Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2014; 244(7); 835-843; doi: 10.2460/javma.244.7.835

Awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of large animal hospital surveillance and infection control practices by referring veterinarians and clients.

Abstract: To assess awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of surveillance and infection control practices at a large animal referral hospital among referring veterinarians and clients who sent horses to the facility for veterinary care. Methods: Survey. Methods: 57 referring veterinarians and 594 clients. Methods: A 15-question survey targeting Salmonella enterica as an important pathogen of interest in horses was sent to clients who sent ≥ 1 horse to the University of Florida Large Animal Hospital for veterinary care during July 1, 2007, through July 1, 2011, and to veterinarians who had referred horses to the same hospital prior to July 1, 2011. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics. The χ(2) test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to examine associations among variables of interest. Results: Survey response rates were low (57/467 [12%] for veterinarians and 594/3,095 [19%] for clients). Significantly more (35/56 [63%]) veterinarians than clients (227/585 [39%]) were aware that the hospital operates a surveillance and infection control program. Most veterinarians (56/57 [98%]) and clients (554/574 [97%]) indicated that sampling and testing of horses to detect Salmonella shedding in feces at admission and during hospitalization was justified. In addition, on a scale of 1 (not important) to 10 (very important), veterinarians and clients indicated it was very important (median score, 10 [interquartile range, 8 to 10] for both groups) that a referral hospital operates a surveillance and infection control program. Conclusions: Survey results indicated that awareness of hospital surveillance and infection control practices was higher among veterinarians than clients, and these practices were considered relevant and well-accepted among participant veterinarians and clients.
Publication Date: 2014-03-22 PubMed ID: 24649995DOI: 10.2460/javma.244.7.835Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses a survey conducted to measure the awareness, acceptance, and perceived relevance of surveillance and infection control practices at a large animal hospital among both referring veterinarians and clients. The survey found that while awareness of these practices was higher among veterinarians, the practices were generally seen as justified and important by both groups.

Survey Methodology

  • The study was conducted through a survey of 57 referring veterinarians and 594 clients who had sent at least one horse to the University of Florida Large Animal Hospital for veterinary care between July 1, 2007, and July 1, 2011.
  • The survey consisted of 15 questions focused on Salmonella enterica, a significant pathogen of interest in horses.
  • The researchers used descriptive statistics, the χ(2) test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test to analyze survey responses and examine relationships among variables of interest.

Survey Results

  • Awareness of the hospital’s surveillance and infection control program was significantly higher among veterinarians (63%) than clients (39%). However, the response rate from both groups was relatively low.
  • Almost all veterinarians (98%) and clients (97%) believed that testing horses for Salmonella shedding in feces upon admission and during hospitalization was justified.
  • When asked to rate the importance of a referral hospital operating a surveillance and infection control program on a scale from 1 (not important) to 10 (very important), both veterinarians and clients assigned a median score of 10, indicating it as extremely important.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that while more veterinarians were aware of the hospital’s surveillance and infection control practices, both veterinarians and clients considered these practices key and well-accepted.
  • The high acceptance and perceived relevance of these practices among both groups emphasize the importance of maintaining effective surveillance and infection control practices in large animal hospitals.

Cite This Article

APA
Ekiri AB, House AM, Krueger TM, Hernandez JA. (2014). Awareness, perceived relevance, and acceptance of large animal hospital surveillance and infection control practices by referring veterinarians and clients. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 244(7), 835-843. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.244.7.835

Publication

ISSN: 1943-569X
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 244
Issue: 7
Pages: 835-843

Researcher Affiliations

Ekiri, Abel B
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.
House, Amanda M
    Krueger, Traci M
      Hernandez, Jorge A

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Data Collection
        • Florida / epidemiology
        • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
        • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
        • Horse Diseases / microbiology
        • Horses
        • Hospitals, Animal / standards
        • Humans
        • Infection Control / methods
        • Infection Control / standards
        • Risk Factors
        • Salmonella Infections, Animal / prevention & control
        • Surveys and Questionnaires
        • Veterinarians
        • Zoonoses

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.