FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body...
PloS one2018; 13(6); e0199447; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199447

Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body movement symmetry in the trotting horse.

Abstract: In trotting horses, movement asymmetry is associated with ground reaction force asymmetry. In humans, limb length differences influence contralateral force production. Here we investigate whether horses, in immediate reaction to limb length changes, show movement asymmetry adaptations consistent with reported force differences. Aim of this study was to quantify pelvic and compensatory head and withers movement asymmetry as a function of limb length changes after application of orthotic lifts. In this experimental study movement asymmetry of eleven trotting horses was calculated from vertical displacement of poll, withers, sacrum and left and right tuber coxae with inertial sensors. Horses were assessed in-hand under 5 conditions (all with hind limb boots): without orthotic lifts, and with a 15mm or 30mm orthotic lift applied to the left hind or right hind. A linear mixed model investigated the influence of orthotic lift condition (P<0.05, pairwise posthoc Bonferroni correction). Pelvic movement asymmetry showed increased pelvic downward movement during stance of the shorter limb and increased pelvic upward movement during and after stance of the longer limb (P<0.001) with asymmetry changes of 3-7mm (4-10mm) for 15mm (30mm) lifts. Hip hike (tuber coxae movement asymmetry) was unaffected (P = 0.348). Head and withers movement asymmetry were affected less consistently (2 of 3 respectively 1 of 3 head or withers parameters). The small sample size of the study reduced generalizability, no direct force measurements were conducted and only immediate effects of orthotic lifts were assessed with no re-assessments days or weeks after. Conclusions about mechanical consequences (weight bearing, pushoff) are based on published movement-force associations. Pelvic movement asymmetry with an artificial change in limb length through application of an orthotic lift indicates increased weight support with the shorter limb and increased pushoff with the longer limb. This may be of relevance for the management of horses with different hoof shapes between contralateral limbs, for example some chronically lame horse.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2018-06-21 PubMed ID: 29928020PubMed Central: PMC6013171DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199447Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates how adjusting the length of one hind limb in trotting horses through orthotic lifts affects the symmetrical movement of the upper body. It found that these adjustments led to increased pelvic movement asymmetry, but had varied effects on the horse’s head and withers movement, with implications for the management of horses with different hoof shapes or chronic lameness.

Study Overview

  • The study was based on an experimental setup where the movement asymmetry of eleven trotting horses was monitored under different conditions.
  • The horses were assessed under 5 conditions: without orthotic lifts, and with a 15mm or 30mm orthotic lift applied to the left hind or right hind.
  • Through the use of inertial sensors, the vertical displacement of various parts of the horse’s body – including the poll, withers, sacrum, and left and right tuber coxae – was recorded.

Key Findings

  • Application of the orthotic lifts resulted in increased pelvic movement asymmetry. There was increased downward movement during the stance of the shorter limb and increased upward movement during and after the stance of the longer limb.
  • The asymmetry changes ranged from 3-7mm for the 15mm lifts, and 4-10mm for the 30mm lifts.
  • It is important to note that the hip hike (movement asymmetry of the tuber coxae) was not affected.
  • The head and withers movement asymmetry were less consistently affected, with 2 of 3 head parameters and 1 of 3 withers parameters showing changes.

Implications and Limitations

  • This study only assessed the immediate effects of the orthotic lifts and did not conduct any follow-up assessments days or weeks later.
  • As such, it makes conclusions about mechanical consequences – specifically increased weight support with the shorter limb and increased pushoff with the longer limb – based on published movement-force associations.
  • The findings of the study imply that adjusting limb length might affect the management of horses with differing hoof shapes between contralateral limbs, such as some chronically lame horses.
  • However, the small sample size of the study limits the generalizability of the results.
  • No direct force measurements were conducted, which could have provided additional insights into the impact of orthotic lifts on horse movement.

