Analyze Diet
Stem cells translational medicine2017; 7(1); 98-108; doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0071

Allogeneic Stem Cells Alter Gene Expression and Improve Healing of Distal Limb Wounds in Horses.

Abstract: Distal extremity wounds are a significant clinical problem in horses and humans and may benefit from mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy. This study evaluated the effects of direct wound treatment with allogeneic stem cells, in terms of gross, histologic, and transcriptional features of healing. Three full-thickness cutaneous wounds were created on each distal forelimb in six healthy horses, for a total of six wounds per horse. Umbilical cord-blood derived equine MSCs were applied to each wound 1 day after wound creation, in one of four forms: (a) normoxic- or (b) hypoxic-preconditioned cells injected into wound margins, or (c) normoxic- or (d) hypoxic-preconditioned cells embedded in an autologous fibrin gel and applied topically to the wound bed. Controls were one blank (saline) injected wound and one blank fibrin gel-treated wound per horse. Data were collected weekly for 6 weeks and included wound surface area, thermography, gene expression, and histologic scoring. Results indicated that MSC treatment by either delivery method was safe and improved histologic outcomes and wound area. Hypoxic-preconditioning did not offer an advantage. MSC treatment by injection resulted in statistically significant increases in transforming growth factor beta and cyclooxygenase-2 expression at week 1. Histologically, significantly more MSC-treated wounds were categorized as pro-healing than pro-inflammatory. Wound area was significantly affected by treatment: MSC-injected wounds were consistently smaller than gel-treated or control wounds. In conclusion, MSC therapy shows promise for distal extremity wounds in horses, particularly when applied by direct injection into the wound margin. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:98-108.
Publication Date: 2017-10-24 PubMed ID: 29063737PubMed Central: PMC5746157DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0071Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on the use of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy to improve the healing of distal extremity wounds in horses, discovering that direct injection of these cells into the wound area resulted in better healing outcomes.

Objectives and Methodology of the Study

  • The study set out to understand the impact of direct treatment of wounds using allogeneic stem cells. The focus was on the gross, histologic, and transcriptional characteristics of the healing process.
  • Three full-thickness cutaneous wounds were created on the distal forelimb of six healthy horses, thus making a total of six wounds per horse.
  • Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), derived from umbilical cord blood, were applied to each wound on the day following wound creation using four methods: injection of cells preconditioned in normal or low oxygen (normoxic or hypoxic) environments into wound margins, or use of normoxic or hypoxic-preconditioned cells placed within autologous fibrin gels and applied topically to the wound bed.
  • Control wounds were treated with saline injection or blank fibrin gel.

Collection of Data and Findings

  • Data were collected for six weeks and included measurements of wound surface area, thermography results, gene expression levels, and scores derived from histologic examination.
  • The results showed that regardless of the method of delivery, MSC treatment was safe and improved histologic outcomes and wound area size.
  • However, preconditioning the stem cells in a low-oxygen or hypoxic environment did not provide any additional benefits.
  • Direct injection of the MSCs into the wound margins led to significant increases in the expression of two key wound healing markers, transforming growth factor beta and cyclooxygenase-2.
  • From a histologic perspective, wounds that received MSC treatment were more likely to be classified as pro-healing than pro-inflammatory.
  • The area of the wounds was also significantly affected by treatment: wounds where MSCs were injected were consistently smaller than those treated with gel or controls.

Conclusion

  • The findings of the research suggest that MSC therapy could show promise in the treatment of distal extremity wounds in horses. The results were particularly positive when the cells were directly injected into the wound margins.

Cite This Article

APA
Textor JA, Clark KC, Walker NJ, Aristizobal FA, Kol A, LeJeune SS, Bledsoe A, Davidyan A, Gray SN, Bohannon-Worsley LK, Woolard KD, Borjesson DL. (2017). Allogeneic Stem Cells Alter Gene Expression and Improve Healing of Distal Limb Wounds in Horses. Stem Cells Transl Med, 7(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0071

Publication

ISSN: 2157-6564
NlmUniqueID: 101578022
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 98-108

Researcher Affiliations

Textor, Jamie A
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Clark, Kaitlin C
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Walker, Naomi J
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Aristizobal, Fabio A
  • Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Kol, Amir
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
LeJeune, Sarah S
  • Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Bledsoe, Andrea
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Davidyan, Arik
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Gray, Sarah N
  • Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Bohannon-Worsley, Laurie K
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Woolard, Kevin D
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Borjesson, Dori L
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Hypoxia
  • Cyclooxygenase 2 / analysis
  • Female
  • Fetal Blood / cytology
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / cytology
  • Skin / injuries
  • Transforming Growth Factor beta / analysis
  • Wound Healing / physiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy

References

This article includes 69 references
  1. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S. Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:763–771.
    pmc: PMC2810192pubmed: 19903300
  2. Clark RA, Ghosh K, Tonnesen MG. Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds.. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:1018–1029.
    pubmed: 17435787
  3. Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E. Bioprinted amniotic fluid‐derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds.. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2012;1:792–802.
    pmc: PMC3659666pubmed: 23197691
  4. Wilmink JM, van Weeren PR, Stolk PW. Differences in second‐intention wound healing between horses and ponies: Histological aspects.. Equine Vet J 1999;31:61–67.
    pubmed: 9952331
  5. Wilmink JM, Veenman JN, van den Boom R. Differences in polymorphonucleocyte function and local inflammatory response between horses and ponies.. Equine Vet J 2003;35:561–569.
    pubmed: 14515955
  6. Theoret CL, Barber SM, Moyana TN. Preliminary observations on expression of transforming growth factors beta1 and beta3 in equine full‐thickness skin wounds healing normally or with exuberant granulation tissue.. Vet Surg 2002;31:266–273.
    pubmed: 11994855
  7. Dubuc V, Lepault E, Theoret CL. Endothelial cell hypertrophy is associated with microvascular occlusion in horse wounds.. Can J Vet Res 2006;70:206–210.
    pmc: PMC1477938pubmed: 16850943
  8. Lepault E, Celeste C, Dore M. Comparative study on microvascular occlusion and apoptosis in body and limb wounds in the horse.. Wound Repair Regen 2005;13:520–529.
    pubmed: 16176461
  9. Celeste CJ, Deschene K, Riley CB. Regional differences in wound oxygenation during normal healing in an equine model of cutaneous fibroproliferative disorder.. Wound Repair Regen 2011;19:89–97.
    pubmed: 20955347
  10. Deschene K, Celeste C, Boerboom D. Hypoxia regulates the expression of extracellular matrix associated proteins in equine dermal fibroblasts via HIF1.. J Dermatol Sci 2012;65:12–18.
    pubmed: 21999945
  11. Theoret CL, Olutoye OO, Parnell LK. Equine exuberant granulation tissue and human keloids: A comparative histopathologic study.. Vet Surg 2013;42:783–789.
    pubmed: 24015864
  12. Theoret CL, Wilmink JM. Aberrant wound healing in the horse: Naturally occurring conditions reminiscent of those observed in man.. Wound Repair Regen 2013;21:365–371.
    pubmed: 23441750
  13. Kim SW, Zhang HZ, Guo L. Amniotic mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing in diabetic NOD/SCID mice through high angiogenic and engraftment capabilities.. PloS one 2012;7:e41105.
    pmc: PMC3398889pubmed: 22815931
  14. Kim WS, Sung JH. Hypoxic culturing enhances the wound‐healing potential of adipose‐derived stem cells.. Adv Wound Care 2012;1:172–176.
    pmc: PMC3623590pubmed: 24527300
  15. Liu L, Yu Y, Hou Y. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation promotes cutaneous wound healing of severe burned rats.. PloS one 2014;9:e88348.
    pmc: PMC3930522pubmed: 24586314
  16. Spaas JH, Broeckx S, Van de Walle GR. The effects of equine peripheral blood stem cells on cutaneous wound healing: A clinical evaluation in four horses.. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013;38:280–284.
    pmc: PMC3627309pubmed: 23517358
  17. Zhang J, La X, Fan L. Immunosuppressive effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in rat burn models.. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:5129–5136.
    pmc: PMC4503080pubmed: 26191208
  18. Chacko SM, Ahmed S, Selvendiran K. Hypoxic preconditioning induces the expression of prosurvival and proangiogenic markers in mesenchymal stem cells.. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010;299:C1562–C1570.
    pmc: PMC3006322pubmed: 20861473
  19. Chen L, Xu Y, Zhao J. Conditioned medium from hypoxic bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells enhances wound healing in mice.. PloS one 2014;9:e96161.
    pmc: PMC4004560pubmed: 24781370
  20. Kim JW, Lee JH, Lyoo YS. The effects of topical mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in canine experimental cutaneous wounds.. Vet Dermatol 2013;24:242–e253.
    pmc: PMC3618380pubmed: 23432413
  21. Egana JT, Fierro FA, Kruger S. Use of human mesenchymal cells to improve vascularization in a mouse model for scaffold‐based dermal regeneration.. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15:1191–1200.
    pubmed: 18925832
  22. Weinstein‐Oppenheimer CR, Aceituno AR, Brown DI. The effect of an autologous cellular gel‐matrix integrated implant system on wound healing.. J Transl Med 2010;8:59.
    pmc: PMC2907325pubmed: 20565787
  23. Falanga V, Iwamoto S, Chartier M. Autologous bone marrow‐derived cultured mesenchymal stem cells delivered in a fibrin spray accelerate healing in murine and human cutaneous wounds.. Tissue Eng 2007;13:1299–1312.
    pubmed: 17518741
  24. Mendez JJ, Ghaedi M, Sivarapatna A. Mesenchymal stromal cells form vascular tubes when placed in fibrin sealant and accelerate wound healing in vivo.. Biomaterials 2015;40:61–71.
    pmc: PMC4268422pubmed: 25433608
  25. Smith RK, Werling NJ, Dakin SG. Beneficial effects of autologous bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in naturally occurring tendinopathy.. PloS one 2013;8:e75697.
    pmc: PMC3783421pubmed: 24086616
  26. Van Loon VJ, Scheffer CJ, Genn HJ. Clinical follow‐up of horses treated with allogeneic equine mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood for different tendon and ligament disorders.. Vet Q 2014;34:92–97.
    pubmed: 25072527
  27. Broeckx SY, Borena BM, Van Hecke L. Comparison of autologous versus allogeneic epithelial‐like stem cell treatment in an in vivo equine skin wound model.. Cytotherapy 2015;17:1434–1446.
    pubmed: 26212608
  28. Bussche L, Harman RM, Syracuse BA. Microencapsulated equine mesenchymal stromal cells promote cutaneous wound healing in vitro.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015;6:66.
    pmc: PMC4413990pubmed: 25889766
  29. Spaas JH, Gomiero C, Broeckx SY. Wound‐healing markers after autologous and allogeneic epithelial‐like stem cell treatment.. Cytotherapy 2016;18:562–569.
    pubmed: 26971684
  30. Burk J, Ribitsch I, Gittel C. Growth and differentiation characteristics of equine mesenchymal stromal cells derived from different sources.. Vet J 2013;195:98–106.
    pubmed: 22841420
  31. Iacono E, Brunori L, Pirrone A. Isolation, characterization and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood and Wharton's jelly in the horse.. Reproduction 2012;143:455–468.
    pubmed: 22274885
  32. Broeckx SY, Maes S, Martinello T. Equine epidermis: A source of epithelial‐like stem/progenitor cells with in vitro and in vivo regenerative capacities.. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:1134–1148.
    pubmed: 24368059
