Awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of large animal hospital surveillance and infection control practices by referring veterinarians and clients.
Abstract: To assess awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of surveillance and infection control practices at a large animal referral hospital among referring veterinarians and clients who sent horses to the facility for veterinary care. Methods: Survey. Methods: 57 referring veterinarians and 594 clients. Methods: A 15-question survey targeting Salmonella enterica as an important pathogen of interest in horses was sent to clients who sent ≥ 1 horse to the University of Florida Large Animal Hospital for veterinary care during July 1, 2007, through July 1, 2011, and to veterinarians who had referred horses to the same hospital prior to July 1, 2011. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics. The χ(2) test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to examine associations among variables of interest. Results: Survey response rates were low (57/467 [12%] for veterinarians and 594/3,095 [19%] for clients). Significantly more (35/56 [63%]) veterinarians than clients (227/585 [39%]) were aware that the hospital operates a surveillance and infection control program. Most veterinarians (56/57 [98%]) and clients (554/574 [97%]) indicated that sampling and testing of horses to detect Salmonella shedding in feces at admission and during hospitalization was justified. In addition, on a scale of 1 (not important) to 10 (very important), veterinarians and clients indicated it was very important (median score, 10 [interquartile range, 8 to 10] for both groups) that a referral hospital operates a surveillance and infection control program. Conclusions: Survey results indicated that awareness of hospital surveillance and infection control practices was higher among veterinarians than clients, and these practices were considered relevant and well-accepted among participant veterinarians and clients.
Publication Date: 2014-03-22 PubMed ID: 24649995DOI: 10.2460/javma.244.7.835Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article discusses a survey conducted to measure the awareness, acceptance, and perceived relevance of surveillance and infection control practices at a large animal hospital among both referring veterinarians and clients. The survey found that while awareness of these practices was higher among veterinarians, the practices were generally seen as justified and important by both groups.
Survey Methodology
- The study was conducted through a survey of 57 referring veterinarians and 594 clients who had sent at least one horse to the University of Florida Large Animal Hospital for veterinary care between July 1, 2007, and July 1, 2011.
- The survey consisted of 15 questions focused on Salmonella enterica, a significant pathogen of interest in horses.
- The researchers used descriptive statistics, the χ(2) test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test to analyze survey responses and examine relationships among variables of interest.
Survey Results
- Awareness of the hospital’s surveillance and infection control program was significantly higher among veterinarians (63%) than clients (39%). However, the response rate from both groups was relatively low.
- Almost all veterinarians (98%) and clients (97%) believed that testing horses for Salmonella shedding in feces upon admission and during hospitalization was justified.
- When asked to rate the importance of a referral hospital operating a surveillance and infection control program on a scale from 1 (not important) to 10 (very important), both veterinarians and clients assigned a median score of 10, indicating it as extremely important.
Conclusions
- The study concluded that while more veterinarians were aware of the hospital’s surveillance and infection control practices, both veterinarians and clients considered these practices key and well-accepted.
- The high acceptance and perceived relevance of these practices among both groups emphasize the importance of maintaining effective surveillance and infection control practices in large animal hospitals.
Cite This Article
APA
Ekiri AB, House AM, Krueger TM, Hernandez JA.
(2014).
Awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of large animal hospital surveillance and infection control practices by referring veterinarians and clients.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 244(7), 835-843.
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.244.7.835 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Data Collection
- Florida / epidemiology
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Horse Diseases / epidemiology
- Horse Diseases / microbiology
- Horses
- Hospitals, Animal / standards
- Humans
- Infection Control / methods
- Infection Control / standards
- Risk Factors
- Salmonella Infections, Animal / prevention & control
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Veterinarians
- Zoonoses
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists