Analyze Diet

Descriptive network analysis of a Standardbred horse training facility contact network: Implications for disease transmission.

Abstract: Infectious respiratory disease is a common cause of morbidity among racehorses. Quantification of contact patterns in training facilities could help inform disease prevention strategies. The study objectives were to: i) describe the contact network among horses, locations, and humans at a Standardbred horse training facility in Ontario; ii) describe the characteristics of highly influential individuals; and iii) investigate how management changes alter the network metrics and discuss the potential implications for disease transmission. Proximity loggers detected contacts among horses, staff, and locations ( = 144). Network metrics and node centrality measures were described for a 2-mode and horse-only contact network. The 2-mode network density was 0.16. and the median node degree was 20 [interquartile range (IQR) = 12 to 27]. Yearlings and floating staff were most influential in the network suggesting biosecurity programs should emphasize reducing contacts in these groups. Removing highly influential staff or co-housing of age groups resulted in changes to network diameter and density. . Les maladies respiratoires infectieuses sont une cause commune de morbidité parmi les chevaux de course. Une quantification des patrons de contact dans les centres d’entraînement pourrait aider à avoir des stratégies appropriées de prévention des maladies. Les objectifs de la présente étude étaient de : i) décrire le réseau des contacts entre les chevaux, les localisations et les humains à un centre d’entraînement pour chevaux Stadardbred en Ontario; ii) décrire les caractéristiques d’individus très influents; iii) examiner comment les changements de gestion altèrent le réseau des systèmes de mesure et discuter les implications potentielles pour la transmission des maladies. Des enregistreurs de proximité détectèrent les contacts parmi les chevaux, le personnel et les localisations ( = 144). Les systèmes de mesure et les mesures de centralité des noeuds furent décrits pour un réseau à 2 modes et un réseau de contact entre chevaux uniquement. La densité du réseau à 2 modes était de 0,16 et le degré médian du noeud était 20 [écart interquartile (IQR) = 12 à 27]. Les yearlings et le personnel occasionnel étaient les plus influents dans le réseau suggérant que les programmes de biosécurité devraient mettre l’emphase sur une réduction des contacts dans ces groupes. Le retrait de personnel très influent ou cohabitation de groupes d’âge a résulté en des changements dans le diamètre et la densité du réseau.(Traduit par D Serge Messier).
Publication Date: 2020-08-04 PubMed ID: 32741991PubMed Central: PMC7350062
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research analyses the contact network within a Standardbred horse training facility, showing the human, equine, and location interconnections and its implications to disease transmission. The study found that yearlings and itinerant staff were most influential in the network, and removing such influential staff or grouping horses by age can alter the network dynamics, suggesting potential strategies for disease prevention.

Research Objectives

  • The main aims of the study were to understand the contact network among horses, on-site locations, and humans at a Standardbred horse training facility.
  • To identify and describe the characteristics of highly influential individuals in the network.
  • To assess how changes in the management and structure of the network could potentially influence the network metrics and implications for disease transmission.

Methodology

  • The investigation utilized proximity loggers to detect and record contacts among horses, facility staff, and locations within the training facility (total contacts = 144).
  • Network metrics and measurements of node centrality, which reveal node influence, were described for a two-mode (including both direct and indirect contacts) and horse-only contact network.

Results and Findings

  • The results revealed a two-mode network density of 0.16, reflecting a moderate level of contact throughout the network, with a median node degree of 20, indicating an average horse had direct or indirect connections with 20 other nodes.
  • Among the population, yearlings (young horses between 1 and 2 years old) and floating staff (irregular or part-time employees) held a high degree of influence over the network.

Implications

  • The research suggests that biosecurity programs aimed at disease prevention should focus more extensively on reducing contacts among yearlings and floating staff, as these groups exhibit the highest potential for disease transmission due to their significant connectivity within the network.
  • Alterations in management strategy, such as removing highly influential staff members or implementing age-related cohabitation strategies among horses, resulted in changes to the network’s diameter and density, implying potential directional alterations to disease spread rates or patterns.