Cite This Article

APA
Vertz J, Deblanc D, Rhodin M, Pfau T. (2018). Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body movement symmetry in the trotting horse. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199447

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 6
Pages: e0199447
PII: e0199447

Researcher Affiliations

Vertz, Jodi
  • Healthy Hoofcare, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
  • University of Edinburgh, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Deblanc, Diana
  • Performance Equine Veterinary Services, Peralta, NM, United States of America.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pfau, Thilo
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Foot Orthoses
  • Hindlimb / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Models, Biological
  • Motor Activity / physiology
  • Pelvis / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

We have the following interests. JV is employed by Healthy Hoofcare and DD by Performance Equine Veterinary Services. TP is owner of EquiGait, a provider of gait analysis products and services. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness.. Equine Vet J 1996 Jan;28(1):71-6.
    pubmed: 8565958doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01592.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  2. May SA, Wyn-Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness.. Equine Vet J 1987 May;19(3):185-8.
    pubmed: 3608952doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb01371.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  3. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Kelmer G, Wilson DA. Objective determination of pelvic movement during hind limb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences.. Am J Vet Res 2004 Jun;65(6):741-7.
    pubmed: 15198212doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.741google scholar: lookup
  4. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, Whitfield CT, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Keegan KG. Associations of force plate and body-mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2016 Apr;77(4):337-45.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.4.337pubmed: 27027831google scholar: lookup
  5. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Mar;73(3):368-74.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  6. Pfau T, Spicer-Jenkins C, Smith RK, Bolt DM, Fiske-Jackson A, Witte TH. Identifying optimal parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement symmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs of horses.. Equine Vet J 2014 Nov;46(6):759-63.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12220pubmed: 24329685google scholar: lookup
  7. Maliye S, Voute L, Lund D, Marshall JF. An inertial sensor-based system can objectively assess diagnostic anaesthesia of the equine foot.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2013 Dec;(45):26-30.
    pubmed: 24304400doi: 10.1111/evj.12158google scholar: lookup
  8. Starke SD, Willems E, Head M, May SA, Pfau T. Proximal hindlimb flexion in the horse: effect on movement symmetry and implications for defining soundness.. Equine Vet J 2012 Nov;44(6):657-63.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00576.xpubmed: 22563757google scholar: lookup
  9. Marshall JF, Lund DG, Voute LC. Use of a wireless, inertial sensor-based system to objectively evaluate flexion tests in the horse.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2012 Dec;(43):8-11.
    pubmed: 23447870doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00611.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weightbearing hindlimb lameness trotting on a treadmill.. Equine Vet J 2004 Dec;36(8):727-33.
    pubmed: 15656505doi: 10.2746/0425164044848244google scholar: lookup
  11. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weight-bearing forelimb lameness trotting on a treadmill.. Vet J 2006 Jan;171(1):135-46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.09.004pubmed: 15974567google scholar: lookup
  12. Maliye S, Voute LC, Marshall JF. Naturally-occurring forelimb lameness in the horse results in significant compensatory load redistribution during trotting.. Vet J 2015 May;204(2):208-13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.005pubmed: 25862395google scholar: lookup
  13. Maliye S, Marshall JF. Objective assessment of the compensatory effect of clinical hind limb lameness in horses: 37 cases (2011-2014).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016 Oct 15;249(8):940-944.
    pubmed: 27700267doi: 10.2460/javma.249.8.940google scholar: lookup
  14. Rhodin M, Persson-Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt MA, Thomsen MH, van Weeren PR, Hernlund E. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot.. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):818-824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  15. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor.. J Exp Biol 2005 Jul;208(Pt 13):2503-14.
    pubmed: 15961737doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658google scholar: lookup
  16. Warner SM, Koch TO, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):417-24.
    pubmed: 21059039doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00200.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  17. Ross MW. Lameness in horses: basic facts before starting In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Lameness in the Horse. 2nd edition Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 3.
