Analyze Diet
Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS2026; 1-22; doi: 10.1080/10888705.2026.2676630

Horse Welfare 12: A Human Behavior Change Framework for Improving Horse Welfare.

Abstract: To improve horse welfare do we need more science or a different scientific approach? For over 40 years researchers have called for change to improve horse welfare. During this time, publications have grown exponentially, improving our understanding of horse's needs and the need for change. However, the translation of science into practice is arguably too slow, and yet, there is scant industry-specific research to guide change efforts. To assist behaviour change research, this paper recasts an influential, highly regarded systems thinking framework, the Meadows 12, for the horse industry as the Horse Welfare 12 (HW12). The HW12 identifies 12 places to intervene in a system (horse industry), ranking them from least to most effective, providing researchers with an accessible, practical tool that can be adapted for any species or animal use industry. The HW12 is based on the authors' combined industry lived experience, and extensive horse welfare and systems thinking research. The HW12 is a roadmap that could accelerate translating science into practice, which is perhaps the missing piece of the welfare science puzzle for creating meaningful horse welfare improvements.
Publication Date: 2026-05-21 PubMed ID: 42166248DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2026.2676630Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article presents a new framework, called the Horse Welfare 12 (HW12), designed to improve horse welfare by targeting human behavior change within the horse industry.
  • The framework adapts a well-known systems thinking model (the Meadows 12) to provide practical intervention points aimed at accelerating the application of scientific knowledge to real-world practices.

Introduction and Background

  • The article highlights that despite decades of research into horse welfare, progress in improving conditions for horses has been slower than expected.
  • There has been an exponential increase in scientific publications about horse welfare, enhancing our understanding of horses’ needs and challenges.
  • However, the conversion of this scientific knowledge into effective, widespread changes in behavior and industry practices remains limited.
  • The authors argue that the problem may not be the lack of science, but rather the lack of appropriate frameworks to guide behavior change efforts within the horse community and industry.

The Need for a New Approach

  • Existing research often does not sufficiently address the human elements that affect horse welfare, such as attitudes, culture, and decision-making processes within the industry.
  • There is a scarcity of industry-specific research focused on how best to implement changes to improve welfare practically and sustainably.
  • The authors propose that improving horse welfare requires a systems thinking approach that identifies leverage points for meaningful intervention.

The Meadows 12 Framework and Its Adaptation

  • The Meadows 12 is a well-regarded systems thinking framework originally developed to identify 12 places to intervene in complex systems, ranked from least to most impactful.
  • This framework helps identify where and how to most effectively induce change within a complex network of interactions.
  • The authors have adapted this framework specifically for the horse industry, creating the Horse Welfare 12 (HW12).
  • The HW12 identifies 12 intervention points within the horse industry system, offering a ranked roadmap for where behavior change efforts might have the greatest effect on improving welfare.

Features and Benefits of the HW12 Framework

  • HW12 provides a practical and accessible tool for researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers to design and prioritize interventions.
  • The framework is based on the authors’ combined extensive experience in the horse industry, horse welfare, and systems thinking research, strengthening its relevance and applicability.
  • The HW12 can be adapted for use not just in the horse industry but also for welfare improvements in other species or animal-related industries.
  • By focusing on human behavior change and systemic intervention points, the framework aims to accelerate the translation of scientific knowledge into actual welfare improvements.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The HW12 framework addresses a critical gap in welfare science: transforming research findings into effective and sustained practice changes.
  • The authors suggest that this framework could be the “missing piece” needed to create meaningful, lasting improvements in horse welfare worldwide.
  • The paper encourages researchers and industry professionals to adopt this systems thinking approach as part of future welfare improvement strategies.
  • Ultimately, the HW12 could enhance collaboration, focus efforts on high-impact areas, and improve the overall welfare outcomes for horses by influencing human behavior change in a structured and systematic way.

Cite This Article

APA
Luke KL, Hockenhull J, Furtado T, Ainley N, Osborne M. (2026). Horse Welfare 12: A Human Behavior Change Framework for Improving Horse Welfare. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2026.2676630

Publication

ISSN: 1532-7604
NlmUniqueID: 9804404
Country: England
Language: English
Pages: 1-22

Researcher Affiliations

Luke, Karen L
  • Independent Researcher, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hockenhull, Jo
  • University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Furtado, Tamzin
  • University of Liverpool, Wirral, UK.
Ainley, Naomi
  • Animal Management, Equine and Veterinary Nursing, Northumberland College, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Osborne, Meta
  • Independent Researcher, Naas, Ireland.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.