  33. Aguiar C, Therrien J, Lemire P. Differentiation of equine induced pluripotent stem cells into a keratinocyte lineage.. Equine Vet J 2016;48:338–345.
    pubmed: 25781637
  34. Hackett CH, Greve L, Novakofski KD. Comparison of gene‐specific DNA methylation patterns in equine induced pluripotent stem cell lines with cells derived from equine adult and fetal tissues.. Stem Cells Dev 2012;21:1803–1811.
    pmc: PMC3376462pubmed: 21988203
  35. Lepage SI, Nagy K, Sung HK. Generation, characterization, and multilineage potency of mesenchymal‐like progenitors derived from equine induced pluripotent stem cells.. Stem Cells Dev 2016;25:80–89.
    pubmed: 26414480
  36. Sharma R, Livesey MR, Wyllie DJ. Generation of functional neurons from feeder‐free, keratinocyte‐derived equine induced pluripotent stem cells.. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:1524–1534.
    pubmed: 24548115
  37. Whitworth DJ, Ovchinnikov DA, Sun J. Generation and characterization of leukemia inhibitory factor‐dependent equine induced pluripotent stem cells from adult dermal fibroblasts.. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:1515–1523.
    pmc: PMC4066230pubmed: 24555755
  38. Carrade DD, Affolter VK, Outerbridge CA. Intradermal injections of equine allogeneic umbilical cord‐derived mesenchymal stem cells are well tolerated and do not elicit immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions.. Cytotherapy 2011;13:1180–1192.
    pubmed: 21899391
  39. Carrade DD, Lame MW, Kent MS. Comparative analysis of the immunomodulatory properties of equine adult‐derived mesenchymal stem cells().. Cell Med 2012;4:1–11.
    pmc: PMC3495591pubmed: 23152950
  40. Schuh EM, Friedman MS, Carrade DD. Identification of variables that optimize isolation and culture of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from equine umbilical‐cord blood.. Am J Vet Res 2009;70:1526–1535.
    pubmed: 19951125
  41. Hale BW, Goodrich LR, Frisbie DD. Effect of scaffold dilution on migration of mesenchymal stem cells from fibrin hydrogels.. Am J Vet Res 2012;73:313–318.
    pubmed: 22280396
  42. Mohanty N, Gulati BR, Kumar R. Phenotypical and functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells derived from equine umbilical cord blood.. Cytotechnology 2016;68:795–807.
    pmc: PMC4960129pubmed: 25487085
  43. Cornelisse CJ, Robinson NE, Berney CA. Thermographic study of in vivo modulation of vascular responses to phenylephrine and endothelin‐1 by dexamethasone in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2006;38:119–126.
    pubmed: 16536380
  44. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.. Nat Methods 2012;9:671–675.
    pmc: PMC5554542pubmed: 22930834
  45. Jackson WM, Nesti LJ, Tuan RS. Concise review: Clinical translation of wound healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells.. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2012;1:44–50.
    pmc: PMC3727688pubmed: 23197639
  46. Badiavas AR, Badiavas EV. Potential benefits of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for wound healing.. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2011;11:1447–1454.
    pmc: PMC3188697pubmed: 21854302
  47. Borena BM, Martens A, Broeckx SY. Regenerative skin wound healing in mammals: State‐of‐the‐art on growth factor and stem cell based treatments.. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;36:1–23.
    pubmed: 25924569
  48. Dash NR, Dash SN, Routray P. Targeting nonhealing ulcers of lower extremity in human through autologous bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells.. Rejuvenation Res 2009;12:359–366.
    pubmed: 19929258
  49. Chung E, Rybalko VY, Hsieh PL. Fibrin‐based stem cell containing scaffold improves the dynamics of burn wound healing.. Wound Repair Regen 2016;24:810–819.
    pubmed: 27348084
  50. Fang S, Xu C, Zhang Y. Umbilical cord‐derived mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomal microRNAs suppress myofibroblast differentiation by inhibiting the transforming growth factor‐beta/SMAD2 pathway during wound healing.. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2016;5:1425–1439.
    pmc: PMC5031180pubmed: 27388239
  51. Qi Y, Jiang D, Sindrilaru A. TSG‐6 released from intradermally injected mesenchymal stem cells accelerates wound healing and reduces tissue fibrosis in murine full‐thickness skin wounds.. J Invest Dermatol 2014;134:526–537.
