Willingness to adopt personal biosecurity strategies on thoroughbred breeding farms: Findings from a multi-site pilot study in Australia’s Hunter Valley.
Abstract: There are almost 9,500 full-time employees in Australia's thoroughbred horse breeding industry. During foaling, they can be exposed to bodily fluids and mucous membranes which may present risks for zoonotic disease. These risks can be mitigated through personal biosecurity strategies. The aim of this study was to identify which personal biosecurity strategies were more or less likely to be adopted by workers. Seventeen participants representing 14 thoroughbred breeding farms and three equine veterinary practices in Australia's largest thoroughbred breeding region trialed up to 16 stakeholder-nominated personal biosecurity strategies over the 2021 foaling season. The strategies encompassed personal protective equipment (PPE), zoonotic disease awareness, policies and protocols, supportive environments, and leadership. Strategy adoption was monitored through three repeated self-audit surveys designed around the Transtheoretical Model of change (TTM) and findings were reviewed in exit interviews. For all survey waves in aggregate, 13 strategies were practiced by at least 50.0% of participants. Participants were most likely to use a ready-made foaling box (98.0%), communicate the message that PPE usage is a personal responsibility (94.1%) and use ready-made PPE kits (88.2%). However, 31.4% had no intention of doing practice sessions and/or dummy runs for PPE use and 27.5% had no intention of using a buddy system on farm/practice to check use of PPE. Whilst these rates indicate workers' willingness to adopt and maintain personal biosecurity strategies, they also indicate capacity for more practices to be implemented more often. Overall, the findings highlight the need for personal biosecurity interventions to be sensitive to the demands of the annual thoroughbred breeding calendar, the size of the breeding operation and the availability of skilled staff.
Copyright © 2022 Thompson, Taylor, Mendez, Chicken, Carrick and Durrheim.
Publication Date: 2022-12-15 PubMed ID: 36590817PubMed Central: PMC9797739DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1017452Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article presents an analysis of the adoption of personal biosecurity strategies by workers in Australia’s thoroughbred horse breeding industry, highlighting the difference in their readiness to adopt various strategies meant to limit the risk of zoonotic diseases.
Objective of the Study
- The primary aim of the research was to identify which personal biosecurity strategies are more likely to be adopted by workers in Australia’s thoroughbred horse breeding industry. This was done in an attempt to limit potential risks that these workers face during foaling, such as exposure to bodily fluids and mucous membranes, which could lead to zoonotic diseases.
Methodology
- The study involved 17 participants who were representatives of 14 thoroughbred breeding farms and three equine veterinary practices in Australia’s largest thoroughbred breeding region. The participants were monitored while they trialed up to 16 personal biosecurity strategies throughout the 2021 foaling season.
- The strategies that were examined encompassed personal protective equipment (PPE), disease awareness, policies and protocols, supportive environments, and leadership.
- The researchers then monitored the adoption of these strategies through three repeated self-audit surveys, which were structured around the Transtheoretical Model of change (TTM).
- The findings were then reviewed in exit interviews at the end of the study period.
Findings
- A majority of the participants adopted 13 of the strategies, with the top three being the use of a ready-made foaling box (98.0%), promoting the message that PPE usage is a personal responsibility (94.1%), and the use of ready-made PPE kits (88.2%).
- However, not all the strategies were well received. For instance, 31.4% of the participants had no intention of doing practice sessions for PPE use, and 27.5% had no intention of using a buddy system to check the use of PPE.
Conclusion
- Although a significant proportion of the participants showed a willingness to adopt and maintain personal biosecurity strategies, the adoption rates indicated that more practices could be implemented more often.
- The primary takeaway from the study is that personal biosecurity interventions must be sensitive to the demands of the annual thoroughbred breeding calendar, the size of the breeding operation, and the availability of skilled staff.
Cite This Article
APA
Thompson K, Taylor J, Mendez D, Chicken C, Carrick J, Durrheim DN.
(2022).
Willingness to adopt personal biosecurity strategies on thoroughbred breeding farms: Findings from a multi-site pilot study in Australia’s Hunter Valley.
Front Vet Sci, 9, 1017452.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1017452 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
- Consultant Veterinarian, Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
- Equine Specialist Consulting, Scone, NSW, Australia.
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Author JC is the owner-operator of Equine Specialist Consulting. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
This article includes 63 references
- Morel MD, Newcombe J, Holland S. Factors affecting gestation length in the Thoroughbred mare. Anim Reprod Sci (2002) 74:175–85.
- Foley M. Caring for those who care: a tribute to nurses and their safety. Online J Issues Nurs (2004) 9:2.
- Thompson K, McGreevy P, McManus P. A critical review of horse-related risk: a research agenda for safer mounts, riders and equestrian cultures. Animals (2015) 5:561–75.
- Riley CB, Liddiard JR, Thompson K. A cross-sectional study of horse-related injuries in veterinary and animal science students at an Australian university. Animals (2015) 5:951–64.
- Weese J. A review of equine zoonotic diseases: risks in veterinary medicine. In: Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP (Orlando, FL: ) (2002).