Cite This Article

APA
Rossi TM, Milwid RM, Moore A, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL. (2020). Descriptive network analysis of a Standardbred horse training facility contact network: Implications for disease transmission. Can Vet J, 61(8), 853-859.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 61
Issue: 8
Pages: 853-859

Researcher Affiliations

Rossi, Tanya M
  • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Rossi, Milwid, O'Sullivan, Greer); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario (Moore).
Milwid, Rachael M
  • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Rossi, Milwid, O'Sullivan, Greer); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario (Moore).
Moore, Alison
  • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Rossi, Milwid, O'Sullivan, Greer); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario (Moore).
O'Sullivan, Terri L
  • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Rossi, Milwid, O'Sullivan, Greer); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario (Moore).
Greer, Amy L
  • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Rossi, Milwid, O'Sullivan, Greer); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario (Moore).

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses
  • Ontario / epidemiology

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Bailey CJ, Rose RJ, Reid SW, Hodgson DR. Wastage in the Australian thoroughbred racing industry: a survey of Sydney trainers.. Aust Vet J 1997 Jan;75(1):64-6.
  2. Powell DG, Burrows R, Goodridge D. Respiratory viral infections among thoroughbred horses in training during 1972.. Equine Vet J 1974 Jan;6(1):19-24.
  3. Gilkerson JR, Bailey KE, Diaz-Méndez A, Hartley CA. Update on viral diseases of the equine respiratory tract.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2015 Apr;31(1):91-104.
    pubmed: 25648568doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.11.007google scholar: lookup
  4. Timoney PJ. Equine influenza.. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 1996 Jun;19(3):205-11.
    pubmed: 8800546doi: 10.1016/0147-9571(96)00006-9google scholar: lookup
  5. Wood JL, Newton JR, Chanter N, Mumford JA. Association between respiratory disease and bacterial and viral infections in British racehorses.. J Clin Microbiol 2005 Jan;43(1):120-6.
  6. Willoughby R, Ecker G, McKee S, Riddolls L, Vernaillen C, Dubovi E, Lein D, Mahony JB, Chernesky M, Nagy E. The effects of equine rhinovirus, influenza virus and herpesvirus infection on tracheal clearance rate in horses.. Can J Vet Res 1992 Apr;56(2):115-21.
    pmc: PMC1263518pubmed: 1317244
  7. Myers C, Wilson WD. Equine influenza virus. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2006;5:187–196.
  8. Sánchez-Matamoros A, Martínez-López B, Sánchez-Vizcaíno F, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Social network analysis of Equidae movements and its application to risk-based surveillance and to control of spread of potential Equidae diseases.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2013 Oct;60(5):448-59.
  9. Frössling J, Ohlson A, Björkman C, Håkansson N, Nöremark M. Application of network analysis parameters in risk-based surveillance - examples based on cattle trade data and bovine infections in Sweden.. Prev Vet Med 2012 Jul 1;105(3):202-8.
  10. Christley RM, Pinchbeck GL, Bowers RG, Clancy D, French NP, Bennett R, Turner J. Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals.. Am J Epidemiol 2005 Nov 15;162(10):1024-31.
    pubmed: 16177140doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi308google scholar: lookup
  11. Hayama Y, Kobayashi S, Nishida T, Muroga N, Tsutsui T. Network simulation modeling of equine infectious anemia in the non-racehorse population in Japan.. Prev Vet Med 2012 Jan 1;103(1):38-48.
  12. Rosanowski SM, Cogger N, Rogers CW, Bolwell CF, Benschop J, Stevenson MA. Analysis of horse movements from non-commercial horse properties in New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2013 Sep;61(5):245-53.
    pubmed: 23441839doi: 10.1080/00480169.2012.750571google scholar: lookup
  13. Bell IG, Drury-Klein C. Analysis of horse movements and events during the 2007 outbreak of equine influenza in New South Wales, Australia.. Aust Vet J 2011 Jul;89 Suppl 1:63-8.
  14. Spence KL, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Greer AL. Descriptive and network analyses of the equine contact network at an equestrian show in Ontario, Canada and implications for disease spread.. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jun 21;13(1):191.
    pmc: PMC5480143pubmed: 28637457doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1103-7google scholar: lookup
  15. Spence KL, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Greer AL. A longitudinal study describing horse demographics and movements during a competition season in Ontario, Canada.. Can Vet J 2018 Jul;59(7):783-790.
    pmc: PMC6005130pubmed: 30026628
