Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2025; 13(1); 16; doi: 10.3390/vetsci13010016

Efficacy of Ozone Bagging Therapy in Equine Chronic Distal Limb Wounds: Clinical Evaluation of Eight Cases.

Abstract: Limb wounds in horses represent a significant therapeutic challenge due to poor vascularization, reduced skin elasticity, and high risk of complications such as exuberant granulation tissue. Conventional treatments sometimes fail to provide satisfactory healing outcomes, leading to prolonged recovery and increased costs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical ozone therapy using the bagging method in promoting the epithelialization and contraction of chronic distal limb wounds in horses refractory to conventional management. Eight horses, aged 3-21 years, with chronic wounds averaging 48.79 ± 21.20 cm2, were treated exclusively with ozone (50 μg/mL) administered by bagging for 30 min every 48 h until complete healing. All cases achieved full wound closure within 27-91 days without systemic medication or major complications. Macroscopic evaluation showed favorable healing, with the restoration of skin pigmentation and hair growth in most cases, while only minimal fibrous scarring was observed in a few patients. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in epithelialization, particularly during the last four weeks of treatment. These findings suggest that ozone bagging therapy is a simple, cost-effective, and well-tolerated method that may enhance the healing of chronic distal limb wounds in horses. Further controlled trials are needed to standardize treatment protocols and compare ozone with conventional therapies.
Publication Date: 2025-12-23 PubMed ID: 41600672PubMed Central: PMC12846506DOI: 10.3390/vetsci13010016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This small case series evaluated topical ozone “bagging” in eight horses with chronic lower-limb wounds that had not responded to standard treatments. All wounds closed within 27–91 days with minimal complications, suggesting ozone may support healing, but controlled comparative trials are still needed.

What the researchers asked and why it matters

  • Question: Can topical ozone gas delivered by the bagging method promote epithelialization and contraction of chronic distal limb wounds in horses that are refractory to conventional care?
  • Rationale: Distal limb wounds in horses often heal poorly due to low vascularity, reduced skin elasticity, motion, and a tendency to develop exuberant granulation tissue, leading to prolonged recovery and high costs.
  • Clinical gap: When standard methods (e.g., cleansing, bandaging, topical antimicrobials/biologics) fail, veterinarians need alternatives that are effective, safe, and practical in field conditions.

Study design and population

  • Design: Prospective clinical case series without a control group.
  • Sample: Eight horses, 3–21 years old, each with a chronic distal limb wound that had not responded to conventional management.
  • Baseline wound size: Mean area 48.79 ± 21.20 cm² (moderate-to-large full-thickness cutaneous defects).
  • Setting: Clinical practice conditions; no systemic medications were used during ozone treatment.

Intervention: Ozone bagging protocol

  • Modality: Topical ozone gas delivered by enclosing the distal limb in an ozone-resistant bag (“bagging”).
  • Dose and schedule: 50 μg/mL ozone for 30 minutes every 48 hours, continued until complete wound closure.
  • Concomitant care: Ozone therapy used exclusively; no systemic drugs and no reported major adjunctive procedures during the ozone phase.
  • Practical note: Bagging typically involves sealing the limb in a bag, insufflating with ozone at a controlled concentration/flow, maintaining exposure for the set time, and venting through an ozone destruct unit to protect handlers.

Outcomes and measurements

  • Primary outcome: Time to complete wound closure (re-epithelialization with contraction).
  • Secondary/qualitative outcomes: Macroscopic healing quality, including restoration of skin pigmentation and hair growth; presence and degree of scarring; complications.
  • Epithelialization dynamics: Statistical analysis examined changes over time, with emphasis on trends during later treatment weeks.