    pubmed: 23921952
  52. Zgheib C, Hodges M, Hu J. Mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell correction of the impaired biomechanical properties of diabetic skin: The role of miR‐29a.. Wound Repair Regen 2016;24:237–246.
    pmc: PMC7691865pubmed: 26808714
  53. Sasaki M, Abe R, Fujita Y. Mesenchymal stem cells are recruited into wounded skin and contribute to wound repair by transdifferentiation into multiple skin cell type.. J Immunol 2008;180:2581–2587.
    pubmed: 18250469
  54. Caputo WJ, Vaquero C, Monterosa A. A retrospective study of cryopreserved umbilical cord as an adjunctive therapy to promote the healing of chronic, complex foot ulcers with underlying osteomyelitis.. Wound Repair Regen 2016;24:885–893.
    pubmed: 27312890
  55. Ho SS, Murphy KC, Binder BY. Increased survival and function of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids entrapped in instructive alginate hydrogels.. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2016;5:773–781.
    pmc: PMC4878334pubmed: 27057004
  56. Futagami A, Ishizaki M, Fukuda Y. Wound healing involves induction of cyclooxygenase‐2 expression in rat skin.. Lab Invest 2002;82:1503–1513.
    pubmed: 12429810
  57. Simon AM, Manigrasso MB, O'Connor JP. Cyclo‐oxygenase 2 function is essential for bone fracture healing.. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:963–976.
    pubmed: 12054171
  58. Hamamoto T, Yabuki A, Yamato O. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclooxygenase‐2 induction during wound healing in dog skin.. Res Vet Sci 2009;87:349–354.
    pubmed: 19535119
  59. Ishida Y, Kimura A, Nosaka M. Immunohistochemical analysis on cyclooxygenase‐2 for wound age determination.. Int J Legal Med 2012;126:435–440.
    pubmed: 22399103
  60. Bischofberger AS, Dart CM, Horadagoda N. Effect of Manuka honey gel on the transforming growth factor beta1 and beta3 concentrations, bacterial counts and histomorphology of contaminated full‐thickness skin wounds in equine distal limbs.. Aust Vet J 2016;94:27–34.
    pubmed: 26814159
  61. Theoret CL, Barber SM, Gordon JR. Temporal localization of immunoreactive transforming growth factor beta1 in normal equine skin and in full‐thickness dermal wounds.. Vet Surg 2002;31:274–280.
    pubmed: 11994856
  62. Haber M, Cao Z, Panjwani N. Effects of growth factors (EGF, PDGF‐BB and TGF‐beta 1) on cultured equine epithelial cells and keratocytes: Implications for wound healing.. Vet Ophthalmol 2003;6:211–217.
    pubmed: 12950652
  63. van den Boom R, Wilmink JM, O'Kane S. Transforming growth factor‐beta levels during second‐intention healing are related to the different course of wound contraction in horses and ponies.. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10:188–194.
    pubmed: 12100380
  64. Lichtman MK, Otero‐Vinas M, Falanga V. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF‐beta) isoforms in wound healing and fibrosis.. Wound Repair Regen 2016;24:215–222.
    pubmed: 26704519
  65. Carrade DD, Owens SD, Galuppo LD. Clinicopathologic findings following intra‐articular injection of autologous and allogeneic placentally derived equine mesenchymal stem cells in horses.. Cytotherapy 2011;13:419–430.
    pubmed: 21105841
  66. Chen L, Tredget EE, Liu C. Analysis of allogenicity of mesenchymal stem cells in engraftment and wound healing in mice.. PloS one 2009;4:e7119.
    pmc: PMC2743192pubmed: 19771171
  67. Pezzanite LM, Fortier LA, Antczak DF. Equine allogeneic bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells elicit antibody responses in vivo.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015;6:54.
    pmc: PMC4414005pubmed: 25889095
  68. Owens SD, Kol A, Walker NJ. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell treatment induces specific alloantibodies in horses.. Stem Cells Int 2016;2016:5830103.
    pmc: PMC5018342pubmed: 27648075
  69. Williams LB, Co C, Koenig JB. Response to intravenous allogeneic equine cord blood‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells administered from chilled or frozen state in serum and protein‐free media.. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:56.
    pmc: PMC4956649pubmed: 27500136