Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2021; 8; 692031; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.692031

Effect of Speed and Surface Type on Individual Rein and Combined Left-Right Circle Movement Asymmetry in Horses on the Lunge.

Abstract: Differences in movement asymmetry between surfaces and with increasing speed increase the complexity of incorporating gait analysis measurements from lunging into clinical decision making. This observational study sets out to quantify by means of quantitative gait analysis the influence of surface and speed on individual-rein movement asymmetry measurements and their averages across reins (average-rein measurements). Head, withers, and pelvic movement asymmetry was quantified in 27 horses, identified previously as presenting with considerable movement asymmetries on the straight, during trot in hand and on the lunge on two surfaces at two speeds. Mixed linear models (p < 0.05) with horse as the random factor and surface and speed category (and direction) as fixed factors analyzed the effects on 11 individual-rein and average-rein asymmetry measures. Limits of agreement quantified differences between individual-rein and average-rein measurements. A higher number of individual-rein asymmetry variables-particularly when the limb that contributed to movement asymmetry on the straight was on the inside of the circle-were affected by speed (nine variables, all p ≤ 0.047) and surface (three variables, all p ≤ 0.037) compared with average-rein asymmetry variables (two for speed, all p ≤ 0.003; two for surface, all p ≤ 0.046). Six variables were significantly different between straight-line and average-rein assessments (all p ≤ 0.031), and asymmetry values were smaller for average-rein assessments. Limits of agreement bias varied between +0.4 and +4.0 mm with standard deviations between 3.2 and 12.9 mm. Fewer average-rein variables were affected by speed highlighting the benefit of comparing left and right rein measurements. Only one asymmetry variable showed a surface difference for individual-rein and average-rein data, emphasizing the benefit of assessing surface differences on each rein individually. Variability in straight-line vs. average-rein measurements across horses and exercise conditions highlight the potential for average-rein measurements during the diagnostic process; further studies after diagnostic analgesia are needed.
Publication Date: 2021-07-12 PubMed ID: 34322537PubMed Central: PMC8311175DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.692031Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines how speed and type of surface affect the movement asymmetry in horses, and how these factors increase the complexity of incorporating gait analysis measurements into clinical decision making.

Objective of the Research

  • This study aimed to quantify the impact of surface type and speed on the movement asymmetry of horses. This movement asymmetry was measured on individual reins and the averages across reins (average-rein measurements).

Methodology

  • The research was conducted on 27 horses known to present with notable movement asymmetries. During this study, the movement of their head, withers, and pelvic regions were analyzed as they trotted, both in hand and on the lunge, on two types of surfaces and at two different speeds.
  • A statistical approach known as mixed linear models was used to analyze and determine the effects of these factors on 11 types of individual-rein and average-rein asymmetry measures.
  • Difference between individual-rein and average-rein measurements were quantified using a statistical tool called limits of agreement.

Key Findings

  • The results of the study showed that individual-rein asymmetry variables were significantly affected by both speed (nine variables) and surface type (three variables) as compared to average-rein asymmetry variables (two for both speed and surface).
  • Six variables showed considerable differences between ‘straight-line’ and ‘average-rein’ assessments, with asymmetry values lesser in the case of average-rein assessments.
  • The limits of agreement bias varied between +0.4 mm and +4.0 mm, while the standard deviations fluctuated between 3.2mm to 12.9mm. This indicated varying levels of accuracy for the measurement techniques applied.

Implications of the Research

  • The study shows that fewer average-rein variables are influenced by speed, underscoring the advantage of comparing right and left rein measurements.
  • Only one asymmetry variable displayed a variable surface difference for individual and average-rein data. This demonstrates the advantage of assessing surface differences for each rein individually.
  • The discrepancies across straight-line and average-rein measurements in different horses and under varying conditions underscore the potential benefits of using average-rein measurements during the diagnostic process.
  • However, the researchers recommend further studies after diagnostic analgesia to better understand these findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Pfau T, Persson-Sjodin E, Gardner H, Orssten O, Hernlund E, Rhodin M. (2021). Effect of Speed and Surface Type on Individual Rein and Combined Left-Right Circle Movement Asymmetry in Horses on the Lunge. Front Vet Sci, 8, 692031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.692031

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 692031

Researcher Affiliations

Pfau, Thilo
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Persson-Sjodin, Emma
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gardner, Harriet
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Orssten, Olivia
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Conflict of Interest Statement