Key findings

  • Closure rate: 8/8 horses achieved full wound closure.
  • Time to heal: 27–91 days across cases, despite prior refractoriness to conventional care.
  • Healing quality: Favorable macroscopic outcomes; most cases showed return of pigmentation and hair, with only minimal fibrous scarring in a few patients.
  • Epithelialization: Significant improvements were observed, particularly during the final four weeks of treatment, suggesting an acceleration or cumulative effect over time.
  • Safety: No major complications were reported; therapy was well tolerated without systemic support.

How ozone might help these wounds (biological plausibility)

  • Antimicrobial action: Ozone and its reactive species can reduce bacterial and fungal burden, potentially lowering infection-driven delays in equine distal limb wounds.
  • Biofilm disruption: Oxidative effects may weaken microbial biofilms that resist conventional antiseptics.
  • Pro-healing signaling: Controlled oxidative stress can activate cytoprotective pathways (e.g., Nrf2), modulate inflammation, and promote growth factor expression relevant to angiogenesis and fibroblast activity.
  • Perfusion and oxygenation: Ozone exposure may improve local oxygen delivery indirectly (e.g., by effects on red blood cells and microcirculation), supporting granulation tissue maturation and epithelial cell migration.
  • Tissue remodeling: Balanced oxidative cues may help limit exuberant granulation tissue and encourage orderly matrix deposition and contraction.

Strengths and contributions

  • Clinical relevance: Focus on a notoriously difficult wound category in horses.
  • Consistency: Uniform ozone protocol (50 μg/mL, 30 minutes every 48 hours) across cases.
  • Practicality: Demonstrates a protocol that can be performed in typical equine practice without systemic drugs.
  • Outcome completeness: All cases followed to full closure with qualitative cosmetic assessments.

Limitations and potential biases

  • No control group: Cannot separate ozone effects from natural healing, improved bandaging, or time; comparative efficacy remains unknown.
  • Small sample (n=8): Limits generalizability and statistical power; outcomes may not represent broader populations or all wound types.
  • Selection bias: “Refractory” cases may have heterogeneous prior care; unmeasured factors (e.g., debridement quality, contamination level, limb motion management) could influence results.
  • Assessment bias: Macroscopic evaluations are partly subjective; blinding was not described.
  • Protocol details: Exact ozone generation parameters (flow rate, gas volume, bag material) and standardized wound measurement methods were not specified in the abstract.

Clinical implications

  • Use case: Consider ozone bagging as an adjunct or alternative when standard topical therapies fail in distal limb wounds, especially where bioburden and chronic inflammation are concerns.
  • Expected course: Healing may require weeks to months; improvements in epithelialization may be more pronounced after several weeks of consistent therapy.
  • Cosmesis: Potential for hair regrowth and pigment return with minimal scarring in many cases is encouraging for performance and cosmetic outcomes.
  • Antibiotic stewardship: The absence of systemic medications suggests potential to reduce antimicrobial use when infection is localized and manageable.

Safety and practical considerations for implementation

  • Handler safety: Prevent ozone inhalation with good ventilation and ozone destruct units; avoid exposure to eyes and mucosa.
  • Tissue safety: Use validated concentrations (e.g., around 50 μg/mL for topical gas) and durations to avoid oxidative tissue injury or delayed healing from excessive dosing.
  • Bandaging: Maintain appropriate compression/protective bandages between sessions to control motion, edema, and contamination—critical cofactors in equine distal limb healing.
  • Monitoring: Track wound area, granulation tissue characteristics, exudate, odor, and pain; adjust frequency if excessive desiccation or irritation occurs.

How this compares with conventional and adjunctive options

  • Standard care: Cleansing, moisture-balanced dressings, topical antimicrobials, judicious debridement, and motion/edema control remain foundational.
  • Other adjuncts: Silver dressings, honey/sugar, negative-pressure therapy, platelet-rich plasma, skin grafts, and biologics can be effective but vary in cost, logistics, and evidence strength.
  • Relative position: Ozone bagging appears simple and potentially cost-effective, but head-to-head trials are needed to define where it outperforms or complements these therapies.

Cost and logistics

  • Equipment: Requires an ozone generator, ozone-resistant bags/sleeves, seals, and a destruct unit; consumables are relatively inexpensive once equipment is available.
  • Time: 30-minute sessions every 48 hours align with typical bandage change schedules in equine practice.
  • Potential savings: Faster closure without systemic drugs can reduce overall care costs, though formal economic analyses are needed.

What to look for in future research

  • Controlled trials: Randomized comparisons versus standard care or other adjuncts to quantify efficacy, time-to-closure, infection control, and cosmetic outcomes.
  • Dose optimization: Systematic evaluation of ozone concentration, exposure time, and frequency; criteria for starting/stopping therapy.
  • Standardized outcomes: Objective planimetry, blinded assessments, microbiology, pain/function metrics, and long-term recurrence/scar quality.
  • Subgroup analyses: Effects across wound etiologies, contamination levels, presence of exuberant granulation tissue, and limb locations.
  • Safety profiling: Adverse event tracking across larger cohorts and varied field conditions.

Bottom line

  • This small case series suggests ozone bagging at 50 μg/mL every 48 hours can achieve complete closure with good cosmetic results in chronic equine distal limb wounds that previously failed standard care.
  • Given design limitations, these findings are promising but preliminary; robust controlled studies are required before routine adoption as first-line therapy.

Cite This Article

APA
Repciuc CC, Oros NV, Mureșan ȘMC, Sevastre B, Joaquim JGF, Oana LI. (2025). Efficacy of Ozone Bagging Therapy in Equine Chronic Distal Limb Wounds: Clinical Evaluation of Eight Cases. Vet Sci, 13(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010016

