horses was found to be 10.5% at 5 meters, 6.8% at 10 meters, and 4.6% at a distance of 25 meters.

Second Study

  • In the second experiment, once the flies were marked, their feeding was interrupted, and they were released about 50cm from the host horse.
  • This marked group included 1274 tabanids from five different species.
  • The percentage of these flies that moved between horses was recorded as 9.7% at 5 meters, 9.7% at 10 meters, and 4.6% at 25 meters.

Key Findings and Implications

  • Through both the experiments, it was observed that no tabanids transferred between animals separated by a distance of 50 meters.
  • Based on the results, the research provided strong evidence to the claim that segregating animals more than 50 meters apart can effectively prevent the mechanical transmission of diseases by tabanids.
  • This insight could substantially benefit animal husbandry practices and control of diseases that are transmitted through these vectors.

Cite This Article

APA
Barros AT, Foil LD. (2006). The influence of distance on movement of tabanids (Diptera: Tabanidae) between horses. Vet Parasitol, 144(3-4), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.041

Publication

ISSN: 0304-4017
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 144
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 380-384

Researcher Affiliations

Barros, A T M
  • Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro 1880, Corumbá, MS 79320-900, Brazil.
Foil, L D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Diptera / physiology
    • Feeding Behavior / physiology
    • Horses / parasitology
    • Motor Activity / physiology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 8 times.
    1. Cardenas NC, Sanchez F, Lopes FPN, Machado G. Coupling spatial statistics with social network analysis to estimate distinct risk areas of disease circulation to improve risk-based surveillance.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2022 Sep;69(5):e2757-e2768.
      doi: 10.1111/tbed.14627pubmed: 35694801google scholar: lookup
    2. Bonnet SI, Bouhsira E, De Regge N, Fite J, Etoré F, Garigliany MM, Jori F, Lempereur L, Le Potier MF, Quillery E, Saegerman C, Vergne T, Vial L. Putative Role of Arthropod Vectors in African Swine Fever Virus Transmission in Relation to Their Bio-Ecological Properties.. Viruses 2020 Jul 20;12(7).
      doi: 10.3390/v12070778pubmed: 32698448google scholar: lookup
    3. Calistri P, DeClercq K, De Vleeschauwer A, Gubbins S, Klement E, Stegeman A, Cortiñas Abrahantes J, Antoniou SE, Broglia A, Gogin A. Lumpy skin disease: scientific and technical assistance on control and surveillance activities.. EFSA J 2018 Oct;16(10):e05452.
      doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5452pubmed: 32625728google scholar: lookup
    4. Lohmann KL, James CR, Higgins SN, Howden KJ, Epp T. Disease investigations for equine infectious anemia in Canada (2009-2012) - Retrospective evaluation and risk factor analysis.. Can Vet J 2019 Nov;60(11):1199-1206.
      pubmed: 31692681
    5. Kocher A, Desquesnes M, Kamyingkird K, Yangtara S, Leboucher E, Rodtian P, Dargantes A, Jittapalapong S. Evaluation of an Indirect-ELISA Test for Trypanosoma evansi Infection (Surra) in Buffaloes and Its Application to a Serological Survey in Thailand.. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:361037.
      doi: 10.1155/2015/361037pubmed: 26101772google scholar: lookup
    6. Herczeg T, Blahó M, Száz D, Kriska G, Gyurkovszky M, Farkas R, Horváth G. Seasonality and daily activity of male and female tabanid flies monitored in a Hungarian hill-country pasture by new polarization traps and traditional canopy traps.. Parasitol Res 2014 Nov;113(11):4251-60.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4103-6pubmed: 25193049google scholar: lookup
    7. Yadav SC, Kumar R, Manuja A, Goyal L, Gupta AK. Early detection of Trypanosoma evansi infection and monitoring of antibody levels by ELISA following treatment.. J Parasit Dis 2014 Mar;38(1):124-7.
      doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0204-2pubmed: 24505190google scholar: lookup
    8. Desquesnes M, Dargantes A, Lai DH, Lun ZR, Holzmuller P, Jittapalapong S. Trypanosoma evansi and surra: a review and perspectives on transmission, epidemiology and control, impact, and zoonotic aspects.. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:321237.
      doi: 10.1155/2013/321237pubmed: 24151595google scholar: lookup