Abstract: In this study, we analysed genetic diversity, population structure and inbreeding in the Lipica Stud Farm population by integrating pedigree records, microsatellite (STR) and genome-wide SNP data generated using the GGP Equine 70K BeadChip. The dataset comprised 233 horses from the Lipica Stud Farm, which served as the reference population for comparisons of diversity estimates based on pedigree-, STR- and SNP data. The STR data were originally generated for routine parentage verification and were included here to compare inbreeding estimates based on pedigree, STR and genome-wide SNP data. Pedigrees of the analysed horses were traced back to the 18th century, with the longest ancestral path spanning 35 generations. The mean pedigree inbreeding coefficient in the reference population was 11.55%, while ancestral inbreeding coefficients ranged from 5.93% to 15.42%. Microsatellite analyses revealed an average observed heterozygosity (Ho) of 0.68 and a mean of 5.9 alleles per locus, with STR-based inbreeding (F) ranging from 0.10 to 0.15. However, genomic inbreeding estimated from runs of homozygosity (F) varied between 0.09 and 0.28, with an average of 0.16. Selection signature analysis identified several putative candidate regions, whereas integrated haplotype score (iHS) analysis highlighted three candidate protein-coding genes (ZNF114, DENND5A, and TENM4). The ROH islands contained 24 genes previously associated with pigmentation, reproduction, muscle function, and other biologically relevant traits in horses. These results provide a comprehensive genomic characterisation of the Lipica Stud Farm population and offer important insights into genetic diversity and inbreeding patterns in the Lipizzan breed.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This research provides a detailed genetic analysis of the Lipizzan horse population at the Lipica Stud Farm, examining their genetic diversity, population structure, and degree of inbreeding through the use of pedigree information, microsatellite markers, and genome-wide SNP data.
Objectives of the Study
To analyze the genetic diversity of the Lipizzan horses using multiple data sources: pedigree records, microsatellites (STR), and genome-wide SNP data.
To assess the population structure and inbreeding levels within the Lipica Stud Farm population.
To identify genomic regions potentially under selection related to important traits.
Data and Methods
The study analyzed a total of 233 Lipizzan horses from the Lipica Stud Farm, serving as the reference population.
Three data types were integrated for analysis:
Pedigree data tracing back up to the 18th century, with ancestry going as far as 35 generations.
Microsatellite (STR) data originally collected for routine parentage verification.
Genome-wide SNP data obtained using the GGP Equine 70K BeadChip, covering around 70,000 genetic markers.
Key Findings – Inbreeding and Genetic Diversity
Pedigree analysis showed a mean inbreeding coefficient of 11.55%, indicating moderate inbreeding within this population.
Ancestral inbreeding coefficients ranged from 5.93% to 15.42%, reflecting the historical genetic background of these horses.
Microsatellite data revealed:
An average observed heterozygosity (Ho) of 0.68, indicating a relatively high level of genetic variability at these loci.
A mean of 5.9 alleles per locus, which is a measure of allele richness.
STR-based inbreeding (F) ranged between 0.10 and 0.15, slightly lower but comparable to pedigree estimates.
SNP-based genomic inbreeding, calculated from runs of homozygosity (ROH), varied more widely from 0.09 to 0.28 with an average of 0.16, indicating more nuanced inbreeding patterns detectable at the genomic scale.
Genomic Insights and Selection Signatures
Selection signature analyses helped identify candidate genomic regions that may be under selection pressures in this population.
Using integrated haplotype score (iHS) methods, three candidate protein-coding genes were highlighted: ZNF114, DENND5A, and TENM4, potentially related to breed-specific traits.
The runs of homozygosity (ROH) islands—regions with excessive homozygosity—contained 24 genes associated with:
Pigmentation patterns
Reproductive traits
Muscle function
Other biological traits relevant to horse physiology and performance
Significance and Implications
The study provides a comprehensive genomic characterization of the Lipizzan horses from the Lipica Stud Farm, integrating traditional pedigree data with modern genomic technologies.
The combination of pedigree, STR, and SNP data presents a robust picture of genetic diversity and inbreeding, which is valuable for breeding management and conservation efforts.
Identification of candidate genes and selection signatures lays groundwork for future studies on the genetic basis of important traits in the Lipizzan breed, including those affecting appearance and performance.
Such detailed genetic information aids breeders in making informed decisions to maintain genetic health and avoid excessive inbreeding, ultimately supporting the sustainability of this historic horse population.
Cite This Article
APA
Ferme T, Zorc M, Cotman M, Mesarič M, Dovč P.
(2026).
Characterization of Lipizzan Horse Population From Lipica Stud Using Molecular and Pedigree Data.
Anim Genet, 57(4), e70182.
https://doi.org/10.1002/age.70182
Ballou JD. Ancestral Inbreeding Only Minimally Affects Inbreeding Depression in Mammalian Populations. Journal of Heredity 88: 169–178.
Baumung R, Farkas J, Boichard D, Mészáros G, Sölkner J, Curik I. GRAIN: A Computer Program to Calculate Ancestral and Partial Inbreeding Coefficients Using a Gene Dropping Approach. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 132: 100–108.
Boichard D, Maignel L, Verrier E. The Value of Using Probabilities of Gene Origin to Measure Genetic Variability in a Population. Genetics Selection Evolution 29, no. 1: 5–23.
Browning BL, Tian X, Zhou Y, Browning SR. Fast Two‐Stage Phasing of Large‐Scale Sequence Data. American Journal of Human Genetics 108: 1880–1890.
Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA. Stacks: An Analysis Tool Set for Population Genomics. Molecular Ecology 22: 3124–3140.
Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LCA M, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second‐Generation PLINK: Rising to the Challenge of Larger and Richer Datasets. GigaScience 4: s13742‐015‐0047‐8.
Clutton‐Brock J. A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. .
Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR. NeEstimator v2: Re‐Implementation of Software for the Estimation of Contemporary Effective Population Size (Ne) From Genetic Data. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 209–214.
Doekes HP, Curik I, Nagy I, Farkas J, Kövér G, Windig JJ. Revised Calculation of Kalinowski's Ancestral and New Inbreeding Coefficients. Diversity 12: 155.
Gautier M, Vitalis R. Rehh: An R Package to Detect Footprints of Selection in Genome‐Wide SNP Data From Haplotype Structure. Bioinformatics 28: 1176–1177.
Goyache F, Gutiérrez JP, Fernández I. Using Pedigree Information to Monitor Genetic Variability of Endangered Populations: The Xalda Sheep Breed of Asturias as an Example. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 120: 95–105.
James J W. A Note on Selection Differential and Generation Length When Generations Overlap. Animal Science 1977;24:109–112.
Jombart T, I Ahmed. Adegenet 1.3‐1: New Tools for the Analysis of Genome‐Wide SNP Data. Bioinformatics 2011;27:3070–3071.
Kalinowski S T, P W Hedrick, P S Miller. Inbreeding Depression in the Speke's Gazelle Captive Breeding Program. Conservation Biology 2000;14:1375–1384.
Kalinowski S T, M L Taper, T C Marshall. Revising How the Computer Program CERVUS Accommodates Genotyping Error Increases Success in Paternity Assignment. Molecular Ecology 2007;16:1099–1106.
Kamvar Z N, J F Tabima, N J Grunwald. Poppr: An R Package for Genetic Analysis of Populations With Clonal, Partially Clonal, and/or Sexual Reproduction. PeerJ 2014;2:e281.
Kassambara A. Ggpubr: ggplot2 Based Publication Ready Plots. CRAN 2026.
Kavar T, P Dovč. Domestication of the Horse: Genetic Relationships Between Domestic and Wild Horses. Livestock Science 2008;116:1–14.
Kirin M, R McQuillan, C S Franklin, H Campbell, P M McKeigue, J F Wilson. Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity. PLoS One 2010;5:e13996.
Klassmann A, M Gautier. Detecting Selection Using Extended Haplotype Homozygosity (EHH)‐Based Statistics in Unphased or Unpolarized Data. PLoS One 2022;17:e0262024.
Lencz T, Lambert C, DeRosse P. Runs of Homozygosity Reveal Highly Penetrant Recessive Loci in Schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007 104:19942–19947.
MacCluer JW, Boyce AJ, Dyke B, Weitkamp LR, Pfenning DW, Parsons CJ. Inbreeding and Pedigree Structure in Standardbred Horses. Journal of Heredity 1983 74:394–399.
Maignel L, Boichard D, Verrier E. Genetic Variability of French Dairy Breeds Estimated From Pedigree Information. Interbull Bulletin 1996 49:49–54.
Marklund L, Moller MJ, Sandberg K, Andersson L. A Missense Mutation in the Gene for Melanocyte‐Stimulating Hormone Receptor (MCIR) is Associated With the Chestnut Coat Color in Horses. Mammalian Genome 1996 7:895–899.
Meuwissen THE, Luo Z. Computing Inbreeding Coefficients in Large Populations. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 1992 24:305–313.
Meyermans R, Gorssen W, Buys N, Janssens S. How to Study Runs of Homozygosity Using PLINK? A Guide for Analyzing Medium Density SNP Data in Livestock and Pet Species. BMC Genomics 2020 21:94.
Mi H, Thomas P. PANTHER Pathway: An Ontology‐Based Pathway Database Coupled With Data Analysis Tools. Methods in Molecular Biology 2009 563:123–140.
Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research—An Update. Bioinformatics 2012 28:2537–2539.
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd‐Brown K. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole‐Genome Association and Population‐Based Linkage Analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics 81: 559–575.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. .
Rus, J. 2011. Rejski program za pasmo lipicanski konj, 56. Kobilarna Lipica.
Santiago E, Novo I, Pardiñas AF, Saura M, Wang J, Caballero A. Recent Demographic History Inferred by High‐Resolution Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 3642–3653.
Sargolzaei M, Iwaisaki H, Colleau JJ. CFC: A Tool for Monitoring Genetic Diversity. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil 13–18 August, 2006 27–8.
Tammen I, Bailey E, Mather M, Nicholas FW. Equus in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA). Animals: An Open Access Journal From MDPI 14: 2069.
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. MICRO‐CHECKER: Software for Identifying and Correcting Genotyping Errors in Microsatellite Data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4:535–538.
Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer International Publishing.
Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics 16:97–159.
Zechner P, Sölkner J, Bodo I. Analysis of Diversity and Population Structure in the Lipizzan Horse Breed Based on Pedigree Information. Livestock Production Science 77:137–146.
Zechner P, Zohman F, Sölkner J. Morphological Description of the Lipizzan Horse Population. Livestock Production Science 69:163–177.
Zhdanova OL, Pudovkin AI. Nb_HetEx: A Program to Estimate the Effective Number of Breeders. Journal of Heredity 99:694–695.