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 1
PII: 16

Researcher Affiliations

Repciuc, Călin Cosmin
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oros, Nicușor-Valentin
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mureșan, Ștefana Maria Cristina
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sevastre, Bogdan
  • Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Joaquim, Jean Guilherme Fernandes
  • Bioethicus Institute, Botucatu 18605-545, SP, Brazil.
Oana, Liviu-Ioan
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Harman RM, Theoret CL, Van de Walle GR. The horse as a model for the study of cutaneous wound healing.. Adv. Wound Care 2021;10:381–399.
    doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0883pubmed: 34042536google scholar: lookup
  2. Jacobs KA, Leach DH, Fretz PB, Townsend HGG. Comparative aspects of the healing of excisional wounds on the leg and body of horses.. Vet. Surg. 1984;13:83–90.
  3. Bertone A. Management of exuberant granulation tissue.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1989;5:551–556.
    pubmed: 2691030
  4. Jørgensen E, Bay L, Skovgaard LT, Bjarnsholt T, Jacobsen S. An equine wound model to study effects of bacterial aggregates on wound healing.. Adv. Wound Care 2019;8:487–498.
    doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0901pmc: PMC6709944pubmed: 31456906google scholar: lookup
  5. García CA, Eurides D, Berbert RP, Rodrigues M, Neves SMN, Rinaldi F. Skin healing in one equine by therapy with ozone.. Rev. CENIC Cienc. Biol. 2010;41:1–6.
  6. Travagli V, Zanardi I, Bocci V. Topical applications of ozone and ozonated oils as anti-infective agents: An insight into the patent claims.. Recent Pat. Anti-Infect. Drug Discov. 2009;4:130–142.
    doi: 10.2174/157489109788490271pubmed: 19519548google scholar: lookup
  7. Travagli V, Zanardi I, Valacchi G, Bocci V. Ozone and ozonated oils in skin diseases: A review.. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010;2010:610418.
    doi: 10.1155/2010/610418pmc: PMC2910505pubmed: 20671923google scholar: lookup
  8. Miura T, Iwai A, Tamoto K, Yamazaki A, Nochi H. Components and anti-inflammatory action mechanism of ozonized olive oil. Proceedings of the 19th Ozone World Congress of the IOA; Tokyo, Japan. 31 August–3 September 2009; pp. 145–166.
  9. Valacchi G, Lim Y, Belmonte G, Miracco C, Zanardi I, Bocci V, Travagli V. Ozonated sesame oil enhances cutaneous wound healing in SKH1 mice.. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19:107–115.
  10. ISCO3. Madrid Declaration on Ozone Therapy.. 3rd ed. International Scientific Committee of Ozone Therapy; Madrid, Spain: 2020.
  11. Camps-Ramírez AM, Claro-González JN, Cuesta-Guillén A. Aplicación tópica del oleozón como alternativa de tratamiento en lesiones causadas por fricción en caballos de tiro.. REDVET Rev. Electrón. Vet. 2006;7:1695–7504.
  12. Kosachenco B, Calliari C, Appel B, Mentz F, Malschitzky E. Efecto terapéutico de la Ozonoterapia en la cicatrización de heridas en perros: Reporte de casos.. Rev. Esp. Ozonoter. 2018;8:197–210.
  13. Kim HS, Noh SU, Han YW, Kim KM, Kang H, Kim HO, Park YM. Therapeutic effects of topical application of ozone on acute cutaneous wound healing.. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2009;24:368–374.
    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.3.368pmc: PMC2698179pubmed: 19543419google scholar: lookup
  14. Hendrickson D, Virgin J. Factors that affect equine wound repair.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2005;21:33–44.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.11.002pubmed: 15691598google scholar: lookup
  15. WFOT. WFOT’s Review on Evidence-Based Ozone Therapy.. World Federation of Ozone Therapy, 2015. [(accessed on 6 September 2023)]. Available online: https://www.wfoot.org/.
  16. Zhang J, Guan M, Xie C, Luo X, Zhang Q, Xue Y. Increased growth factors play a role in wound healing promoted by noninvasive oxygen-ozone therapy in diabetic foot ulcers.. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014;2014:273475.
    doi: 10.1155/2014/273475pmc: PMC4096389pubmed: 25089169google scholar: lookup
  17. Bocci V. Ozone. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2010. pp. 17–24.
    doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9234-2google scholar: lookup
  18. Repciuc C.C., Luca V, Chirilă F, Pop G, Oana L.I.. Antibacterial effect of topical ozone in horses with distal limb infected wounds.. Agricultura 2019;111:328–332.
  19. Montevecchi M, Dorigo A, Cricca M, Checchi L. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of an ozonated oil with chlorhexidine digluconate and povidone-iodine: A disk diffusion test.. New Microbiol. 2013;36:289–302.
    pubmed: 23912871
  20. Carrijo B.N., Pires R.H., Costa G.B., Guiotto F.G., Rodrigues V.S., Ferreira J.C.. Ozone gas and ozonized sunflower oil as alternative therapies against Pythium insidiosum isolated from dogs.. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2022;44:398–406.
