Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 683-687; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00279.x

The relationship between massage to the equine caudal hindlimb muscles and hindlimb protraction.

Abstract: Massage is widely used in physiotherapy, but there has been little previous research examining its effectiveness in increasing equine soft tissue length. Objective: To determine the effect of massage on equine hindlimb protraction. We hypothesised that massage to the caudal muscles of the equine hindlimb, specifically the superficial gluteal, semitendinosus, biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscles, can increase passive and active hindlimb protraction. Methods: The study used a crossover design in which 8 horses were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 4, A and B. Group A received massage for 30 min, group B received sham treatment for 30 min. The procedure was repeated following a 7 day 'washout' period, when group A received the 30 min sham treatment and group B, 30 min of massage. Passive hindlimb protraction was measured before and after each intervention, using a modified version of the human 'Sit and Reach test' for general muscle flexibility. Active protraction was measured using 2 dimensional kinematic analysis of stride length. The data analysis used the Wilcoxon signed rank test at a significance of P < 0.05. Results: Massage to the caudal limb muscles significantly increased passive (P = 0.01) and active limb (P = 0.01) protraction. Conclusions: This study indicates that massage can increase protraction of the equine hindlimb. Massage may, therefore, play a valuable role in the development of strategies used to improve a horse's locomotor function, e.g. during rehabilitation or optimum performance for competition.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059081DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00279.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of using massages on specific muscles in a horse’s hindlimb to increase both passive and active limb movement. It concludes that massaging certain muscles can significantly enhance a horse’s locomotive function, which can be useful in optimizing performance or rehabilitation procedures.

Objective and Hypothesis

  • The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of massaging certain muscles in the hindlimb of horses on the protraction, or movement, of the limb.
  • The researchers hypothesized that when certain hindlimb muscles (specifically the superficial gluteal, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, and semimembranosus muscles) are massaged, this could lead to an increase in both passive and active hindlimb protraction.

Methods

  • The research utilized a crossover design where eight horses were randomly split into two groups (A and B), with four horses in each group.
  • Group A was given a 30-minute massage, while Group B received a 30-minute sham or fake treatment. After a 7-day “washout” period, the procedure was repeated with group assignments switched (Group A received the sham treatment, Group B received the massage).
  • The researchers measured passive hindlimb protraction using a horse-adapted version of the human ‘Sit and Reach test,’ a general muscle flexibility test.
  • Active protraction was assessed through 2-dimensional kinematic analysis of stride length.
  • The data analysis involved the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results

  • The study found that massaging the posterior limb muscles led to a significant increase in both passive (P=0.01) and active (P=0.01) limb protraction.

Conclusions

  • Based on the results, the study reaffirms that massages can enhance the movement of a horse’s hindlimb.
  • The application of massage can therefore be seen as valuable in developing strategies aimed at improving a horse’s locomotor function, whether that’s for heightened performance in competition or for effective rehabilitation processes.

Cite This Article

APA
Hill C, Crook T. (2011). The relationship between massage to the equine caudal hindlimb muscles and hindlimb protraction. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 683-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00279.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 683-687

Researcher Affiliations

Hill, C
  • The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK. hillcarolynj@hotmail.com
Crook, T

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cross-Over Studies
    • Hindlimb / physiology
    • Horses / physiology
    • Massage / veterinary
    • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Bergh A, Asplund K, Lund I, Boström A, Hyytiäinen H. A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine in Sport and Companion Animals: Soft Tissue Mobilization.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 2;12(11).
      doi: 10.3390/ani12111440pubmed: 35681903google scholar: lookup
    2. Atalaia T, Prazeres J, Abrantes J, Clayton HM. Equine Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of the Literature.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 22;11(6).
      doi: 10.3390/ani11061508pubmed: 34067449google scholar: lookup
    3. Memon MA, Shmalberg J, Adair HS 3rd, Allweiler S, Bryan JN, Cantwell S, Carr E, Chrisman C, Egger CM, Greene S, Haussler KK, Hershey B, Holyoak GR, Johnson M, Jeune SL, Looney A, McConnico RS, Medina C, Morton AJ, Munsterman A, Nie GJ, Park N, Parsons-Doherty M, Perdrizet JA, Peyton JL, Raditic D, Ramirez HP, Saik J, Robertson S, Sleeper M, Dyke JV, Wakshlag J. Integrative veterinary medical education and consensus guidelines for an integrative veterinary medicine curriculum within veterinary colleges.. Open Vet J 2016;6(1):44-56.
      doi: 10.4314/ovj.v6i1.7pubmed: 27200270google scholar: lookup