  16. Milwid RM, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Laskowski M, Greer AL. Validation of modified radio-frequency identification tag firmware, using an equine population case study.. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0210148.
  17. Milwid RM, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Laskowski M, Greer AL. Comparison of the dynamic networks of four equine boarding and training facilities.. Prev Vet Med 2019 Jan 1;162:84-94.
  18. Dubé C, Ribble C, Kelton D, McNab B. A review of network analysis terminology and its application to foot-and-mouth disease modelling and policy development.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2009 Apr;56(3):73-85.
  19. Borgatti SP, Everett MG. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc Networks 1997;19:243–269.
  20. Csárdi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Syst 2006. p. 1695.
  21. Newman ME. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks.. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 2):066133.
    pubmed: 15244693doi: 10.1103/physreve.69.066133google scholar: lookup
  22. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.. Nature 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2.
    pubmed: 9623998doi: 10.1038/30918google scholar: lookup
  23. Scheidt AB, Cline TR, Clark LK. The effect of all-in-all-out growing-finishing on the health of pigs. J Swine Health Prod 1995;3:203–205.
  24. Davies PR, Morrow WE, Deen J, Gamble HR, Patton S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in finishing swine raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA.. Prev Vet Med 1998 Jul 17;36(1):67-76.
    pubmed: 9677628doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00072-5google scholar: lookup
  25. Webb CR. Investigating the potential spread of infectious diseases of sheep via agricultural shows in Great Britain.. Epidemiol Infect 2006 Feb;134(1):31-40.
    pmc: PMC2870361pubmed: 16409648doi: 10.1017/s095026880500467xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement.. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
    pmc: PMC5867011pubmed: 29424487doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043google scholar: lookup
  27. Handwerger S, Raucher B, Altarac D, Monka J, Marchione S, Singh KV, Murray BE, Wolff J, Walters B. Nosocomial outbreak due to Enterococcus faecium highly resistant to vancomycin, penicillin, and gentamicin.. Clin Infect Dis 1993 Jun;16(6):750-5.
    pubmed: 8329505doi: 10.1093/clind/16.6.750google scholar: lookup
  28. Rosenberger LH, Hranjec T, Politano AD, Swenson BR, Metzger R, Bonatti H, Sawyer RG. Effective cohorting and "superisolation" in a single intensive care unit in response to an outbreak of diverse multi-drug-resistant organisms.. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011 Oct;12(5):345-50.
    pmc: PMC4845630pubmed: 21936667doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.076google scholar: lookup
  29. Laurent C, Rodriguez-Villalobos H, Rost F, Strale H, Vincent JL, Deplano A, Struelens MJ, Byl B. Intensive care unit outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae controlled by cohorting patients and reinforcing infection control measures.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008 Jun;29(6):517-24.
    pubmed: 18510461doi: 10.1086/588004google scholar: lookup
  30. Canadian Swine Health Board Technical Committee on Biosecurity. National Swine Farm-Level Biosecurity Standard. Canadian Swine Health Board 2010.
  31. Morley PS, Townsend HG, Bogdan JR, Haines DM. Risk factors for disease associated with influenza virus infections during three epidemics in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000 Feb 15;216(4):545-50.
    pubmed: 10687010doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.216.545google scholar: lookup
  32. Rossi TM, Moore A, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL. Equine Rhinitis A Virus Infection at a Standardbred Training Facility: Incidence, Clinical Signs, and Risk Factors for Clinical Disease.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:71.
    pmc: PMC6424864pubmed: 30918893doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00071google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Pusterla N, James K, Barnum S, Bain F, Barnett DC, Chappell D, Gaughan E, Craig B, Schneider C, Vaala W. Frequency of Detection and Prevalence Factors Associated with Common Respiratory Pathogens in Equids with Acute Onset of Fever and/or Respiratory Signs (2008-2021). Pathogens 2022 Jul 2;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070759pubmed: 35890002google scholar: lookup
  2. Rossi TM, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL. Descriptive network analysis of Ontario, Canada equine competitions: implications for disease control. BMC Vet Res 2025 Dec 23;22(1):43.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-05248-zpubmed: 41430608google scholar: lookup