  21. Ferreira J.C., Pires R.H., Costa G.B.D., Carrijo B.N., Guiotto F.G., Rodrigues V.S.. The in vitro effect of ozone therapy against equine Pythium insidiosum.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;98:103305.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103305pubmed: 33663716google scholar: lookup
  22. Paz G.S., Camargo G.G., Cury J.E., Apolonio E.V.P., Garces H.G., Prado A.C.D., Chechi J.L., Oliveira A.L., Watanabe M.J., Bagagli E.. Outbreak of equine pythiosis in a southeastern region of Brazil: Environmental isolation and phylogeny.. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021;69:1617–1624.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.14135pubmed: 33991402google scholar: lookup
  23. Di Filippo P.A., Ribeiro L.M.F., Gobbi F.P., Lemos G.B., Rodrigues R.B.R., Jerdy H., da Silva L.C., Viana I.S., Quirino C.R.. Effects of pure and ozonated sunflower seed oil on hypergranulation, infection, and healing of equine distal limb wounds.. Braz. J. Vet. Med. 2020;42:e113520.
  24. María A., Calles E., Denis R., Labrada A.. El oleozón como nueva alternativa terapéutica en medicina veterinaria.. REDVET Rev. Electrón. Vet. 2006;7:1–5.
  25. Romary D.J., Landsberger S.A., Bradner K.N., Ramirez M., Leon B.R.. Liquid ozone therapies for epithelial wounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Int. Wound J. 2023;20:1235–1252.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.13941pmc: PMC10031250pubmed: 36056800google scholar: lookup
  26. Araujo A.L., Teixeira F.A., Lacerda T.F., Flecher M.C., Souza V.R.C., Coelho C.S.. Effects of topical application of pure and ozonized andiroba oil on experimentally induced wounds in horses.. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2017;54:66.
  27. Flamia L.B.G., Wilmsen M.O.. Utilização de três técnicas de ozonioterapia no tratamento de ferida em casco equino: Relato de caso.. Braz. J. Dev. 2021;7:104613–104623.
    doi: 10.34117/bjdv7n11-198google scholar: lookup
  28. Bocci V. Oxygen-Ozone Therapy. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2002.
    doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9952-8google scholar: lookup
  29. Carnevali F., Argentieri M., Ippedico G., Minniti C.A., Amodio L., Mellano L., van der Esch S.A.. Managing horse wounds with or without exuberant granulation tissue using an innovative wound dressing: A retrospective study.. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2014;1:6–16.
  30. Pchepiorka R., Moreira M.S., Lascane N.A.S., Catalani L.H., Allegrini S., Jr., de Lima N.B., Gonçalves E.F.. Effect of ozone therapy on wound healing in rat buccal mucosa.. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020;119:104889.
  31. Huth K.C., Saugel B., Jakob F.M., Cappello C., Quirling M., Paschos E., Ern K., Hickel R., Brand K. Effect of aqueous ozone on the NF-κB system. J. Dent. Res. 2007;86:451–456.
    doi: 10.1177/154405910708600512pubmed: 17452567google scholar: lookup
  32. Luo J., Chen A.F.. Nitric oxide: A newly discovered role in wound healing. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2005;26:259–264.
  33. Re L., Sanchez G.M., Mawsouf N. Clinical evidence of ozone interaction with pain mediators. Saudi Med. J. 2010;31:1363–1367.
    pubmed: 21136002
  34. Rilling S., Viebahn R. The Use of Ozone in Medicine. Haug Publishers; Heidelberg, Germany: 1987.
  35. Cisterna B., Costanzo M., Lacavalla M.A., Galiè M., Angelini O., Tabaracci G., Malatesta M. Low ozone concentrations affect structural and functional features of fibroblasts in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:10133.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms221810133pmc: PMC8466365pubmed: 34576295google scholar: lookup
  36. Ogut E. Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of ozone therapy in enhancing vasculogenesis and angiogenesis through growth factor activation and oxidative signaling pathways. Discov. Med. 2025;2:240.
  37. He S., Chen W., Xia J., Lai Z., Yu D., Yao J., Cai S. Effects of ozone autohemotherapy on blood VEGF, TGF-β and PDGF levels after finger replantation. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2020;9:3332–3339.
    doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1467pubmed: 33065786google scholar: lookup
  38. Fitzpatrick E., Holland O.J., Vanderlelie J.J. Ozone therapy for the treatment of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Int. Wound. J. 2018;15:633–644.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.12907pmc: PMC7949634pubmed: 29536625google scholar: lookup
  39. Valacchi G., Fortino V., Bocci V. The dual action of ozone on the skin. Br. J. Dermatol. 2005;153:1096–1100.
  40. Silva D.R., Guimarães A.L., Vieira A.M.R.A., Duarte E.D., Almeida E.M., Maximiano H.A., Viana T.D.S., Silva W.S.L. Ozone therapy in equines. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2024;11:15–19.
    doi: 10.22161/ijaers.1112.3google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.