FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract / Barrier precautions, isolation protocols, and personal hygie...
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2004; 20(3); 543-559; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.07.006

Barrier precautions, isolation protocols, and personal hygiene in veterinary hospitals.

Abstract: Because nosocomial and zoonotic diseases are inherent and ever-present risks in veterinary hospitals, proactive policies should be in place to reduce the risk of sporadic cases and outbreaks. Policies should ideally be put in place before disease issues arise, and policies should be effectively conveyed to all relevant personnel. Written policies are required for practical and liability reasons and should be reviewed regularly. Although no infection control program can eliminate disease concerns, proper implementation of barrier precautions and isolation can reduce the exposure of hospitalized animals and hospital personnel to infectious agents. Appropriate personal hygiene, particularly hand hygiene, can assist in the prevention of disease transmission when pathogens bypass barriers and are able to contact personnel. Veterinary hospitals have moral, professional, and legal requirements to provide a safe workplace and to reduce the risks to hospitalized patients. Based on experience in the human medical field and on the continual emergence of new infectious diseases, infection control challenges can only be expected to increase in the future. Regular reassessment of protocols based on ongoing research and clinical experiences is required.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2004-11-03 PubMed ID: 15519817PubMed Central: PMC7135499DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.07.006Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper, “Barrier precautions, isolation protocols, and personal hygiene in veterinary hospitals,” emphasizes the importance of infection control in veterinary hospitals through preventive measures, including barrier precautions, isolation protocols, and personal hygiene practices. The study suggests that these practices are essential to protecting animals and hospital staff from infectious diseases.

Proactive Policies

  • The research underscores the importance of proactive policies to mitigate the risk of nosocomial and zoonotic diseases in veterinary hospitals. These policies should ideally be established prior to any disease outbreak and should be well communicated to all relevant hospital staff.
  • The use of written policies is noted as a requirement for practicality and liability reasons, with a regular review process to ensure they remain up-to-date and effective.

Infection Control Measures

  • The paper emphasizes that although no infection control program can completely eliminate disease risks, the proper implementation of barrier precautions and isolation protocols can significantly reduce infections. This entails limiting the exposure of hospitalized animals and hospital personnel to infectious agents, crucial for maintaining a safe environment in the hospital.
  • Barrier precautions refer to measures that prevent the spread of infectious agents. They include using personal protective equipment and maintaining clean surfaces.
  • Isolation protocols involve separating infected animals from those susceptible to infection, thus minimizing disease spread.

Personal Hygiene

  • The research also highlights the central role of personal hygiene practices in disease prevention, particularly in circumstances when pathogens bypass barriers. Among these practices, hand hygiene is specifically highlighted, due to its effectiveness in mitigating disease transmission.

Moral, Professional, and Legal Requirements

  • Veterinary hospitals have moral, professional, and legal obligations to provide a safe workplace and ensure the health and wellbeing of the animals under their care. These include minimizing risks for both the staff and the animals.

Future Challenges and Reassessments

  • The paper anticipates increased infection control challenges in the future, drawing parallels with the human medical field and the continual emergence of new infectious diseases. The researchers reinforce the necessity for regular reassessment of protocols, based on ongoing research and clinical experiences, to adapt to and overcome these challenges.

Cite This Article

APA
Weese JS. (2004). Barrier precautions, isolation protocols, and personal hygiene in veterinary hospitals. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 20(3), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2004.07.006

Publication

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice
ISSN: 0749-0739
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 543-559

Researcher Affiliations

Weese, J Scott
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1. jsweese@uoguelph.ca

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Disease Transmission, Infectious / prevention & control
  • Disease Transmission, Infectious / veterinary
  • Hand Disinfection / methods
  • Hand Disinfection / standards
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / transmission
  • Horses
  • Hospitals, Animal / standards
  • Humans
  • Hygiene
  • Infection Control / methods
  • Quarantine / veterinary
  • Zoonoses

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001 Apr;22(4):248-57.
    pubmed: 11379716doi: 10.1086/501895google scholar: lookup
  2. Garner JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996 Jan;17(1):53-80.
    pubmed: 8789689doi: 10.1086/647190google scholar: lookup
  3. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; final rule.. Fed Regist 1991;56:64175–64182.
  4. Hirschmann H, Fux L, Podusel J, Schindler K, Kundi M, Rotter M, Wewalka G. The influence of hand hygiene prior to insertion of peripheral venous catheters on the frequency of complications.. J Hosp Infect 2001 Nov;49(3):199-203.
    pubmed: 11716637doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1077google scholar: lookup
  5. Shiojima T, Ohki Y, Nako Y, Morikawa A, Okubo T, Iyobe S. Immediate control of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit.. J Infect Chemother 2003 Sep;9(3):243-7.
    pubmed: 14513393doi: 10.1007/s10156-003-0255-5google scholar: lookup
  6. Slota M, Green M, Farley A, Janosky J, Carcillo J. The role of gown and glove isolation and strict handwashing in the reduction of nosocomial infection in children with solid organ transplantation.. Crit Care Med 2001 Feb;29(2):405-12.
    pubmed: 11246324doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00034google scholar: lookup
  7. Johnson S, Gerding DN, Olson MM, Weiler MD, Hughes RA, Clabots CR, Peterson LR. Prospective, controlled study of vinyl glove use to interrupt Clostridium difficile nosocomial transmission.. Am J Med 1990 Feb;88(2):137-40.
    pubmed: 2301439doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90462-mgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Weinstein RA. Controlling antimicrobial resistance in hospitals: infection control and use of antibiotics.. Emerg Infect Dis 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):188-92.
    pmc: PMC2631704pubmed: 11294703doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010206google scholar: lookup
  9. Cloney DL, Donowitz LG. Overgown use for infection control in nurseries and neonatal intensive care units.. Am J Dis Child 1986 Jul;140(7):680-3.
    pubmed: 3087156doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140210078030google scholar: lookup
  10. Rush J, Fiorino-Chiovitti R, Kaufman K, Mitchell A. A randomized controlled trial of a nursery ritual: wearing cover gowns to care for healthy newborns.. Birth 1990 Mar;17(1):25-30.
    pubmed: 2189428doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1990.tb00006.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Renaud MT. Effects of discontinuing cover gowns on a postpartal ward upon cord colonization of the newborn.. JOGN Nurs 1983 Nov-Dec;12(6):399-401.
    pubmed: 6558246doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1983.tb01092.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Leclair JM, Freeman J, Sullivan BF, Crowley CM, Goldmann DA. Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions.. N Engl J Med 1987 Aug 6;317(6):329-34.
    pubmed: 3600729doi: 10.1056/nejm198708063170601google scholar: lookup
  13. Srinivasan A, Song X, Ross T, Merz W, Brower R, Perl TM. A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002 Aug;23(8):424-8.
    pubmed: 12186206doi: 10.1086/502079google scholar: lookup
  14. Puzniak LA, Leet T, Mayfield J, Kollef M, Mundy LM. To gown or not to gown: the effect on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.. Clin Infect Dis 2002 Jul 1;35(1):18-25.
    pubmed: 12060870doi: 10.1086/340739google scholar: lookup
  15. Seto WH, Tsang D, Yung RW, Ching TY, Ng TK, Ho M, Ho LM, Peiris JS. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).. Lancet 2003 May 3;361(9368):1519-20.
    pmc: PMC7112437pubmed: 12737864doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13168-6google scholar: lookup
  16. Lipp A. The effectiveness of surgical face masks: what the literature shows.. Nurs Times 2003 Sep 30-Oct 6;99(39):22-4.
    pubmed: 14562656
  17. Karanfil LV, Murphy M, Josephson A, Gaynes R, Mandel L, Hill BC, Swenson JM. A cluster of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an intensive care unit.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992 Apr;13(4):195-200.
    pubmed: 1593099doi: 10.1086/646509google scholar: lookup
  18. Rubin LG, Tucci V, Cercenado E, Eliopoulos G, Isenberg HD. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in hospitalized children.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992 Dec;13(12):700-5.
    pubmed: 1289397doi: 10.1086/648342google scholar: lookup
  19. Lai KK, Kelley AL, Melvin ZS, Belliveau PP, Fontecchio SA. Failure to eradicate vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a university hospital and the cost of barrier precautions.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998 Sep;19(9):647-52.
    pubmed: 9778162doi: 10.1086/647892google scholar: lookup
  20. Sehdev PS. The origin of quarantine.. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:35–36.
  21. Lynch L. Communicable disease nursing.. .
  22. National Communicable Disease Center. Isolation techniques for use in hospitals, vol. PHS, publication no. 2054.. .
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Isolation techniques for use in hospitals, vol. HHS, publication no (CDC) 80–83214.. .
  24. Garner JS, Simmons BP. CDC guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals.. Am J Infect Control 1984;12:103–163.
  25. Madan AK, Raafat A, Hunt JP, Rentz D, Wahle MJ, Flint LM. Barrier precautions in trauma: is knowledge enough?. J Trauma 2002 Mar;52(3):540-3.
    pubmed: 11901332doi: 10.1097/00005373-200203000-00020google scholar: lookup
  26. Madan AK, Rentz DE, Wahle MJ, Flint LM. Noncompliance of health care workers with universal precautions during trauma resuscitations.. South Med J 2001 Mar;94(3):277-80.
    pubmed: 11284513
  27. Kirkland KB, Weinstein JM. Adverse effects of contact isolation.. Lancet 1999 Oct 2;354(9185):1177-8.
    pubmed: 10513715doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04196-3google scholar: lookup
  28. Evans HL, Shaffer MM, Hughes MG, Smith RL, Chong TW, Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG. Contact isolation in surgical patients: a barrier to care?. Surgery 2003 Aug;134(2):180-8.
    pubmed: 12947316doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.222google scholar: lookup
  29. Larson E. A causal link between handwashing and risk of infection? Examination of the evidence.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988 Jan;9(1):28-36.
    pubmed: 19722934doi: 10.1086/645729google scholar: lookup
  30. Larson E, Kretzer EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions.. J Hosp Infect 1995 Jun;30 Suppl:88-106.
    pubmed: 7561001doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(95)90010-1google scholar: lookup
  31. Nyström B. Impact of handwashing on mortality in intensive care: examination of the evidence.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994 Jul;15(7):435-6.
    pubmed: 7963433doi: 10.1086/646947google scholar: lookup
  32. Wiese ER. Semmelweis.. Ann Med Hist 1930;2:80–88.
  33. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002 Dec;23(12 Suppl):S3-40.
    pubmed: 12515399doi: 10.1086/503164google scholar: lookup
  34. Ehrenkranz NJ, Alfonso BC. Failure of bland soap handwash to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991 Nov;12(11):654-62.
    pubmed: 1753080doi: 10.1086/646261google scholar: lookup
  35. Larson E, Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Grove GL, Talbot GH. Physiologic and microbiologic changes in skin related to frequent handwashing.. Infect Control 1986 Feb;7(2):59-63.
    pubmed: 3633879doi: 10.1017/s019594170006389xgoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Winnefeld M, Richard MA, Drancourt M, Grob JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use.. Br J Dermatol 2000 Sep;143(3):546-50.
    pubmed: 10971327doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2000.03708.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  37. Karabey S, Ay P, Derbentli S, Nakipoglu Y, Esen F. Handwashing frequencies in an intensive care unit.. J Hosp Infect 2002 Jan;50(1):36-41.
    pubmed: 11825050doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1132google scholar: lookup
  38. Larson E, Friedman C, Cohran J, Treston-Aurand J, Green S. Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on the hands of nurses.. Heart Lung 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):404-12.
    pubmed: 9315469doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(97)90027-3google scholar: lookup
  39. Harrison WA, Griffith CJ, Ayers T, Michaels B. Bacterial transfer and cross-contamination potential associated with paper-towel dispensing.. Am J Infect Control 2003 Nov;31(7):387-91.
    pubmed: 14639433doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.81google scholar: lookup
  40. Kampf G, Rudolf M, Labadie JC, Barrett SP. Spectrum of antimicrobial activity and user acceptability of the hand disinfectant agent Sterillium Gel.. J Hosp Infect 2002 Oct;52(2):141-7.
    pubmed: 12392906doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1281google scholar: lookup
  41. McNeil SA, Foster CL, Hedderwick SA, Kauffman CA. Effect of hand cleansing with antimicrobial soap or alcohol-based gel on microbial colonization of artificial fingernails worn by health care workers.. Clin Infect Dis 2001 Feb 1;32(3):367-72.
    pubmed: 11170943doi: 10.1086/318488google scholar: lookup
  42. Pottinger J, Burns S, Manske C. Bacterial carriage by artificial versus natural nails.. Am J Infect Control 1989 Dec;17(6):340-4.
    pubmed: 2596731doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(89)90003-5google scholar: lookup
  43. Moolenaar RL, Crutcher JM, San Joaquin VH, Sewell LV, Hutwagner LC, Carson LA, Robison DA, Smithee LM, Jarvis WR. A prolonged outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: did staff fingernails play a role in disease transmission?. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000 Feb;21(2):80-5.
    pubmed: 10697282doi: 10.1086/501739google scholar: lookup
  44. Hoffman PN, Cooke EM, McCarville MR, Emmerson AM. Micro-organisms isolated from skin under wedding rings worn by hospital staff.. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jan 19;290(6463):206-7.
    pmc: PMC1417906pubmed: 3917754doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6463.206google scholar: lookup
  45. Jacobson G, Thiele JE, McCune JH, Farrell LD. Handwashing: ring-wearing and number of microorganisms.. Nurs Res 1985 May-Jun;34(3):186-8.
    pubmed: 3889854
  46. Weese JS, DaCosta T, Button L, Goth K, Ethier M, Boehnke K. Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from the environment in a veterinary teaching hospital.. J Vet Intern Med 2004 Jul-Aug;18(4):468-70.
    pubmed: 15320581doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2004)18<468:iomsaf>2.0.co;2google scholar: lookup
  47. Namias N, Widrich J, Martinez OV, Cohn SM. Pathogenic bacteria on personal pagers.. Am J Infect Control 2000 Oct;28(5):387-8.
    pubmed: 11029144doi: 10.1067/mic.2000.109183google scholar: lookup
  48. Cohen SR, McCormack DJ, Youkhana A, Wall R. Bacterial colonization of stethoscopes and the effect of cleaning.. J Hosp Infect 2003 Nov;55(3):236-7.
    pubmed: 14572494doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00297-4google scholar: lookup
  49. Jones JS, Hoerle D, Riekse R. Stethoscopes: a potential vector of infection?. Ann Emerg Med 1995 Sep;26(3):296-9.
    pubmed: 7661417doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70075-7google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Fesseha H, Kefelegn T, Mathewos M. Animal care professionals' practice towards zoonotic disease management and infection control practice in selected districts of Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia.. Heliyon 2022 May;8(5):e09485.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09485pubmed: 35637673google scholar: lookup
  2. Verkola M, Järvelä T, Järvinen A, Jokelainen P, Virtala AM, Kinnunen PM, Heikinheimo A. Infection prevention and control practices of ambulatory veterinarians: A questionnaire study in Finland.. Vet Med Sci 2021 Jul;7(4):1059-1070.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.464pubmed: 33645926google scholar: lookup
  3. Purens AGM. Facemask Alternatives in Veterinary Medicine in the Context of COVID-19 Shortages.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:561.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00561pubmed: 33062649google scholar: lookup
  4. Bergström K, Grönlund U. A pre- and post-intervention study of infection control in equine hospitals in Sweden.. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Aug 22;56(1):52.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-014-0052-4pubmed: 25146752google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.