Abstract: Detection of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in horses in Sweden has increased attention on infection control (IC) in equine hospitals. This study established baseline data on IC programmes within such settings, evaluated compliance with some IC procedures before and after an education intervention, and examined barriers to compliance.The study was carried out between 2008 and 2011 in four Swedish equine hospitals. Data on current IC of each hospital, purchase data on hand sanitisers and disposable gloves per patient, and direct observations of compliance with procedures were monitored pre- and post-intervention. The intervention comprised a lecture on common IC and a review of each hospital's current procedures. For comparison, retrospective purchase data were reviewed. A questionnaire on individual compliance, experiences and opinions of IC was issued to employees. Results: Three hospitals completed the study, while the fourth reported its IC procedures and completed the questionnaire. Actual numbers of procedures, content and level of documentation differed among the hospitals. Similarities were poor or absent IC implementation strategy, lack of active surveillance of compliance with procedures and no monitoring of such as nosocomial infections. Among the hospitals which completed the study, two reported pre-intervention observation of compliance, while all three reported post-intervention observations. The purchase data showed trends for changes over time, although not uniformly related to the intervention. One hospital demonstrated a significant post-intervention increase in compliance with glove procedures, accompanied by a non-significant post-intervention increase in purchases figures. Compliance with dress code and personal appearance was high in all three hospitals (92-100%), while compliance with hand hygiene procedures was generally poorer. Barriers to compliance cited in the questionnaire (data from four hospitals) included insufficient supplies of hygiene products, lack of readily accessible places for cleaning, insufficient knowledge and high workload. Conclusions: Potential for easily attainable improvements in IC, such as traceability of documents, implementation strategies and surveillance of efficacy, was revealed. Attention to hand hygiene implementation and improvement of logistics appeared important. Data on purchases per patient were readily available and therefore applicable for intra-hospital surveillance of IC trends over time.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research examines infection control programs in Swedish equine hospitals, identifies barriers to compliance, and assesses how an education intervention could improve their practice. The researchers found that while there were structures for infection control, there were areas for improvement such as documentation traceability, implementation strategy, and surveillance.
Methodology of the Study
The study was conducted in four equine hospitals in Sweden between 2008 and 2011. It included collecting baseline data on existing infection control systems, observation of compliance before and after an intervention, and an evaluation of deterrents.
Examination comprised observing actual purchase data of sanitizers and disposable gloves per patient, compliance with infection control methods, and their post-intervention assessment.
The intervention involved a lecture on fundamental infection control measures as well as an evaluation of each hospital’s current procedures.
To ensure validity, retrospective purchase data were analyzed. Staff members were also given a questionnaire to assess their compliance, experiences, and viewpoints about infection control.
Study Findings
Regarding operational procedures, documentation content, and level, considerable differences and variations were identified amongst the hospitals. Shared issues amongst the hospitals included the absence or inadequate implementation of infection control strategies, a lack of compliance surveillance, and no monitoring of hospital-acquired infections.
Two hospitals reported observation of compliance even before the intervention, whereas all three showed compliance after the intervention.
Gloves purchase data showed a significant increase post-intervention, an indication of improved compliance with glove procedures.
However, compliance differed across different areas; dress code and personal appearance compliance were high in all three hospitals (between 92-100%) while hand hygiene practices were not as impressive.
Barriers to Compliance
From the staff questionnaires, several barriers to better compliance were outlined. They include insufficient supplies of hygiene products, inadequate easily accessible sanitation points, lack of knowledge, and high workload.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The research brought to the fore the potential for improving infection control in equine hospitals, specifically in areas of document traceability, strategy implementation, effectiveness surveillance.
Hand hygiene implementation and improvement of logistics were also identified as crucial areas for attention.
The data on purchases per patient were readily available and hence applicable for internal hospital tracking of infection control trends over time.
Cite This Article
APA
Bergström K, Grönlund U.
(2014).
A pre- and post-intervention study of infection control in equine hospitals in Sweden.
