Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2026; 254; 106926; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.106926

Estimating the economic value of working donkeys in Ethiopia.

Abstract: There is limited empirical evidence on the quantitative economic contribution of donkeys to livelihoods, leading to their undervaluation and exclusion from policy. Here an enterprise budget analysis is embedded within a stochastic dynamic population model for three production systems in Ethiopia to evaluate system inputs, outputs and the economic contribution of donkeys. The model was parameterised using data from household surveys, focus group discussions and key informant interviews, supplemented by literature. The economic value of donkeys' (unpaid) homestead and agricultural services was estimated in terms of both monetary savings and conserved human labour hours. The benefits of donkey ownership significantly exceed the costs, with an average net return of USD 567 (95% PI: 479-660) per household per year. Donkeys provide essential unpaid labour, particularly in domestic agricultural and pastoral systems. Households saved an average of USD 498 (95% PI: 437-564) a year by utilising their own donkeys. Additionally, they reduce household labour demands by up to 16.5 hours per week, easing the workload on women and enabling children to attend school. In agriculture, donkeys support all production stages, providing an average of 53 days of work per year. This study demonstrates the importance of donkeys across Ethiopia's production systems and the need for investment in donkey health and welfare to sustain these benefits. Donkeys provide essential economic services, helping marginalised households with limited resources to significantly enhance their well-being and financial circumstances.
Publication Date: 2026-05-30 PubMed ID: 42229176DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.106926Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research quantifies the economic value of working donkeys across different production systems in Ethiopia, highlighting their significant contributions to household livelihoods and the importance of investing in their health and welfare.

Background and Purpose

  • Donkeys in Ethiopia play a vital role in supporting rural households by providing unpaid labor, but their economic contributions are often undervalued and neglected in policy decisions.
  • This study aims to fill the empirical gap by quantitatively assessing the economic benefits derived from donkeys in different Ethiopian production systems.

Methodology

  • The researchers integrated an enterprise budget analysis within a stochastic dynamic population model to evaluate inputs, outputs, and economic impacts related to donkeys.
  • Three production systems were analyzed, likely including domestic, agricultural, and pastoral systems, to reflect diverse donkey uses across Ethiopia.
  • Data sources included:
    • Household surveys to gather primary data on donkey use and benefits.
    • Focus group discussions and key informant interviews to obtain qualitative insights and contextual information.
    • Existing literature to supplement and validate findings.
  • The model estimated not only monetary savings from donkey labor but also human labor hours conserved.

Key Findings

  • Donkey ownership provided a substantial net economic return of approximately USD 567 per household per year, indicating that the benefits significantly exceed associated costs.
  • Households saved around USD 498 annually by using their own donkeys instead of alternatives, such as hired labor or mechanized transport.
  • Donkeys reduced labor demands on household members by up to 16.5 hours per week, especially alleviating workload on women and enabling children to attend school.
  • In agricultural contexts, donkeys supported all stages of production, averaging 53 working days per year per household.

Implications

  • The study highlights donkeys’ role as essential providers of unpaid economic services in Ethiopia’s rural production systems.
  • By enabling marginalised households with limited resources to enhance productivity and well-being, donkeys contribute to poverty alleviation and livelihood sustainability.
  • Investment in donkey health and welfare is crucial to maintaining and improving these economic benefits, implying a need for policy inclusion and support programs targeting donkey populations.
  • Recognition of donkeys’ value can lead to better resource allocation for veterinary services, training, and infrastructure to support donkey welfare.

Conclusion

  • The research establishes a clear economic case for valuing working donkeys in Ethiopia, demonstrating their critical input in enhancing household income and labor efficiency.
  • Enabling policy frameworks and community investments focused on donkey health and welfare can sustain and amplify these benefits, supporting rural livelihoods across the country.

Cite This Article

APA
Asteraye GB, Jobling R, Jemberu WT, Pinchbeck G, Knight-Jones TJD, Chaters GL, Rushton J. (2026). Estimating the economic value of working donkeys in Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med, 254, 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.106926

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 254
Pages: 106926
PII: S0167-5877(26)00145-5

Researcher Affiliations

Asteraye, Girma Birhan
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Department of Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. Electronic address: Girma.Asteraye@ed.ac.uk.
Jobling, Ruth
  • Brooke: Action for Working Horses and Donkeys, London, United Kingdom.
Jemberu, Wudu T
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Pinchbeck, Gina
  • Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Department of Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J D
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Chaters, Gemma L
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; The Centre for Health Informatics, Computing and Statistics (CHICAS), Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Rushton, Jonathan
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.