TP is the owner of EquiGait Ltd., a company providing gait analysis products and services. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Hildebrand M. Symmetrical gaits of horses. Science (1965) 150:701–8.
    doi: 10.1126/science.150.3697.701pubmed: 5844074google scholar: lookup
  2. Ross MW. Movement. In: Mike RW, Sue Dyson J. editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders; (2011).
  3. Baxter GM, Stashak TS. Examination for lameness. In: Baxter GM. editor. Lameness in Horses. Wiley-Blackwell; (2011). 143 p.
  4. Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle. Equine Vet J (2011) 43:686–94.
  5. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LEA, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface. Am J Vet Res (2012) 73:1890–9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  6. Starke SD, Raistrick K, May SA, Pfau T. The effect of trotting speed on the evaluation of subtle lameness in horses. Vet J (2013) 197:245–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.006pubmed: 23611486google scholar: lookup
  7. Rhodin M, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Effect of lungeing on head and pelvic movement asymmetry in horses with induced lameness. Vet J (2013) 198(Suppl.): e39–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.031pubmed: 24140227google scholar: lookup
  8. Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, Rhodin M. Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing. Equine Vet J (2016) 48:78–82.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12385pmc: PMC4964936pubmed: 25399722google scholar: lookup
  9. Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Alterations in body lean angle in lame horses before and after diagnostic analgesia in straight lines in hand and on the lunge. Vet J (2018) 239:1–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.07.006pubmed: 30197103google scholar: lookup
  10. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Rhodin M. Effect of meloxicam treatment on movement asymmetry in riding horses in training. PLoS ONE (2019) 4:e0221117.
  11. McCracken MJ, Kramer J, Keegan KG, Lopes M., Wilson DA, Reed SK. Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:652–6.
  12. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor. J Exp Biol (2005) 208 (Pt 13):2503–14.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658pubmed: 15961737google scholar: lookup
  13. Warner SM, Koch TO, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground. Equine Vet J (2010) 42(Suppl. 3):417–24.
  14. Starke SD, Witte TH, May SA, Pfau T. Accuracy and precision of hind limb foot contact timings of horses determined using a pelvis-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech (2012) 45:1522–8.
  15. Starke SD, Willems E, May SA, Pfau T. Vertical head and trunk movement adaptations of sound horses trotting in a circle on a hard surface. Vet J (2012) 193:73–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.10.019pubmed: 22104508google scholar: lookup
  16. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res (2012) 73:368–74.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  17. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, Whitfield CT, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Associations of force plate and body-mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res (2016) 77:337–45.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.4.337pubmed: 27027831google scholar: lookup
  18. Robilliard JJ, Pfau T, Wilson AM. Gait characterisation and classification in horses. J Exp Biol (2007) 210:187–97.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02611pubmed: 17210956google scholar: lookup
  19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet (1986) 1:307–10.
    doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8pubmed: 2868172google scholar: lookup
  20. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Andersen PH, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner. PLoS ONE (2017) 12:e0176253.
  21. Pfau T, Jennings C, Mitchell H, Olsen E, Walker A, Egenvall A. Lungeing on hard and soft surfaces: movement symmetry of trotting horses considered sound by their owners. Equine Vet J (2016) 48:83–9.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12374pubmed: 25297461google scholar: lookup
  22. Rey A, Goldstein RM, Perruchet P. Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making?. Psychol Res (2009) 73:372–9.
    doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0156-4pubmed: 18626659google scholar: lookup
  23. Pfau T, Boultbee H, Davis H, Walker A, Rhodin M. Agreement between two inertial sensor gait analysis systems for lameness examinations in horses. Equine Vet Educ (2016) 28:203–8.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12400google scholar: lookup
  24. Chateau H, Camus M, Holden-Douilly L, Falala S, Ravary B, Vergari C. Kinetics of the forelimb in horses circling on different ground surfaces at the trot. Vet J (2013) 198:e20–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.028pubmed: 24511634google scholar: lookup
  25. Usherwood JR, Wilson AM. Biomechanics: no force limit on greyhound sprint speed. Nature (2005) 438:753–4.
    doi: 10.1038/438753apubmed: 16341003google scholar: lookup
  26. Dyson SJ, Genovese R. The suspensory apparatus. In: Sue Dyson J, Mike WR. editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders; (2011).
  27. Schmutz A, Chèze L, Jacques J, Martin P. A method to estimate horse speed per stride from one IMU with a machine learning method. Sensors (2020) 20:518.
    doi: 10.3390/s20020518pmc: PMC7014525pubmed: 31963422google scholar: lookup
  28. Persson-Sjodin E, Serra Braganca F, Pfau T, Egenvall A, Weishaupt M, Rhodin M. Movement symmetry of the withers can be used to discriminate primary forelimb lameness from compensatory forelimb asymmetry in horses with induced lameness. Equine Vet J (2016) 48(Suppl.):32.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.64_12595pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  29. Rhodin M, Persson-Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Braganca F, Pfau T, Roepstorff L. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot. Equine Vet J (2018) 50:818–24.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  30. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet J (2018) 50:117–24.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12705pmc: PMC5724686pubmed: 28548349google scholar: lookup