  18. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Haubro Andersen P, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner.. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176253.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176253pmc: PMC5404851pubmed: 28441406google scholar: lookup
  19. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Vet J 2017 Sep;49(5):567-569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12715pubmed: 28804943google scholar: lookup
  20. White SC, Gilchrist LA, Wilk BE. Asymmetric limb loading with true or simulated leg-length differences.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 Apr;(421):287-92.
    pubmed: 15123962doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000119460.33630.6dgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Perttunen JR, Anttila E, Södergård J, Merikanto J, Komi PV. Gait asymmetry in patients with limb length discrepancy.. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004 Feb;14(1):49-56.
    pubmed: 14723788doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00307.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Wiggers N, Nauwelaerts SL, Hobbs SJ, Bool S, Wolschrijn CF, Back W. Functional locomotor consequences of uneven forefeet for trot symmetry in individual riding horses.. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0114836.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114836pmc: PMC4315574pubmed: 25646752google scholar: lookup
  23. Ross MW. Manipulation In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 80–88.
  24. Geor R. Nutritional management of the equine athlete, in: Hinchcliff K, Geor R, Kane A editors. Equine Exercise Physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. pp 303–304.
  25. Starke SD, Witte TH, May SA, Pfau T. Accuracy and precision of hind limb foot contact timings of horses determined using a pelvis-mounted inertial measurement unit.. J Biomech 2012 May 11;45(8):1522-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.014pubmed: 22483227google scholar: lookup
  26. McCracken MJ, Kramer J, Keegan KG, Lopes M, Wilson DA, Reed SK, LaCarrubba A, Rasch M. Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation.. Equine Vet J 2012 Nov;44(6):652-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00571.xpubmed: 22563674google scholar: lookup
  27. Pfau T, Boultbee H, Davis H, Walker A, Rhodin M. Agreement between two inertial sensor gait analysis systems for lameness examinations in horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2016;28(4). 203–208.
  28. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness. I: Lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force patterns of the limbs.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988 Sep;(6):99-106.
    pubmed: 9079070doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04655.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Persson-Sjodin E, Barstow A, Forbes B, Rhodin M. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing Thoroughbreds in training.. Equine Vet J 2018 Jan;50(1):117-124.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12705pmc: PMC5724686pubmed: 28548349google scholar: lookup
  30. McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus.. J Exp Biol 2003 Apr;206(Pt 8):1325-36.
    pubmed: 12624168doi: 10.1242/jeb.00254google scholar: lookup
  31. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, Janicek J, Kramer J, Lacarrubba A, Walsh DM, Cassells MW, Esther TM, Schiltz P, Frees KE, Wilhite CL, Clark JM, Pollitt CC, Shaw R, Norris T. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):92-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X479568pubmed: 20156242google scholar: lookup
  32. Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Thoracolumbar movement in sound horses trotting in straight lines in hand and on the lunge and the relationship with hind limb symmetry or asymmetry.. Vet J 2017 Feb;220:95-104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.003pubmed: 28190505google scholar: lookup
  33. Rhodin M, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Effect of lungeing on head and pelvic movement asymmetry in horses with induced lameness.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e39-45.
    pubmed: 24140227doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.031google scholar: lookup
  34. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LE, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Dec;73(12):1890-9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  35. Pfau T, Daly K, Davison J, Bould A, Housby N, Weller R. Changes in movement symmetry over the stages of the shoeing process in military working horses.. Vet Rec 2016 Aug 20;179(8):195.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103516pubmed: 27358309google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Horan K, Kourdache K, Coburn J, Day P, Carnall H, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Hammond L, Millard S, Lancaster B, Pfau T. The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop. PLoS One 2021;16(11):e0257820.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257820pubmed: 34813584google scholar: lookup
  2. Pitts JB, Kramer J, Reed SK, Schiltz P, Thombs L, Keegan KG. Effect of induced hindlimb length difference on body-mounted inertial sensor measures used to evaluate hindlimb lameness in horses. PLoS One 2020;15(2):e0228872.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228872pubmed: 32069321google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.