- Sack A, Oladunni FS, Gonchigoo B, Chambers TM, Gray GC. Zoonotic diseases from horses: a systematic review. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis (2020) 20:484–95.
- Lambe H, Sykes BW. Prevalence of salmonella faecal shedding in at-risk hospitalised cases in an equine hospital in New Zealand: a pilot study. Equine Vet Edu (2021) 34:e554–7.
- Galuppi R, Piva S, Castagnetti C, Sarli G, Iacono E, Fioravanti M. Cryptosporidium parvum: from foal to veterinary students. Vet Parasitol (2016) 219:53–6.
- Grinberg A, Pomroy W, Carslak H, Shi Y, Gibson I, Drayton B. Study of neonatal cryptosporidosis of foals in New Zealand. N Z Vet J (2009) 57:284–9.
- Weese JS, Slovis N, Rousseau J. Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in neonatal foals and mares at a referral hospital. J Vet Int Med (2021) 35:1140–6.
- Polkinghorne A, Greub G. A new equine and zoonotic threat emerges from an old avian pathogen, Chlamydia psittaci. Clin Microbiol Infect (2017) 23:693–4.
- Jelocnik M, Branley J, Heller J, Raidal S, Alderson S, Galea F. Multilocus sequence typing identifies an avian-like Chlamydia psittaci strain involved in equine placentitis and associated with subsequent human psittacosis. Emerg Microbes Infect (2017) 6:1–3.
- Taylor KA, Durrheim D, Heller J, O'Rourke B, Hope K, Merritt T. Equine chlamydiosis—An emerging infectious disease requiring a one health surveillance approach. Zoonoses Public Health (2018) 65:218–21.
- Jones B, Taylor K, Lucas R, Merritt TD, Chicken C, Heller J. Challenges in using serological methods to explore historical transmission risk of Chlamydia psittaci in a workforce with high exposure to equine chlamydiosis. Commun Dis Intell (2019) 16:43–65.
- Australian Veterinary Association. Guidelines for Veterinary Personal Biosecurity. St Leonards NSW: Australian Veterinary Association; (2017).
- Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Waltner-Toews D, Tanner M. From “one medicine” to “one health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Prev Vet Med (2011) 101:148–56.
- Taylor K, Thomas S, Mendez D, Chicken C, Carrick J, Heller J. “Prevention is the biggest success”: barriers and enablers to personal biosecurity in the thoroughbred breeding industry. Prev Vet Med (2020) 183:105135.
- Weese J. Infection control and biosecurity in equine disease control. Equine Vet J (2014) 46:654–60.
- Willemsen A, Cobbold R, Gibson J, Wilks K, Lawler S, Reid S. Infection control practices employed within small animal veterinary practices—A systematic review. Zoonoses Public Health (2019) 66:439–57.
- Wright JG, Jung S, Holman RC, Marano NN, McQuiston JH. Infection control practices and zoonotic disease risks among veterinarians in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc (2008) 232:1863–72.
- Wiethoelter AK, Schembri N, Dhand NK, Sawford K, Taylor MR, Moloney B. Australian horse owners and their biosecurity practices in the context of Hendra virus. Prev Vet Med (2017) 148:28–36.
- Wiethoelter AK, Sawford K, Schembri N, Taylor MR, Dhand NK, Moloney B. “We've learned to live with it”—A qualitative study of Australian horse owners' attitudes, perceptions and practices in response to Hendra virus. Prev Vet Med (2017) 140:67–77.
- Manyweathers J, Field H, Longnecker N, Agho K, Smith C, Taylor M. “Why won't they just vaccinate?” Horse owner risk perception and uptake of the Hendra virus vaccine. BMC Vet Res (2017) 13:1–12.
- Manyweathers J, Field H, Jordan D, Longnecker N, Agho K, Smith C. Risk mitigation of emerging zoonoses: hendra virus and non-vaccinating horse owners. Transbound Emerg Dis (2017) 64:1898–911.
- Schemann K, Lewis FI, Firestone SM, Ward MP, Toribio J-AL, Taylor MR. Untangling the complex inter-relationships between horse managers' perceptions of effectiveness of biosecurity practices using Bayesian graphical modelling. Prev Vet Med (2013) 110:37–44.
- Schemann K, Taylor MR, Toribio J-A, Dhand NK. Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia. Prev Vet Med (2011) 102:304–14.
- Firestone SM, Lewis FI, Schemann K, Ward MP, Toribio J-ALML, Taylor MR. Applying Bayesian network modelling to understand the links between on-farm biosecurity practice during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak and horse managers' perceptions of a subsequent outbreak. Prev Vet Med (2014) 116:243–51.
- Goyen KA, Wright JD, Cunneen A, Henning J. Playing with fire–What is influencing horse owners' decisions to not vaccinate their horses against deadly Hendra virus infection?. PLoS ONE (2017) 12:e0180062.
- Manyweathers J, Taylor MC, Longnecker N. Expertise and communicating about infectious disease: a case study of uncertainty and rejection of local knowledge in discourse of experts and decision makers. J Sci Commun (2020) 19:1–20.
- Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association Inc. HTBA Member Benefits. (n.d) Available online at: https://www.htba.com.au/_files/ugd/d01163_ee380ee1a5894ef18adc4bfa35d70d40.pdf (accessed June 20, 2022).
- Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association Inc. Organisation Scone, New South Wales, Australia: Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association Inc.. (2021) Available online at: https://www.htba.com.au/organisation (accessed June 20, 2022).
- Thoroughbred Breeders Australia. Economic Impact web page. (2022) Available online at: https://www.tbaus.com/australian-breeding/economic-impact/ (accessed June 20, 2022).
- Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In:Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath KV, editors. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass/Wiley (2015). p. 125–48.
- Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Fava JL. Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol (1988) 56:520–8.
- DiClemente CC, Crisafulli MA. Relapse on the road to recovery: learning the lessons of failure on the way to successful behavior change. J Health Serv Psychol (2022) 5:1–10.
- Akter R, Sansom FM, El-Hage CM, Gilkerson JR, Legione AR, Devlin JM. A 25-year retrospective study of Chlamydia psittaci in association with equine reproductive loss in Australia. J Med Microbiol (2021) 70:1284.
- Amavisit P, Markham PF, Lightfoot D, Whithear KG, Browning GF. Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella Heidelberg in an equine hospital. Vet Microbiol (2001) 80:85–98.
- Roberts MC, O'Boyle DA. The prevalence and epizootiology of salmonellosis among groups of horses in South East Queensland. Au Vet J (1981) 57:27–35.
- Cuny C, Witte W. MRSA in equine hospitals and its significance for infections in humans. Vet Microbiol (2017) 200:59–64.
- Taylor J, Thompson K, Annand EJ, Massey PD, Bennett J, Eden JS. Novel variant Hendra virus genotype 2 infection in a horse in the greater Newcastle region, New South Wales, Australia. One Health (2022) 15:100423.
- Williamson K, Wheeler S, Kerr J, Bennett J, Freeman P, Kohlhagen J. Hendra in the Hunter Valley. One Health (2020) 10:100162.
- Magouras I, Brookes VJ, Jori F, Martin A, Pfeiffer DU, Dürr S. Emerging zoonotic diseases: Should we rethink the animal–human interface?. Front Vet Sci (2020) 7:582743.
- MacLeod A, Spence N. Biosecurity: tools, behaviours, and concepts. Emerg Top Life Sci (2020) 4:449–52.
- Burr K. Evaluating Use of Personal Protective Equipment by Veterinary Professionals Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, USA: University of Washington; (2022).
- Guldenmund FW. Understanding and Exploring Safety Culture. Oisterwijk: Uitgeverij BOXPress. (2010).
- Barnett RL. On the safety hierarchy and hierarchy of controls. Am J Mech Eng (2020) 8:61–8.
- Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and investigating horse-related human injury and fatality in work and non-work equestrian environments: a consideration of the workplace health and safety framework. Animals (2016) 6:33.
- Mendez DH, Kelly J, Buttner P, Nowak M, Speare R. Management of the slowly emerging zoonosis, Hendra virus, by private veterinarians in Queensland, Australia: a qualitative study. BMC Vet Res (2014) 10:215.
- Lynden J, Ogden J, Hollands T. Contracting for care–the construction of the farrier role in supporting horse owners to prevent laminitis. Equine Vet J (2018) 50:658–66.
- Churchill J. Increase the success of weight loss programs by creating an environment for change. Compend Contin Educ Vet (2010) 32:E1.
- Richens I, Houdmont J, Wapenaar W, Shortall O, Kaler J, O'Connor H. Application of multiple behaviour change models to identify determinants of farmers' biosecurity attitudes and behaviours. Prev Vet Med (2018) 155:61–74.
- Armitage CJ. Is there utility in the transtheoretical model?. Br J Health Psychol (2009) 14:195–210.
- Sutton S, French D, Hennings S. Transtheoretical model of behavior change. Curr Psychol (1997) 22:234–51.
- Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol (1992) 47:1102–14.
- Dawson D, Mayger K, Thomas MJ, Thompson K. Fatigue risk management by volunteer fire-fighters: Use of informal strategies to augment formal policy. Acci Anal Prevent (2015) 84:92–8.
- Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In:Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; (1985). p. 11-39.
- Speksnijder DC, Wagenaar JA. Reducing antimicrobial use in farm animals: how to support behavioral change of veterinarians and farmers. Animal Front (2018) 8:4–9.
- Chapman M, Thomas M, Thompson K. What people really think about safety around horses: the relationship between risk perception, values and safety behaviours. Animals (2020) 10:2222.
- Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant (2013) 47:2025–47.
- Wang L, Crameri G. Emerging zoonotic viral diseases. Rev Sci Tech (2014) 33:569–81.
- Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature (2008) 451:990–3.
- Wang L-F, Anderson DE, Mackenzie JS, Merson MH. From Hendra to Wuhan: what has been learned in responding to emerging zoonotic viruses. Lancet (2020) 395:e33–e4.
- Lönker NS, Fechner K, Abd El Wahed A. Horses as a crucial part of one health. Vet Sci (2020) 7:1–28.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists