Analyze Diet
Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T2021; 34(1); 9-16; doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721846

Use of Hausdorff Distance and Computer Modelling to Evaluate Virtual Surgical Plans with Three-Dimensional Printed Guides against Freehand Techniques for Navicular Bone Repair in Equine Orthopaedics.

Abstract:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical execution of a virtual surgical plan (VSP) with three-dimensional (3D) guides against a freehand approach in the equine navicular bone using an automated computer analysis technique. Methods:  Eight pairs of cadaveric forelimb specimens of adult horses were used in an experimental study design with modelling. Limbs received either a 3.5 mm cortical screw according to a VSP or using an aiming device. Using computed tomography and computer segmentation, a comparison was made between the executed screw and the planned screw using the Hausdorff distance (HD). Results:  Navicular bone mean HD registration error was -0.06 ± 0.29 mm. The VSP with 3D printing demonstrated significantly superior accuracy with a mean deviation of 1.19 ± 0.42 mm compared with aiming device group (3.53 ± 1.24 mm,  = 0.0018). The VSP group was 5.0 times more likely to result in a mean aberration of less than 1.0 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.62-33.4). A 3.5 mm screw with an optimal entry point can have a maximum deviation angle of 3.23 ± 0.07, 2.70 ± 0.06 and 2.37 ± 0.10 degrees in a proximal, dorsal and palmar direction respectively, prior to violating one of the cortical surfaces. Conclusions:  Procedures performed using the 3D guides have a high degree of accuracy, with minimal mean deviations (<1 mm and <1 degree) of a VSP compared with those using the conventional aiming device. The use of VSP and the HD for evaluation of orthopaedic surgeries and outcome measures shows promise for simplifying and improving surgical accuracy.
Publication Date: 2021-01-13 PubMed ID: 33440435DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721846Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on assessing the precision of virtual surgical plans (VSP) with 3D printed guides against traditional freehand surgical approaches for repairing the navicular bone in horses. The study utilized Hausdorff distance (HD) as a means of evaluation and computer modeling for the execution of an automated computer-based analysis.

Methodology

  • Eight pairs of adult horse cadaveric forelimb specimens were applied in an experimental set-up with computer modeling.
  • Each limb was subjected to the insertion of a 3.5 mm cortical screw via either a VSP or an aiming device.
  • The researchers used computed tomography and computer segmentation for comparing the pre-planned and the implemented screws by applying the Hausdorff distance measurement.

Results

  • The mean HD registration error for Navicular bone was -0.06 ± 0.29 mm.
  • VSP with 3D printing demonstrated significantly superior accuracy with a mean deviation of 1.19 ± 0.42 mm against the aiming device group (3.53 ± 1.24 mm).
  • There was a five times higher probability for the VSP group to result in a mean aberration of less than 1.0 mm.
  • A 3.5 mm screw, with an optimal entry point, can have a maximum deviation angle of 3.23 ± 0.07, 2.70 ± 0.06 and 2.37 ± 0.10 degrees in a proximal, dorsal, and palmar direction respectively, before breaching any of the cortical surfaces.

Conclusions

  • According to the study, procedures performed using the 3D guides assure a high degree of accuracy, with deviations lesser than 1 mm and 1 degree when compared to the conventional aiming device.
  • The research concluded that the use of VSP and the HD as evaluation methods could potentially improve orthopaedic surgical accuracy and simplify the outcome measurement methods.

Cite This Article

APA
Biedrzycki AH, Kistler HC, Perez-Jimenez EE, Morton AJ. (2021). Use of Hausdorff Distance and Computer Modelling to Evaluate Virtual Surgical Plans with Three-Dimensional Printed Guides against Freehand Techniques for Navicular Bone Repair in Equine Orthopaedics. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 34(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721846

Publication

ISSN: 2567-6911
NlmUniqueID: 8906319
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 1
Pages: 9-16

Researcher Affiliations

Biedrzycki, Adam H
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Kistler, Hannah C
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Perez-Jimenez, Erik E
  • Equine Performance Center, Ocala, Florida, United States.
Morton, Alison J
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Screws / veterinary
  • Female
  • Forelimb / surgery
  • Horses / surgery
  • Male
  • Orthopedic Procedures / methods
  • Orthopedic Procedures / veterinary
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / veterinary
  • Virtual Reality

Conflict of Interest Statement

None declared.

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Biedrzycki AH, Elane GL. Three-Dimensional Modeling and In Silico Kinematic Evaluation of Interspinous Ligament Desmotomy in Horses.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:817300.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.817300pubmed: 35433641google scholar: lookup
  2. Trolinger-Meadows KD, Biedrzycki AH, He H, Werpy N. Three-Dimensional Segmentation and in silico Comparison of Equine Deep Digital Flexor Tendon Pathology in Horses Undergoing Repeated MRI Examination.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:706046.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.706046pubmed: 34746274google scholar: lookup