Acta Vet Scand, 56(1), 52.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0052-4
Garcia-Alvarez L, Dawson S, Cookson B, Hawkey P. Working across the veterinary and human health sectors.. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012 Jul;67 Suppl 1:i37-49.
Steneroden KK, Van Metre DC, Jackson C, Morley PS. Detection and control of a nosocomial outbreak caused by Salmonella newport at a large animal hospital.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 May-Jun;24(3):606-16.
Bereket W, Hemalatha K, Getenet B, Wondwossen T, Solomon A, Zeynudin A, Kannan S. Update on bacterial nosocomial infections.. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012 Aug;16(8):1039-44.
Morley PS. Evidence-based infection control in clinical practice: if you buy clothes for the emperor, will he wear them?. J Vet Intern Med 2013 May-Jun;27(3):430-8.
Sax H, Clack L, Touveneau S, Jantarada Fda L, Pittet D, Zingg W. Implementation of infection control best practice in intensive care units throughout Europe: a mixed-method evaluation study.. Implement Sci 2013 Feb 19;8:24.
Shea A, Shaw S. Evaluation of an educational campaign to increase hand hygiene at a small animal veterinary teaching hospital.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012 Jan 1;240(1):61-4.
Nakamura RK, Tompkins E, Braasch EL, Martinez JG Jr, Bianco D. Hand hygiene practices of veterinary support staff in small animal private practice.. J Small Anim Pract 2012 Mar;53(3):155-60.
Smith JR, Packman ZR, Hofmeister EH. Multimodal evaluation of the effectiveness of a hand hygiene educational campaign at a small animal veterinary teaching hospital.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013 Oct 1;243(7):1042-8.
Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug H, Richardus JH, Behrendt MD, Vos MC, van Beeck EF. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010 Mar;31(3):283-94.
Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Puumala S, Anderson JR, Craig R, Iwen PC, Jourdan D, Keuchel J, Marion N, Peterson D, Sholtz L, Smith V. Prospective, controlled, cross-over trial of alcohol-based hand gel in critical care units .. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008 Jan;29(1):8-15.
Traore O, Hugonnet S, Lübbe J, Griffiths W, Pittet D. Liquid versus gel handrub formulation: a prospective intervention study.. Crit Care 2007;11(3):R52.
Boyce JM, Cooper T, Dolan MJ. Evaluation of an electronic device for real-time measurement of alcohol-based hand rub use.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009 Nov;30(11):1090-5.
Boyce JM. Measuring healthcare worker hand hygiene activity: current practices and emerging technologies.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011 Oct;32(10):1016-28.
Eckmanns T, Bessert J, Behnke M, Gastmeier P, Ruden H. Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units: the Hawthorne effect.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006 Sep;27(9):931-4.
Chen LF, Carriker C, Staheli R, Isaacs P, Elliott B, Miller BA, Anderson DJ, Moehring RW, Vereen S, Bringhurst J, Rhodes L, Strittholt N, Sexton DJ. Observing and improving hand hygiene compliance: implementation and refinement of an electronic-assisted direct-observer hand hygiene audit program.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013 Feb;34(2):207-10.
Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uçkay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. 'My five moments for hand hygiene': a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene.. J Hosp Infect 2007 Sep;67(1):9-21.
Wierup M, Allard Bengtsson U, Vågsholm I. Biosafety considerations and risk reduction strategy for a new veterinary faculty building and teaching hospital in Sweden. Infect Ecol Epidemiol 2020 Jun 4;10(1):1761588.
Bortolami A, Williams NJ, McGowan CM, Kelly PG, Archer DC, Corrò M, Pinchbeck G, Saunders CJ, Timofte D. Environmental surveillance identifies multiple introductions of MRSA CC398 in an Equine Veterinary Hospital in the UK, 2011-2016. Sci Rep 2017 Jul 14;7(1):5499.
Sani Kaware M, Ibrahim MI, Shafei MN, Hairon SM, Abdullahi AU. Impact of an educational intervention on nurses' perception of handoff process in public hospitals in Katsina, Nigeria: a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Nurs 2025 May 17;24(1):555.