FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Unhandled horses classified with broken/unbroken test (BUT) ...
Frontiers in veterinary science2022; 9; 1022255; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1022255

Unhandled horses classified with broken/unbroken test (BUT) exhibit longer avoidance, flight reactions, and displacement behaviors when approached by humans.

Abstract: Horses with a low level of tameness are at higher risk for transport-related disease and injury; hence, European regulations for the protection of animals during transport (EC 1/2005) are stricter for unhandled (unbroken) horses. However, the regulation does not provide adequate tools for unhandled horse identification. The Broken/Unbroken Test (BUT) was developed and validated to easily identify whether a horse is broken (handled) or not. As a further validation step, the aim of this study was to assess whether there is any correspondence between the BUT classification and the behavioral response of the horse. A total of 100 healthy Italian Heavy Draft horses were video recorded when assessed with the BUT. In total, 90 videos (48 handled and 42 unhandled horses) matched the inclusion criteria and were assessed. The behavior of each horse was evaluated by three observers blinded as to the horses' experience with a focal animal continuous recording method. Behaviors were classified in four categories: stress, avoidance, displacement, and aggression. A Mann-Whitney test was used to identify differences in behavioral patterns between horses classified as handled or unhandled with the BUT. Unhandled horses showed not only a significantly longer time to be approached by the handler but also more avoidance and flight reactions (p < 0.001). Unhandled horses showed significantly longer displacement behaviors, such as sniffing (p < 0.001). These findings further validate the BUT classification and confirm that horses classified as unhandled are more prone to show avoidance and flight reactions when approached by humans. For this reason, the adoption of the BUT could be helpful to minimize humans' horse-related injuries and, if applied regularly before loading, to contribute to safeguard the welfare of horses during transport.
Copyright © 2022 Riva, Sobrero, Menchetti, Minero, Padalino and Dalla Costa.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-09-26 PubMed ID: 36225797PubMed Central: PMC9548601DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1022255Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research looks at how unhandled (unbroken) horses, compared to handled (broken) horses, display longer times of avoidance, flight responses and displacement behaviors when being approached by humans. It validates a testing method called the Broken/Unbroken Test (BUT) for identifying such horses, arguing it could reduce human injuries and improve horse welfare during transport.

Research Purpose and Test Used

  • The research aims to further validate a method known as the Broken/Unbroken Test (BUT) which ascertains if a horse is handled or unhandled. The test is designed to improve horse identification processes, as European regulations for protecting animals during transport (EC 1/2005) are stricter for unhandled horses.
  • One of the challenges addressed by this research is that current regulations don’t provide adequate tools for identifying unhandled horses. Unhandled horses are less accustomed to human interaction, which heightens the risk of disease or injury during transport due to their heightened stress responses.

Research Methodology

  • A total of 100 healthy Italian Heavy Draft horses were observed and video recorded when evaluated with the BUT. Of these, 90 videos (comprising 48 handled and 42 unhandled horses) met the study’s criteria and were assessed.
  • Each horse’s behavior was evaluated using a continuous recording method by three observers. The evaluation was blind, with observers unaware of the horses’ prior experience with human handling.
  • Four categories were used for classifying behaviors: stress, avoidance, displacement, and aggression. A statistical test called a Mann-Whitney test was used to detect differences in behavioral patterns between handled and unhandled horses.

Research Findings

  • The results revealed that unhandled horses took a significantly longer time to approach the handler, exhibiting more avoidance and flight reactions. These horses also showed longer displacement behaviors such as sniffing.
  • These findings further validate the BUT classification, affirming that unhandled horses are more likely to display avoidance and flight responses when approached by humans due to their lower level of tameness.
  • The researchers suggested that regular application of the BUT before loading could help minimize horse-related injuries to humans and enhance horse welfare during transport.

Cite This Article

APA
Riva MG, Sobrero L, Menchetti L, Minero M, Padalino B, Dalla Costa E. (2022). Unhandled horses classified with broken/unbroken test (BUT) exhibit longer avoidance, flight reactions, and displacement behaviors when approached by humans. Front Vet Sci, 9, 1022255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1022255

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 1022255

Researcher Affiliations

Riva, Maria Giorgia
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Sobrero, Lucia
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Menchetti, Laura
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
  • Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Minero, Michela
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Padalino, Barbara
  • Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Anette B, Donald B, Marcus D, Mariano D, Joerg H, Linda K. Scientific opinion concerning the welfare of animals during transport.. EFSA J (2011) 9:11–20.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1966pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  2. Schmidt A, Hödl S, Möstl E, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate, and heart rate variability in transport-naive horses during repeated road transport.. Domest Anim Endocrinol (2010) 39:205–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2010.06.002pubmed: 20688463google scholar: lookup
  3. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Van der Werf JTN, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav (2022) 76:289–96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  4. Knowles TG, Brown SN, Pope SJ, Nicol CJ, Warriss PD, Weeks CA. The response of untamed (unbroken) ponies to conditions of road transport.. Anim Welf (2010) 19:1–15.
  5. Menchetti L, Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Padalino B. Development and validation of a test for the classification of horses as broken or unbroken.. Animals (2021) 11:2303.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082303pmc: PMC8388372pubmed: 34438758google scholar: lookup
  6. Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement.. J Anim Sci (1991) 69:4167–75.
    doi: 10.2527/1991.69104167xpubmed: 1778832google scholar: lookup
  7. Dawkins MS. Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare.. Zoology (2003) 106:383–7.
    doi: 10.1078/0944-2006-00122pubmed: 16351922google scholar: lookup
  8. Mason G, Mendl M. Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare?. Anim Welf (1993) 2:301–19.
  9. Appleby DL, Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA. Relationship between aggressive and avoidance behaviour by dogs and their experience in the first six months of life.. Vet Rec (2002) 150:434–8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.150.14.434pubmed: 11993972google scholar: lookup
  10. Fox MW. The Dog : Its Domestication and Behavior.. New York, NY: Garland Press; (1978).
  11. McCune S. The impact of paternity and early socialisation on the development of cats' behaviour to people and novel objects.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1995) 45:109–24.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00603-Pgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Fordyce G, Goddard ME, Tyler R, Williams G, Toleman MA. Temperament and bruising of bos indicus cross cattle.. Aust J Exp Agric (1985) 25:283–8.
    doi: 10.1071/EA9850283google scholar: lookup
  13. Boissy A, Bouissou MF. Effects of early handling on heifers' subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1988) 20:259–73.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90051-2google scholar: lookup
  14. Jago JG, Krohn CC, Matthews LR. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human-animal interactions in young cattle.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1999) 62:137–51.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00219-6google scholar: lookup
  15. Boivin X, Braastad BO. Effects of handling during temporary isolation after early weaning on goat kids' later response to humans.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1996) 48:61–71.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01019-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Tanida H, Miura A, Tanaka T, Yoshimoto T. Behavioral response to humans in individually handled weanling pigs.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1995) 42:249–59.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00545-Pgoogle scholar: lookup
  17. Markowitz TM, Dally MR, Gursky K, Price EO. Early handling increases lamb affinity for humans.. Anim Behav (1998) 55:573–87.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0640pubmed: 9514670google scholar: lookup
  18. Hausberger M, Roche HH, Henry SS, Visser EKA. Review of the human-horse relationship.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 109:1–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015google scholar: lookup
  19. Sankey C, Henry S, Clouard C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M. Asymmetry of behavioral responses to a human approach in young naive vs. trained horses.. Physiol Behav (2011) 104:464–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.009pubmed: 21605580google scholar: lookup
  20. Minka NS, Ayo JO, Sackey AKB, Adelaiye AB. Assessment and scoring of stresses imposed on goats during handling, loading, road transportation and unloading, and the effect of pretreatment with ascorbic acid.. Livest Sci (2009) 125:275–82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.006google scholar: lookup
  21. Hall C, Heleski C. The role of the ethogram in equitation science.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2017) 190:102–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.013google scholar: lookup
  22. Marsbøll AF, Christensen JW. Effects of handling on fear reactions in young Icelandic horses.. Equine Vet J (2015) 47:615–9.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12338pubmed: 25138590google scholar: lookup
  23. Keeling LJ, Blomberg A, Ladewig J. Horse-riding accidents: when the human-animal relationship goes wrong! in Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology.. Lillehammer, Norway. (1999).
  24. Dai F, Zappaterra M, Minero M, Bocchini F, Riley CB, Padalino B. Equine transport-related problem behaviors and injuries: a survey of italian horse industry members.. Animals (2021) 11:1–19.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010223pmc: PMC7831101pubmed: 33477521google scholar: lookup
  25. Martin P, Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 3rd Edn.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. (2007).
    doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810893google scholar: lookup
  26. McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Equitation Science.. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; (2011).
  27. Corgan ME, Grandin T, Matlock S. Evaluating the Reaction to a Complex Rotated Object in the American Quarter Horse (Equus caballus).. Animals (2021) 11:1383.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051383pmc: PMC8152253pubmed: 34068020google scholar: lookup
  28. Young T, Creighton E, Smith T, Hosie CA. Novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2012) 140:33–43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.008google scholar: lookup
  29. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Knight P, Celi P, Jeffcott L, Muscatello G. Behaviour during transportation predicts stress response and lower airway contamination in horses.. PLoS One (2018) 13:e0194272.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194272pmc: PMC5863983pubmed: 29566072google scholar: lookup
  30. Siniscalchi M, Padalino B, Lusito R, Quaranta A. Is the left forelimb preference indicative of a stressful situation in horses?. Behav Processes (2014) 107:61–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.018pubmed: 25108052google scholar: lookup
  31. Fureix C, Pagès M, Bon R, Lassalle J-M, Kuntz P, Gonzalez GA. Preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses' emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship.. Behav Processes 82, 202–10 (2009).
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012pubmed: 19591910google scholar: lookup
  32. Waring G. Horse Behavior.. Norwich, NY: Noyes and William Andrew; (2003).
  33. Søndergaard E, Halekoh U. Young horses' reactions to humans in relation to handling and social environment.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2003) 84:265–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.011google scholar: lookup
  34. Zappaterra M, Costa LN, Felici M, Minero M, Perniola F, Tullio D. Journeys, journey conditions, and welfare assessment of in Italy.. Animals (2022) 12:2083.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12162083pmc: PMC9404719pubmed: 36009673google scholar: lookup
  35. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2006) 101:185–242.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001google scholar: lookup
  36. LeGuin E. Man and horse in harmony, in The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World.. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–196 (2005).
  37. Fazio E, Medica P, Cravana C, Ferlazzo A. Pituitary-adrenocortical adjustments to transport stress in horses with previous different handling and transport conditions.. Vet world (2016) 9:856–61.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.856-861pmc: PMC5021835pubmed: 27651674google scholar: lookup
  38. Dai F, Dalla Costa A, Bonfanti L, Caucci C, Di Martino G, Lucarelli R. Positive reinforcement-based training for self-loading of meat horses reduces loading time and stress-related behavior.. Front Vet Sci (2019) 6:350.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00350pmc: PMC6802606pubmed: 31681807google scholar: lookup
  39. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, Knight P, Celi P, Jeffcott L. Risk factors in equine transport-related health problems: a survey of the Australian equine industry.. Equine Vet J (2016) 49:507–11.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12631pubmed: 27564584google scholar: lookup
  40. Popescu S, Diugan EAA. The relationship between behavioral and other welfare indicators of working horses.. J Equine Vet Sci (2013) 33:1–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.04.001google scholar: lookup
  41. Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Murray LAM, Guazzetti S, Canali E, Minero MA. Study on validity and reliability of on-farm tests to measure human–animal relationship in horses and donkeys.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2015) 163:110–21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.007google scholar: lookup
  42. Zeitler-Feicht MH. Horse Behaviour Explained.. London: Manson Publishing Ltd. (2004).
  43. Troisi A. Displacement activities as a behavioral measure of stress in nonhuman primates and human subjects.. Stress (2002) 5:47–54.
    doi: 10.1080/102538902900012378pubmed: 12171766google scholar: lookup
  44. Root-Bernstein M. Displacement activities during the honeybee transition from waggle dance to foraging.. Anim Behav (2010) 79:935–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.010google scholar: lookup
  45. Wilz KJ. Causal and functional analysis of dorsal pricking and nest activity in the courtship of the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.. Anim Behav (1970) 18:115–24.
    doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(70)90078-3google scholar: lookup
  46. Wilz KJ. The disinhibition interpretation of the ‘displacement’ activities during courtship in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus.. Anim Behav (1970) 18:682–7.
    doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(70)90012-6google scholar: lookup
  47. Wilz KJ. Self-regulation of motivation in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.).. Nature (1970) 226:456–66.
    doi: 10.1038/226465b0pubmed: 16057318google scholar: lookup
  48. Mendl M, Burman OHP, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.. Proc Biol Sci (2010) 277:2895–904.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303pmc: PMC2982018pubmed: 20685706google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Boklund A, Dippel S, Dorea F, Figuerola J, Herskin M, Miranda Chueca MA, Nannoni E, Nonno R, Riber A, Stahl K, Stegeman JA, Thulke HH, Tuyttens F, Winckler C, Raj M, Velarde A, Candiani D, Van der Stede Y, Michel V. Welfare of horses at slaughter. EFSA J 2025 Jan;23(1):e9178.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9178pubmed: 39877304google scholar: lookup
  2. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Boklund A, Dippel S, Dorea F, Figuerola J, Herskin M, Miranda Chueca MA, Nannoni E, Nonno R, Riber A, Stahl K, Stegeman JA, Thulke HH, Tuyttens F, Winckler C, Raj M, Velarde A, Candiani D, Van der Stede Y, Michel V. Welfare of horses during killing for purposes other than slaughter. EFSA J 2025 Jan;23(1):e9195.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9195pubmed: 39877302google scholar: lookup
  3. Fletcher KA, Limon G, Padalino B, Hall GK, Chancellor N, Grist A, Gibson TJ. Impact of Social Buffering and Restraint on Welfare Indicators during UK Commercial Horse Slaughter. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 12;13(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13142276pubmed: 37508053google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.