Analyze Diet
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2001; 96(5); 599-602; doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762001000500002

Trypanosoma evansi control and horse mortality in the Brazilian Pantanal.

Abstract: The impact of three treatment strategies for Trypanosoma evansi control on horse mortality in the Brazilian Pantanal based on four size categories of cattle ranches is explored. The region's 49,000 horses are indispensable to traditional extensive cattle ranching and T. evansi kills horses. About 13% of these horses would be lost, annually, due to T. evansi if no control were undertaken. One preventive and two curative treatment strategies are financially justifiable in the Pantanal. The best available technology for the treatment of T. evansi from a horse mortality perspective is the preventive strategy, which spares 6,462 horses, annually. The year-round cure spares 5,783 horses, and the seasonal cure saves 5,204 horses on a regional basis relative to no control strategy. Regardless of the strategy adopted, 39% of the costs or benefits fall to the largest ranches, while 18% fall to the smallest ranches.
Publication Date: 2001-08-14 PubMed ID: 11500755DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762001000500002Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the study of the impact of three treatment methods for Trypanosoma evansi control on horse mortality across various cattle ranches in the Brazilian Pantanal, outlining the most cost-effective and beneficial strategies.

Overview of the Research

  • The study comprehensively explores the effects of three distinct approaches to control Trypanosoma evansi, a parasite known to cause death in horses, in the Brazilian Pantanal region. The article emphasizes the importance of this study as horses are vital for cattle ranching activities in this area.
  • The research highlights that if no control measures were taken, about 13% of the total 49,000 horses in the region would be lost annually to T. evansi, signifying a severe challenge to cattle ranching.

Preventive and Curative Strategies

  • The research suggests one preventive and two curative treatment approaches. It underlines these methods are cost-effective and offer a financial justification for their implementation in the Pantanal region.
  • The study reveals that from a horse mortality perspective, the preventive strategy is the best available technology for treating T. evansi, saving an estimate of 6,462 horses annually.
  • The authors compare these figures with the curative strategies: the year-round cure saves approximately 5,783 horses annually, whereas the seasonal cure saves around 5,204 horses in a year when compared to a situation with no control measures in place.

Effect on Different Sized Ranches

  • In terms of the distribution of costs or benefits across ranches of various sizes, the research indicates that irrespective of the method employed, the largest ranches account for 39% of the costs or benefits.
  • In contrast, the smallest ranches encompass about 18% of the costs or benefits, providing an understanding of how treatment strategies for T. evansi influence different stakeholders within the ranching community.

Cite This Article

APA
Seidl AF, Moraes AS, Silva RA. (2001). Trypanosoma evansi control and horse mortality in the Brazilian Pantanal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 96(5), 599-602. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762001000500002

Publication

ISSN: 0074-0276
NlmUniqueID: 7502619
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 96
Issue: 5
Pages: 599-602

Researcher Affiliations

Seidl, A F
  • Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1172, USA. Andrew.Seidl@colostate.edu
Moraes, A S
    Silva, R A

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Brazil / epidemiology
      • Horse Diseases / economics
      • Horse Diseases / mortality
      • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
      • Horses
      • Risk Factors
      • Seasons
      • Trypanosoma / isolation & purification
      • Trypanosomiasis / mortality
      • Trypanosomiasis / prevention & control
      • Trypanosomiasis / veterinary

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. More S, Bøtner A, Butterworth A, Calistri P, Depner K, Edwards S, Garin-Bastuji B, Good M, Gortázar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda MA, Nielsen SS, Raj M, Sihvonen L, Spoolder H, Stegeman JA, Thulke HH, Velarde A, Willeberg P, Winckler C, Baldinelli F, Broglia A, Candiani D, Beltrán Beck B, Kohnle L, Morgado J, Bicout D. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Trypanosoma evansi infections (including Surra). EFSA J 2017 Jul;15(7):e04892.
        doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4892pubmed: 32625557google scholar: lookup
      2. Desquesnes M, Dargantes A, Lai DH, Lun ZR, Holzmuller P, Jittapalapong S. Trypanosoma evansi and surra: a review and perspectives on transmission, epidemiology and control, impact, and zoonotic aspects. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:321237.
        doi: 10.1155/2013/321237pubmed: 24151595google scholar: lookup
      3. Gillingwater K, Kumar A, Anbazhagan M, Boykin DW, Tidwell RR, Brun R. In vivo investigations of selected diamidine compounds against Trypanosoma evansi using a mouse model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009 Dec;53(12):5074-9.
        doi: 10.1128/AAC.00422-09pubmed: 19786604google scholar: lookup